Urine derivation after radical cystectomy
Authors:
J. Jarabák; R. Zachoval; V. Vik
Authors‘ workplace:
Urologické oddělení Thomayerovy nemocnice, přednosta: Doc. MUDr. R. Zachoval, Ph. D.
Published in:
Rozhl. Chir., 2014, roč. 93, č. 1, s. 46-52.
Category:
Various Specialization
Overview
Introduction:
Radical cystectomy, performed both for the treatment of cancer and other conditions, needs to be followed by ensuring the derivation of urine. The aim of this work is to summarize the possibilities of urine derivation after cystectomy, their advantages, disadvantages and long-term results.
Methods:
A review article summarising relevant literature and the team of authors’ own experience.
Conclusion:
This work compares advantages and risks of different types of urine derivation following radical cystectomy.
Key words:
radical cystectomy – urine derivation – Bricker’s conduit
Sources
1. Čermák A, Pacík D, Vít V. Kontinentní a inkontinentní derivace moči, měchýř šetřící postupy. Urol List 2012;10:34–43.
2. Jarolím L. Derivace moči po cystektomii. Urol List 2008; 6:53–59.
3. Simon J. Ectopia vesicae( absence of the anterior walls of the bladder and pubis abdominal parieties); operation for directing the orifices of the ureters into the rectum; temporary success; subsequent death; autopsy. Lancet 1852;2:568–570.
4. Maydl K. Prvé případy radikálního léčení rozštěpeného měchýře. Čas Lék Čes 1894;33:337–343.
5. Pawlik K. Exstirpace močového měchýře. Čas Lek Čes 1890;29:705–706.
6. Tizzoni G, Foggi A. Die wiederherstellung der harnblase. Centralblatt für chirurgie 1888;15:921–924.
7. Lemoine G. Creation d’une vessie nouvellepar un procedure personnel apres cystectomie gorale pour cancer. J Urol Med Chir 1913;4:367.
8. Coffey RC. Physiologic implantation of the severed ureter on common bile duct into the intestine. JAMA 1911;56:397–403.
9. Coffey RC. Bilateral submucous transplantation of ureters into large intestine by tube technic. JAMA 1929;93:1529–1538.
10. Ferrit DO, Odel HM. Elektrolyte pattern of the blood after bilateral ureterosigmoidostomy. JAMA 1950;142:634–641.
11. Lapides J. Mechanism of electrolyte imbalance following ureterosigmoid transpantation. Surgery Gynekology and Obstetrics 1951;93:691–706.
12. Bricker EM. Bladder substitution after pelvic evisceration. Surg Clin North Am 1950;30:1511–1521.
13. Kock NG, Nelson AE, Norlen EL, et al. Urinary diversion via kontinent ileum reservoir. Clinical experience. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1978;49,Suppl:23–31.
14. Thürofff JW, Alken P, Riedmiller H, et al. 100 cases of Mainz-pouch (mixed augmentationęn recum for bladder augmentation and urinary diversion. Word J Urol 1985;11:179–184.
15. Goodwin WE, Winter CC, Barker WF. Cup-patch technique of ileocystoplasty for baldder enlargement or partila substitutes. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1959;108:240–244.
16. Thüroff JW, Mattiasson A, Andersen JT, et al. The standardization of terminology and assessment of functional characteristics of intestinal urinary reservoirs. Neurourol Urodynam 1996;15:499–511.
17. Schmidt J, Madersbacher S, Eberle J, et al. Long term outcome of ileal konduit urinary diversion. Eur Urol 2002;1,Suppl:160.
18. Seifert L. Die darm-siphonblase. Arch Klin Chir 1935;183: 569–574.
19. Mansson W, Lindstedt E. Elektrolyte disturbances after jejunal condiut urinary diversion. Scan J Urol Nephrol 1978;12:17–21.
20. Thüroff JW, Alken P, Riedmiller H, et al. 100 cases of Mainz-pouch. Continuing experience and evolution. J Urol 1988;140:283–288.
21. Rolland RG, Mitchell ME, Bihrle R, et al. Indiana continent urinary reservoir. J Urol 1987;137:1136–1139.
22. Lockhart JL. Remodeled right colon. An alternative irinary reservoir. J Urol 1987;138:730–734.
23. Bejany DE, Politano VA. Stapled and nonstapled tapared distal ileum for construction of a kontinent colonic urinary reservoir. J Urol 1988;140:491–494.
24. Riedmiller H, Berger R, Miller S, et al. Continent appendix stoma. A modification of the Mainz pouch technique. J Urol 1990;143:1115–1117.
25. Monti PR, Carwalho R, Dutta MA, et al. New techniques for construction of efferent konduit based upon Mitrofanoff principle. Urology 1997;49:112–115.
26. Fisch M, Wammack R, Miller SC, et al. The Mainz pouch II (sigma-rectum pouch). J Urol 1993;149:258–263.
27. Hautmann RE, Egghart R, Frohneberg D, et al. Die ileum-neoblaze. Urologe 1987;26:67–73.
28. Hautmann RE, de Petriconi R, Gottfried HW, et al. The ileal neobladder. Complication and functional results in 363 patients after 11 years of follow-up. J Urol 1999;161:422–428.
29. Studer UE, Danuser H, Merz VW, et al. Experience in 100 patients with an ileal low pressure bladder substitute combined with an afferent tubular isoperistaltis segment. J Urol 1995; 154:49–56.
30. Thurairaja R, Burkhard FC, Studer UE. Ortotopická neovezika – současný stav. Urol List 2008;6:5–12.
31. Babjuk M. Derivace moči u nemocných s nádory močového měchýře. In: Dvořáček J, Babjuk M, et al. Onkourologie 1. vyd. Praha, Galen 2005:198.
Labels
Surgery Orthopaedics Trauma surgeryArticle was published in
Perspectives in Surgery
2014 Issue 1
Most read in this issue
- Urine derivation after radical cystectomy
- Pelvic exenteration in the treatment of advanced tumours of the small pelvis
-
Is thyroid and parathyroid surgery safe?
Is it suitable for one-day surgery? - Biliary stent as a cause of bowel obstruction