Monitoring Quality of Life in Critically Ill Patients: a Multicenter Study
Authors:
R. Pařízková; V. Černý; P. Dostál; L. Vašátko 1; P. Hora 2; I. Herold 3; I. Novák 2; D. Nalos 1
Authors‘ workplace:
Klinika anesteziologie, resuscitace a intenzivní medicíny, LF UK a FN, Hradec Králové, přednosta doc. MUDr. Vladimír Černý, PhD., FCCM, 1 Anesteziologicko-resuscitační oddělení, Masarykova nemocnice, Ústí nad Labem, primář MUDr. Daniel Nalos, 2 I. interní
Published in:
Anest. intenziv. Med., , 2001, č. 5, s. 240-251
Category:
Overview
The restoration of quality of life has become one of the key goals of the intensive care. Quality of life becomes one of the factors of evaluation theclinical outcome from the long-term perspective. The aim of the prospective observational study was to assess the quality of life of patients hospitalizedin intensive care units 6 months and one year after the discharge. From the total number of 1,368 patients enrolled to the study, 1,110 were dischargedto home care. Quality of life was assessed according to the questionnaire SF-36 (Short Form 36-Item Health Survey). In all patients the followingparameters were assessed: diagnostic group; APACHE II and SOFA scores; length of hospitalization and clinical outcome. Basic diagnostic groupswere formed by the trauma patients (n = 115), head-brain injury (n = 137), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (n = 86), post-CPR states (n =184), ARDS (n = 76) and intoxications (n = 425). Quality of life in the whole set of patients was in all criteria statistically significantly lower comparedto controls in 6 and 12 months after discharge; the most affected dimensions were physical abilities, the ability to perform common daily activities,and social functions. Statistically significant decrease of selected dimensions could be observed in most diagnostic groups 6 and 12 months afterdischarge, except for the group of intoxicated patients in which the restoration of quality of life was comparable to control group 12 months afterdischarge. In patients with different SOFA scores no significant changes in selected quality of life dimensions could have been observed 6 or 12 monthsafter discharge. Higher mortality was associated with advanced age ł 70 years, length of stay ł 14 days and APACHE II score > 20. The quality oflife represents an important part of the clinical outcome. Prediction of the quality of life should become an integral part of complex decision makingprocess in critically ill patients.
Key words:
intensive care – clinical outcome – quality of life – SF-36
Labels
Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation and Inten Intensive Care MedicineArticle was published in
Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
2001 Issue 5
Most read in this issue
- Inflammatory Disease in the Jaw Region – Difficult Intubation
- Post-traumatical Tracheomalacia with Tracheo-oesophageal Phistula – Less Frequent Complication of Blunt Neck Trauma: a Case Report
- The Nutritional Support of Critically Ill Patients
- Monitoring Quality of Life in Critically Ill Patients: a Multicenter Study