Základy kognitivní, afektivní a sociální neurovědy
X. Kooperace

Czech version

Authors: F. Koukolík
Authors‘ workplace: Primář: MUDr. František Koukolík, DrSc. ; Národní referenční laboratoř prionových chorob ; Fakultní Thomayerova nemocnice s poliklinikou, Praha ; Oddělení patologie a molekulární medicíny
Published in: Prakt. Lék. 2011; 91(10): 571-576
Category: Editorial

Overview

The functioning of genomes, cells, multicellular organisms, social insects and human societies depends on cooperation. The core of cooperation is a loss of the reproductive potential of “selfish” replicator. But the core of natural selection is competition, therefore evolution of cooperation and altruism is a question. Five theoretical rules for the evolution of cooperation are

– kin selection,

– direct reciprocity,

– indirect reciprocity,

– network reciprocity, and

– group selection.

Human cooperation is different due to cognitive faculties of the human brain. Cooperation collapses if there is no punishment of defectors. Possible evolution of cooperation in Homo heidelbergensis is an interesting hypothesis. Field research of contemporary Turkana warriors supports cooperation evolved on an ethno-linguistic base and grounded on sometimes harsh punishment of defectors. Neuronal correlates of cooperative behaviour describes a number of experiments.

Key words:
cooperation, evolution, neuronal correlates.

Sources

1. Bowles, S., Gintis, H. The evolution of strong reciprocity: cooperation in heterogenous populations. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2004, 65, p. 17-28.

2. Boyd. R., Gintis, H., Bowles, S. et al. The evolution of altruistic punishment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, p. 3531-3535.

3. Brosnan, S.F., Salwiczek, L., Bshary, R. The interplay of cognition and cooperation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 2010, 365, p. 2699-2710.

4. Burnham, T.C., Johnson D.D.P. The biological and evolutionary logic of human cooperation. Analyse & Kritik 2005, 27, p. 113-135.

5. Dubreilh, B. Paleolithic public good games: why human culture and cooperation did not evolved in one step? Biol. Philos. 2010, 25, p. 53-73.

6. Gächter, S., Herrman, B., Thöni, C. Culture and cooperation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 2010, 365, p. 2651-2661.

7. Gomes, C.M., Mundry, R., Boesch, C. Long term reciprocation of grooming in wild West African Chimpanzees. Phi.l Trans. R. Soc. B. 2009, 276, p. 699-706.

8. Hardin, G. The tragedy of the commons. Science 1968, 162, p. 1243-1248.

9. Hauser, M., McAuliffe, K., Blake, P.R. Evolving the ingredients for reciprocity and spite. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 2009, 364, p. 3255-3266.

10. Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., et al. „Economic man“ in cross-cultural perspective: behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies? Behav. Brain. Sci. 2005, 28, p. 795-855.

11. Henrich, J., McElreath, R., Barr A. et al. Costly punishment across human societies. Science 2006, 312, p. 1767-1170.

12. Henrich, J., Ensminger, J., McElreath, R., et al. Markets, religion, community size, and the evolution of fairness and punishment. Science 2010, 327, s. 1480-1484.

13. Keller, L. (vyd.). Levels of selection in evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.

14. Knoch, D., Pascual-Leone, A., Meyer, K. et al. Diminishing reciprocal fairness by disrupting the right prefrontal cortex. Science 2006, 314, p. 829-832.

15. Knoch, D., Nitsche, M.A., Fischbacher, U. et al. Studiyng the neurobiology of social interaction with transcranial direct current stimulation – the example of punishing unfairness. Cereb. cortex 2008, 9, p. 1987-1990.

16. Koukolík, F. Sociální mozek. Praha: Karolinum, 2006.

17. Koukolík, F. Před úsvitem, po ránu. Eseje o dětech a rodičích. Praha: Karolinum, 2008.

18. Koukolík, F. Evoluce a evoluční teorie V. Darwinovy teorie evoluce. Prakt. Lék. 2010, 90, s. 268-273.

19. Koukolík, F. Evoluce a evoluční teorie IX. Evoluce lidského mozku. Prakt. Lék. 2010, 90, s. 451-454.

20. Lau, G., Moulds, M.L., Richardson, R. Ostracism: how much it hurts depends on how you remember it. Emotion 2009, 9, p. 430-434.

21. Lieberman, F., Hauert, C., Nowak, M.A. Evolutionary dynamics of graphs. Nature 2005, 433, p. 312-316.

22. Lissek, S., Peters, S., Fuchs, N. et al. Cooperation and deception recruit different subsets of the theory of mind. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e2023.

23. Marlowe, F.W., Berbesque, J.C., Barrett, C. et al. The „spiteful“ origins of human cooperation. Proc. R. Soc. B. 2011, 278, p. 2159-2164.

24. Mathew, S., Boyd, R. Punishment sustains large-scale cooperation in prestate warfare. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2011, 108, p. 11375-11380.

25. McKabe, K., Houser, D., Ryan, L. et al. A functional image study of cooperation in two-person reciprocal exchange. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2001, 98, p. 11832-11835.

26. Mellis, A.P., Semman, D. How is human cooperation different? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 2010, 365, p. 2663-2674.

27. Nowak, M.A., Sigmund, K. Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature 1998, 393, p. 573-577.

28. Nowak, M.A. Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science 2006, 314, p. 1560-1563.

29. Nunn, C.L., Lewis, R.J. (vyd.) Cooperation and collective action in animal behavior. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press 2001.

30. Panchanathan, K., Boyd, R. A tale of two detectors: the importance of standing for evolution of indirect reciprocity. J. Theor. Biol. 2003, 224, p. 115-126.

31. Phan, K. L., Sripada, Ch.S., Angstadt, M. et al. Reputation for reciprocity engages the brain reward center. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2010,107, p. 13099-13104.

32. Rand, D.G., Ohtsuki, H., Nowak, M.A. Direct reciprocity with costly punishment: generous tit-for-tat prevails. J. Theor. Biol. 2009, 256, p. 45-57.

33. Rightmire, G.P. Brain size and encephalization in early to mid-pleistocene homo. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol 2004, 124, p. 109-123.

34. Rilling, J.K., Gutman, D.A., Zeh, T.R. et al. A neural basis for social cooperation. Neuron 2002, 35, p. 395-405.

35. Sosis, R. Darwin´s cathedral. Evolution, religion and nature of society. Evol. Hum. Behav. 2003, 24, 137-143.

36. Spitzer, M., Fischbacher, U., Herrnberger, B. et al. The neural signature of social norm compliance. Neuron 2007, 56, p. 185-196.

37. Wilson, E.O., Hölldobler, B. Eusociality: Origin and consequences Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2005, 102, p. 13367-13371.

38. Yamamoto, S., Tanaka, M. Do Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) spontaneously take turns in a reciprocal cooperation task? J. Comp. Psychol. 2009, 123, p. 242-249.

39. Yamamoto, S., Humle, T., Tanaka, M. Chimpanzees help each other upon request. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e7416. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone. 0007416).

40. Yamasue, H., Abe, O., Suga, M. et al. Sex-linked neuroanatomical basis of human altruistic cooperativeness. Cereb. cortex 2008, 18, p. 2331-2340.