Infraglenoid fracture of the scapular neck − fact or myth?

Overview

In 1991, Ada and Miller described a new type of scapular neck fracture. It was a transverse fracture of the scapular body passing from the inferior border of the glenoid to the medial border of the scapular body (their type IIC). This fracture was later designated by Goss as a “fracture of neck inferior to scapula spine“. Since then, this type of fracture has been the cause of a number of controversies, mainly concerning the so-called “floating shoulder”. However, scapular neck fractures can be considered to be only those fractures that separate completely the glenoid from the scapular body. Term “fracture of neck inferior to scapula spine“ does not fit into this definition because it does not compromise the junction between the glenoid fossa and the scapular body. Actually, it is a transverse two-part fracture of the infraspinous part of the scapular body. As a result this term should no longer be used in the literature.

Keywords:

scapular fractures – scapular neck fractures – scapular body fractures – floating shoulder

Introduction

Scapular neck fractures are a much-debated issue in the literature [1−10]. Until the beginning of the 1990s, two types of these fractures were primarily recognized, namely those of the surgical and the anatomical necks of the scapula [2−4,7,10]. Some authors specified also a third type, a so-called transspinous fracture of the scapular neck [3−5,10]. In 1991, Ada and Miller [1] described another type that, three years later was designated by Goss [6] as a “fracture of neck inferior to scapula spine.“ Since then, this description has caused much controversy, mainly concerning the so-called “floating shoulder.”

History

In 1991, Ada and Miller [1] published a simple classification scheme where lines IIA, B and C represented fractures of the scapular neck (Fig. 1), but, with neither detailed description, nor explanation in the text. The course of lines drawn on the posterior surface of the scapula suggests that type IIA are fractures of the surgical neck, type II B transspinous scapular neck fractures and type IIC transverse fractures of the scapular body passing from the inferior border of the glenoid just below the scapular spine to the medial border of the scapular body. Fractures of the anatomical neck were not included in this schema.

In 1994, Goss [6] modified the Ada and Miller “classification” without prior discussion. He excluded transspinous scapular neck fractures, included fractures of the anatomical neck and called the IIC type a “fracture of neck inferior to scapula spine“ (Fig. 2). This term was adopted by other authors without any critical analysis, which caused a confusion that persists in the literature until today [11−15].

Anatomy

The scapular neck is not an exactly-defined anatomi­cal structure. Anatomical textbooks present the scapu­lar neck as a transitional zone between the scapular body and the glenoid [16]. On the posterior surface of the scapula, this narrowing of the bone mass of the late­ral angle can be well seen between the glenoid and the lateral border of the scapular spine as a so-called spinoglenoid notch (Fig. 3). The superior aspect of the neck is formed by the coracoid base, its inferior part is considered to be the subglenoid portion of the late­ral border of the scapular body. Based on the course of fracture lines, the region of the scapular neck is further divided into the anatomical and surgical necks (Fig. 3).

Classifications of scapular neck fractures

Scapular neck fractures are defined as extraarticular fractures of the lateral angle of the scapula, which separate the glenoid from the scapular body [3−5,10]. All their types have the common feature of a fracture line running from the lateral border (Fig. 3). Its further course is used to distinguish between the three basic scapular neck fractures, i.e., fractures of the anatomical and surgical necks and transspinous neck fractures. In the spinoglenoid notch the line extends either in the direction of the coracoglenoid notch (anatomical neck fractures) or the scapular notch (surgical neck fractures). Transspinous neck fractures pass from the late­ral border, through the middle narrowed portion of the scapular spine, into the supraspinous fossa.

The type IIC of Ada and Miller [1], i.e., the Goss´ [6] “fracture of neck inferior to scapula spine“, does not comply with the definition of a scapular neck fracture as it does not separate the glenoid, but a large infraspinous fragment, from the scapular body. The glenoid remains firmly connected to the superior part of the body, i.e., the spinal column. For this reason, it is a transverse two-part fracture of the infraspinous part of the scapular body. Arguments that it is a scapular neck fracture because the fracture line runs through the subglenoid part of the lateral border of the scapular body that forms the inferior part of the scapular neck, are incorrect. The fracture line does not run through the entire scapular neck.

The subglenoid region, or the proximal half of the lateral border, is a typical starting point for a number of fracture lines constituting various types of scapular fractures [17,18]. What is then the difference between the line of a “fracture of neck inferior to scapula spine” and the line of a two-part infraspinous scapular body fracture passing through the lateral border of the scapu­lar body 1 cm to 2 cm more distally (Fig. 4)? In our view there is no difference. In spite of this, e.g., Cole et al. [12], in their 2012 study, designate this fracture pattern (see their Fig. 1c) as a fracture of scapular neck (Fig. 5). Acceptance of this view would imply that almost all infraspinous fractures of the scapular body could be considered as fractures of the scapular neck, although none of them actually affects the junction between the glenoid and the scapular body.

Clinical implications

Two-part infraspinous fractures of the scapular body are presented as fractures of the scapular neck in a number of studies, mainly for two reasons. The first reason is inadequate radiographic diagnosis and, consequently, incorrect classification of a majority of these fractures evaluated solely on radiographs as a surgical neck fracture. Only 3D CT reconstructions can show the true fracture pattern [19]. Another reason is acceptance of Goss´ classification and his deliberate specification of this fracture as a scapular neck fracture.

Bartoníček et al. [18] found, in their series of 375 scapular fractures, that two-part fractures of the insfraspinous part of the scapular body accounted for 24% of all cases and for 47% of the 187 scapular body fractures studied. In addition, almost one third (32%) of two-part infraspinous fractures of the scapular body were associated with a clavicular shaft fracture. Thereby, designation of this pattern as a scapular neck fracture has a number of implications. In epidemiological studies it significantly changes the ratio of the scapular neck and body fractures. For example Tuček et al. [20] recorded in their study 8%, Armitage et al. [17] 22%, Ada and Miller [1] 27% and Zhang 29 % [15] as scapular neck fractures.

The combination of a two-part infraspinous fracture of the scapular body with a fracture of the clavicular shaft is frequently presented in the literature as a “floating shoulder” [8,21,22]. This is another mistake, as it inflates the real number of reported “floating shoulder” cases. [8,21−23].

Ada and Miller [1] recommended operative treatment of scapular neck fractures with a displacement of more than 1 cm, or angulation of more than 40°. However, this recommendation concerned primarily their type IIC type fractures, which are actually scapular body fractures and not scapular neck fractures. Goss [6], followed later by other authors [13,14], adopted these criteria for all types of fractures of scapular neck, without any critical analysis. Thus, these criteria, which were developed solely on the basis of radiographs of scapular body fractures, have been cited in the literature until today, without any verification of their validity [1,6,13,14].

Conclusion

Fracture of neck inferior to scapula spine (IIC type fracture) is a typical example of the controversies surrounding the classification of scapular fractures. Sca­pular neck fractures can be considered to be only those fractures that completely separate the glenoid from the scapular body. At the same time, it has to be accepted that a scapular neck fracture is a generic term comprising three different types of neck fractures. Their morphological verification requires, in a majority of cases, 3D CT reconstructions. Goss’s ”Fracture of neck inferior to scapula spine“ is not a fracture of the scapular neck, as it does not compromise the junction between the glenoid fossa and the scapular body. As a result this term should no longer be used in the literature.

Supported by IP ZRO MO 1012.

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have not conflict of interest in connection with this paper and that the article has not been published in any other journal.

Michal Tuček

Department of Orthopaedics, First Faculty of Medicine,

Charles University and Military University Hospital Prague

U Vojenské nemocnice 1200

169 02, Prague 6

Czech Republic

e-mail: tucekmic@gmail.com