Hand function and handwriting treatment program in post-stroke patients – a pilot study
Authors:
Krivošíková M. 1,2; Krejstová E. 3; Veselá K. 4; Angerová Y. 1
Authors‘ workplace:
Klinika rehabilitačního lékařství, 1. LF UK a VFN v Praze
1; Klinika rehabilitace a tělovýchovného lékařství, 2. LF UK a FN Motol, Praha
2; Odborný léčebný ústav Jevíčko, Jevíčko
3; Ústav speciálněpedagogických studií, Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci
4
Published in:
Rehabil. fyz. Lék., 30, 2023, No. 1, pp. 4-12.
Category:
Original Papers
doi:
https://doi.org/10.48095/ccrhfl20234
Overview
Introduction: Writing is a complex functional activity that involves motor, sensory and cognitive skills. It is an important part of a person‘s daily occupations. Impairments in qualitative and quantitative parameters of writing are common in patients after stroke. There is a lack of evidence-based therapeutic procedures and programmes for writing re-education and graphomotor training in patients with hemiparesis. Aim: The aim of the pilot study was to determine the feasibility of a 4-week therapeutic program of hand function and handwriting skills and its acceptability for patients after stroke in an outpatient occupational therapy program. Methods: A descriptive design was chosen for the pilot study. A 4-week intensive therapeutic program focusing on hand function and handwriting skills was designed and implemented. The 4-week intervention included a total of 20 hours of 30-minute sessions led by an occupational therapist and an additional 30 minutes of home-based exercise. The therapy included repetitive training with elements of the CIMT (constraint-induced movement therapy) method, task-oriented training (functional writing) and handwriting training. The progress of the home program was recorded by the patient in a diary. A total of seven adults with stroke were enrolled in the pilot program. The upper extremity range of motion was assessed by goniometry at the beginning and at the end of the programme, hand function was assessed by the Frenchay Arm Test (FAT) and the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test (JTHFT). Handwriting skills were assessed using the Handwriting Assessment Battery for Adults. Results: The results obtained in FAT and JTHFT scores indicate a positive effect of the therapy on hand function in all patients. In the area of writing, an improvement in writing legibility was demonstrated. Patients were satisfied with the intensity, content and level of difficulty of the tasks in the therapy program. Conclusion: The proposed therapeutic program of hand function and handwriting skills is feasible and acceptable for stroke patients according to the set conditions and criteria. It can serve as a recommendation for training fine motor skills in patients with writing disorders.
Keywords:
stroke – occupational therapy – intervention – handwriting – writing disorders
Sources
1. Asher AV. Handwriting instruction in elementary schools. Am J Occup Ther 2006; 60(4): 461–471. doi: 10.5014/ajot.60.4.461.
2. Hajovsky DB, Villeneuve EF, Reynolds MR et al. Cognitive ability influences on written expression: evidence for developmental and sex-based differences in school-age children. J Sch Psychol 2018; 67: 104–118. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2017.09.001.
3. Saini R, Chauhan VS, Chaudharya S et al. Disorder of written expression: a case report. Pravara Medical Review 2012; 4(1): 18–20.
4. Doney R, Lucas BR, Jirikowic T et al. Graphomotor skills in children with prenatal alkohol exposure and fetal alkohol spectrum disorder: a population-based study in remote Australia. Austr Occup Ther J 2017; 64(1): 68–78. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12326.
5. Doležalová J. Rozvoj grafomotoriky v projektech. Praha: Portál 2016.
6. Bednářová J, Šmardová V. Diagnostika dítěte předškolního věku. Brno: Edika 2015. ISBN 978-80-266-0658-1.
7. Dettrick-Janes M, McCluskey M, Lannin N et al. Handwriting legibility in healthy older adults. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr 2015; 33(3): 189–203. doi: 10.31009/02703181.2015.1037978.
8. Nakayama H, Jorgensen H, Raaschou H et al. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75(4): 394–398. doi: 10.1016/0003-9993(94)90161-9.
9. Kong KH, Chua KSG, Lee J. Recovery of upper limb dexterity in patients more than 1 year after stroke: frequency, clinical correlates and predictors. NeuroRehabilitation 2011; 28(2): 105–111. doi: 10.3233/NRE-2011-0639.
10. Carr JH, Shepherd RB. Stroke rehabilitation: guidelines for exercise and training to optimize motor skill. London: Butterworth-Heinemann 2003.
11. Simpson B, McCluskey A, Lannin N et al. Feasibility of a home-based program to improve handwriting after stroke: a pilot study. Disabil Rehabil 2016; 38(7): 673–682. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1059495.
12. Yancosek KE, Howell D. Systematic review of interventions to improve or augment handwriting ability in adult clients. Occup Ther J Res 2011; 31(2): 55–63. doi: 10.3928/15394492-20100722-03.
13. Hillerová L, Mikulecká E, Mayer M et al. Statistické vlastnosti nové škály skóre vizuálního hodnocení funkčního úkolu ruky u pacientů po cévní mozkové příhodě. Rehabil Fyz Lék 2006; 13(3): 107–111.
14. Lang CE, Wagner JM, Edwards DF et al. Recovery of grasp versus reach in people with hemiparesis poststroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2006; 20(4): 444–454. doi: 10.1177/1545968306289299.
15. Thompson-Butel AG, Lin GG, Shiner CT et al. Two common tests of dexterity can stratify upper limb motor function after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Reapir 2014; 28(8): 788–796. doi: 10.1177/1545968314523678.
16. Veselková E. Grafomotorika u pacientů po cévní mozkové příhodě. Praha, 2020. Diplomová práce. Univerzita Karlova, 1. lékařská fakulta, Klinika rehabilitačního lékařství. Vedoucí práce Bc. Mária Krivošíková, M.Sc.
17. Winstein C, Stein J, Arena R et al. Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American heart association/American stroke association. Stroke 2016; 47(6): e698–e169. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000098.
18. Platz T, Owilabi M. Clinical pathways in stroke rehabilitation: background, scope and methods. In: Platz T (ed). Clinical pathways in stroke rehabilitation. Springer 2021. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-58505-1_2.
19. Beaudet M. Effectiveness of an adult handwriting training program. Austr Occup Ther J 2006; 53(3): 247–248. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2006.00550.x.
20. Veerbeek JM, van Wegen E, van Peppen R et al. What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014; 9(2): e87987. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087987.
21. Thant A, Wanpen S, Nualnetr N et al. Effects of task-oriented training on upper extremity functional performance in patients with sub-acute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. J Phys Ther Sci 2019; 31(1): 81–87. doi: 10.1589/jpts.31.82.
22. Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP et al. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2006; 296(17): 2095–2104. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.17.2095.
23. Lo AC, Guarino PD, Richards LG et al. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. New Engl J Med 2010; 362(19): 1772–1783. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0911341.
Labels
Physiotherapist, university degree Rehabilitation Sports medicineArticle was published in
Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine
2023 Issue 1
Most read in this issue
- Development of rehabilitation in the Czech Republic
- The Franklin Method – body and movement in imagination
- Physiotherapy in primary and lower-secondary school children with poor posture
- The effect of physiotherapy on the quality of motion patterns in impingement syndrome