#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Experience with Strabologic Surgery on Pediatric Patients with Divergence Excess Exotropia


Authors: Pavla Hrubá 1,2;  Alice Marková 1,2;  Štěpán Rusňák 1
Authors‘ workplace: Oční klinika Fakultní nemocnice Plzeň 1;  Oční Optimar s. r. o., Plzeň 2
Published in: Čes. a slov. Oftal., 80, 2024, No. 4, p. 1-7
Category: Original Article
doi: https://doi.org/10.31348/2024/19

Overview

Aim: This retrospective clinical study evaluates the results of surgical treatment of patients diagnosed with intermittent exotropia of the divergence excess type. The study compares the results of surgery delayed due to the Covid-19 pandemic (patients underwent the surgery after the age of eight), versus a group of younger children.

Materials and methods: The objective angle of deviation and quality of binocular functions were examined. The follow-up period was six months after surgery. The patients were divided into two groups according to age: 4–7 years and 8–13 years.

Each group included 20 patients. The second group comprised patients whose surgery was postponed due to restrictions on elective surgery during the ongoing pandemic. The surgery took place at the University Hospital in Pilsen. Angle of deviation and binocular functions were examined before surgery, postoperatively, and three and six months after surgery. Data were collected retrospectively and statistically processed. The main values were plotted in charts.

Results: Accordance between the angle of deviation before surgery in both groups was statistically demonstrated. During the six-month follow-up period, the median angle of deviation was statistically without proof of disparity between the groups. Six months after surgery, an objective angle of deviation within the limit ±5 degrees was achieved in 65% of patients from the first group and in 75% from the second group. Binocular vision before surgery was statistically without proof of difference between both groups. However the statistical processing demonstrated a difference between the two groups six months after the surgery. Better binocular functions were achieved by the younger children in the first group.

Conclusion: The objective deviation angle was comparable in both study groups prior to surgery as well as six months after the surgery. The first group of younger patients attained a higher quality of binocular functions within the six-month follow-up period compared to children operated on after the age of eight. This claim was statistically verified.

Keywords:

Binocular vision – COVID-19 – divergence excess – intermittent exotropia – lateral rectus recession – medial rectus resection


Sources
  1. Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group; Writing Committee; Mohney BG, Cotter SA, Chandler DL et al. Three-Year Observation of Children 3 to 10 Years of Age with Untreated Intermittent Exotropia. Ophthalmology 2019 Sep;126(9):1249-1260.
  2. Pang Y, Gnanaraj L, Gayleard J, et al. Interventions for intermittent exotropia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2021, Issue 9. Art. No.: CD003737.
  3. HM. Exodeviation: Their Classification, Diagnosis And Treatment. American Journal of Ophthalmology 1966; 62(6):1161-1166.
  4. Hwang JM. How to Better Treat Patients with Intermittent Exotropia: A Review of Surgical Treatment of Intermittent Exotropia, Kor J Ophthalmol. 2022 Dec; 36(6):550-564.
  5. Lee BJ, Lim HT. High Accommodative Convergence/Accommodation Ratio Consecutive Esotropia following Surgery for Intermittent Exotropia: Clinical Feature, Diagnosis and Treatment. J Clin Med. 2021;10:2135.
  6. Joyce KE, Beyer F, Thomson RG, et al. A systematic review of the effectiveness of treatments in altering the natural history of intermittent exotropia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99:440-450.
  7. Kushner BJ. Diagnosis and treatment of exotropia with a high accommodation convergence-accommodation ratio. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999 Feb;117(2):221-224.
  8. Kushner BJ, Morton GV. Distance/Near Differences in Intermittent Exotropia. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116(4):478-486.
  9. Von Noorden GK, Campos EC. Binocular vision and ocular motility, 6th edition. Missouri (USA): Mosby Inc.; 2002. Exodeviations; p. 356-377.
  10. Cooper J, Ciuffreda KJ, Kruger PB. Stimulus and response AC/A ratios in intermittent exotropia of the divergence excess type. Br J Ophthalmol. 1982;66:398-404.
  11. Kushner BJ. Conservative management of intermittent exotropia to defer or avoid surgery. J AAPOS 2019;23(5):256.e1-256.e6.
  12. Gerinec A. Detská oftalmológia. Martin (Slovenská republika): Vydavatelstvo Osveta, s. r. o.; 2005. Chirurgia strabismu; p.187.
  13. Gerinec A. Detská oftalmológia. Martin (Slovenská republika): Vydavatelstvo Osveta, s. r. o.; 2005. Postnatálny vývoj oka; p. 33.
  14. Kolektiv autorů. Dětská Oftalmologie, 1. vydání. Praha: Grada Publishing a. s.; 2022. Ortoptika; p. 170-179.
  15. Rowe F.J. Clinical Orthoptics, 3rd Edition. West Sussex (UK): Willey-Blackwell; 2012. Orthoptic Investigative Procedures, p. 45-129.
  16. Sprunger DT, Lambert SR et al. Esotropia and Exotropia Preffered Practice Pattern. San Francisco (USA): American Academy of Ophalmology; 2022. Exotropia; p. 203.
  17. Spierer O, Spierer A. Unilateral lateral rectus recession is an effective surgery for intermittent exotropia in young children. BMC Ophthalmology 2021 Jan 6;21(1):10.
  18. Wang L, Nelson, LB. One muscle strabismus surgery. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology 2010 Sept;21(5):335-340.
Labels
Ophthalmology
Topics Journals
Login
Forgotten password

Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.

Login

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#