1. EASL. EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver dis ease. J Hepatol 2016; 64 (6): 1388–1402. doi: 10.1007/s00125-016-3910-y.
2. Calori G, Lattuada G, Ragogna F et al. Fatty liver index and mortality: the cremona study in the 15th year of fol low-up. Hepatology 2011; 54 (1): 145–152. doi: 10.1002/hep.24356.
3. Haldar D, Kern B, Hodson J et al. Outcomes of liver transplantation for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: a European liver transplant registry study. J Hepatol 2019; 71 (2): 313–322. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.04.011.
4. EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver dis ease (MASLD). J Hepatol 2024; S0168-8278 (24) 00329-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2024.04.031.
5. Yki-Järvinen H. Non-alcoholic fatty liver dis ease as a cause and a consequence of metabolic syndrome. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2014; 2 (11): 901–910. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587 (14) 70032-4.
6. Eslam M, Valenti L, Romeo S. Genetics and epigenetics of NAFLD and NASH: clinical impact. J Hepatol 2018; 68 (2): 268–279. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.09.003.
7. Romeo S, Kozlitina J, Xing C et al. Genetic variation in PNPLA3 confers susceptibility to nonalcoholic fatty liver dis ease. Nat Genet 2008; 40 (12): 1461–1465. doi: 10.1038/ng.257.
8. Kozlitina J, Smagris E, Stender S et al. Exome-wide association study identifies a TM6SF2 variant that confers susceptibility to nonalcoholic fatty liver dis ease. Nat Genet 2014; 46 (4): 352–356. doi: 10.1038/ng.2901.
9. Wang Y, Kory N, BasuRay S et al. PNPLA3, CGI-58, and inhibition of hepatic triglyceride hydrolysis in mice. Hepatology 2019; 69 (6): 2427–2441. doi: 10.1002/hep.30583.
10. Borén J, Adiels M, Björnson E et al. Effects of TM6SF2 E167K on hepatic lipid and very low-density lipoprotein metabolism in humans. JCI Insight 2020; 5 (24): e144079. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.144079.
11. Valenti L, Al-Serri A, Daly AK et al. Homozygosity for the patatin-like phospholipase-3/adiponutrin I148M polymorphism influences liver fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver dis ease. Hepatology 2010; 51 (4): 1209–1217. doi: 10.1002/hep.23622.
12. Rotman Y, Koh C, Zmuda JM et al. The association of genetic variability in patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein 3 (PNPLA3) with histological severity of nonalcoholic fatty liver dis ease. Hepatology 2010; 52 (3): 894–903. doi: 10.1002/hep.23759.
13. Dongiovanni P, Petta S, Maglio C et al. Transmembrane 6 superfamily member 2 gene variant disentangles nonalcoholic steatohepatitis from cardiovascular dis ease. Hepatology 2015; 61 (2): 506–514. doi: 10.1002/hep.27490.
14. Koo BK, Joo SK, Kim D et al. Additive effects of PNPLA3 and TM6SF2 on the histological severity of non-alcoholic fatty liver dis ease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 33 (6): 1277–1285. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14056.
15. Ekstedt M, Hagström H, Nasr P et al. Fi brosis stage is the strongest predictor for dis ease-specific mortality in NAFLD after up to 33 years of fol low-up. Hepatology 2015; 61 (5): 1547–1554. doi: 10.1002/hep.27368.
16. Liu Y, Zhong GC, Tan HY et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver dis ease and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular dis ease, and cancer: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2019; 9 (1): 11124. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47687-3.
17. Söderberg C, Stål P, Askling J et al. Decreased survival of subjects with elevated liver function tests during a 28-year fol low-up. Hepatology 2010; 51 (2): 595–602. doi: 10.1002/hep.23314.
18. Gellert-Kristensen H, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Nordestgaard BG et al. Genetic risk of fatty liver dis ease and mortality in the general population: a Mendelian randomization study. Liver Int 2023; 43 (9): 1955–1965. doi: 10.1111/liv.15629.
19. Käräjämäki AJ, Hukkanen J, Kauma H et al. Metabolic syndrome but not genetic polymorphisms known to induce NAFLD predicts in creased total mortality in subjects with NAFLD (OPERA study). Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2020; 80 (2): 106–113. doi: 10.1080/00365513.2019.1700428.
20. Hejlova I, Honsova E, Sticova E et al. Prevalence and risk factors of steatosis after liver transplantation and patient outcomes. Liver Transplant 2016; 22 (5): 644–655. doi: 10.1002/lt.24393.
21. Mikova I, Neroldova M, Hubacek JA et al. Donor PNPLA3 and TM6SF2 variant alleles confer additive risks for graft steatosis after liver transplantation. Transplantation 2020; 104 (3): 526–534. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002876.
22. Trunecka P, Mikova I, Dlouha D et al. Donor PNPLA3 rs738409 genotype is a risk factor for graft steatosis. A post-transplant biopsy-based study. Dig Liver Dis 2018; 50 (5): 490–495. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.12.030.
23. Kleiner DE, Brunt EM, Van Natta M et al. Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver dis ease. Hepatology 2005; 41 (6): 1313–1321. doi: 10.1002/hep.20701.
24. Krawczyk M, Rau M, Schattenberg JM et al. Combined effects of the PNPLA3 rs738409, TM6SF2 rs58542926, and MBOAT7 rs641738 variants on NAFLD severity: a multicenter biopsy--based study. J Lipid Res 2017; 58 (1): 247–255. doi: 10.1194/jlr.P067454.
25. Speliotes EK, Butler JL, Palmer CD et al. PNPLA3 variants specifically confer increased risk for histologic nonalcoholic fatty liver dis ease but not metabolic dis ease. Hepatology 2010; 52 (3): 904–912. doi: 10.1002/hep.23768.
26. Anstee QM, Darlay R, Cockell S et al. Genome-wide association study of non-alcoholic fatty liver and steatohepatitis in a histological ly characterised cohort. J Hepatol 2020; 73 (3): 505–515. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.04.003.
27. Zain SM, Mohamed R, Mahadeva S et al. A multi-ethnic study of a PNPLA3 gene variant and its association with dis ease severity in non-alcoholic fatty liver dis ease. Hum Genet 2012; 131 (7): 1145–1152. doi: 10.1007/s00439-012-1141-y.
28. Targher G, Byrne CD, Lonardo A et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver dis ease and risk of incident cardiovascular dis ease: a meta-analysis. J Hepatol 2016; 65 (3): 589–600. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.05.013.
29. Xia M, Ma S, Huang Q et al. NAFLD-related gene polymorphisms and all-cause and cause-specific mortality in an Asian population: the Shanghai Changfeng Study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2022; 55 (6): 705–721. doi: 10.1111/apt.16772.
30. Roberts MS, Angus DC, Bryce CL et al. Survival after liver transplantation in the United States: a dis ease-specific analysis of the UNOS database. Liver Transpl 2004; 10 (7): 886–897. doi: 10.1002/lt.20137.
31. Dumortier J, Guillaud O, Adham M et al. Negative impact of de novo malignancies rather than alcohol relapse on survival after liver transplantation for alcoholic cirrhosis: a retrospective analysis of 305 patients in a single center. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102 (5): 1032–1041. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01079.x.
32. Burra P, Senzolo M, Adam R et al. Liver transplantation for alcoholic liver dis ease in Europe: a study from the ELTR (European Liver Transplant Registry). Am J Transplant 2010; 10 (1): 138–148. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009. 2869.x.
33. Belli LS, Perricone G, Adam R et al. Impact of DAAs on liver transplantation: major effects on the evolution of indications and results. An ELITA study based on the ELTR registry. J Hepatol 2018; 69 (4): 810–817. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.06.010.
ORCID autorů
I. Míková 0000-0001-7928-7558,
M. Neřoldová 0000-0002-3792-9564,
M. Jirsa 0000-0001-7300-6735,
J. Mareš 0000-0002-4727-3685,
P. Trunečka 0000-0002-4753-4419.
Doručeno/Submitted: 28. 7. 2024
Přijato/Accepted: 1. 8. 2024
Korespondenční autorka
MUDr. Mgr. Irena Míková
Klinika hepatogastroenterologie
Institut klinické a experimentální medicíny
Vídeňská 1958/9
140 21 Praha 4
irena.mikova@ikem.cz