#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

A novel model to evaluate the learning curve in microsurgery: Serial anastomosis of the rat femoral artery


Authors: Lombardo G. A. G. 1;  P. Hyza 2;  A. Stivala 1;  S. Tamburino 1;  J. Veselý 2;  R. E. Perrotta 1
Authors‘ workplace: University of Catania, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy 1;  Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, St Anne’s University, Hospital Brno, Czech Republic 2
Published in: ACTA CHIRURGIAE PLASTICAE, 57, 1-2, 2015, pp. 9-12

INTRODUCTION

Microsurgery training is an essential component of the plastic surgery residency program.

Although many non-living animal models have been proposed as a suitable alternative to the living model 1–4, they don’t allow to reproduce many of the factors that normally occur during a microsurgical dissection and anastomosis, such as bleeding and vessel spasm, as well as they prevent the surgeon to check the anastomosis by performing a patency test. Therefore the live rat animal model is still indispensable. In bibliography, many living rat animal models have been reported, consisting in the performance of several exercises, such as flaps or transplants, but all of them imply the use of a high number of animals allowing the use of one vessel only for one exercise. We propose a simple method to evaluate the surgeon’s microsurgical skills during the training, consisting in the performance of 4 anastomosis in a row. This allows to exploit as much as possible the same vessel and it leads to an amplification of the trainee surgeon’s mistakes, helping the novice surgeon to assess his microsurgical level and to improve his capacity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS/SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

The experiment was approved by the Ethics Committee at St. Anne University hospital in Brno and performed under standard conditions (i.e., temperature 24°C to 25°C, light conditions, sterility).

A total number of 30 Wistar-albino Rats, weighting approximately between 300–350 g, were used in this study. The rats were intraperitoneally anesthetized using ketamine (75−95 mg/kg) and xylazine (5−8 mg/kg) solution. Euthanasia was performed with intracardiac phenobarbital administration. Both femoral arteries of each rat were used, giving a total of 60 vessels with a diameter ranging from 0.9 to 1.1 mm.

In order to obtain as much space as possible, it is mandatory to completely expose the femoral artery, from the inguinal ligament up to the ending of the vessel in the saphenous artery, through an accurate ligature of every vessel that branches off from the femoral artery up to the genicular descending artery.

The microvascular technique used was the simple-interrupted suture in 10-0 nylon, according to the standard method of Acland5, and anastomoses were performed in a proximal-distal fashion.

After each procedure, the surgical field was irrigated with a topical 10% magnesium sulphate solution to reduce the risk of vessel spasm8.

Once the femoral artery was completely prepared, the first author performed serial anastomoses to a maximum of 4 (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Series of anastomoses in a row accomplished on one single femoral artery in a rat. The optimal length and caliber of the vessel is crucial in order to properly perform the training model
Fig. 1. Series of anastomoses in a row accomplished on one single femoral artery in a rat. The optimal length and caliber of the vessel is crucial in order to properly perform the training model

This model has been used on 60 femoral arteries by a single surgeon who had no previous microsurgical experience (G. L.).

Following accomplishment of each anastomosis, patency was checked by a standard patency test after 10 minutes (Fig. 2). Each microsurgical session was concluded every time the surgeon achieved a negative patency test, indicating the vessel’s occlusion. The test results were then collected in relation to the number of anastomoses in a row in a table, calculating the patency rate. The higher was the number of patent anastomoses, the greater was the patency rate.

Fig. 2. Positive patency test performed in 4 serial anastomosis: clinical assessment of vessel patency can be demonstrated by occluding the vessel with two forceps distal to the anastomoses, then sliding one forceps for several millimeters over the vascular wall to empty the vessel. Finally the release of the proximal forceps should show a rapid filling from proximal to distal, demonstrating the flow through the anastomoses. In this case the patency test is positive
Fig. 2. Positive patency test performed in 4 serial anastomosis: clinical assessment of vessel patency can be demonstrated by occluding the vessel with two forceps distal to the anastomoses, then sliding one forceps for several millimeters over the vascular wall to empty the vessel. Finally the release of the proximal forceps should show a rapid filling from proximal to distal, demonstrating the flow through the anastomoses. In this case the patency test is positive

RESULTS

Patency rate was 96.6% (n=58) for a single anastomosis; 63.3% (n=38) for 2 anastomoses in a row; 36.6% (n=22) for three anastomoses in a row and 18.3% (n=11) for 4 anastomoses in a row (Fig. 3)

The results of each femoral artery procedure are summarized in Table 1.

Fig. 3. Summary of the correlation between the increasing number of the anastomosis in a row and the percentage of positive patency test
Fig. 3. Summary of the correlation between the increasing number of the anastomosis in a row and the percentage of positive patency test
 

Tab. 1. Summary of the progressive improvement of microsurgical skills related to the patency test performed on each accomplished anastomosis
Tab. 1. Summary of the progressive improvement of microsurgical skills related to the patency test performed on each accomplished anastomosis

DISCUSSION

The use of a rat model in microsurgery training dates back to the early 1960’s, when pioneers, such as Lee 7, identified the necessity of low cost surgical models that could meet the clinical needs of the day. The rat model, but in particular the rat femoral artery, is definitely the most frequently used in microsurgical training for its easy dissection, for the optimal exposure of the vessel and for its dimensions (0.7–1.1 mm). This is essential in order to learn to tackle every possible difficult situation in surgical practice.

Various factors contribute to the difficulty of performing several anastomoses in series:

  1. Incorrect stitches distribution along the margins, instead of parallel arrangement with regards to the blood flow direction;
  2. Twisting of the vessel between each anastomosis;
  3. Repeated traumatic pinching of vessel’s margins;
  4. Increase of the platelet deposit downstream of each anastomosis;
  5. Limitation of the clamping space;
  6. Awkward surgical field;
  7. Gradually increasing stress to the surgeon.

All these factors are the typical mistakes performed by the novice surgeon, who doesn’t realize, at the beginning of its training, the importance of avoiding them during a microsurgical suture. This exercise shows the errors amplification, this way leading the surgeon to correct himself.

We have found that patency test was resulted positive after achieving four anastomoses in a row only during the latest microsurgical sessions. These results show how the surgeon gradually improved his skills, reaching a plateau in the learning curve at the end of his microsurgical training, in which the risk of errors is much lower.

The training of a novice microsurgeon is a step-by-step process. Starting from simple exercises such as end-to-end suture of the femoral artery, the trainee will be able to perform a more advanced practice like the rat kidney autotransplantation or the epigastric free flap7. All the living models for microsurgical training reported in bibliography improve the microsurgical skills increasing the difficulty in the vessel dissection or decreasing the vessel’s size but none of them highlights the typical mistakes that a novice surgeon does at the beginning of its training.

In our opinion, this model helps the novice surgeon to assess his microsurgical level and to improve his capacity in performing an anastomosis through an exercise consisting in creating 4 anastomoses in a row. Indeed, this leads to an amplification of the trainee surgeon’s mistakes, which add up to each other as the anastomoses are performed. However, further studies need to be conducted in order to increase the sample.

Moreover lately many studies focus on the research of suitable non-living models, this leading to the costs reduction and the animal preservation. The performance of serial anastomoses on the same artery avoids the animal waste, working on the same vessel as much as possible.

The surgeon’s technique and the accuracy in placing the stitches are the most important factors in determining the patency of serial anastomoses, as demonstrated by the learning curve effect observed in Table 1. Thus, this model can be used to evaluate the progress of a plastic surgery resident in his microsurgical training.

CONCLUSION

Considering the most common mistakes performed by the microsurgeon at the beginning of his microsurgical training, we believe that this model helps the novice surgeon to assess his microsurgical level and to improve his capacity in performing an anastomosis through an exercise consisting in placing 4 anastomoses in a row.

Corresponding Author:

Serena Tamburino, M.D.

Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Catania

Cannizzaro Hospital

Via messina 829, 95100 Catania

Italy

E-mail: serenatamburino@hotmail.com


Sources

1. Austin GT, Hammond FW, Schaberg SJ, Scharpf HO. A laboratory model for vascular microsurgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1983 Jul;41(7):450–5.

2. Kaufman T, Hurwitz DJ, Ballantyne DL. The foliage leaf in microvascular surgery. Microsurgery. 1984;5(1):57–8.

3. Weber D, Moser N, Rösslein R. A synthetic model for microsurgical training: a surgical contribution to reduce the number of animal experiments. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1997 Aug;7(4):204–6.

4. Lannon DA, Atkins JA, Butler PE. Non-vital, prosthetic, and virtual reality models of microsurgical training. Microsurgery. 2001;21(8):389–93.

5. Acland RD. Practice manual for microvascular surgery. St. Louis: Mosby; 1980.

6. Lee S. Historical events on development of experimental microsurgical organ transplantation. Yonsei Med J. 2004 Dec 31;45(6):1115–20.

7. Shurey S, Akelina Y, Legagneux J, Malzone G, Jiga L, Ghanem AM. The rat model in microsurgery education: classical exercises and new horizons. Arch Plast Surg. 2014 May;41(3):201–8. doi: 10.5999/aps.2014.41.3.201. Epub 2014 May 12.

8. Hyza P, Streit L, Schwarz D, Kubek T, Vesely J. Vasospasm of the flap pedicle: the effect of 11 of the most often used vasodilating drugs. Comparative study in a rat model. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Oct;134(4):574e–84e.

Labels
Plastic surgery Orthopaedics Burns medicine Traumatology
Topics Journals
Login
Forgotten password

Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.

Login

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#