Adherence to reporting guidelines in Perspectives in Surgery
Authors:
O. Ryska
Authors‘ workplace:
Ústav živočišné fyziologie a genetiky AV ČR, v. v. i., Liběchov
ředitel: Ing. J. Kopečný, DrSc.
; Royal Lancaster Infirmary, UHMB NHS Foundation Trust, Lancaster
Published in:
Rozhl. Chir., 2017, roč. 96, č. 3, s. 125-129.
Category:
Original articles
Overview
Introduction:
Reporting guidelines were established to improve the quality of scientific papers. Currently, the most common are CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials), STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) and CARE (Clinical Consensus-based Case Reporting Guideline). Spin can be defined as (un)intentionally biased interpretation of results aimed at convincing readers of a positive benefit of any given intervention. The aim of the study was to evaluate the adherence of papers published in Perspectives in Surgery to CONSORT, STROBE or CARE and to identify the frequency of spin.
Methods:
All articles published between 10/2014 and 9/2016 were analysed. Editorials and letters to editor were excluded. Original papers and case reports were assessed using 12 parameters. Any conclusion not corresponding to outcomes from pre-defined measurements was identified as spin. Descriptive statistics were used.
Results:
Of 210 articles, 144 (69%) were analysed – 67 (47%) retrospective studies, 3 (2%) prospective studies and 74 (51%) case reports. The studies showed the highest compliance in terms of reporting the cohort size (89%). On the other hand, study limitations were presented in 22%. Performed investigations and interventions were described in all (100%) case reports. Conversely, limitations were not mentioned in any. None of the analysed papers met all of the 12 monitored parameters. Spin was identified in 47 (67%) original articles.
Conclusion:
None of the evaluated papers adhered completely to the current reporting guidelines. Spin occurred in more than 2/3 of the publications.
Key words:
reporting guidelines − spin − CONSORT − STROBE − CARE
Sources
1. Simera I, Moher D, Hirst A, et al. Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network. BMC Med 2010;8:24.
2. Simera I, Moher D, Hoey J, et al. The EQUATOR Network and reporting guidelines: Helping to achieve high standards in reporting health research studies. Maturitas 2009;63:4–6.
3. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Med 2010;8:18–25.
4. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med 2007;147:573−7.
5. Gagnier JJ, Kienle G, Altman DG, et al. The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development. BMJ Case Rep 2013;7:23.
6. Hopewell S, Altman DG, Moher D, et al. Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal ‚Instructions to Authors‘. Trials 2008;9:20.
7. Smith TA, Kulatilake P, Brown LJ, et al. Do surgery journals insist on reporting by CONSORT and PRISMA? A follow-up survey of “instructions to authors”. Ann Med Surg 2015;4:17–21.
8. Ochodo EA, De Haan MC, Reitsma JB, et al. Overinterpretation and misreporting of diagnostic accuracy studies: evidence of “spin”. Radiology 2013;267:581–8.
9. Fletcher RH, Black B. “Spin” in scientific writing: scientific mischief and legal jeopardy. Med Law 2007;26:511−25.
10. Boutron I, Dutton S, Ravaud P, et al. Reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results for primary outcomes. JAMA 2010;303:2058–64.
11. Vera-Badillo FE, Shapiro R, Ocana A, et al. Bias in reporting of end points of efficacy and toxicity in randomized, clinical trials for women with breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2013;24:1238–44.
12. Sims MT, Henning NM, Wayant CC. Do emergency medicine journals promote trial registration and adherence to reporting guidelines? A survey of „Instructions for Authors“. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2016;24:137.
13. Ahmed Ali U, van der Sluis PC, Issa Y, et al. Trends in worldwide volume and methodological quality of surgical randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 2013;258:199−207.
14. Wells CI, Robertson JP, O‘Grady G, et al. Trends in publication of general surgical research in New Zealand, 1996–2015. ANZ J Surg 2016;87:76−9.
15. Knobloch K, Vogt PM. Adherence to CONSORT abstract reporting suggestions in surgical randomized-controlled trials published in Annals of Surgery. Ann Surg 2011;254:546−7.
16. Camm CF, Agha RA, Edison E. CONSORT adherence in journals is still far from perfect. Ann Surg 2015;261:e38.
17. Agha RA, Fowler AJ, Lee SY, et al. Systematic review of the methodological and reporting quality of case series in surgery. Br J Surg 2016;103:1253−8.
18. Moher D, Schulz KF, Simera I et al. Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines. PLoS Med 2010;7:e1000217.
19. Turner L, Shamseer L, Altman DG, et al. Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;11:MR000030.
20. EQUATOR Network website: Introduction to reporting guidelines. Available from http://www.equator-network.org.
21. Agha RA, Fowler AJ, Limb C, et al. Impact of the mandatory implementation of reporting guidelines on reporting quality in a surgical journal: A before and after study. Int J Surg 2016;30:169−72.
22. Richason TP, Paulson SM, Lowenstein SR, et al. Case reports describing treatments in the emergency medicine literature: missing and misleading information. BMC Emerg Med 2009;9:10−5.
23. Lazarus C, Haneef R, Ravaud P, et al. Classification and prevalence of spin in abstracts of non-randomized studies evaluating an intervention. BMC Med Res Methodol 2015;15:85.
Labels
Surgery Orthopaedics Trauma surgeryArticle was published in
Perspectives in Surgery
2017 Issue 3
Most read in this issue
- Wilkie’s syndrome – a rare cause of duodenal obstruction in an adult female patient
- Laparoscopic diverting ileostomy in rectal cancer surgery
- Complete minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophageal resection
- The risks of retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy