#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Current role of endoscopic ultrasound investigation in the diagnosis of pancreatic diseases – our experiences


Authors: T. Krechler;  M. Dvořák;  T. Švestka
Authors‘ workplace: Přednosta: prof. MUDr. Aleš Žák, DrSc. ;  4. interní klinika 1. LF UK a VFN Praha
Published in: Prakt. Lék. 2012; 92(1): 35-39
Category: Of different specialties

Overview

The diagnosis of pancreatic diseases is still problematic. Non-invasive methods in diagnosis are the most important :

  • abdominal ultrasound,
  • computerised tomography,
  • magnetic resonance,
  • positron emission tomography.
Endoscopic ultrasound combines both the endoscope and ultrasound investigation. This special examination plays a crucial role in the differential diagnosis in the specific cases of pancreatic diseases. Between October 2008 and October 2011 in our department (Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Hospital in Prague) we carried out 720 investigations using endoscopic ultrasound with one-dimensional ultrasound probe:
  • 156 patients (21.6 %) had been diagnosed with chronic pancreatitis (or suspicion),
  • 148 patients (20.5 %) had pancreatic cancer (or suspicion), and
  • 49 patients (6.8 %) had cystic tumour of the pancreas (or suspicion).
Only 122 patients (16.9 %) had normal endoscopic ultrasound findings.

According to our results, endoscopic ultrasound has an irreplaceable role primarily in the
  • differential diagnosis of focal lesions,
  • diagnosis of small lesions of the pancreas,
  • and early diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis.
Endoscopic ultrasound is a special “expert dependent” method, and it is imperative that it is performed in specialised and experienced departments.

Key words:
differential diagnosis, endoscopic ultrasound, pancreatic cancer, chronic pancreatitis, cystic tumour of the pancreas


Sources

1. Napoleon, B., Dumortier, R., Kerien-Souquet, O. et al. Do normal findings at biliary endoscopic ultrasongraphy obviate the need for endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patiens with suspicion of common bile duct stone? A prospective follow-up study of 238 patients. Endoscopy 2003, 35, p. 411-415.

2. Catalano, M.F., Sahai, A., Levy, M. et al. EUS-based criteria for the diagnosis of chronic panceatitis: the Rosemont classification. Gastrointestal. Endosc. 2009, 69, p. 1251-1261.

3. Buscail, I., Escourrou, J., Moreau, J. et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography in chronic pancreatitis: a comparative prospective study with conventional ultrasonography, computed tomography, and ERCP. Pancreas 1995, 10, p. 251-257.

4. Sahai, A.V., Zimmermann, M., Aabakken, L. et al. Prospective assessment of the ability of endoscopic ultrasound to diagnose, exclude, or establish the severity of chronic pancreatitis found by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1998, 48, p. 18-25.

5. Nakaizumi, A., Uehara, H., Iishi, H. et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography in diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer. Dig. Dis. Sci. 1995, 40, p. 696-700.

6. Palazzo, I., Roseau, G., Gayet, B. et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Results of a prospective study with comparison to ultrasonography and CT scan. Endoscopy 1993, 25, p. 143-150.

7. Yasuda, K., Mukai, H., Nakajima, M. et al. Staging of pancreatic carcinoma by endoscopic ultrasonography. Endoscopy 1993, 25, p. 151-155.

8. Gress, F.G., Hawes, R.H., Savides, S.J. et al. Role of EUS in the preoperative staging of pancreatic cancer: a large single-center experience. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1999, 50, p. 786-791.

9. Morris-Stiff, G., Ascopel, X., Barry, J.D. et al. Selective use of endoscopic ultrasound in the evaluation of carcinomas of the pancreatic head. Dig. Surg. 2011, 28, p. 373-378.

10. Catanzaro, A., Richardson, S., Veloso, H. et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with clinically indeterminance suspicion of pancreatic cancer and normal EUS. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2003, 58, p. 836-840.

11. Klapkan, J.B., Chang, K.J., Lee, J.G., Nguyen P. Negative predictive value of endoscopic ultrasound in a large series of patiens with a clinical suspicion of pancreatic cancer. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2005, 100, p. 2658-2661.

12. Canto, M.I., Coggins, M., Hruban, RH. et al. Screening for early pancreatic neoplasia in high-risk individuals: a prospective controlled study. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2006, 4, p. 766-781.

13. Poley, J.W., Kluijt, I., Gouma, D.J. et al. The yield of first-time endoscopic ultrasonography in screening individuals at high risk to develop pancreatic cancer. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2009, 104, 2175-2181.

14. Kliment, M., Urban, O., Cegan, M. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound - guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses: utility and impact on managment of patients. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2010, 45, 1372-1379.

15. Mallery, J.S., Centeno, B.A., Hahn, P.F. et al. Pancreatic tissue sampling guided by EUS, CT/US, and Surgery: a comparison of sensitivity and specificity. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2002, 56, p. 218-224.

16. Chang, K.J., Nguyen, P., Ericsson, R.A. et al. The clinical utility of endoscopic ultrasound - guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic carcinoma. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1997, 45, p. 387-393.

Labels
General practitioner for children and adolescents General practitioner for adults
Topics Journals
Login
Forgotten password

Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.

Login

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#