Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in employees of the National Institute of Public Health in the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Czech Republic, April-May 2020
Authors:
H. Orlíková; H. Zákoucká; A. Fialová; R. Limberková; M. Malý; H. Jiřincová; J. Kynčl; P. Rainetová; M. Špačková; A. Kubátová; M. Chaloupka; I. Vodičková; B. Macková
Authors‘ workplace:
Státní zdravotní ústav, Praha, Ředitelka: MUDr. Barbora Macková
Published in:
Prakt. Lék. 2021; 101(3): 160-168
Category:
Of different specialties
Overview
In the Czech Republic, the first wave of the COVID-19 epidemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, occurred in the spring of 2020, peaking at the end of March. From March 1st to May 31st, a total of 9,230 people tested positive by PCR were detected. We assessed the prevalence of COVID-19 infections in employees of the National Institute of Public Health at the end of the first wave by detecting specific antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. Voluntary testing for the presence of IgA and IgG antibodies was performed by ELISA tests using Euroimmun SARS-CoV-2 IgA and Euroimmun SARS-CoV-2 IgG semi-quantitative commercial assays. The participants answered a questionnaire regarding symptoms of an acute respiratory infection in the last quarter and known contact with COVID-19 infection. A total of 78 out of 270 persons (29%) experienced symptoms of acute respiratory infection, 7 (2.6%) lost the olfactory sense or taste and 15 (5.6%) were in contact with an infected person.
The first sampling was performed between April 6th and May 22nd, 2020. A total of 270 employees were tested, of which 224 (83%) were women. The IgA and IgG antibodies SARS-CoV-2 were positive or borderline in 31 subjects. The second sample was taken from 30 of them and the third sample was from taken two persons several weeks apart. Based on the dynamics of the antibodies, 10 (3.7% of the whole group) were evaluated as seropositive, in whom we indirectly infer a past SARS-CoV-2 infection. A total of 246 people had negative serology (of which 239 based on the first sample and 7 based on the second one). In 14 people it was not possible to determine whether an infection occurred, i.e. the result was evaluated as inconclusive. The positive association of persistent seroconversion in the symptomatic subjects compared to the asymptomatic ones was statistically insignificant with a relative risk of 1.61 (95% CI: 0.47–5.54), p = 0.449.
Keywords:
SARS-CoV-2 – antibodies anti SARS-CoV-2 IgA, IgG – seroprevalence – COVID-19 – seroepidemiological study
Sources
1. Backer JA, Klinkenberg D, Wallinga J. Incubation period of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infections among travellers from Wuhan, China, 20–28 January 2020. Euro Surveill 2020; 25(5): 2000062.
2. Baron RC, Risch L, Weber M, et al. Frequency of serological non-responders and false-negative RT-PCR results in SARS-CoV-2 testing: a population-based study. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020; 58(12): 2131–2140.
3. Bartovská Z, Andrle F, Beran O, et al. Data from the first wave of COVID-19 from the Central Military Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic. Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol 2020; 69(4): 164–171.
4. Callow KA, Parry HF, Sergeant M, Tyrrell DA. The time course of the immune response to experimental coronavirus infection of man. Epidemiol Infect 1990; 105(2): 435–446.
5. Dušek L. Studie SARS-CoV-2-CZ-Preval. Prezentace z tiskové konference MZ ČR, 6. 5. 2020 (online). Dostupné z: https://covid-imunita.uzis.cz/res/file/prezentace/20200506-dusek.pdf (cit. 2021-05-15).
6. Fischer B, Knabbe C, Vollmer T. SARS-CoV-2 IgG seroprevalence in blood donors located in three different federal states, Germany, March to June 2020. Euro Surveill 2020; 25(28): 2001285.
7. Fu L, Wang B, Yuan T, et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect 2020; 80(6): 656–665.
8. Grant JJ, Wilmore SMS, McCann NS, et al. Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in healthcare workers at a London NHS Trust. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2021; 42(2): 212–214.
9. Gudbjartsson DF, Norddahl GL, Melsted P, et al. Humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2 in Iceland. N Engl J Med 2020; 383(18): 1724–1734.
10. Guo L, Ren L, Yang S, et al. Profiling early humoral response to diagnose novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Clin Infect Dis 2020; 71(15): 778–785.
11. Herroelen PH, Martens GA, De Smet D, et al. Humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2: comparative clinical performance of seven commercial serology tests. Am J Clin Pathol 2020; 154(5): 610–619.
12. Kellam P, Barclay W. The dynamics of humoral immune responses following SARS-CoV-2 infection and the potential for reinfection. J Gen Virol 2020; 101(8): 791–797.
13. Krátká Z, Fürst T, Vencálek O, a kol. Průzkumný vrt: jak správně připravit, provést a vyhodnotit séroprevalenční studii. Čas. Lék. čes. 2020; 159: 217–225.
14. Li LQ, Huang T, Wang YQ, et al. COVID‐19 patients’ clinical characteristics, discharge rate, and fatality rate of meta‐analysis. J Med Virol 2020; 92(6): 577–583.
15. Long QX, Tang XJ, Shi QL, et al. Clinical and immunological assessment of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections. Nat Med 2020; 26(8): 1200–1204.
16. Long QX, Liu BZ, Deng HJ, et al. Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19. Nat Med 2020; 26(6): 845–848.
17. Malickova K, Kratka Z, Luxova S, et al. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing in IBD healthcare professionals: are we currently able to provide COVID-free IBD clinics? Scand J Gastroenterol 2020; 55(8): 917–919.
18. Marklund E, Leach S, Axelsson H, et al. Serum-IgG responses to SARS-CoV-2 after mild and severe COVID-19 infection and analysis of IgG non-responders. PloS One 2020; 15(10): e0241104.
19. Peeling RW, Wedderburn CJ, Garcia PJ, et al. Serology testing in the COVID-19 pandemic response. Lancet Infect Dis 2020: 20(9): e245–e249.
20. Pollán M, Pérez-Gómez B, Pastor-Barriuso R, et al. Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in Spain (ENE-COVID): a nationwide, population-based seroepidemiological study. Lancet 2020; 396(10250): 535-544.
21. Zhao J, Yuan Q, Wang H, et al. Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with novel coronavirus disease 2019. Clin Infect Dis 2020; 71(16): 2027–2034.
Labels
General practitioner for children and adolescents General practitioner for adultsArticle was published in
General Practitioner
2021 Issue 3
Most read in this issue
- How to (correctly) process and publish case report from clinical practice?
- Our experience with the use of NPWT methods and their availability
- Lingua geographica in the general practitioner’s surgery
- Clinical course of COVID-19 in a high-risk patient