The influence of the passive phase shortening on the diagnostic yield of nitroglycerine stimulated head-up tilt test
Authors:
P. Mitro; M. Szakács
Authors‘ workplace:
III. interná klinika Lekárskej fakulty UPJŠ a FN L. Pasteura, Košice, Slovenská republika, prednosta doc. MUDr. Peter Mitro, Ph. D.
Published in:
Vnitř Lék 2005; 51(11): 1272-1276
Category:
Original Contributions
Overview
The aim of the study was to compare the diagnostic yield of three different head-up tilt test protocols. A total of 438 patients with syncope of unexplained etiology were examined. Protocol I was represented by Westminster protocol (passive test for 45 minutes, 60º) followed, if negative, by nitroglycerine (NTG) stimulated test for another 15 minutes. Protocol I was performed in 236 patients (99 men, 137 women, mean age 37.7 ± 18.9 years). In protocol II, passive phase was shortened to 30 minutes followed by 15 minutes NTG stimulated test. It was performed in 116 patients (38 men, 78 women, mean age 35.7 ± 18.9 years). Protocol III - Italian protocol - consisted of 20 minutes passive phase and 15 minutes NTG stimulated phase and was performed in 86 patients (25 men, 61 women, mean age 38.2 ± 18.1 years). The positivity rate of passive phase declines with the shortening of passive phase from 45 minutes to 30 minutes and 20 minutes respectively (21 % vs 9 % vs 18 %, p = 0,04) and it raises in NTG stimulated phase reciprocally (79 % vs 91 % vs 82 %, p = 0.04). The total positivity rate is not significantly different in three protocols (63 % vs 70 % vs 71 %, p = 0.81). Frequency of mixed type vasovagal syncope is decreasing (63 % vs 54 % vs 41 %, p = 0.004) and frequency of vasodepressor type is increasing (24 % vs 38 % vs 54 %, p = 0.003) by the shortening of passive phase of head-up tilt test. The frequency of cardioinhibitory type is the same. Duration of NTG stimulated phase is not different in three different protocols (6.8 ± 4.1 min vs 6.0 ± 4.1 min vs 5.4 ± 3.1 min, p = 0.16). Thus, the passive phase shortening of NTG stimulated head-up tilt test does not decrease the diagnostic yield of the test and has an advantage of time saving in this time consuming procedure.
Key words:
head-up tilt test - nitroglycerine - vasovagal syncope - diagnosis
Sources
1. Aerts AJ. Nitrate stimulated tilt table testing: a review of the literature. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2003; 26: 1528-1537.
2. Almquist A, Goldenberg IF, Milstein S et al. Provocation of bradycardia and hypotension by isoproterenol and upright posture in patients with unexplained syncope. N Engl J Med 1989; 320: 346-351.
3. Baron-Esquivias G, Pedrote A, Cayuela A et al. Long-term outcome of patients with asystole induced by head-up tilt test. Eur Heart J 2002; 23: 483-489.
4. Bartoletti A, Alboni P, Ammirati F et al. “The Italian Protocol”: a simplified head-up tilt testing potentiated with oral nitroglycerin to assess patients with unexplained syncope. Europace 2000; 2: 339-342.
5. Bartoletti A, Gaggioli G, Menozzi C et al. Head-up tilt testing potentiated with oral nitroglycerin: a randomized trial of the contribution of a drug-free phase and a nitroglycerin phase in the diagnosis of neurally mediated syncope. Europace 1999; 1: 183-186.
6. Brignole M, Menozzi C, Del Rosso A et al. New classification of haemodynamics of vasovagal syncope: beyond the VASIS classification. Analysis of the pre-syncopal phase of the tilt test without and with nitroglycerin challenge. Vasovagal Syncope International Study. Europace 2000; 2: 66-76.
7. Brignole M, Alboni P, Benditt DG et al. Guidelines on management (diagnosis and treatment) of syncope-update 2004. Europace 2004; 6: 467-537.
8. Del Rosso A, Bartoletti A, Bartoli P et al. Methodology of head-up tilt testing potentiated with sublingual nitroglycerin in unexplained syncope. Am J Cardiol 2000; 85: 1007-1011.
9. Del Rosso A, Bartoli P, Bartoletti A et al. Shortened head-up tilt testing potentiated with sublingual nitroglycerin in patients with unexplained syncope. Am Heart J 1998; 135: 564-570.
10. Dvorak R, Kozak M, Semrad B et al. Neural syncope - a current therapeutic problem. Vnitr Lek 1995; 41: 846-850.
11. Fitzpatrick AP, Theodorakis G, Vardas P et al. Methodology of head-up tilt testing in patients with unexplained syncope. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 17: 125-130.
12. Foglia-Manzillo G, Giada F, Beretta S et al. Reproducibility of head-up tilt testing potentiated with sublingual nitroglycerin in patients with unexplained syncope. Am J Cardiol 1999; 84: 284-288.
13. Kenny RA, Ingram A, Bayliss J et al. Head-up tilt: a useful test for investigating unexplained syncope. Lancet 1986; 1: 1352-1355.
14. Lacunza Ruiz J, Garcia Alberola A, Sanchez Munoz JJ et al. Head-up tilt test potentiated with nitroglycerin. What is the optimal duration of the test after administration of the drug? Rev Esp Cardiol 20025; 55: 713-717.
15. Melenovsky V, Wichterle D, Malik J et al. Nitroglycerin induced syncope occurs in subjects with delayed phase shift of baroreflex action. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2002; 25: 828-832.
16. Mitro P, Trejbal D Present trends in the pathogenesis, diagnosis and therapy of vasovagal syncope. Vnitr Lek 1997; 43: 765-769.
17. Natale A, Sra J, Akhtar M et al. Use of sublingual nitroglycerin during head-up tilt-table testing in patients > 60 years of age. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82: 1210-1213.
18. Raviele A, Gasparini G, Di Pede F et al. Nitroglycerin infusion during upright tilt: a new test for the diagnosis of vasovagal syncope. Am Heart J 1994; 127: 103-111.
19. Raviele A, Menozzi C, Brignole M et al. Value of head-up tilt testing potentiated with sublingual nitroglycerin to assess the origin of unexplained syncope. Am J Cardiol 1995; 76: 267-272.
20. Zeng C, Liu G, Yang C et al. Evaluation of a single stage nitroglycerin tilt table test for diagnosis of neurally mediated syncope. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2001; 24: 1494-1499.
Labels
Diabetology Endocrinology Internal medicineArticle was published in
Internal Medicine
![Issue 11](https://www.prolekare.cz/media/cache/resolve/journal_issue/media/image_pdf/ca9a75d648f6ead7cfc30b26b4c2ad9e.jpeg)
2005 Issue 11
Most read in this issue
- Regression equations for QT and QTc intervals of the electrocardiogram
- A rare complication after aortocoronary bypass: acute cholestatic hepatitis and agranulocytosis induced by ticlopidin and simvastatin in patients allergic to salicilates
- Type 1A diabetes mellitus and autoimmunity
- New possibilities in the treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension