Painless colonoscopy

Bezbolestná kolonoskopie

Autor deklaruje, že v souvislosti s předmětem studie nemá žádné komerční zájmy.

Redakční rada potvrzuje, že rukopis práce splnil ICMJE kritéria pro publikace zasílané do biomedicínských časopisů.

Authors: S. Cadoni
Authors place of work: Digestive Endoscopy Unit, S. Barbara Hospital, Iglesias (CI), Italy
Published in the journal: Gastroent Hepatol 2014; 68(3): 192-193
Category: Digestivní endoskopie: komentář

Summary

Colonoscopy is the gold standard for examination of the large bowel, but it can be a painful procedure when performed without sedation. Distension and elongation of the colon by air insufflation (AI), loop formation – particularly at the sigmoid with consequent stretching of its mesenteric attachments [1] – and abdominal compression applied to help the progression of the instrument, are all contributing factors generating pain, particularly during the insertion phase.

Sedatives and/or analgesics are commonly given to improve patient satisfaction with the examination. This has led to their widespread and increasing use, with the associated need for recovery and escort requirement, post-procedure activity restrictions, increased costs and medication-related complications [2–5]. Painful colonoscopy and the need for sedation/analgesia have been found to be associated especially with females, younger age, previous pelvic surgery, body mass index < 18.5 kg/m2 and pre-procedural anxiety [2,6–8].

Unsedated colonoscopy, or colonoscopy with on-demand sedation [8–10], are feasible and represent a viable option for many patients, even in colorectal cancer screening settings [11–13] particularly for those unable to undergo sedation due to lack of an escort [11–14].

Obviously the use of methods that inflict less pain during colonoscopy would render unsedated/on-demand sedation procedures more acceptable and reduce the use of medications.

Several methods for decreasing patient pain during the insertion phase of colonoscopy have been investigated to achieve an easier, safer and more acceptable exploration of the colon. These include the use of small-calibre colonoscopes and endoscopes designed for the upper gastrointestinal tract [15,16], variable-stiffness colonoscopes [17], insufflation with carbon dioxide (CO₂) instead of air [18], magnetic endoscope imaging (MEI) [19], and use of water-aided colonoscopy (WAC), in which warm water is used in lieu of air insufflation during insertion [20].

Some of the above-mentioned instrumentations are expensive or not easily available, while WAC is a unique example of an inexpensive way to decrease pain during the insertion phase of colonoscopy. Formally recognized by the Technology Assessment Committee of the ASGE [21], WAC can reduce pain during the procedure and the need for sedation [22–26]. It can be broadly subdivided into water immersion (WI), which is characterized by suction removal of the infused water predominantly during the withdrawal phase; and water exchange (WE), characterized by suction removal of the infused water predominantly during the insertion phase [20]. WI and WE make colonoscopy easier and less painful [22–28], reduce the need for sedation [22,24–26,28], and increase patient willingness to repeat the examination [22,25,28].

Uniquely, WE is the least painful method and may enhance the adenoma detection rate (ADR), particularly in the proximal colon and for adenomas < 10 mm, with obvious advantages in screening settings [22,23,26–28].

WAC is the focus of an interesting review in this issue of Gastroenterologie a hepatologie [29], and the ESGE Live Demonstration event in Prague (12–13^th September 2014) will have a session devoted entirely to painless colonoscopy. Don’t miss it!

The author declares he has no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study.

The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE „uniform requirements“ for biomedical papers.

Sergio Cadoni, M.D.

Digestive Endoscopy Unit

S. Barbara Hospital

Iglesias (CI), Italy 09016

cadonisergio@gmail.com

Zdroje

1. Shah SG, Brooker JC, Thapar C et al. Patient pain during colonoscopy: an analysis using real-time magnetic endoscope imaging. Endoscopy 2002; 34(6): 435–440.

2. Takahashi Y, Tanaka H, Kinjo M et al. Sedation-free colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48(4): 855–859.

3. Sharma VK, Nguyen CC, Crowell MD et al. A national study of cardiopulmonary unplanned events after GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66(1): 27–34.

4. Leung FW, Aljebreen AM, Brocchi E et al. Sedation-risk-free colonoscopy for minimizing the burden of colorectal cancer screening. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 2(3): 81–89. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v2.i3.81.

5. Al-Awabdy B, Wilcox CM. Use of anesthesia on the rise in gastrointestinal endoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 5(1): 1–5. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i1.1.

6. Park DI, Kim HJ, Park JH et al. Factors affecting abdominal pain during colonoscopy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 19(8): 695–699.

7. Eckardt AJ, Swales C, Bhattacharya K et al. Open access colonoscopy in the training setting: which factors affect patient satisfaction and pain? Endoscopy 2008; 40(2): 98–105. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-995469.

8. Paggi S, Radaelli F, Amato A et al. Unsedated colonoscopy: an option for some but not for all. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75(2): 392–398. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.09.015.

9. Petrini JL, Egan JV, Hahn WV. Unsedated colonoscopy: patient characteristics and satisfaction in a community-based endoscopy unit. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69(3 Pt 1): 567–572. doi: 10.1016//j.gie.2008.10.027.

10. Leung J, Mann S, Siao-Salera R et al. A randomized, controlled trial to confirm the beneficial effects of the water method on U.S. veterans undergoing colonoscopy with the option of on-demand sedation. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73(1): 103–110. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.09.020.

11. Leung JW, Mann S, Leung FW. Option for screening colonoscopy without sedation: a pilot study in United States veterans. Alimen Pharmacol Ther 2007; 26(4): 627–631.

12. Leung FW, Aharonian HS, Leung JW et al. Impact of a novel water method on scheduled unsedated colonoscopy in U.S. veterans. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69(3 Pt 1): 546–550. doi: 10.1016//j.gie.2008.08.014.

13. Leung FW, Harker JO, Jackson G et al. A proof-of-principle, prospective, randomized controlled trial demonstrating improved outcomes in scheduled unsedated colonoscopy by the water method. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72(4): 693–700. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.05.020.

14. Leung JW, Mann S, Siao-Salera R et al. The established and time-tested water exchange method in scheduled unsedated colonoscopy significantly enhanced patient-centered outcomes without prolonging procedural times – A randomized controlled trial. J Interv Gastroenterol 2013; 3(1): 7–11.

15. Park CH, Lee WS, Joo YE et al. Sedation-free colonoscopy using an upper endoscope is tolerable and effective in patients with low body mass index: a prospective randomized study. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101(11): 2504–2510.

16. Garborg KK, Loberg M, Matre J et al. Reduced pain during screening colonoscopy with an ultrathin colonoscope: a randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 2012; 44(8): 740–746. doi: 10.1055//s-0032-1309755.

17. Brooker JC, Saunders BP, Shah SG et al. A new variable stiffness colonoscope makes colonoscopy easier: a randomised controlled trial. Gut 2000; 46(6): 801–805.

18. Wu H, Hu B. The role of carbon dioxide insufflation in colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2012; 44(2): 128–136. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1291487.

19. Hoff G, Bretthauer M, Dahler S et al. Improvement in caecal intubation rate and pain reduction by using 3-dimensional magnetic imaging for unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized trial of patients referred for colonoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol 2007; 42(7): 885–889.

20. Leung FW. Water-aided colonoscopy. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2013; 42(3): 507–519. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2013.05.006.

21. Maple JT, Banerjee S, Barth BA et al. Methods of luminal distention for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77(4): 519–525. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.09.025.

22. Rabenstein T, Radaelli F, Zolk O. Warm water infusion colonoscopy: a review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2012; 44(10): 940–951. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1310157.

23. Leung FW, Amato A, Ell C et al. Water-aided colonoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76(3): 657–666. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.04.467.

24. Falt P, Liberda M, Smajstrla V et al. Combination of water immersion and carbon dioxide insufflation for minimal sedation colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, single-center trial. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 24(8): 971– 977. doi: 10.1097//MEG.0b013e3283543f16.

25. Amato A, Radaelli F, Paggi S et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation or warm-water infusion versus standard air insufflation for unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56(4): 511–518. doi: 10.1097//DCR.0b013e318279addd.

26. Cadoni S, Gallittu P, Sanna S et al. A two-center randomized controlled trial of water-aided colonoscopy versus air insufflation colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2014; 46(3): 212–218. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1353604.

27. Hsieh YH, Koo M, Leung FW. A patient-blinded randomized, controlled trial comparing air insufflation, water immersion and water exchange during minimally sedated colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2014. [in press]. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.126.

28. Cadoni S, Sanna S, Gallittu P et al. Impact on maximum insertion pain during diagnostic and screening colonoscopy with on demand sedation: a two center randomized controlled trial of air insufflation, water immersion and water exchange. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79 (5 Suppl): AB126–AB127.

29. Falt P. Water-aided colonoscopy. Gastroent Hepatol 2014; 68(3): 194–201.