Approaches to radial shaft
Authors:
J. Bartoníček 1,2; O. Naňka 2; M. Tuček 1
Authors‘ workplace:
Klinika ortopedie 1. LF UK a ÚVN Praha
přednosta: prof. MUDr. J. Bartoníček, DrSc.
1; Anatomický ústav 1. LF UK Praha
přednosta: prof. MUDr. K. Smetana, DrSc.
2
Published in:
Rozhl. Chir., 2015, roč. 94, č. 10, s. 415-424.
Category:
Monothematic special - Summary statement
Overview
In the clinical practice, radial shaft may be exposed via two approaches, namely the posterolateral Thompson and volar (anterior) Henry approaches. A feared complication of both of them is the injury to the deep branch of the radial nerve. No consensus has been reached, yet, as to which of the two approaches is more beneficial for the proximal half of radius. According to our anatomical studies and clinical experience, Thompson approach is safe only in fractures of the middle and distal thirds of the radial shaft, but highly risky in fractures of its proximal third. Henry approach may be used in any fracture of the radial shaft and provides a safe exposure of the entire lateral and anterior surfaces of the radius.
The Henry approach has three phases. In the first phase, incision is made along the line connecting the biceps brachii tendon and the styloid process of radius. Care must be taken not to damage the lateral cutaneous nerve of forearm.
In the second phase, fascia is incised and the brachioradialis identified by the typical transition from the muscle belly to tendon and the shape of the tendon. On the lateral side, the brachioradialis lines the space with the radial artery and veins and the superficial branch of the radial nerve running at its bottom. On the medial side, the space is defined by the pronator teres in the proximal part and the flexor carpi radialis in the distal part. The superficial branch of the radial nerve is retracted together with the brachioradialis laterally, and the radial artery medially.
In the third phase, the attachment of the pronator teres is identified by its typical tendon in the middle of convexity of the lateral surface of the radial shaft. The proximal half of the radius must be exposed very carefully in order not to damage the deep branch of the radial nerve. Dissection starts at the insertion of the pronator teres and proceeds proximally along its lateral border in interval between this muscle and insertion of the supinator. During release and retraction of the supinator posterolaterally, it is beneficial to supinate the proximal fragment of the shaft as much as possible, preferably by K-wire drilled perpendicular into the anterior surface of the fragment and rotated externally. As a result, canalis supinatorius is moved posteriorly which reduces the risk of injury to the deep branch of the radial nerve. The supinator is released always from distal to proximal. Approximately at the level of the biceps brachii tendon, it is usually necessary to identify and ligate the radial recurrent artery and vein which prevent retraction of the radial vessels medially. After detachment of the whole supinator, a small Hohmann elevator is carefully inserted between the muscle and the bone. If necessary, it is now possible to open the anterior surface of the joint capsule and revise the humeroradial joint.
Key words:
Henry approach − Thompson approach − radial shaft fractures − forearm fractures
Sources
1. Bartoníček J. Historie operační léčby diafyzárních zlomenin předloktí v letech 1878−1975. Ortopedie 2010;4:232−9.
2. Oestern H-J. Unterarmschaftfrakturen. In: Schmit K-P, Towfigh H, Letsch R (Hrsg). Tscherne Unfal chirurgie. Ellenbogen, Unterarm, Hand. 1 Ellenbogen-Unteram. Berlin, Springer 2001:181−96.
3. Weckbach A, Blasttert TR. Die Untearmschaftfraktur des Erwachsenen. Unfallchirurg 2002;73:627−41.
4. Stewart RL. Forearm fractures. In: Stannard PJ, Schmidt AH, Kregor PJ (eds). Surgical treatment of orthopaedic trauma. New York, Thieme 2007:340–63.
5. Jupiter JB. AO manual of fracture management elbow and forearm. Stuttgart, Thieme 2009.
6. Catalano LW, Zlotolow DA, Hitchcock PB, et al. Surgical exposures of the radius and ulna. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2011;19:430−8.
7. Morgan SJ. Forearm fractures: Open reduction and internal fixation. In Wiss DA (ed): Fractures. Third edition. Philadelphia, Wolters Kluwer 2013:215−32.
8. Schulte LM, Meals CG, Neviaser RJ. Management of adult diaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2014;22:437−46.
9. Gaulke R. Diaphyseal fractures of the forearm. In Browner BD, Juppiter JB, Krettek Ch, Anderson PA (eds): Skeletal trauma. Philadelphia, Elsevir-Saunders 2015:1313–46.
10. Streubel PN, Pesántez RE. Diaphyseal fractures of radius and ulna. In Court-Brown CH, Heckman AD, McQueen MM, Ricci WM, Torneta P (eds). Rockwood and Green´s Fractures in Adults. 8th edition. Philadelphia, Wolters Kluwer 2015:1121−78.
11. Bartoníček J. Operační přístupy u zlomenin hlavičky a diafýzy rádia. Acta Chir. Orthop Traumatol Čech 1988;55:497−516.
12. Bartoníček J, Jehlička D, Stehlík J. Dlahová osteosyntéza zlomenin proximální poloviny diafýzy rádia. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Čech 1995;62:86−93.
13. Thompson JE. Anatomical methods of approach in operations on the long bones of the extremities. Ann Surg 1918;68:309−29.
14. Henry AK. Complete exposure of the radius. Brit J Surg 1926;13:506−8.
15. Henry AK. Exposures of long bones and other surgical methods. Bristol, Wright 1927.
16. Henry AK. Extensile exposures. Edinburgh, Livingstone 1945.
17. Müller ME, Allgöwer M, Willeneger H. Technik der operativen Frakturbehandlung. Berlin, Springer 1963.
18. Müller ME, Allgöwer M, Willeneger H. Manual der Osteosynthese. Berlin, Springer 1969.
19. Müller ME, Allgöwer M, Willeneger H, et al. Manual der Osteosynthese. Berlin, Springer 1977.
20. Müller ME, Allgöwer M, Willeneger H, et al. Manual of internal fixation. Berlin, Springer 1991.
21. Heim D. Forearm shaft fractures. In Rüedi T, Murphy WM (eds): AO principles of fracture management. New York, Thieme 2006:341−55.
22. Čech O, Stryhal F. Moderní osteosyntéza v traumatologii a ortopedii. Praha, Avicenum 1972,123−2.
23. Bartoníček J, Heřt J. Základy klinické anatomie pohybového aparátu. Praha, Maxdorf 2004.
24. Frohse F, Fränkel M. Die Muskeln des menschlichen Armes. Jena, Fischer 1908.
25. Davies F, Laird M. The supinator muscle and the deep radial (posterior interosseous) nerve. Anat Rec 1948;101:243−50.
26. Brash JC. Neuro-vascular hila of limb muscles. Edinburgh, Livingstone 1955.
27. Robson AJ, See MS, Ellis H. Applied anatomy of the superficial branch of the radial nerve. Clin Anat 2008;21:38−45.
28. Spinner RJ, Berger RA, Carmichael SW, et al. Isolated paralysis of the extensor digitorum communis associated with posterior (Thompson) approach to the proximal radius. J Hand Surg 1998;23-A:135−41.
29. Witt JD, Kamineni S. The posterior interosseous nerve and the posterolateral approach to the proximal radius. J Bone Joint Surg 1998;80-B:240−2.
30. Elgafy H, Ebraheim NA, Rezcallah AT, et al. Posterior interosseous nerve terminal branches. Clin Orthop Rel Res 2000;376:242−51.
31. Diliberti T, Botte MJ, Abrams RA. Anatomical consideration regarding the posterior interosseous nerve during posterolateal approaches to the proximal part of the radius. J Bone Joint Surg 2008;82:809−13.
32. Hoppenfeld S, deBoer P, Buckley R. Surgical exposures in orthopaedics. The anatomic approach. 4th edit. Philadelphia, Wolters Kluwer 2009.
33. Kiloh LG, Nevin S. Isolated neuritis of the anterior interosseous nerve. Brit Med J 1952;1:850−1.
34. Mekhail AO, Ebraheim NA, Jackson WT, et al. Vulnerability of the posterior interosseous nerve during proximal radius exposures. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1995;315:199−208.
35. Bartoníček J. Diafyzární zlomeniny předloktí. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Čech 2000;67:133−7.
Labels
Surgery Orthopaedics Trauma surgeryArticle was published in
Perspectives in Surgery
2015 Issue 10
Most read in this issue
- Scapular fractures
- Surgical treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation: Tension band wiring versus hook plate
- Internal fixation of radial shaft fractures: Anatomical and biomechanical principles
- Approaches to radial shaft