Epidermolytická hyperkeratóza vulvy asociovaná s bazocelulárním karcinomem u pacientky s vaginálním condyloma acuminatum a vaginální intraepiteliální neoplazií infikovanými HPV typu 42
:
Denisa Kacerovská 1,2; Michal Michal 1,2; Jana Kašpírková 2; Dmitry V. Kazakov 1,2
:
Šikl’s Department of Pathology, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine in
Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic
1; Bioptic Laboratory, Pilsen, Czech Republic
2
:
Čes.-slov. Patol., 50, 2014, No. 2, p. 92-94
:
Original Article
Výskyt bazocelulárního karcinomu vulvy je vzácný. Autoři popisují případ 79-leté ženy s anamnézou vaginálního condyloma acuminatum a vaginální intraepiteliální neoplazie 3 (VaIN 3), která měla solitární lézi bělavé barvy s centrální deskvamací, velikosti 8x5 mm v oblasti velkého labia vulvy vpravo. Histopatologické vyšetření prokázalo typický obraz superficiálního a nodulárního bazocelulárního karcinomu. Navíc zde byla přítomná nápadná mnohočetná ložiska epidermolytické hyperkeratózy. Tato ložiska se nacházela v místě superficiálního bazocelulárního karcinomu anebo byla ostře ohraničena od tumoru. Retrospektivní molekulárně biologické vyšetření prokázalo infekci lidskými papilomaviry typu 42, a to jak ve vzorku pocházejícího z vaginálního condyloma acuminatum, tak z VaIN 3, nikoliv však z bazocelulárního karcinomu spojeného s epidermolytickou hyperkeratózou. Podle našich nejlepších znalostí postižení ženského genitálního systému epidermolytickou hyperkeratózou je velmi vzácné s dosud 6 publikovanými případy. Znalost výskytu epidermolytické hyperkeratózy v této oblasti a jeho správné rozpoznání je důležité, neboť může být nesprávně interpretované jako viry způsobená léze.
Klíčová slova:
vulva – bazocelulární karcinom – epidermolytická hyperkeratóza – lidský papilomavirus
Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and epidermolytic hyperkeratosis (EH) are both rare in the vulva. We are reporting on an unusual case of BCC carcinoma associated with epidermolytic hyperkeratosis involving the lower female genital tract, a previously unreported event in a patient who also had other lesions in the lower female genital tract, including condyloma acuminatum and vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia.
CASE REPORT
A 79-year-old woman presented with a solitary whitish lesion sized 8 x 5 mm with a central desquamation located on the right labium majus. Histopathologic examination revealed a typical superficial and nodular BCC (Fig. 1A). Additionally, there were multiple remarkable foci of epidermolytic hyperkeratosis composed of cells with cytoplasmic clearing and amphophilic fibrillar material in the lower spinous layer and coarse keratohyaline granules and eosinophilic globules in the upper spinous layer accompanied with compact hyperkeratosis. These foci both merged with superficial BCC or were sharply demarcated from the tumor (Fig. 1B).
The patient´s medical history included an excision of an intravaginal condyloma acuminatum two years ago (Fig. 2B) and a focus of vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia 3 (VaIN 3) from a vaginal vault examined a year ago (Fig. 2C). There was no history of radiotherapy of the pelvic region, immunosuppression or previous trauma in the vulvar region (such as a burn). A retrospective molecular-biological examination performed by PCR and sequencing using general GP5+/6+, and HPV type-specific primers of all the available material revealed HPV type 42 in both the condyloma acuminatum and VaIN 3 specimen retrospectively, but not in the BCC associated with EH.
DISCUSSION
Epidermolytic hyperkeratosis (EH) is an abnormality of epidermal maturation characterized by compact hyperkeratosis, accompanied by granular and vacuolar degeneration of the cells of the spinous and granular layers (1). It may be a congenital or an acquired defect and usually is most commonly identified as a small incidental focus in a specimen submitted for another lesion. This reaction pattern has been described in a variety of acquired solitary skin lesions including fibro-inflammatory lesions, benign and malignant neoplasms (1-4).
Involvement of the lower female genitalia by EH is a rare finding with six cases published to date (5-9). It may occur as a localized/isolated finding or in association with an oral mucosal lesion or as a part of a generalized keratinopathy. Awareness of EH in this location and its distinction is important because it may be potentially misinterpreted as a viral condyloma or even molluscum contagiosum.
Our case represents a co-occurrence of two rare findings on the vulva, i.e. a focus of EH in association with BCC which is an unusual neoplasm in this location. The question is whether these two findings, i.e. EH and BCC are coincidental or related. It is well-known that ultraviolet radiation is an important etiologic factor for BCCs on sun-exposed areas but their occurrence in locations not exposed to the sun raises the possibility of other, not yet defined, etiologic agents. It is interesting in this regard to note that Carlson et al. (10) suggested that it was a possible consequence of clonal expansion of mutated keratinocytes because of long-term exposure to mutagens such as UV light and HPV, thus explaining the presence of EH around neoplastic skin tumors as a reflection of a field cancerization, i.e. multiple genetic defects in tissue, most of which does not result in cancer. Apart from EH, two other “incidental” findings namely acantholytic dyskeratosis and pronounced acantholysis as found in Hailey-Hailey (10) disease may be considered to be a similar phenomenon. The development of cancers in these regions would be expected to be higher than in areas without these reaction patterns because of the greater possibility of a second mutation leading to malignancy in the mutated population (10).In our case, we identified HPV type 42 in the condyloma acuminatum and VaIN 3 specimens but not in the specimen of BCC associated with EH. This low-risk type of HPV belonging to the alpha papillomavirus genus with mucosal tissue tropism has been previously detected in patients with condylomata acuminate (11). Our failure in detection of HPV in vulvar BCC is consistent with other investigations, which have also failed to detect HPV in BCCs from perianal and genital skin (12-14).
Correspondence address:
Denisa Kacerovska, MD, PhD
Šikl’s Department of Pathology, Charles University,
Medical Faculty Hospital,
Alej Svobody 80, 304 60, Pilsen, Czech Republic
phone: +420-737220482, Fax: +420-377104650
e-mail: kacerovska@medima.cz
Sources
1. Weedon D. Weedon´s Skin Pathology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2010.
2. Ackerman AB. Histopathologic concept of epidermolytic hyperkeratosis. Arch Dermatol 1970; 102: 253-259.
3. Mehregan AH. Epidermolytic hyperkeratosis: incidental findings in the epidermis and in the intraepidermal eccrine sweat duct units. J Cutan Pathol 1978; 5: 76-80.
4. Mahaisavariya P, Cohen PR, Rapini RP. Incidental epidermolytic hyperkeratosis. Am J Dermatopathol 1995; 17: 23-28.
5. De Coninck A, Willemsen M, De Dobbeleer G et al. Vulvar localization of epidermolytic acanthoma. A light- and electron-microscopic study. Dermatologica 1986; 172: 276-278.
6. Quinn TR, Young RH. Epidermolytic hyperkeratosis in the lower female genital tract: an uncommon stimulant of mucocutaneous papillomavirus infection – a report of two cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1997; 16: 163-168.
7. Swann MH, Pujals JS, Pillow J et al. Localized epidermolytic hyperkeratosis of the female external genitalia. J Cutan Pathol 2003; 30: 379-381.
8. High WA, Miller MD. Localized epidermolytic hyperkeratosis of the female genitalia: a case report and review of an underappreciated disorder of women. Med Gen Med 2005; 7: 33.
9. Russell P, Valmadre S, Howard V. Localised epidermolytic hyperkeratosis of the vulva: a case of mistaken identity. Pathology 2010; 42: 483-485.
10. Carlson JA, Scott D, Wharton J et al. Incidental histopathologic patterns: possible evidence of “field cancerization” surrounding skin tumors. Am J Dermatopathol 2001; 23: 494-497.
11. Tachezy R, Smahelova J, Salakova M et al. Human papillomavirus genotype distribution in Czech women and men with diseases etiologically linked to HPV. PLoS One 2011; 6: e21913.
12. Gibson GE, Ahmed I. Perianal and genital basal cell carcinoma: A clinicopathologic review of 51 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol 2001; 45: 68-71.
13. Nehal KS, Levine VJ, Ashinoff R. Basal cell carcinoma of the genitalia. Dermatol Surg 1998; 24: 1361-1363.
14. Kort R, Fazaa B, Bouden S. Perianal basal cell carcinoma. Int J Dermatol 1995; 34: 427-428.
Labels
Anatomical pathology Forensic medical examiner ToxicologyArticle was published in
Czecho-Slovak Pathology
2014 Issue 2
Most read in this issue
- WHO classification of tumours of soft tissue and bone 2013: the main changes compared to the 3rd edition
- Where does Ewing sarcoma end and begin - two cases of unusual bone tumors with t(20;22)(EWSR1-NFATc2) alteration
- The current staging for uterine body malignancies and its importance for clinical practice
- Epidermolytic hyperkeratosis of the vulva associated with basal cell carcinoma in a patient with vaginal condyloma acuminatum and vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia harboring HPV, type 42