Use of cellular exosomes as a new carrier in breast cancer gene therapy
Authors:
N. Maleki 1,2; S. Mirhakimi 3; S. Babashah 4*; A. Sayadi 2*; G. Parnian 5; M. Hadizadeh 1
Authors‘ workplace:
Cancer Research Center – Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
1; Gynecology and Reproductive Biology Department, Kowsar Poly-clinic, Tehran, Iran
2; Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Faculty of New Sciences and New Technologies, Islamic Azad University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3; Department of Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
4; Appletree Medical Group, 275 Dundad W (Grange), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
5
Published in:
Klin Onkol 2021; 34(4): 300-305
Category:
Original Articles
doi:
https://doi.org/10.48095/ccko2021300
Overview
Background: Breast cancer is recognized as a major clinical challenge in gynecological diseases worldwide. Exosomes are small vesicles derived from multicellular bodies that are secreted by many cells into the extracellular environment and thus participate in intercellular communication through the transfer of genetic information such as encoded and non-encoded RNAs to target cells. Tumor-derived exosomes are thought to be a rich source of microRNAs (miRs) that can regulate the function of other cancer cells in the tumor microenvironment. However, the exact mechanisms by which tumor cell-derived exosomes affect their neighboring cells, as well as the biological function of exosomal miRs in receptor cells, are not well understood. Materials and methods: In this study, after the overexpression of MiR-205 in breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231 class), cell-derived exosomes were successfully isolated and characterized by electron microscopy and dynamic light scattering. Results: The determination of MiR-205 expression levels in exosomes secreted from engineered cells confirmed the high expression of this miR in exosomes. It was also found that the treatment of tumor exosomes carrying this miR had an apoptotic induction effect and also had a significant effect on reducing the expression of Bcl-2 gene transcript in a time-dependent manner in breast cancer cells (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Overall, this study suggests that exosomal transfer of tumor suppressor miRs to cancer cells could be a suitable platform for nucleic acid transfer to these cells and be highly effective in cancer treatment.
Keywords:
breast cancer – Exosomes – apoptosis – microRNA – gene therapy
Introduction
Exosomes are nano-sized cup-shaped vesicles of the size 40–100 nm, which are released from many cell types into the intercellular space. Pathogens can exploit exosomes to spread their infectivity. The RNA and protein contents of exosomes released from cells into the bloodstream and body fluids are very different in health and disease and can be measured as a diagnostic marker. Exosomes derived from cancer cells have been shown to be rich in tumor marker microRNAs (miRs). More recently, mRNAs and miRs have been identified in the exosome that can be absorbed by neighboring (near or distant) cells and subsequently regulate receptor cells [1]. Therefore, the examination of these miRs in cells can be a criterion for the diagnosis of many diseases.
MiRs have recently been found to be closely linked to various diseases, including cancer. Because of the potential of miRs to target large numbers of mRNAs, these non-coding-RNAs (ncRNAs) are involved in all biological phenomena, including cell cycle regulation, cell growth, apoptosis, cell differentiation, and the stress response [2]. There is growing evidence that miRs play an important role in cancer biology, and recent studies have confirmed the oncogenic and tumor inhibitory role of miRs in cancer cells, and also shown that miRs can be expressed by oncogenes themselves and regulate tumor inhibitory genes. It is possible that the expression of miRs in both in vivo and in vitro through the synthesis of pre-miR molecules or antisense oligonucleotides can be regulated, which is a promising prospect for cancer treatment. Evidence suggests that miRs are stable in body fluids, including saliva, urine, milk, and blood [3]. In addition, extracellular miRs for packaging inside exosomes or microvesicles can be loaded into high-density lipoprotein (HDL), or form an AGO2-bonded extracellular protein. The key role of miRs has been identified as regulators of various cellular processes such as evolutionary timing, cell proliferation, cell differentiation, organ development and apoptosis. Abnormal expression of miRs has been reported in many cancers, and there is strong evidence that miRs play a key role as oncogenes or tumor suppressors in the development of many human malignancies [4].
MiR-205 is highly under-expressed in breast tumor cells compared to the normal breast cells. Even in vivo analysis reports down regulatory pattern of MiR-205 in breast cancer cell lines including MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231. Additionally, overexpression of MiR-205 inhibits cell proliferation and independent growth as well as cell invasion [5]. Moreover, previous studies have proved that MiR-205 suppresses metastasis. In vivo studies have proved the down-regulated condition of miR‐205 in drug-resistant derivatives. ErbB3 and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) are direct targets for MiR-205 and this miR applies its suppressive effect via direct interaction with the MiR-205 binding site in the 3’-untranslated region (3-UTR) of ErbB3 and VEGF-A. Hence, these findings propose MiR-205 as a tumor suppressor in the breast cancer [6]. MiR‐205 enhances the chemo-sensitivity of breast cancer cells to chemotherapy by suppressing VEGF-A and fibroblast growth factor-2 [7], resulting in decreased phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) /Akt signaling pathway activity and increased apoptosis upon chemotherapy. As a result, MiR-205 may be used as a predictive biomarker and a potential therapeutic target in breast cancer treatment [8].
Apoptosis, programmed cell death, happens when cells are not needed. Apoptosis is caused by a family of proteases called caspases. Caspases are made in the form of inactive precursors called procapsase, which are activated by proteolytic digestion in response to symptoms that induce apoptosis [9]. Members of the Bcl-2 family play a key role in regulating changes in mitochondrial membrane permeability. Some proteins in this family, such as Bcl-2, Bcl-XL, and Mcl-1, are inhibitors of apoptosis or anti-apoptosis and maintain cell survival by binding to mitochondrial ducts. In contrast, the binding of pro-apoptotic proteins of the Bcl-2 family such as Bax, Bid, Bak, Bcl-XS to the outer membrane of the mitochondria increases the permeability of this organ and causes the onset of apoptosis [10]. The balance between pre-apoptotic and anti-apoptotic activity of members of the Bcl-2 family is highly determinant of whether a cell goes for or survives the apoptosis. Cells induce apoptosis to their adjacent cells via intercellular communication, which happens with the assist of exosomes in microenvironment [11].
Materials and methods
Cell culture
Cell line MDA-MB-231 (cell line derived from invasive breast cancer) was prepared from Pasteur Institute of Iran. These cells were grown in DMEM medium containing 10% of fetal calf serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin, in a humid incubator with 5% CO2 and 37 °C.
Exosome isolation and purification
Exosomes were prepared from the supernatant of the MDA-MB-231 cell line at passage 3 by differential centrifugation and according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In short, the culture media was removed when the cells were developed through up to almost 85% of the plate. Firstly, the supernatants were centrifuged at 3,000xg for 10 min for lessening the amount of residual cells. Then, Exoquick (System Biosciences) solution was added to the supernatant with a ratio of 5/1. Isolation steps followed as of the manufacturer’s instruction, and the last point was to suspend the exosome pellets in 50 µL phosphate buffer solution (PBS) and stored at −20 °C until use.
Exosome Identification
The morphology and size of the purified exosomes were measured by scanning electron microscopy (Digital FESEM, KYKY-EM3200, China). Hence, an aliquot of the abovementioned exosomes was fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde on a microscope slide, washed by PBS, and then the ascending amount of ethanol was used for reaching its critical point of dehydration. The slide was then dried on a glass substrate and coated with gold.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
For microscopic observation, a small volume of the purified exosome was fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde and washed with PBS. The sample was then dewatered with ethanol on a dry glass surface. The size and morphology of the exosomes were evaluated by electron microscopy (Digital SEM, KYKY-EM3200, China).
Dynamic light scattering (DLS)
40 μL of extracted exosome were dissolved in 300 μL PBS. The solution was then sonicated. Exosomes were measured by Zetasizer Nano ZS software (Malvern Instruments, UK).
Total RNA isolation and qRT-PCR
Since exosomes are a rich and protected source of miRs, it is presumed that exosomal transfer of miRs from tumor cells to their adjacent cells may be a factor in modulating target genes’ expression and regulating tumor progression. We, therefore, sought to provide a molecular justification for the effect of tumor exosomes on its microenvironment.
Total RNA was isolated with quite similar to manufacturer’s instructions, briefly as follows: Trizol (Invitrogen/Life Technologies) was initially admitted and then the sample was treated with RNase-free DNase (Fermentase, Lithuania). Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized by reverse transcription of 2 µg total RNA using random hexamers. Then, poly- (A) -tailed RNAs were reverse-transcribed. Quantitative real-time PCR was performed by ABI Step One Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using SYBRGreen® Mastermix™ II (TAKARA, Japan). Real-time PCR was used to measure the effect of MiR-205-containing exosomes of engineered breast cancer cells on the induction of apoptosis in breast cancer cells. The expression level of each gene and miR were subsequently assessed by using the 2-DDCt method, in which ΔΔCT = (CTmiR — CTU6snRNA) target— (CTmiR— CTU6snRNA) control. The expression level of MiR-205 was normalized to U6 small nuclear RNA (U6snRNA). To calculate the relative fold change values, the Ct value data were normalized to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). The primer sequence was as follows: 5’‐CGG GAT TTC AGT GGA GTG AAG TTC‐3’ (miR‐205); 5’-CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACATATACT-3’ (U6snRNA, sense) and 5’-ACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGTGTC-3’ (U6snRNA, antisense); 5’ ACCCACTCCTCCACCTTTGA-3’ (GAPDH, sense) and 5’-CTGTTGCTGTAGCCAAATTCGT-3’ (GAPDH, antisense).
Overexpression of miR
The tube containing the lyophilized miR precursor sequence was briefly centrifuged to collect all material at the end of the tube. The precursor sequence was dissolved in 330 μL of nuclease-free water according to the manufacturer‘s protocol, increasing this amount of water to form a 10 µM solution. The tube was placed at room temperature for a few minutes, and then the contents of the tube were mixed with a gentle pipette. The resulting suspension was stored at −20 °C.
Data analysis
The data were presented as mean standard deviation (SD) from two or three independent experiments and the t-test was used for statistical analysis of data changes. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
The size and morphology of the exosomes were assessed by Scanning Electron Microscopy. The results showed that the isolated exosomes have a spherical appearance with a size range of 100 nm, which is shown in Fig. 1.
Using Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) technique, particles’ motion was measured and the size of the exosomes was measured by a Zetasizer. The following diagram (Fig. 2) is based on two parameters: size and percentage of vesicles. This diagram shows that the maximum vesicle population is about 60 nm. Another short peak is observed within 120–100 nm. As we know, vesicles below 200 nm are evidence of the presence of exosomes.
Exosome size measurements by DLS showed a bell-shaped size distribution with a peak of about 60 nm. What is important at this stage is the determination of MiR-205 levels in engineered exosomes (exosomes derived from transfected breast cancer cells) with the precursor sequence (MiR-205 compared with the exosomal control group (exosomes derived from uninfected breast cancer cells)). As it can be seen in Fig. 3, engineered exosomes showed a much higher expression of MiR-205 compared to control exosomes (P < 0.001).
To investigate the effects of exosomal transmission of MiR-205 to breast cancer cells, these cells were compared with engineered exosomes (exosomes derived from cancer cells transfected with the MiR-205 precursor sequence) compared with the control group’s exosomes derived from untransfected breast cancer cells. The real-time PCR results as shown in the following figure showed that exosomes derived from untransfected breast cancer cells (exosomal control group) had no significant effect on the expression of Bcl-2 anti-apoptotic gene transcript. In contrast, engineered exosomes containing MiR-205 resulted in a significant reduction in the expression of Bcl-2 anti-apoptotic gene transcript in a time-dependent manner. The idea is demonstrated in Fig. 4.
To investigate the effects of exosomal transfer of MiR-205 on the induction of apoptosis in breast cancer cells, these cells were treated with the MiR-205 derived exosomes. Flow cytometry results, as shown in Fig. 5, presented that engineered exosomes containing MiR-205 were able to induce apoptosis in breast cancer cells compared to the control group.
Discussion
A report of the presence of mRNA in the exosomes refers to the study by Posner et al. The group showed that human and mouse mast cell lines contain about 1,300 different mRNAs, many of which are not present in the cytoplasm of exosome-secreting primary cells. Translation of these mRNAs in vitro showed that they could be converted into functional proteins. This group was also able to prove the presence of miRs in the studied exosomes [12]. In 2017, Kalli et al examined microparticles in mesenchymal stem cell secretions and confirmed the presence of RNA in these secretions. They suggested that RNAs in the environment of mesenchymal stem cells are located in phospholipid vesicles and that these RNAs are often small RNAs, especially miRs [13]. In 2004, Varadharajan et al examined bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and tissue-specific stem cells and demonstrated that the secretion of miRs has a selective pattern, indicating a dynamic regulation of the presence of miRs in microvesicles. Based on their observations, the group stated that stem cells exert at least part of their trophic activity through the exchange of microvesicles between cells [14]. In 2017, Tamimi et al concluded that the cellular separation of cultured breast cancer cells from the substrate, when rapid, results in the release of exosomes and has significant effects on the cellular process, which clinically leads to the metastasis of cancer [15]. In line with previous findings, this paper found that exosomes’ secretion could have a direct effect on its cancer.
Due to the attractive properties of exosomes as carriers of drugs and genes, many studies have been conducted in this regard and very satisfactory results have been obtained. In 2018, Varadharajan et al reported that overexpression of miR-10b initiates invasion and metastasis in breast cancer and that overexpression in early breast cancer is associated with clinical progression of the disease [14]. It has been reported that MiR-31 was highly expressed in mouse lung cancer cells [15]. A further study on the relationship between expression mRNAs and the progression of lung cancer have discovered a large number of MiRs that are closely related to lung cancer. Some of them contained miR overexpression in lung cancer, and the rest had less miR than normal lung tissue or cells. However, downregulation and silencing methods are commonly used for overexpression in lung cancers, especially RNA intervention technology [16].
Apoptosis could have been induced to the cells via their adjacent cells, in which many molecular pathways are involved. Exosome transfer in the microenvironment intercellular communication is to name but a few, which has been found in this study. In line with our study, other previous papers also support the idea. The pathway of cell death activation varies depending on how the death message is transmitted to the cell [17,18]. If the messages are internal, the first activated organ will be the mitochondria, and if the message is expressed through cell surface receptors, the message will be transmitted from the adapter to the caspase cascade through adaptive molecules. The rate of receptor-induced cell death is more severe than the mitochondrial pathway. Apoptosis receptors are cell surface receptors that transmit messages through specific ligands and activate the caspase cascade [19,20].
Conclusion
As presented in the Results section, MiR-205 was overexpressed in tumor cells. Interestingly, exosomes derived from the engineered cells, which contained significant amounts of MiR-205, reduced the expression of the anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 gene and induced apoptosis in breast cancer cells. Importantly, not only does MiR-205 induce apoptosis by targeting Bcl-2 gene transcripts, but also exosomal nanocarriers were able to deliver this miR to the cell, and so in this study, a platform is proposed that is able to effectively deliver nucleic acid to the cell.
Since the use of exosomes secreted by cells in gene delivery has recently been proposed as a new approach in gene therapy, the targeted placement of MiR-205 in exosomes of breast cancer cells following the induction of overexpression of this miR in cells and the effect of exosomal treatment on the key gene involved in apoptosis, Bcl-2, was an innovative and targeted approach to this study.
Alterations in the natural expression of miRs are a common feature of cancers, including breast cancers. Because miRs can act as oncogenes or tumor suppressors, understanding the biology of miRs and modulating their expression and activity could create new opportunities for future cancer treatment. Also, since the anti-apoptotic gene Bcl-2 acts as a tumor promoter in breast cancer, it can be an attractive target for the treatment of this malignancy.
Overall, the findings of the present study showed that exosomes containing MiR-205 can significantly reduce the expression of Bcl-2 anti-apoptotic gene transcript and induce apoptosis in breast cancer cells. However, the tumor exosomes of the control group were not able to produce this feature. The results also show that not only tumor cell-derived exosomes with MiR-205 overexpression can cause cell apoptosis in breast cancer cells, but also this platform delivers nucleic acid to the cell in terms of performance efficiency with minimal necrosis for the cell, and this is very noteworthy in gene therapy.
Acknowledgements
The practical stage of this research was done at the Gynecology and Reproductive Biology Department, Kowsar Poly-clinic, Tehran, Iran. Thus, their spiritual support is highly appreciated.
Author’s contributions
Narges Maleki and Sadegh Babashah contributed equally to this work as corresponding authors. The corresponding authors of this article justify that ALL the mentioned individuals in this article are members of this research team and had had substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting the article, revising it, and final approval of the version to be published.
Availability of data and materials
The data used in this study are available from the corresponding author on request.
Consent for publication
All the authors confirm that the manuscript represents their honest work.
The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study.
Autoři deklarují, že v souvislosti s předmětem studie nemají žádné komerční zájmy.
The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE recommendation for biomedical papers.
Redakční rada potvrzuje, že rukopis práce splnil ICMJE kritéria pro publikace zasílané do biomedicínských časopisů.
Atefeh Sayadi, M.Sc.
Gynecology and Reproductive
Biology Department
Kowsar Poly-clinic
P.O. box: 1658143443
Tehran, Iran
e-mail: movi_85@yahoo.com
and
Sadegh Babashah, PhD
Department of Molecular Genetics
Faculty of Biological Sciences
Tarbiat Modares University
P.O. Box: 14115-154
Tehran, Iran
e-mail: babashah@modares.ir
Submitted/Obdrženo: 18. 1. 2021
Accepted/Přijato: 13. 2. 2021
Sources
1. Zhang J, Li S, Li L et al. Exosome and exosomal microRNA: trafficking, sorting, and function. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2015 Feb; 13 (1): 17–24. doi: 10.1016/j.gpb.2015.02.001.
2. Théry C, Zitvogel L, Amigorena S. Exosomes: composition, biogenesis and function. Nat Rev Immunol 2002; 2 (8): 569–579. doi: 10.1038/nri855.
3. Yeo RW, Lai RC, Zhang B et al. Mesenchymal stem cell: an efficient mass producer of exosomes for drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2013; 65 (3): 336–341. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.07.001.
4. Lai RC, Tan SS, Teh BJ et al. Proteolytic potential of the MSC exosome proteome: implications for an exosome-mediated delivery of therapeutic proteasome. Int J Proteomics 2012; 2012: 971907. doi: 10.1155/2012/971907.
5. Francken AB, Schouten PC, Bleiker E et al. Breast cancer in women at high risk: the role of rapid genetic testing for BRCA1 and -2 mutations and the consequences for treatment strategies. Breast 2013; 22 (5): 561–568. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.07.045.
6. Wu H, Zhu S, Mo YY. Suppression of cell growth and invasion by MiR-205 in breast cancer. Cell Res 2009; 19 (4): 439–448. doi: 10.1038/cr.2009.18.
7. Hu Y, Qiu Y, Yagüe E et al. miRNA-205 targets VEGFA and FGF2 and regulates resistance to chemotherapeutics in breast cancer. Cell Death Dis 2016; 7 (6): e2291. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2016.194.
8. Liu J, Mao Q, Liu Y et al. Analysis of MiR-205 and miR-155 expression in the blood of breast cancer patients. Chin J Cancer Res 2013; 25 (1): 46–54. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.1000-9604.2012.11.04.
9. Boya P, Roumier T, Andreau K et al. Mitochondrion-targeted apoptosis regulators of viral origin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2003; 304 (3): 575–581. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x (03) 00630-2.
10. O‘Brien V. Viruses and apoptosis. J Gen Virol 1998; 79 (Pt 8): 1833–1345. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-79-8-1833.
11. Wooster R, Bignell G, Lancaster J et al. Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2. Nature 1995; 378 (6559): 789–792. doi: 10.1038/378789a0.
12. Posner MC, Wolmark N. Non-invasive breast carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1992; 21 (3): 155–164. doi: 10.1007/BF01974998.
13. Kalli S, Semine A, Cohen S et al. American Joint Committee on Cancer‘s Staging System for Breast Cancer, eighth edition: what the radiologist needs to know. Radiographics 2018; 38 (7): 1921–1933. doi: 10.1148/rg.201 8180056.
14. Varadharajan E, Priya S, Prakash G et al. Mucinous carcinoma of the breast with neuroendocrine differentiation. Iran J Pathol 2015; 10 (3): 231–236. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1827.2000.01095.x.
15. Tamimi RM, Hankinson SE, Chen WY et al. Combined estrogen and testosterone use and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166 (14): 1483–1489. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.14.1483.
16. Toikkanen S, Kujari H. Pure and mixed mucinous carcinomas of the breast: a clinicopathologic analysis of 61 cases with long-term follow-up. Hum Pathol 1989; 20 (8): 758–764. doi: 10.1016/0046-8177 (89) 90069-5.
17. Shi J, Liang ZY, Meng ZL et al. [Tubulolobular carcinoma of breast: a clinicopathologic study of 8 cases]. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi 2012; 41 (10): 681–685. Chinese. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5807.2012.10.008.
18. Joglekar-Javadekar M, Van Laere S, Bourne M et al. Characterization and targeting of platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA) in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). Neoplasia 2017; 19 (7): 564–573. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2017.03.002.
19. Xin H, Li Y, Buller B et al. Exosome-mediated transfer of miR-133b from multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells to neural cells contributes to neurite outgrowth. Stem Cells 2012; 30 (7): 1556–1564. doi: 10.1002/stem.1129.
20. van den Boorn JG, Dassler J, Coch C et al. Exosomes as nucleic acid nanocarriers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2013; 65 (3): 331–335. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.06.011.
Labels
Paediatric clinical oncology Surgery Clinical oncologyArticle was published in
Clinical Oncology
2021 Issue 4
Most read in this issue
- Basic information for identifying psychological disorders caused by malignant disease
- Somatostatin receptor PET beyond the neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract – the review of literature
- Cancer-associated thrombosis – treatment and prevention with direct oral factor Xa inhibitors
- The double-edged sword of inoquinolone in cancer and COVID-19-infected patients