Baha as a Possible Solution for Single-sided Deafness
Authors:
J. Bouček 1; J. Vokřál 2; L. Černý 2; M. Chovanec 3; Z. Čada 1; M. Zábrodský 1; E. Zvěřina 1; J. Betka 1; J. Skřivan 4
Authors‘ workplace:
Klinika otorinolaryngologie a chirurgie hlavy a krku 1. LF UK a FN v Motole, Praha
1; Foniatrická klinika 1. LF UK a VFN v Praze
2; Klinika otorinolaryngologická 3. LF UK a FN Královské Vinohrady, Praha
3; Klinika ušní, nosní a krční 2. LF UK a FN v Motole, Praha
4
Published in:
Cesk Slov Neurol N 2016; 79/112(3): 324-330
Category:
Short Communication
Overview
Aim:
To summarize data for the Baha (Bone anchored hearing aid) implantable hearing system based on the principle of bone conduction for the single-sided deafness (SSD) compensation, regardless of aetiology that may be congenital, vascular (Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss; SSNHL), infectious, traumatic, tumorous or iatrogenous.
Patients and methodology:
59 patients with an SSD were examined between September 2010 and August 2014 and included into the study. The SSD aetiology included sudden hearing loss, temporal bone fracture, ototoxic effects of a treatment, chronic otitis and a growing vestibular schwannoma.
Results:
All patients were tested for the effect by the Baha Softband and 23 decided to undergo the surgery. During the entire course of the study, three generations of the Baha implants were used (BI300, BIA400, Attract) without any intraoperative or postoperative complications. The effectivity of the Baha system was shown during testing of a sentence comprehension in noise, with a significant improvement after six weeks and one year respectively. In this testing, the signal was coming to the deaf side and noise to the hearing side, on a loudness level of 65 dB SPL and 70 dB SPL, respectively.
Conclusion:
Baha represents an effective option for correction of patients with SSD. Patients should be offered to test an implantable and/or non-surgical options for compensation as part of routine care for patients with single-sided deafness.
Key words:
single-sided deafness – Baha – Softband – hearing in noise test
The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study.
The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE “uniform requirements” for biomedical papers.
Sources
1. Tjellstrom A, Lindstrom J, Hallen O, et al. Osseointegrated titanium implants in the temporal bone. A clinical study on bone-anchored hearing aids. Am J Otol 1981;2(4):304–10.
2. Shaw EA. Transformation of sound pressure level from the free field to the eardrum in the horizontal plane. J Acoust Soc Am 1974;56(6):1848–61.
3. Litovsky RY. Binaural hearing. Cochlear white papars 2008. [online]. Available from URL: http://www.cochlear.com/wps/wcm/connect/48d02c0b-bca2-4df4-8b17-aa1c192e1967/Litovsky+white+paper_Binaural+hearing.pdf.
4. Giolas TG, Wark DJ. Communication problems associated with unilateral hearing loss. J Speech HearDisord 1967;32(4):336–43.
5. Hausler R, Colburn S, Marr E. Sound localization in subjects with impaired hearing. Spatial-discrimination and interaural-discrimination tests. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1983;400:1–62.
6. Harford E, Barry J. A rehabilitative approach to the problem of unilateral hearing impairment: the contralateral routing of signals cros. J Speech Hear Disord 1965;30: 121–38.
7. Bosman AJ, Hol MK, Snik AF, et al. Bone-anchored hearing aids in unilateral inner ear deafness. Acta Otolaryngol 2003;123(2):258–60.
8. Wazen JJ, Spitzer JB, Ghossaini SN, et al. Transcranial contralateral cochlear stimulation in unilateral deafness. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129(3):48–54.
9. Newman CW, Sandridge SA, Wodzisz LM. Longitudinal benefit from and satisfaction with the Baha system for patients with acquired unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Otol Neurotol 2008;29(8):1123–31. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31817dad20.
10. Niparko JK, Cox KM, Lustig LR. Comparison of the bone anchored hearing aid implantable hearing device with contralateral routing of offside signal amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness. Otol Neurotol 2003;24(1):73–8.
11. Andersen HT, Schroder SA, Bonding P. Unilateral deafness after acoustic neuroma surgery: subjective hearing handicap and the effect of the bone-anchored hearing aid. Otol Neurotol 2006;27(6):809– 14.
12. Snik AF, Mylanus EA, Proops DW, et al. Consensus statements on the BAHA system: where do we stand at present? Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 2005;195:2–12.
13. Vaneecloo FM, Ruzza I, Hanson JN, et al. The monaural pseudo-stereophonic hearing aid (BAHA) in unilateral total deafness: a study of 29 patients. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord), 2001;122(5):343– 50.
14. Boucek J, Chovanec M, Vokral J, et al. Baha as a Solution for Single-sided Deafness after Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery. Cesk Slov Neurol N 2012;75/108(5):602– 5.
15. Stewart CM, Clark JH, Niparko JK. Bone-anchored devices in single-sided deafness. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2011;71:92– 102. doi: 10.1159/000323589.
16. Wazen JJ, Van Ess MJ, Alameda J, et al. The Baha system in patients with single-sided deafness and contralateral hearing loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010;142(4):554–9. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2009.12.047.
17. Faber HT, de Wolf MJ, Cremers CW, et al. Benefit of Baha in the elderly with single-sided deafness. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013;270(4):1285– 91. doi: 10.1007/s00405-012-2151-z.
18. den Besten CA, Harterink E, McDermott AL, et al. Clinical results of Cochlear BIA300 in children: experience in two tertiary referral centers. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2015;79(12):2050– 5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.09.010.
19. Baker S, Centric A, Chennupati SK. Innovation in abutment-free bone-anchored hearing devices in children: updated results and experience. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2015;79(10):1667– 72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.07.021.
20. Arndt S, Aschendorff A, Laszig R, et al. Comparison of pseudobinaural hearing to real binaural hearing rehabilitation after cochlear implantation in patients with unilateral deafness and tinnitus. Otol Neurotol 2011;32(1):39–47. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181fcf271.
21. Pfiffner F, Kompis M, Flynn M, et al. Benefits of low-frequency attenuation of baha(R) in single-sided sensorineural deafness. Ear Hear 2011;32(1):40–5. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181ecd002.
22. Kompis M, Pfiffner F, Krebs M, et al. Factors influencing the decision for Baha in unilateral deafness: the Bern benefit in single-sided deafness questionnaire. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2011;71:103–11. doi: 10.1159/000323591.
23. Dun CA, de Wolf MJ, Hol MK, et al. Stability, survival, and tolerability of a novel baha implant system: six-month data from a multicenter clinical investigation. Otol Neurotol 2011;32(6):1001–7. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182267e9c.
24. Zarowski AJ, Verstraeten N, Somers T, et al. Headbands, testbands and softbands in preoperative testing and application of bone-anchored devices in adults and children. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2011;71:124–31. doi: 10.1159/000323728.
25. Dun CA, de Wolf MJ, Mylanus EA, et al. Bilateral bone-anchored hearing aid application in children: the Nijmegen experience from 1996 to 2008. Otol Neurotol 2010;31(4):615–23. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181dbb37e.
26. Verhagen CV, Hol MK, Coppens-Schellekens W, et al. The Baha Softband. A new treatment for young children with bilateral congenital aural atresia. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2008;72(10):1455–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2008.06.009.
27. Nelissen RC, Mylanus EA, Cremers CW, et al. Long-term compliance and satisfaction with percutaneous bone conduction devices in patients with congenital unilateral conductive hearing loss. Otol Neurotol 2015;36(5):826–33. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000765.
28. Martin TP, Lowther R, Cooper H, et al. The bone-anchored hearing aid in the rehabilitation of single-sided deafness: experience with 58 patients. Clin Otolaryngol 2010;35(4):284–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2010.02177.x.
29. Berenholz LP, Burkey JM, Lippy WH. Use of a bone-anchored hearing aid for functional single-sided deafness. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;137(3):522–3.
Labels
Paediatric neurology Neurosurgery NeurologyArticle was published in
Czech and Slovak Neurology and Neurosurgery
2016 Issue 3
Most read in this issue
- Sympathetic Chain Schwannoma – a Case Report
- Clinical Guideline for the Diagnostics and Treatment of Patients with Ischemic Stroke and Transitory Ischemic Attack – Version 2016
- Validity Study of the Boston Naming Test Czech Version
- Pre-motor and Non-motor Symptoms of Parkinson’s Disease – Taxonomy, Clinical Manifestation and Neuropathological Correlates