VISUAL OUTCOMES, CONTRAST SENSITIVITY, AND SATISFACTION WITH MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS BLENDED TECHNIQUE: LATE MID-TERM RESULTS

Stáhnout PDF English version

Autoři: NA. Blanco ^1,2,3; A. Tello ^1,2,4,5; V. Galvis ^1,4,5; E. Mendoza Mogollón ²
Působiště autorů: Ophthalmology Foundation of Santander - Carlos Ardila Lulle (FOSCAL), Floridablanca, Colombia ¹; Industrial University of Santander (UIS), Bucaramanga, Colombia ²; Santa Lucía Ophthalmology Clinic, Medellín, Colombia ³; Autonomous University of Bucaramanga (UNAB), Bucaramanga, Colombia ⁴; Virgilio Galvis Eye Center, Floridablanca, Colombia ⁵
Vyšlo v časopise: Čes. a slov. Oftal., 79, 2023, No. 2, p. 80-85
Kategorie: Originální práce
doi: https://doi.org/10.31348/2023/13

Souhrn

Purpose: To describe clinical visual outcomes, spectacle independence, and patient satisfaction after cataract surgery with blending implantation of ReSTOR (Alcon laboratories) multifocal intraocular lenses.

Material and Methods: A single-arm, non-randomized prospective study assessed patients undergoing cataract surgery with ReSTOR® +2.50 intraocular lens in the dominant eye and +3.00 add in the fellow eye between January 2015 to January 2020.

Results: In total, 47 patients (94 eyes) were enrolled, 28 women and 19 men. The average age at surgery time was 64 ±8 years, average postoperative follow-up was 45.4 ±7.0 months, with a minimum of 18.9 months. Postoperative binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was on average 0.07 logMar (Snellen 20/24), uncorrected binocular intermediate visual acuity at 65 cm was 0.07 logMar (20/24), uncorrected binocular near visual acuity at 40 cm was 0.06 logMar (20/23). Contrast sensitivity under photopic and scotopic conditions, with and without glare, remained at the upper limit of normality. 98% of patients were quite satisfied or very satisfied. 87% did not require glasses for any activities, either at distant vision, nor at near vision.

Conclusions: Cataract surgery with ReSTOR® IOL blended vision showed medium-term satisfactory visual results, achieving spectacle independence and a high level of satisfaction.

Zdroje

1. Wang W, Yan W, Fotis K, et al. Cataract Surgical Rate and Socioeconomics: A Global Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Nov1;57(14):5872-5881.

2. Foster A, Gilbert C, Johnson G. Changing patterns in global blindness: 1988-2008. Community Eye Health. 2008;21(67):37-39.

3. Yan W, Wang W, van Wijngaarden P, Mueller A, He M. Longitudinal changes in global cataract surgery rate inequality and associations with socioeconomic indices. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2019 May;47(4):453-460.

4. Breyer DRH, Beckers L, Ax T, Kaymak H, Klabe K, Kretz FTA. [Current Review: Multifocal Intraocular Lenses and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2020 Aug;237(8):943-957.

5. Lundström M, Llovet F, Llovet A, et al. Validation of the Spanish Catquest-9SF in patients with a monofocal or trifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Dec;42(12):1791-1796.

6. Hohberger B, Laemmer R, Adler W, Juenemann AGM, Horn FK. Measuring contrast sensitivity in normal subjects with OPTEC® 6500: influence of age and glare. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007 Dec;245(12):1805-1814.

7. Pedrotti E, Carones F, Aiello F, et al. Comparative analysis of visual outcomes with 4 intraocular lenses: Monofocal, multifocal, and extended range of vision. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 Feb;44(2):156-167.

8. Gundersen KG, Potvin R. Comparative visual performance with monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013 Oct;7:1979-1985. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S52922

9. Hovanesian JA. Patient-reported outcomes of multifocal and accommodating intraocular lenses: analysis of 117 patients 2-10 years after surgery. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018 Nov;12:2297-2304. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S182943

10. Vingolo EM, Carnevale C, Fragiotta S, Rigoni E, Iacobelli L. Visual Outcomes and Contrast Sensitivity after Bilateral Implantation of Multifocal Intraocular Lenses with +2.50 or +3.0 Diopter Addition: 12-Month Follow-Up. Semin Ophthalmol. 2017;32(5):588-592.

11. Vilar C, Hida WT, de Medeiros AL, et al. Comparison between bilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of two bifocal intraocular lenses. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug;11:1393-1397. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S139909

12. Blehm C, Potvin R. Evaluating Refractive and Visual Outcomes After Bilateral Implantation of an Apodized Diffractive Multifocal Toric Intraocular Lens with a Moderate Add in the Dominant Eye and a Higher Add in the Fellow Eye. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr;14:1035-1041. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S246271

13. Podborączyńska-Jodko K, Lubiński W, Post M. Intermediate vision and other visual function parameters in patients after uneventful cataract surgery with implantation of diffractive intraocular lenses using the blending procedure. Klin Oczna. 2020;122(2):49-53.

14. Hovanesian JA, Lane SS, Allen QB, Jones M. Patient-Reported Outcomes/ Satisfaction and Spectacle Independence with Blended or Bilateral Multifocal Intraocular Lenses in Cataract Surgery. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec;13:2591-2598. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S227629

15. Lee JH, Chung HS, Moon SY, et al. Clinical Outcomes after Mixand- Match Implantation of Extended Depth of Focus and Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lenses. J Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug;2021:8881794. doi:10.1155/2021/8881794

16. Bala C, Poyales F, Guarro M, et al. Multicountry clinical outcomes of a new nondiffractive presbyopia-correcting IOL. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022;48(2):136-143. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000712

17. Newsom TH, Potvin R. Evaluation of Quality of Vision and Visual Outcomes with Bilateral Implantation of a Non-Diffractive Extended Vision Intraocular Lens with a Target of Slight Myopia in the Non-Dominant Eye. Clin Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan;16:183-190. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S350850

18. Amelsfort T, Webers VSC, Bauer NJC, Clement LHH, van den Biggelaar FJHM, Nuijts RMMA. Visual outcomes of a new nondiffractive extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens targeted for minimonovision: 3-month results of a prospective cohort study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022;48(2):151-156. doi:10.1097/j. jcrs.0000000000000825

19. Zamora-de La Cruz D, Zúñiga-Posselt K, Bartlett J, Gutierrez M, Abariga SA. Trifocal intraocular lenses versus bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with presbyopia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun;6(6):CD012648.

20. Hovanesian JA, Jones M, Allen Q. The PanOptix Trifocal IOL vs the ReSTOR 2.5 Active Focus and ReSTOR 3.0-Add Multifocal Lenses: A Study of Patient Satisfaction, Visual Disturbances, and Uncorrected Visual Performance. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Mar;15:983- 990. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S285628

21. Galvis V, Escaf LC, Escaf LJ, et al. Visual and satisfaction results with implantation of the trifocal Panoptix® intraocular lens in cataract surgery. J Optom. 2022 Jul-Sep;15(3):219-227.