Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination – Approximate Normal Values for the Czech Population
Authors:
D. Beránková 1–3; P. Krulová 1,4; M. Mračková 2,5; I. Eliášová 2,5; M. Košťálová 2,6; E. Janoušová 7; I. Stehnová 5; M. Bar 1; P. Ressner 1; P. Nilius 1; M. Tomagová 4,8; I. Rektorová 2,5
Authors‘ workplace:
Centrum pro kognitivní poruchy, Neurologická klinika LF OU a FN Ostrava
1; Výzkumná skupina Aplikované neurovědy, CEITEC – Středoevropský technologický institut MU, Brno
2; Katedra rehabilitace, LF OU v Ostravě
3; Ústav ošetřovatelství a porodní asistence, LF OU v Ostravě
4; Neurologická klinika LF MU a FN u sv. Anny v Brně
5; Neurologická klinika LF MU a FN Brno
6; Institut biostatistiky a analýz, LF MU, Brno
7; Ústav ošetrovateľstva, JLF UK v Bratislave
8
Published in:
Cesk Slov Neurol N 2015; 78/111(3): 300-305
Category:
Original Paper
Overview
Aim:
The aim of this study was to provide benchmark normal values for Addenbrooke’s cognitive examination (ACE-R) and its domains for the Czech population.
Methods:
The study included 143 healthy subjects (89 women and 54 men) aged 55–89 years, without brain injury, neurodegenerative disease, severe hearing or visual impairment and without a psychiatric disease, with MMSE above 27 points. Participants were interviewed in detail to ascertain any previous brain injury history and to determine the level of self-sufficiency in daily living activities. Individuals with a history of brain injury or impaired self-sufficiency were excluded from the study. ACE-R values and values for its domains in men and women were compared with Mann-Whitney test and values for the four age and education groups were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test. P-values were corrected for multiple testing using Bonferroni correction.
Results:
Cut-off scores were set at 2nd and 7th percentile. Negative correlation with age (p < 0.001, r = –0.43) and positive correlation with education (p < 0.001, r = 0.41) were statistically significant for the overall test performance and also for the performance in individual cognitive domains except for the Attention and orientation domain. The effect of sex was not statistically significant. The cut-off score for the total score in Addenbrooke’s cognitive examination for all subjects aged 55–89 years is 74 points at the 2nd percentile and 79 points at the 7th percentile.
Conclusion:
The study suggests cut-off scores for the Czech population of ACE-R and provides the basis for the development of Czech norms for this test.
Key words:
Addenbrooke’s cognitive examination – normal values – cognitive deficit
The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study.
The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE “uniform requirements” for biomedical papers.
Sources
1. Hummelová‑ Fanfrdlová Z, Rektorová I, Sheardová K, Bartoš A, Línek V, Ressner P et al. Česká adaptace Addenbrookského kognitivního testu. Cesk Psychol 2009; 53(4): 376– 388.
2. Mioshi E, Dawson K, Mitchell J, Arnold R, Hodges RJ. The Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination Revised (ACE‑ R): a brief cognitive test battery for dementia screening. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2006; 21(11): 1078– 1085.
3. Bartoš A, Raisová M, Kopeček M. Důvody a průběh novelizace české verze Addenbrookského kognitivního testu (ACE‑ CZ). Cesk Slov Neurol N 2011; 74/ 107(6): 681– 684.
4. Reyes MA, Perez‑ Lloret SP, Roldan Gerscovich E, Martin ME, Leiguarda R, Merello M. Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination validation in Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Neurol 2011; 16(1): 142– 147. doi: 10.1111/ j.1468‑ 1331.2008.02384.x.
5. Bak TH, Mioshi E. A cognitive bedside assesement beyond MMSE: the Addenbroke’s Cognitive Examination. Pract Neurol 2007; 7(4): 245– 249.
6. Grigoletto F, Zappalá G, Anderson DW, Lebowitz BD. Norms for the Mini‑Mental State Examination in a healthypopulation. Neurology 1999; 53(2): 315– 320.
7. Košťálová M, Mračková M, Mareček M, Beránková D, Eliášová I, Janoušová E et al. Test 3F Dysartrický profil – normativní hodnoty řeči v češtině. Cesk Slov Neurol N 2013; 76/ 109(5): 614– 618.
8. Crawford S, Whitnall L, Robertson J, Evans JJ. A systematic review of the accuracy and clinical utility of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination and the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination‑ Revised in the diagnosis of dementia. J Geriatr Psychiatry 2012; 27(7): 659– 669. doi: 10.1002/ gps.2771.
9. Raimondi C, Gleichgerrcht E, Richly P, Torralva T, Roca M,Camino J et al. The Spanish version of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination – Revised (ACE‑ R) in subcortical ischemic vascular dementia. J Neurol Sci 2012; 322(1– 2): 228– 231. doi: 10.1016/ j.jns.2012.08.002.
10. Alexopoulos P, Ebert A, Richter‑ Schmidinger T, Schöll E,Natale B, Aguilar CA. Validation of the German Revised Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination for Detecting Mild Cognitive Impairment, Mild Dementia in Alzheimer’s Disease and Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration. Dement Geriatr Cogni Disord 2010; 29(5): 448– 456.
11. Bartoš A, Čechová L, Švarcová J, Říčný J, Řípová D. Likvorový triplet (tau proteiny a beta‑amyloid) v diagnostice Alzheimerovy‑ Fischerovy nemoci. Cesk Slov Neurol N 2012; 70/ 108(5): 587– 594.
Labels
Paediatric neurology Neurosurgery NeurologyArticle was published in
Czech and Slovak Neurology and Neurosurgery
2015 Issue 3
Most read in this issue
- Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination – Approximate Normal Values for the Czech Population
- Spinal Shock – from Pathophysiology to Clinical Manifestation
- Diagnosis of Epileptic Seizures
- Air Embolism of the Brain – a Case Report