#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Conspiracy theories as a natural part of pandemics


Authors: Vojtěch Pišl 1;  Jan Vevera- 1 3
Authors‘ workplace: Psychiatrická klinika LF UK a FN Plzeň 1;  Katedra psychiatrie IPVZ, Praha 2;  Psychiatrická klinika 1. LF UK a VFN v Praze 3
Published in: Čas. Lék. čes. 2021; 160: 37-39
Category: News

Overview

Effectiveness of the policy measures against the COVID-19 pandemic is reduced by spread of conspiracy theories. Moreover, conspiracy theories induce opposition to vaccines. The text shows that increased occurrence of conspiracy theories is a typical public reaction to a disaster and describes some of the mechanisms contributing to susceptibility to conspiracy explanations on the individual as well as societal level.

Keywords:

catastrophe – conspiracy theories – coronavirus – medical psychology – pandemics


Sources
  1. World Health Organization. Situation Report 13. WHO, 2020. Dostupné na: www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200202-sitrep-13-ncov-v3.pdf?sfvrsn=195f4010_6
  2. Douglas KM, Uscinski JE, Sutton RM et al. Understanding conspiracy theories. Polit Psychol 2019; 40: 3–35.
  3. Kowalski J, Marchlewska, M, Molenda Z et al. Adherence to safety and self-isolation guidelines, conspiracy and paranoia-like beliefs during COVID-19 pandemic in Poland - associations and moderators. Psychiatry Res 2020; 294: 113540.
  4. Duplaga M. The determinants of conspiracy beliefs related to the COVID-19 pandemic in a nationally representative sample of internet users. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17: 7818.
  5. Romer D, Jamieson KH. Conspiracy theories as barriers to controlling the spread of COVID-19 in the U.S. Soc Sci Med 2020; 263: 113356.
  6. Jolley D, Douglas KM. The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions. PLoS ONE 2014; 9: e89177.
  7. Hornsey MJ, Finlayson M, Chatwood G, Begeny CT. Donald Trump and vaccination: the effect of political identity, conspiracist ideation and presidential tweets on vaccine hesitancy J Exp Soc Psychol 2020; 88: 103947.
  8. Lazarus JV, Ratzan SC, Palayew A et al. A global survey of potential acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine. Nat Med 2021; 7: 225–228.
  9. National Pandemic Alarm. Representative survey monitoring public opinion, emotions and experience with novelty corona virus spread in five Central European countries. NPA, 2021. Dostupné na: www.nationalpandemicalarm.eu/en/2021-01-29?index=vaccination#global-timeline-index-wrapper
  10. Robinson E, Jones A, Lesser I, Daly M. International estimates of intended uptake and refusal of COVID-19 vaccines: A rapid systematic review and meta-analysis of large nationally representative samples [preprint]. medRxiv 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.01.20241729.
  11. Pennycook G, McPhetres J, Bago B, Rand D. Predictors of attitudes and misperceptions about COVID-19 in Canada, the U.K., and the U.S.A. [preprint] Psyarxiv 2020, doi:10.31234/osf.io/zhjkp.
  12. Cheng C. To be paranoid is the standard? Panic responses to SARS outbreak in the Hong Kong special administrative region. Asian Perspect 2004; 28: 67-98.
  13. Smallman S. Whom do you trust? Doubt and conspiracy theories in the 2009 influenza pandemic. Inter Global Studies 2015; 6: 1-24.
  14. Townshend I, Awosoga O, Kulig J, HaiYan F. Social cohesion and resilience across communities that have experienced a disaster. Nat Hazards 2015; 76: 913–938.
  15. Sullivan G. Disasters, Overview. In: Teo T (ed.): Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology. Springer Science + Business Media, New York, 2014: 445-448.
  16. Vevera J, Hrubý J. Práce s oběťmi katastrof. In: Papežová H (ed.). Naléhavé stavy v psychiatrii. Maxdorf, Praha, 2014: 123-132.
  17. Vevera J, Černý M. Truchlení. In: Papežová H (ed.). Naléhavé stavy v psychiatrii. Maxdorf, Praha, 2014: 109-122.
  18. Speis PD, Andreadakis E, Diakakis M et al. Psychosocial vulnerability and demographic characteristics in extreme flash floods: the case of Mandra 2017 flood in Greece. Int J Diast Risk Re 2019; 41: 101285.
  19. Park CL. Making sense of the meaning literature: an integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events. Psychol Bull 2010; 136: 257–301.
  20. Miller BL. Science denial and COVID conspiracy theories potential neurological mechanisms and possible responses. JAMA 2020; 324: 2255-2256.
  21. Stroud NJ. Selective exposure theories. In: Kenski K, Jamieson KH (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication. Oxford University Press, 2014: 531-548.
  22. Kunda Z. The case for motivated reasoning. Psych Bul 1990; 108: 480–498.
  23. Klapper JT. The effects of mass communication. Free Press, Glencoe, 1960.
  24. Hart W, Albarracin D, Eagly AH et al. Feeling validated versus being correct: a meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psychol Bull 2009; 135: 555–588.
  25. Taber CS, Lodge M. Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. Am J Polit Sci 2006; 50: 755–Z69.
  26. Zaumseil M, Schwarz S. Understandings of coping: a critical review of coping theories for disaster contexts. In: Zaumseil M, Schwarz S, von Vacano M, Sullivan GB, Prawitasari-Hadiyono JE (eds.). Cultural Psychology of Coping With Disasters: The case of an earthquake in Java, Indonesia. Springer Science + Business Media, New York, 2014: 45–83.
  27. Swami V, Furnham A. Preliminary examination of the psychometric properties of the Psychiatric Scepticism Scale. Scand J Psychol 2011; 52: 399–403.
  28. Jasinskaja-Lahti I, Jetten J. Unpacking the relationship between religiosity and conspiracy beliefs in Australia. B J Soc Psychol 2019; 58: 938–954.
  29. Imhoff R, Bruder M. Speaking (un-)truth to power: conspiracy mentality as a generalized political attitude. Eur J Personality 2014; 28: 25-43.
  30. Wood M, Douglas KM, Sutton RM. Dead and alive: beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories. Soc Psychol Personal Sci 2012; 3: 767-773.
  31. Douglas KM, Sutton RM, Callan MJ et al. Someone is pulling the strings: hypersensitive agency detection and belief in conspiracy theories. Think Reason 2016; 22: 57-77.
  32. Imhoff R, Lamberty PK. Too special to be duped: need for uniqueness motivates conspiracy beliefs. Eur J Soc Psychol 2017; 47: 724–734.
  33. Lincoln T, Peter N, Schäfer M, Moritz S. Impact of stress on paranoia. Psychol Med 2009; 39: 1129–1139.
  34. Kesting, ML, Bredenpohl M, Klenke J et al. The impact of social stress on self-esteem and paranoid ideation. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 2013; 44: 122-128.
  35. Grzesiak-Feldman M. The effect of high-anxiety situations on conspiracy thinking. Curr Psychol 2013; 32: 100–118.
  36. Mani A, Mullainathan S, Shafir E, Zhao J. Poverty impedes cognitive function. Science 2013; 341: 976–980.
  37. Oliver-Smith A. What is a disaster? Anthropological perspectives on a persistent question. In: Oliver-Smith A, Hoffman S (eds.). The Angry Earth: Disaster in Anthropological Perspective. Routledge, London, 1999: 18–34.
  38. World Health Organization. Health literacy: the solid facts. WHO, 2015. Dostupné na: www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/190655/e96854.pdf
Labels
Addictology Allergology and clinical immunology Angiology Audiology Clinical biochemistry Dermatology & STDs Paediatric gastroenterology Paediatric surgery Paediatric cardiology Paediatric neurology Paediatric ENT Paediatric psychiatry Paediatric rheumatology Diabetology Pharmacy Vascular surgery Pain management Dental Hygienist

Article was published in

Journal of Czech Physicians

Issue 1

2021 Issue 1

Most read in this issue
Topics Journals
Login
Forgotten password

Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.

Login

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#