Zraková neuroprotéza – stimulace zrakových korových center v mozku. Návrh neinvazivní transkraniální stimulace funkčních neuronů
Authors:
Ján Lešták
Authors‘ workplace:
České vysoké učení technické v Praze, Fakulta biomedicínského inženýrství, Kladno
Published in:
Čes. a slov. Oftal., 80, 2024, No. 3, p. 132-137
Category:
Original Article
doi:
https://doi.org/10.31348/2024/2
Overview
Cíl: Představit historii a současnost zrakových korových neuroprotéz a předložit novou metodu stimulace nepoškozených buněk zrakové kůry.
Metody: Práce podává nejen přehled o historii a současném stavu stimulace zrakové kůry u těžkých poruch zraku, ale hlavně upozorňuje na jejich nedostatky. K nim se řadí hlavně stimulace právě poškozených korových buněk na malé ploše a z morfologického hlediska pak možné poškození stimulovaných neuronů elektrodami a jejich zapouzdření gliotickou tkání.
Výsledky: Práce dále předkládá návrh nové technologie zpracování obrazu a jeho transformace do podoby neinvazivní transkraniální stimulace nepoškozených částí mozku, která je chráněna národním i mezinárodním patentem.
Závěr: V práci je předložen ucelený přehled současných možností náhrady ztraceného zraku na úrovni mozkové kůry a návrh nové neinvazivní metody stimulace funkčních neuronů zrakové kůry.
Klíčová slova:
transkraniální stimulace – zraková neuroprotéza – korová zraková centra
Sources
1. Lešták J. Neurotransmission in Visual Analyzer and Bionic Eye. A Review. Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 2021;77:55-59.
2. Lestak J, Chod J, Rosina J, Hana K. Visual neuroprosthesis: present and future perspectives. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2022;166:251-257.
3. Foerster O. Contributions to the pathophysiology of the visual pathway and visual sphere. J Psychol Neurol. 1929;39:435-463.
4. Krause F, Schum H. Neue deutsche Chirurgie. Stuttgart, Germany: Enke.1931
5. Brindley GS, Lewin WS. The sensations produced by electrical stimulation of the visual cortex. J Physiol. 1968;196:479-493.
6. Dobelle WH, Mladejovsky MG. Phosphenes produced by electrical stimulation of human occipital cortex, and their application to the development of a prosthesis for the blind. J Physiol. 1974;243:553-557.
7. Schmidt EM, Bak MJ, Hambrecht FT, Kufta CV, O’Rourke DK, Vallabhanath P. Feasibility of a visual prosthesis for the blind based on intracortical microstimulation of the visual cortex. Brain. 1996;119:507-522.
8. Lewis PM, Rosenfeld JV. 2016. Electrical stimulation of the brain and the development of cortical visual prostheses: an historical perspective. Brain Res. 2016;1630:208-212.
9. Khodagholy D, Gelinas JN, Thesen T, et al. NeuroGrid: recording action potentials from the surface of the brain. Nat Neurosci. 2015;18:310-315.
10. Rousche PJ, and Normann RA. Chronic recording capability of the Utah Intracortical Electrode Array in cat sensory cortex. J Neurosci Methods. 1998;82:1-15.
11. Dobelle WH. Artificial vision for the blind by connecting a television camera to the visual cortex. ASAIO J. 2000;46:3-9.
12. Fernández E, Alfaro A, Soto-Sánchez C, et al. Visual percepts evoked with an intracortical 96-channel microelectrode array inserted in human occipital cortex. J Clin Invest. 2021;131(23):e151331. doi: 10.1172/JCI151331
13. Piedade M, Gerald J, Sousa LA, Tavares G, Tomas P. Visual neuroprosthesis: a non invasive system for stimulating the cortex. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers. 2005;52:2648-2662.
14. Pouratian N. The visual cortical prosthesis system provided some functional vision to blind patients in a 12-month assessment of the device. Ophthalmology Times 2020;23, Available from: https://www. ophthalmologytimes.com/retina/prosthesis-system-may-help-blind-patients-see-again). [cited 2022 Apr]
15. Beauchamp MS, Oswalt D, Sun P, et al. D. Dynamic Stimulation of Visual Cortex Produces Form Vision in Sighted and Blind Humans. Cell. 2020;181:774-783.
16. Fernandez E, Alfaro A, and Gonzalez-Lopez P. Toward Long-Term Communication With the Brain in the Blind by Intracortical Stimulation: Challenges and Future Prospects. Front Neurosci. 2020;14:681. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00681
17. Strong SL, Silson EH, Gouws AD, Morland AB, McKeefry DJ. A Direct Demonstration of Functional Differences between Subdivisions of Human V5/MT. Cereb Cortex. 2017;27:1-10.
18. Sanada TM, Namima T, Komatsu H. Comparison of the color selectivity of macaque V4 neurons in different color spaces. J Neurophysiol. 2016;116:2163-2172.
19. Conway BR. The Organization and Operation of Inferior Tempora l Cortex. Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2018;15:381-402.
20. Gaglianese A, Costagli M, Bernardi G, RicciardiE., Pietrini P. Evidence of a direct influence between the thalamus and h.MT+ independent of V1 in the human brain as measured by fMRI. Neuroimage. 2012;60:1440-1447.
21. Ajina S, Bridge H. Subcortical pathways to extrastriate visual cortex underlie residual vision following bilateral damage to V1. Neuropsychologia. 2019;128:140-149.
22. Pezaris JS, Eskandar E. Getting signals into the brain: Visual prosthetics through thalamic microstimulation. Neurosurg Focus. 2009;27(1): E6.
23. Chen SC, Suaning GJ, Morley JW, et al. Simulating prosthetic vision: II. Measuring functional capacity. Vision Res. 2009;49:2329-2343.
24. Liu X, Chen P, Ding X, et al. A narrative review of cortical visual prosthesis systems: the latest progress and significance of nanotechnology for the future. Ann Transl Med. 2022 Jun;10(12):716. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-2858.
25. Bosking WH, Oswalt DN, Foster BL, Sun P, Beauchamp MS, Yoshor D. Percepts evoked by multi-electrode stimulation of human visual cortex. Brain Stimul. 2022;15:1163-1177.
26. de Ruyter van Steveninck J, Güçlü U, van Wezel R, van Gerven M. End-to-end optimization of prosthetic vision. J Vis. 2022;22:20. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.2.20
27. Legon W, Sato TF, Opitz A, et al. Transcranial focused ultrasound modulates the activity of primary somatosensory cortex in humans. Nat Neurosci. 2014;17:322-329.
28. Lee W, Kim HC, Jung Y, et al. Transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation of human primary visual cortex. Sci Rep. 2016;6:34026. doi: 10.1038/srep34026
28. Lu G, Qian X, Castillo J, et al. Transcranial Focused Ultrasound for Noninvasive Neuromodulation of the Visual Cortex. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2021;68:21-28.
30. Fregni F, Pascual-Leone A. Technology insight: noninvasive brain stimulation in neurology-perspectives on the therapeutic potential of rTMS and tDCS. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2007;3:383-393.
31. Williams JA, Imamura M, Fregni,F. Updates on the use of non-invasive brain stimulation in physical and rehabilitation medicine. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41:305-311.
32. Sabel BA, Cárdenas-Morales L, Gao Y. Vision Restoration in Glaucoma by Activating Residual Vision with a Holistic, Clinical Approach: A Review. J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2018;12:1-9.
33. Cicmil N, Krug K. Playing the electric light orchestra-how electrical stimulation of visual cortex elucidates the neural basis of perception. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015;370:20140206.
34. Cohen MR, Newsome WT. What electrical microstimulation has revealed about the neural basis of cognition. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2004;14:169-177.
35. Histed MH, Ni AM, Maunsell JH. Insights into cortical mechanisms of behavior from microstimulation experiments. Prog. Neurobiol. 2013;103:115-130.
36. Lešták J, Tintěra J, Kynčl M, Svatá Z, Obenberger J, Saifrtová A. Changes in the Visual Cortex in Patients with High-Tension Glaucoma. J Clinic Exp Ophthalmol. 2011; S4 doi: 10.4172/2155-9570.S4-002
37. Saifrtová A, Lešták J, Tintěra J, et al. Colour vision defect in patients with high-tension glaucoma. J Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012;3:9 http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-9570.1000252
38. Lestak J, Tintera J, Karel I, Svata Z, Rozsival P. FMRI in Patients with Wet Form of Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Neuro-Ophthalmology. 2013;37:192-197.
39. Lešták J, Tintěra J. Funkční magnetická rezonance u vybraných očních onemocnění [Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Selected Eye Diseases]. Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 2015;71:127-133. Czech.
40. Lestak J, Kyncl M, Tintera J. Bionic Eye and Retinitis Pigmentosa. Biomed J Sci & Tech Res. 2019;19:14347-14348.
41. Lestak J, Fus M. Neuroprotection in glaucoma – a review of electrophysiologist. Exp Ther Med. 2020;19:2401-2405.
42. Luan S, Williams I, Nikolic K, Constandinou TG. Neuromodulation: present and emerging methods. Front Neuroeng 2014;7:27. doi: 10.3389/fneng.2014.00027
43. Vrba J. Lékařské aplikace mikrovlnné techniky. Vyd. 1. V Praze: Nakladatelství ČVUT, 2007, dotisk. 168 s. ISBN 978-80-01-02705-9 ú.
44. Boonzaier J, van Tilborg GAF, Neggers SFW, Dijkhuizen RM. Noninvasive Brain Stimulation to Enhance Functional Recovery After Stroke: Studies in Animal Models. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2018;32:927-940. doi: 10.1177/1545968318804425
45. Zheng KY, Da GY, Lan Y, Wang XQ. Trends of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation From 2009 to 2018: A Bibliometric Analysis. Front Neurosci 2020;14:106. doi: 10.3389/fnins.202
46. Ortiz-Rios M, Agayby B, Balezeau F, et al. Optogenetic stimulation of primate V1 reveals local laminar and large-scale cortical networks related to perceptual phosphenes. bioRxiv. 2021. doi:10.1101/2021.06.01.446505
Labels
OphthalmologyArticle was published in
Czech and Slovak Ophthalmology
2024 Issue 3
Most read in this issue
- Radiation Maculopathy in Patients with Malignant Melanoma of the Corpus Ciliare and Choroidea Following One-Day Session of Stereotactic Radiosurgery
- Visual Neuroprosthesis – Stimulation of Visual Cortical Centers in The Brain. Design of Non-Invasive Transcranial Stimulation of Functional Neurons
- Evaluation of Clinical Results of Implantation of Toric Intraocular Lenses Including their Rotational Stability
- Therapy for Vitreous Seeding Caused by Retinoblastoma. A Review