Clean intermittent catheterization in the treatment of neurogenic dysfunctions of the lower urinary tract after spinal cord injury – comparison of the results of hydrophilic
Coated and standard PVC catheters
Authors:
Vladimír Šámal 1; Alena Kyrianová 2; Jaroslav Šrám 2; Jan Mečl 1; Jan Fogl 1
Authors‘ workplace:
Urologické oddělení, Krajská nemocnice
Liberec a. s.
1; Spinální jednotka
Traumatologicko-ortopedické centrum
Krajská nemocnice Liberec a. s.
2
Published in:
Ces Urol 2011; 15(4): 229-236
Category:
Original article
Overview
Aim:
Clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) of the urinary bladder is one of the standard procedures for emptying of the urinary bladder after spinal cord injury. Complications of intermittent catheterization are infection, injury of the urethra or urethral stricture. In addition to standard PVC catheters are also today available catheters, whose surface is coated with hydrophilic, wettable layer. Hydrophilic catheters should minimize the complications.
Material and methods:
This is a randomized, open label, prospective study monitoring the incidence of symptomatic infections and injuries of the urethra using different material of catheters for CIC. Patients who were admitted to the Spinal Cord Unit of Regional Hospital Liberec were randomized into two groups. The group A using a hydrophilic coated catheters and group B using standard PVC catheters. Patients urine culture examination was performed at weekly intervals. They watched episodes of symptomatic infections and complications of catheterization. During the study patients did not use antibiotic prophylaxis. Since 2009 there were 53 patients after spinal cord injury enrolled. Endpoint was the incidence of symptomatic infection and bloody discharge from urethra or hematuria as an evidence of trauma.
Results:
After entering the study 56.6% of patients had experiences with technique of CIC, others with CIC started. The mean follow-up was 9.09 weeks. The incidence of urinary tract infection was very high in both groups. Without UTI were only 22.2% of patient in the group with hydrophilic catheters and 11.8% patients in the group with standard PVC catheters. At least one episode of symptomatic infection were observed in 74.8% of patients in the group of hydrophilic catheters and 88.2% in the PVC catheters. We demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of symptomatic urinary tract infections in the group using hydrophilic catheters (p < 0.05)
Conclusion:
Intermittent catheterization is a standard option for treatment of dysfunction of the lower urinary tract after spinal cord injury. Use of hydrophilic coated catheters does not affect the incidence of asymptomatic bacteriuria, but decreases the numbers of episodes of symptomatic urinary tract infection. We did not observe a difference in urethral trauma between the two groups of catheters, but the lesions resulting after using PVC catheter was of greater extent.
Key words:
neurogenic detrusor overactivity, intermittent catheterization, urinary tract infection, urethral trauma, hydrophilic coated catheter.
Sources
1. Guttman L, Frankel H. The value of intemittent catheterization in the early management of traumatic paraplegia and tetraplegia. Paraplegie 1966; 4: 63–83.
2. Lapides J, Diokno AC, Silber SM, Lowe BS. Clean intermittent self-catheterization in the treatment of urinary tract disease. J Urol 1972; 107: 458–461.
3. Hansen R, Sorensen F, Kristensen J. Bladder emptying over a period of 10-45 years after a traumatic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2004; 42: 631–637.
4. Moore K, Burt J, Voaklander D. Intermittent catheterization in the rehabilitation setting: a comparison of clean and sterile technique. Clin Rehab 2006; 20: 461–468.
5. Stensballe J, Looms D, Nielsen P, Tvede M. Hydrophilic coated catheters for intermittent catheterization reduce urethral micro trauma: A prospective, radonmized, participant blinded, crossover study of three different type of catheters. Eur Urol 2005; 48: 978–983.
6. Lundgren J, Bengtsson O, Istraelsson A, Jönsson A, Lindh A, Utas J. The importance of osmolality for intermittent catheterization of the urethra. Spinal Cord 2000; 38: 45–50.
7. Hanuš T. Intermitentní katetrizace močového měchýře. Čas Lék čes 1983; 122: 1135–1137.
8. Krhut J, Zachoval R, Ženíšek J, Hanuš T, Zamečník L. Intermitentní katetrizace močového měchýře – indikace, technika a komplikace. Čas Lék čes 2005; 144(10): 674–677.
9. Wyndaele J, Madersbacher H, Kovindha A. Conservative treatment of the neuropathic bladder in spinal cord injured patients. Spinal Cord 2001; 39: 294–300.
10. Polliac T, Bluvshtein V, Philo O, Ronen J, Gelernter I, Luttwak Z, Hart J, Catz A. Clinical and economic consequences of volume- or time-dependent intermittent catheterization in patient with spinal cord lessions and neuropathic bladder. Spinal Cord 2005; 43: 615–619.
11. Cardenas D, Hoffman J. Hydrophilic catheters for reducing the incidence of urinary tract infection: A randomized trial. PM and R. 2009; 90(10): 1668–1671.
12. Cardenas D, Moore K, Danels McC, Scelza W, Graves D, Brooks M, Busch A. Intermittent catheterization with a hydrophilic-coated catheter delays urinary tract infection in acute spinal cord injury: A prospective, randomized, multiceter trial. PM and R 2011; 3(5): 408–417.
13. Kastler E, Denys P. Intermittent catheterization with hydrophylic catheters as a treatment of chronic neurogenic urinary retention. Neurol Urodyn 2011; 30: 21–31.
14. Pilloni S, Krhut J, Mair D, Madersbacher H, Kessler T. Intermittent catheterization in older people? A valuable alternative to an indwelling catheter? Age and ageing 2005; 34: 57–60.
15. Auger J, Rihaoui R, Franasois N, Eustache F. Effect of short-term exposure to two hydrophilic-coated and one gel pre-lubcicated urinary catheters on sperm vitality, motility and kinematics in vitro. Minerva Urol Nefrol 2007; 59(2): 115–124.
16. Torricelli F, Lucon M, Vicenti F, Gomes C, Srougi M, Bruschini H. PSA levels in men with spinal cord injury and under intermittent catheterization. Neurol Urodyn 2011; doi:101002/nau.21119.
17. Salomon J, Schnitzler A, Ville Y, Laffont I, Perronne C, Denys P, Bernard L. Prevention of urinary tract infection in six spinal cord injured pregnant women who gave birth to seven children under a weekly oral cyclic antibiotic program. Int J Infect Dis 2009; 13(3): 399–402.
Labels
Paediatric urologist Nephrology UrologyArticle was published in
Czech Urology
2011 Issue 4
Most read in this issue
- EUROPEAN BOARD OF UROLOGY
- Urachal carcinoma
-
Clean intermittent catheterization in the treatment of neurogenic dysfunctions of the lower urinary tract after spinal cord injury – comparison of the results of hydrophilic
Coated and standard PVC catheters - RADICAL SURGICAL TREATMENT OF HIDRADENITIS SUPPURATIVA OF PENIS AND SCROTUM