The impact of age and gender on scores in the VHI-30 and VHI-10 questionnaires
Authors:
Žofia Frajková 1,2; A. Križeková 2; V. Miššíková 2; Miroslav Tedla 1
Authors‘ workplace:
Klinika otorinolaryngológie, chirurgie hlavy a krku LF UK a UNB, Bratislava
1; Katedra logopédie, Pedagogická fakulta Univerzity Komenského v Bratislave
2
Published in:
Otorinolaryngol Foniatr, 69, 2020, No. 2, pp. 75-81.
Category:
Original Article
Overview
Introduction: Assessing quality of life is part of a comprehensive assessment of voice. The aim of this study is to adapt the original version of Voice Handicap Index to Slovak language, to analyze the impact of age and gender on the score in the VHI-30 questionnaire and its shortened version, VHI-10, and to create degrees of impaired quality of life according to the score.
Material and Methods: Fifty-two patients with voice disorder and one hundred and four participants without voice disorder were enrolled. Each participant of study completed a VHI-30 questionnaire. The effect of age on the score was evaluated by calculating the Spearman coefficient. Data from healthy respondents over the age range of 20 to 60 years were used. The impact of gender on patient scores was evaluated using the Wilcoxon test. By calculating percentile values, the degrees of impact of voice disorder on quality of life were defined.
Results: Statistical analysis showed a non-significant effect of age on scores in the VHI--30 (ρ = 0.04; p = 0.68) and VHI-10 questionnaires (ρ = 0.33; p = 0.74). It indicates that age has no significant impact on VHI scores. There are no statistically significant differences in total scores of VHI-30 (W = 1 282; p = 0.64) and VHI-10 (W = 1 328.5; p = 0.87) between the genders. The degree of impairment of quality of life can be determined as acceptable, mild, moderate or severe according to the scores in the questionnaires.
Conclusion: Age and gender have non-significant effect on scores in the VHI-30 and VHI-10 questionnaires.
Keywords:
Quality of life – voice disorder – Voice Handicap Index
Sources
1. Behlau, M., Dos Santos, L. M. A., Oliveira, G.: Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the voice handicap index into Brazilian Portuguese. J Voice, 25, 2011, 3, s. 354–359.
2. Dejonckere, P. H., Bradley, P., Clemente, P., et al.: A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of (phonosurgical) treatments and evaluating new assessment techniques. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 258, 2001, 2, s. 77–82.
3. Dejonckere, P. H.: Assessment of voice and respiratory function. In: Remacle M., Eckel H. (eds). Surgery of Larynx and Trachea. Berlin, Springer, 2010, s. 11–26.
4. Frostová, J., Lejska, M.: Hodnocení kvality hlasu pomocí DSI (Dysphonia Severity Index). Otorinolaryngol Foniatr, 63, 2014, 1, s. 10–15.
5. Helidoni, M. E., Murry, T., Moschandreas, J., et al.: Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the voice handicap index into Greek. J Voice, 24, 2010, 2, s. 221–227.
6. Jacobson, B. H., Johnson, A., Grywalski, C., et al.: The voice handicap index (VHI) development and validation. Am J Speech Lang Pathol, 6, 1997, 3, s. 66–70.
7. Jaruchinda, P., Suwanwarangkool, T.: Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Voice Handicap Index into Thai. J Med Assoc Thai, 98, 2015, 12, s. 1199–1208.
8. Karlsen, T., Grieg, A. R. H., Heimdal, J. H., et al.: Cross-cultural adaption and translation of the voice handicap index into Norwegian. Folia Phoniatr Logop, 64, 2012, 5, s. 234–240.
9. Križeková, A.: Validizácia slovenskej verzie dotazníka Voice Handicap Index. Diplomová práca (Mgr.). Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, Pedagogická fakulta, Katedra logopédie, 2019.
10. Matějková, M., Mrázková, E., Richterová, K., et al.: Hlasové potíže obyvatel Moravskoslezského kraje. Prac Lék, 64, 2012, 2–3, s. 78–85.
11. Moradi, N., Pourshahbaz, A., Soltani, M., et al.: Cutoff point at voice handicap index used to screen voice disorders among persian speakers. J Voice, 27, 2013, 1, s. 130–e1.
12. Niebudek-Bogusz, E., Kuzańska, A., Woznicka, E., et al.: Assessment of the Voice Handicap Index as a screening tool in dysphonic patients. Folia Phoniatr Logop, 63, 2011, 5, s. 269–272.
13. Núñez-Battala, F., Corte-Santos, P., Señaris-González, B., et al.: Adaptation and validation to the Spanish of the Voice Handicap Index (VHI-30) and its shortened version (VHI-10). Acta Otorrinolaryngol Esp, 58, 2007, 9, s. 386–392.
14. Ohlsson, A., Dotevall, H.: Voice handicap index in Swedish. Logop Phoniatr Voco, 34, 2009, 2, s. 60–66.
15. Post, M. W.: Definitions of quality of life: what has happened and how to move on. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehab, 20, 2014, 3, s. 167–180.
16. Schindler, A., Ottaviani, F., Mozzanica, F. et al.: Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Voice Handicap Index into Italian. J Voice, 24, 2010, 6, s. 708–714.
17. Sotirović, J., Grgurević, A., Mumović, G., et al.: Adaptation and validation of the Voice Handicap Index (VHI)-30 into Serbian. J Voice, 30, 2016, 6, s. 758, e751–758, e756.
18. Staněk, P.: Hodnocení reedukace hlasu po operaci benigních útvarů hlasivek. Otorinolaryngol Foniatr, 61, 2012, 1, s. 13–22.
19. Škvrňáková, J., Praisler, J., Lukášková, P.: Assessment of voice disorders in patients with laryngeal diseases. Cent Eur J Nurs Midw, 5, 2014; 2, s. 78–84.
20. Švec, J., Lejska, M., Frostová, J., et al.: Česká verze dotazníku Voice Handicap Index pro kvantitativní hodnocení hlasových potíží vnímaných pacientem. Otorinolaryngol Foniatr, 58, 2009, 3, s. 132–139.
21. Trinite, B., Sokolovs, J.: Adaptation and validation of the Voice Handicap Index in Latvian. J Voice, 28, 2014, 4, s. 452–457.
22. Van Gogh, C. L., Mahieu, H. F., Kuik, D. J., et al.: Voice in early glottic cancer to benign voice pathology. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 264, 2007, 9, s. 1033–1038.
23. Zábrodský, M., Chovanec, M., Fík, Z., et al.: Změny ve VKG obrazu a objektivní hlasové analýze při aplikaci minimálně invazivních technologií a NM v chirurgii štítné žlázy. Otorinolaryngol Foniatr, 61, 2012, 3, 148–161.
Labels
Audiology Paediatric ENT ENT (Otorhinolaryngology)Article was published in
Otorhinolaryngology and Phoniatrics
2020 Issue 2
Most read in this issue
- Measurement of oropharyngeal pH in the diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux
- COVID-19 from the point of view of an otorhinolaryngologist, an overview of the situation two months after the first cases of infection in our countries; evidence based
- Cervical hematoma caused by parathyroid adenoma
- Cone-beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) of temporal bone after cochlear implantation – first experiences