Hrabálek L., Bačovský J., Ščudla V., Wanek T., Kalita O.: Multiple Spinal Myeloma and Its Surgical Management
Authors:
L. Hrabálek; J. Bačovský *; V. Ščudla *; T. Wanek; O. Kalita
Authors‘ workplace:
Neurochirurgická klinika FN a LF UP Olomouc, přednosta: prof. MUDr. M. Houdek, CSc.
; III. interní klinika FN a LF UP Olomouc, přednosta: prof. MUDr. V. Ščudla, CSc.
*
Published in:
Rozhl. Chir., 2011, roč. 90, č. 5, s. 270-276.
Category:
Monothematic special - Original
Overview
Introduction and Aim:
The management of spinal multiple myeloma (MM) is a complex process, including causal treatment (i.e. efforts to suppress the tumor clone), as well as supportive therapy, including surgery.
The aim of this article is to present retrospective evaluation of surgical indications in patients with MM or solitary spinal plasmocytoma.
Material:
A total of 10 patients (8 males and 2 females) aged from 32 to 74 years (the mean age of 53.3) were included in the study. The enrolment criteria were the following: patients operated for MM or solitary spinal plasmocytoma during the past 7-year period, with the minimum follow up period of 6 months. The procedures were indicated for progressing neurological deficit (Frankel score) and for axial spinal pain (VAS classification), not responding to conservative therapy. The extent of the disease was assessed based on plain x-ray, MRI and whole- body 18F-FDG PET/CT. Paliative vertebroplasty was indicated in patients with no neurological deficit to control pain, paliative laminectomy without stabilization in subjects with partial neurological lesions, with transpedicular fixation in concomitant pathological fractures or kyphotizations. More radical approach, i.e. the procedure included somatectomy, was indicated in patients with solitary plasmocytoma and in procedures on cervical or thoracolumbar regions. Control clinical and MRI examinations were performed at 6 weeks, at 6 months and then at yearly intervals. At the end of the study, the authors evaluated effectivity of the employed surgical procedures, based on all control findings, and the data were compared with prognostic scoring systems in surgery for spinal metastases (Tomita score, Tokuhashi modified score and Bauer score).
Results:
No local relapses of the tumor or stabilization failure were detected. The effect of surgery on pain control and on prevention of neurological dysfunction was maintained over the follow up period. The authors concluded that all surgical procedures and their radicality were adequate in all subjects.
The agreement between the authors approach (the procedure’s radicality) and the Tomita score, the Tokuhashi modified score and the Bauer score were recorded in 50% of patients, 80% of patients and in 50% of patients, respectively.
Discussion:
MM is characterized by increased oseteolysis, which is not followed by new bone formation. Despite successful conservative therapy of MM, the bone defects fail to heal, cause spinal pain and may result in spinal instability. These specific MM signs represent the principal factor in the decision- making process concerning indication for surgery.
Furthermore, favourable prognosis, with survival times usually exceeding the required expected minimum survival time of 3–6 months, is yet another reason for indication for surgical therapy in patients with spinal MM. Due to advances in chemotherapy and the use of autologic grafts of peripheral stem cells and radiotherapy, the prognosis of patients have significantly improved in last 10 years. The mean survival time has increased from 2.5 years to 4.5 years.
Conclusion:
1. Prevention or improvement of neurological dysfuction and pain control are the main indication criteria for surgery in MM.
2. Surgery should be considered in MM with osteolytic spinal disorder and because of favourable prognosis of the disease when surgery is used.
3. Surgical procedures, including paliative methods resulted in sufficient control of spinal stability in all the study subjects.
4. Using all scoring systems for spinal metastases could result in indications for unnecessary more radical procedures. However, Tokuhashi score appeared to be the most suitable existing prognostic scoring system.
Key words:
multiple myeloma – solitary plasmocytoma – spine – surgery – vertebroplasty
Sources
1. Kariyawasan, C. C., Hughes, D. A., Jayatillake, M. M., Mehta, A. B. Multiple myeloma: causes and consequences of delay in diagnosis. QJM, 2007; 100: 635.
2. Oakland, R. J., Furtado, N. R., Timothy, J., Hall, R. M. The biomechanics of vertebroplasty in multiple myeloma and metastatic bladder cancer: a preliminary cadaveric investigation. J. Neurosurg. Spine, 2008; 9(5): 493–501.
3. Ščudla, V., Zemanová, M., Minařík, J., Bačovský, J., Ordeltová, M., Indrák, K., Budíková, M., Dušek, L., Farbiaková, V. International prognostic index (IPI) – a critical comparison with five multiple myeloma staging systems in the group of 270 patients treated by conventional chemotherapy. Neoplasma, 2006; 53(4): 277–284.
4. Repko, M., Chaloupka, R., Grosman, R., Krbec, M., Tichý, V., Neubauer, J. Možnosti operačního řešení myelomového postižení páteře. Vnitr. Lek., 2006; 52 Suppl. 2: 32–40.
5. Řehák, S., Maisnar, V., Málek, V., Česák, T., Ryska, P., Bartoš, M., Talab, R. Diagnosis and surgical therapy of plasma cell neoplasia of the spine. Neoplasma, 2009; 56(1): 84–87.
6. Frankel, H. L., Mancock, D. O., Hyslop, G., Melzak, J., Michaelis, L. S., Invar, G. H. et al. The value of postural reduction in the initial management of closed injuries of the spine with paraplegia and tetraplegia. Paraplegia, 1969; 7: 179–192.
7. Carlsson, A. M. Assessment of chronic pain: I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale. Pain, 1983;16: 87–101.
8. Boriani, S., Chevalley, F., Weinstein, J. N., Biagini, R., Campanacci, L., De Iure, F., Piccill, P. Chordoma of the spine above the sacrum. Spine, 1996; 21: 1569–1577.
9. Tomita, K., Kawahara N., Baba, H., Tsuchiya, H., Fujita, T., Tiribatake, Y. Total en bloc spondylectomy. Spine, 1997; 22: 324–333.
10. Tomita, K., Kawahara, N., Kobayashi, T., Yoshida, A., Murakami, H., Akamaru, T. Surgical strategy for spinal metastases. Spine, 2001; 26(3): 298–306.
11. Tokuhashi, Y., Matsuzaki, H., Oda, H., Oshima, M., Ryu, J. A revised scoring system for preoperative evaluation of metastatic spine tumor prognosis. Spine, 2005; 30(19): 2186–2191.
12. Bauer, H. Surgical strategy for spinal metastases. Spine, 2002; 27: 1124–1125.
13. Bačovský, J., Ščudla, V., Mysliveček, M., Nekula, J., Vytřasová, M. Scintigraphy using 99mTc-MIBI (sestamibi), a sensitive parameter of activity of multiple myeloma. Neoplasma, 2005; 52: 302–306.
14. Mysliveček, M., Bačovský, J., Buriánková, E., Koranda, P., Formánek, R., Kamínek, M., Ščudla, V., Ptáček, J. Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: comparison with whole body X-ray in the assessment of bone involvement. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Molecular Imaging, 2007; 34 Suppl. 2: S236.
15. Astolfi, S., Scaramuzzo. L., Logroscino, C. A. A minimally invasive surgical treatment possibility of osteolytic vertebral collapse in multiple myeloma. Eur. Spine J., 2009; 18 Suppl. 1: 115–121.
16. Durr, H. R., Wegener, B., Krodel, A., Miller, P. E., Jansson, V., Refior, H. J. Multiple myeloma: surgery of the spine: retrospective analysis of 27 patients. Spine, 2002; 27(3): 320–324.
17. Bacovsky, J., Myslivecek, M., Scudla, V., Koranda, P., Buriankova, E., Minarik, J., Pika, T., Zapletalova, J. Tc-99m MIBI scintigraphy in multiple myeloma: Prognostic value of different Tc-99m MIBI uptake patterns. Clin. Nucl. Med., 35, 2010; 9: 667–670.
18. Fisher, CH. G., Keynan, O., Boyd, M. C., Dvorak, M. The surgical management of primary tumors of the spine. Spine, 2005; 30: 1899–1908.
19. Fisher, CH. G., DiPaola, CH. P., Ryken, T. C., Bilsky, M. H., Shaffrey, CH. I., Berven, S. H., et al. A novel classification system for spinal instability in neoplastic disease. Spine, 2010; Spine, 2010; 35(22): E1221–1229.
20. Leithner, A., Radl, R., Gruber, G., Hochegger, M., Leithner, K., Welkerling, H., Rehak, P., Windhager, R. Predictive value of seven preoperative prognostic scoring systems for spinal metastases. Eur. Spine J., 2008; 17(11): 1488–1495.
21. Tokuhashi, Y., Matsuzaki, H., Toriyama, S., et al. Scoring system for the preoperative evaluation of metastatic spine tumor prognosis. Spine, 1990; 15: 1110–1113.
22. Boriani, S., Bandiera, S., Donthinemi, R., Amandola, L., Cappuccio, M., De Iure, F., Gasbarrini, A. Morbidity of en bloc resections in the spine. Eur. Spine J., 2010; 19: 231–241.
Labels
Surgery Orthopaedics Trauma surgeryArticle was published in
Perspectives in Surgery
2011 Issue 5
Most read in this issue
- Šmíd D., Novák P., Liška V., Třeška V.: Pilonidal Sinus – Surgical Management at Our Surgical Clinic
- Ňaršanská A., Třeška V., Mírka H., Mukenšnabl P., Chlumská A.: Caroli Disease – Dilatation of Intrahepatic Bile Ducts
- Hrabálek L., Starý M., Rosík S., Wanek T.: Surgery for Symptomatic Vertebral Hemangiomas
- Šafránek J., Špidlen V., Vodička J.: Mediastinal Cysts, Surgical Management