Prediction of fluid responsiveness
Authors:
J. Beneš
Authors‘ workplace:
Klinika anesteziologie, resuscitace a intenzivní medicíny, Fakultní nemocnice a Lékařská fakulta v Plzni, Univerzita Karlova v Praze
Published in:
Anest. intenziv. Med., 28, 2017, č. 1, s. 12-22
Category:
Intensive Care Medicine - Review Article
Overview
Assessment of fluid responsiveness is a very important component of fluid therapy in the anaesthetized and critically ill patients. Using a broad spectrum of different tests allows the assessment of the impact of preload change on the central hemodynamics prior to the actual fluid infusion, which may help deliver individiual patient-centered fluid therapy and decrease the risks associated with fluid overload. This review article is a printed supplement and explanation of the electronic Smart Card issued for better understanding of the issue of fluid responsiveness.
KEYWORDS:
fluid responsiveness – infusion therapy – fluid challenge – heart-lung interaction
Sources
1. Benes, J. Tekutinová terapie v intenzivní péči. Anest. Intenziv. Med., 2016, 27, 2, p. 107–115.
2. Neyra, J. A., Li, X., Canepa-Escaro, F., Adams-Huet, B., Toto, R. D., Yee, J. et al. Cumulative Fluid Balance and Mortality in Septic Patients With or Without Acute Kidney Injury and Chronic Kidney Disease. Crit. Care Med., 2016.
3. Wang, N., Jiang, L., Zhu, B., Wen, Y., Xi, X. M. Beijing Acute Kidney Injury Trial (BAKIT) Workgroup, et al. Fluid balance and mortality in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: a multicenter prospective epidemiological study. Crit. Care, 2015, 19, p. 371.
4. Acheampong, A., Vincent, J. L. A positive fluid balance is an independent prognostic factor in patients with sepsis. Crit. Care, 2015, 19, p. 251.
5. Pinsky, M. R., Payen, D. Functional hemodynamic monitoring. Crit. Care, 2005, 9, 6, p. 566–572.
6. Benes, J., Kirov, M., Kuzkov, V., Lainscak, M., Molnar, Z., Voga, G. et al. Fluid Therapy: Double-Edged Sword during Critical Care? BioMed Research International, 2015, 2015, 2, p. 1–14.
7. Marik, P. E. Hemodynamic parameters to guide fluid therapy. Transfusion Alter Transfusion Med., 2010, 11, 3, p. 102–112.
8. Marik, P., Bellomo, R. A rational approach to fluid therapy in sepsis. Br. J. Anaesth., 2015.
9. Henderson, W. R., Griesdale, D. E. G., Walley, K. R., Sheel, A. W. Clinical review: Guyton – the role of mean circulatory filling pressure and right atrial pressure in controlling cardiac output. Harv. Mens Health. Watch, 2010, 14, 6, p. 243.
10. Simmons, D., Linde, L., Miller, J. H., O´Reilly, R. J. Relation between lung volume and pulmonary vascular resistance. Circ. Res., 1961, 9, 3, p. 465-471.
11. Peták, F., Albu, G., Lele, E., Hantos, Z., Morel, D. R., Fontao, F. et al. Lung mechanical and vascular changes during positive- and negative-pressure lung inflations: importance of reference pressures in the pulmonary vasculature. J. Appl. Physiol., 2009, 106, 3, p. 935–942.
12. Creamer, K. M., McCloud, L. L., Fisher, L. E., Ehrhart, I. C. Ventilation above closing volume reduces pulmonary vascular resistance hysteresis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., 1998, 158, 4, p. 1114–1119.
13. Cannesson, M., Aboy, M., Hofer, C. K., Rehman, M. Pulse pressure variation: where are we today? J. Clin. Monit. Comput., 2011, 25, 1, p. 45–56.
14. Monnet, X., Marik, P., Teboul, J. L. Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. Care Med., 2016.
15. Cherpanath, T. G. V., Hirsch, A., Geerts, B. F., Lagrand, W. K., Leeflang, M. M., Schultz, M. J. et al. Predicting Fluid Responsiveness by Passive Leg Raising: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 23 Clinical Trials. Crit. Care Med., 2016, 44, 5, p. 981–991.
16. Marik, P. E., Cavallazzi, R., Vasu, T., Hirani, A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit. Care Med., 2009, 37, 9, p. 2642–2647.
17. Zhang, Z., Lu, B., Sheng, X., Jin, N. Accuracy of stroke volume variation in predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Anesth., 2011, 25, 6, p. 904–916.
18. Sandroni, C., Cavallaro, F., Marano, C., Falcone, C., Santis, P., Antonelli, M. et al. Accuracy of plethysmographic indices as predictors of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med., 2012, 38, 9, p. 1429–1437.
19. Silva, S., Jozwiak, M., Teboul, J. L., Persichini, R., Richard, C., Monnet, X. et al. End-expiratory occlusion test predicts preload responsiveness independently of positive end-expiratory pressure during acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit. Care Med., 2013, 41, 7, p. 1692–1701.
20. Guinot, P. G., Godart, J., de Broca, B., Bernard, E., Lorne, E., Dupont, H. et al. End-expiratory occlusion manoeuvre does not accurately predict fluid responsiveness in the operating theatre. Br. J. Anaesth., 2014, 112, 6, p. 1050–1054.
21. Monnet, X., Osman, D., Ridel, C., Lamia, B., Richard, C., Teboul, J. L. et al. Predicting volume responsiveness by using the end-expiratory occlusion in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients. Crit. Care Med., 2009, 37, 3, p. 951–956.
22. Barbier, C., Loubières, Y., Schmit, C., Hayon, J., Ricôme, J. L., Jardin, F. et al. Respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter are helpful in predicting fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic patients. Intensive Care Med., 2004, 30, 9, p. 1740–1746.
23. Muller, L., Bobbia, X., Toumi, M., Louart, G., Molinari, N., Ragonnet, B. et al. Respiratory variations of inferior venacava diameter to predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneouslybreathing patients with acute circulatory failure: need for a cautious use. Crit. Care, 2012, 16, 5, p. R188.
24. Machare-Delgado, E., Decaro, M., Marik, P. E. Inferior vena cava variation compared to pulse contour analysis as predictors of fluid responsiveness: a prospective cohort study. J. Intensive Care Med., 2011, 26, 2, p. 116–124.
25. Lanspa, M. J., Grissom, C. K., Hirshberg, E. L., Jones, J. P., Brown, S. M. Applying dynamic parameters to predict hemodynamic response to volume expansion in spontaneously breathing patients with septic shock. Shock, 2013, 39, 2, p. 155–160.
26. Airapetian, N., Maizel, J., Alyamani, O., Mahjoub, Y., Lorne, E., Levrard, M. et al. Does inferior vena cava respiratory variability predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients? Crit. Care, 2015, 19, 1, p. 400.
27. Lee, J. H., Kim, J. T., Yoon, S. Z., Lim, Y. J., Jeon, Y., Bahk, J. H. et al. Evaluation of corrected flow time in oesophageal Doppler as a predictor of fluid responsiveness. Br. J. Anaesth., 2007, 99, 3, p. 343–348.
28. Monge García, M. I., Gil Cano, A., Gracia Romero, M., Monterroso Pintado, R., Pérez Madueño, V., Díaz Monrové, J. C. et al. Non-invasive assessment of fluid responsiveness by changes in partial end-tidal CO2 pressure during a passive leg-raising maneuver. Annals of intensive care, 2012, 2, p. 9.
29. Marik, P. E., Cavallazzi, R. Does the central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? An updated meta-analysis and a plea for some common sense. Crit. Care Med., 2013, 41, 7, p. 1774–1781.
30. Eskesen, T. G., Wetterslev, M., Perner, A. Systematic review including re-analyses of 1148 individual data sets of central venous pressure as a predictor of fluid responsiveness. Intensive Care Med., 2016, 42, 3, p. 324–332.
31. Magder, S. Central venous pressure: A useful but not so simple measurement. Crit. Care Med., 2006, 34, 8, p. 2224–2227.
32. Marik, P. E. Iatrogenic salt water drowning and the hazards of a high central venous pressure. Annals of intensive care, 2014, 4, p. 21.
33. Goepfert, M. S., Richter, H. P., Zu Eulenburg, C., Gruetzmacher, J., Rafflenbeul, E., Roeher, K. et al. Individually optimized hemodynamic therapy reduces complications and length of stay in the intensive care unit: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology, 2013, 119, 4, p. 824–836.
34. Marik, P. E., Monnet, X., Teboul, J. L. Hemodynamic parameters to guide fluid therapy. Annals of intensive care, 2011, 1, 1, p. 1.
35. Marik, P. E., Levitov, A., Young, A., Andrews, L. The use of bioreactance and carotid Doppler to determine volume responsiveness and blood flow redistribution following passive leg raising in hemodynamically unstable patients. Chest, 2013, 143, 2, p. 364–370.
36. Perel, A., Pizov, R., Cotev, S. Systolic blood pressure variation is a sensitive indicator of hypovolemia in ventilated dogs subjected to graded hemorrhage. Anesthesiology, 1987, 67, 4, p. 498–502.
37. Cannesson, M., Le Manach, Y., Hofer, C., Goarin, J., Lehot, J., Vallet, B. et al. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of pulse pressure variations for the prediction of fluid responsiveness: a „gray zone“ approach. Anesthesiology, 2011, 115, 2, p. 231–241.
38. Michard, F. Stroke volume variation: from applied physiology to improved outcomes. Crit. Care Med., 2011, 39, 2, p. 402–403.
39. Kubitz, J. C., Annecke, T., Kemming, G. I., Forkl, S., Kronas, N., Goetz, A. E. et al. The influence of positive end-expiratory pressure on stroke volume variation and central blood volume during open and closed chest conditions. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., 2006, 30, 1, p. 90–95.
40. Backer, D., Heenen, S., Piagnerelli, M., Koch, M., Vincent, J. L. Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med., 2005, 31, 4, p. 517–523.
41. Cannesson, M., Tran, N. P., Cho, M., Hatib, F., Michard, F. Predicting fluid responsiveness with stroke volume variation despite multiple extrasystoles. Crit. Care Med., 2012, 40, 1, p. 193–198.
42. Umgelter, A., Reindl, W., Schmid, R. M., Huber, W. Is supra-ventricular arrhythmia a reason for the bad performance of the FlowTrac device? Crit. Care, 2007, 11, 1, p. 406, author reply 406.
43. De Backer, D., Taccone, F. S., Holsten, R., Ibrahimi, F., Vincent, J. L. Influence of respiratory rate on stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesthesiology, 2009, 110, 5, p. 1092–1097.
44. Daudel, F., Tüller, D., Krähenbühl, S., Jakob, S. M., Takala, J. Pulse pressure variation and volume responsiveness during acutely increased pulmonary artery pressure: an experimental study. Crit. Care, 2010, 14, 3, p. R122.
45. Wyler von Ballmoos, M., Takala, J., Roeck, M., Porta, F., Tueller, D., Ganter, C. C. et al. Pulse-pressure variation and hemodynamic response in patients with elevated pulmonary artery pressure: a clinical study. Crit. Care, 2010, 14, 3, p. R111.
46. Duperret, S., Lhuillier, F., Piriou, V., Vivier, E., Metton, O., Branche, P. et al. Increased intra-abdominal pressure affects respiratory variations in arterial pressure in normovolaemic and hypovolaemic mechanically ventilated healthy pigs. Intensive Care Med., 2007, 33, 1, p. 163–171.
47. Renner, J., Gruenewald, M., Quaden, R., Hanss, R., Meybohm, P., Steinfath, M. et al. Influence of increased intra-abdominal pressure on fluid responsiveness predicted by pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in a porcine model. Crit. Care Med., 2009, 37, 2, p. 650–658.
48. Liu, X., Fu, Q., Mi, W., Liu, H., Zhang, H., Wang, P. et al. Pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients experiencing intra-abdominal hypertension. Bioscience trends, 2013, 7, 2, p. 101–108.
49. Kubitz, J. C., Forkl, S., Annecke, T., Kronas, N., Goetz, A. E., Reuter, D. A. et al. Systolic pressure variation and pulse pressure variation during modifications of arterial pressure. Intensive Care Med., 2008, 34, 8, p. 1520–1524.
50. Kubitz, J. C., Annecke, T., Forkl, S., Kemming, G. I., Kronas, N., Goetz, A. E. et al. Validation of pulse contour derived stroke volume variation during modifications of cardiac afterload. Br. J. Anaesth., 2007, 98, 5, p. 591–597.
51. Lahner, D., Kabon, B., Marschalek, C., Chiari, A., Pestel, G., Kaider, A. et al. Evaluation of stroke volume variation obtained by arterial pulse contour analysis to predict fluid responsiveness intraoperatively. Br. J. Anaesth., 2009, 103, 3, p. 346–351.
52. Perel, A. Automated assessment of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesth. Analg., 2008, 106, 4, p. 1031–1033.
53. Benes, J., Zatloukal, J., Kletecka, J., Simanova, A., Haidingerova, L., Pradl, R. et al. Respiratory induced dynamic variations of stroke volume and its surrogates as predictors of fluid responsiveness: applicability in the early stages of specific critical states. J. Clin. Monit. Comput., 2014, 28, 3, p. 225–231.
54. Mahjoub, Y., Lejeune, V., Muller, L., Perbet, S., Zieleskiewicz, L., Bart, F. et al. Evaluation of pulse pressure variation validity criteria in critically ill patients: a prospective observational multicentre point-prevalence study. Br. J. Anaesth., 2014, 112, 4, p. 681–685.
55. Monnet, X., Rienzo, M., Osman, D., Anguel, N., Richard, C., Pinsky, M. R. et al. Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill. Crit. Care Med., 2006, 34, 5, p. 1402–1407.
56. Wilkman, E., Kuitunen, A., Pettilä, V., Varpula, M. Fluid responsiveness predicted by elevation of PEEP in patients with septic shock. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand., 2014, 58, 1, p. 27–35.
57. Messina, A., Colombo, D., Romagnoli, S., Bonicolini, E., De Mattei, G., Longhini, F. et al. The mini-sigh test: a new haemodynamic test of fluid responsiveness in ICU patients undergoing pressure support ventilation. Intens. Care Med. Exp., 2015, 3, Suppl. 1, p. A17.
58. Via, G., Tavazzi, G., Price, S. Ten situations where inferior vena cava ultrasound may fail to accurately predict fluid responsiveness: a physiologically based point of view. Intensive Care Med., 2016, 42, 7, p. 1164–1167.
59. Monnet, X., Teboul, J. L. Passive leg raising: five rules, not a drop of fluid! Crit. Care, 2015, 19, p. 18.
60. Malbrain, M. L. N. G., Reuter, D. A. Assessing fluid responsiveness with the passive leg raising maneuver in patients with increased intra-abdominal pressure: be aware that not all blood returns! Crit. Care Med., 2010, 38, 9, p. 1912–1915.
61. Muller, L., Toumi, M., Bousquet, P. J., Riu-Poulenc, B., Louart, G., Candela, D. et al. An increase in aortic blood flow after an infusion of 100 ml colloid over 1 minute can predict fluid responsiveness: the mini-fluid challenge study. Anesthesiology, 2011, 115, 3, p. 541–547.
62. Mallat, J., Meddour, M., Durville, E., Lemyze, M., Pepy, F., Temime, J. et al. Decrease in pulse pressure and stroke volume variations after mini-fluid challenge accurately predicts fluid responsiveness. Br. J. Anaesth., 2015, 115, 3, p. 449–456.
63. Guinot, P. G., Bernard, E., Deleporte, K., Petiot, S., Dupont, H., Lorne, E. et al. Mini-fluid challenge can predict arterial pressure response to volume expansion in spontaneously breathing patients under spinal anaesthesia. Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine, 2015, 34, 6, p. 333–337.
64. Cecconi, M., Hofer, C., Teboul, J. L., Pettila, V., Wilkman, E., Molnar, Z. et al. Fluid challenges in intensive care: the FENICE study: A global inception cohort study. Intensive Care Med., 2015, 41, 9, p. 1529–1537.
65. Hahn, R. G. Why are crystalloid and colloid fluid requirements similar during surgery and intensive care? Eur. J. Anaesthesiol., 2013, 30, 9, p. 515–518.
66. Young, A., Marik, P. E., Sibole, S., Grooms, D., Levitov, A. Changes in end-tidal carbon dioxide and volumetric carbon dioxide as predictors of volume responsiveness in hemodynamically unstable patients. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth., 2013, 27, 4, p. 681–684.
Labels
Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation and Inten Intensive Care MedicineArticle was published in
Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
2017 Issue 1
Most read in this issue
- The most frequent complications associated with general anaesthesia from the patient’s point of view. Questionnaire comparative study 2007/2014
- Acute respiratory failure and echocardiographic examination
- Prediction of fluid responsiveness