#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#
CS
proLékaře.cz / Journals / Perspectives in Surgery / 2020 - 3

Right hemicolectomy – from laparoscopic facilitated technique to robotic intracorporeal anastomosis

Czech version

Authors: L. Martínek 1,2;  M. Škrovina 1;  R. Bergamaschi 3
Authors‘ workplace: Chirurgické oddělení, Nemocnice Nový Jičín, a. s., Centrum vysoce specializované onkologické péče pro dospělé Nový Jičín 1;  Katedra chirurgických oborů, Lekářská fakulta Ostravské univerzity, Ostrava 2;  Division of Colorectal Surgery, Stony Brook, State University of New York 3
Published in: Rozhl. Chir., 2020, roč. 99, č. 3, s. 110-115.
Category: Review
doi: https://doi.org/10.33699/PIS.2020.99.3.110–115

Overview

Several different operative techniques have been applied in minimally invasive right colectomy. Data reported in literature confirm the advantages of laparoscopic approach, however, there is no sure evidence of which one is the best. The pure laparoscopic technique with intracorporeal anastomosis seems to show some advantages compared to the other laparoscopic and open procedures, although for the price of technical difficulty and a longer operating time.

Keywords:

laparoscopy – robotic surgery – right colectomy – minimally invasive right colectomy

Sources
  1. Schlinkert RT. Laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34(11):1030–1031. doi:10.1007/bf02049971.
  2. Young-Fadok TM, Nelson H. Laparoscopic right colectomy: five-step procedure. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43(2):267–271. doi:10.1007/bf02236994.
  3. Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Brady KM, et al. Standardized approach to laparoscopic right colectomy: outcomes in 70 consecutive cases. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;199(5):675–679. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.06.021.
  4. Bergamaschi R, Haughn C, Reed JF 3rd, et al. Laparoscopic intracorporeal ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease: is it safe? Dis Colon Rectum 2009;52(4):651–656. doi:10.1007/DCR.0b013e31819ed620.
  5. Weber PA, Merola S, Wasielewski A, et al. Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45(12):1689–1694. doi:10.1007/s10350-004-7261-2.
  6. Bailey MB, Davenport DL, Vargas HD, et al. Longer operative time: deterioration of clinical outcomes of laparoscopic colectomy versus open colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2014; 57(5):616–622. doi:10.1097/DCR.0000000000000114.
  7. Alnasser M, Schneider EB, Gearhart SL, et al. National disparities in laparoscopic colorectal procedures for colon cancer. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(1):49–57. doi:10.1007/s00464-013-3160-8.
  8. Rea JD, Cone MM, Diggs BS, et al. Utilization of laparoscopic colectomy in the United States before and after the clinical outcomes of surgical therapy study group trial. Ann Surg. 2011;254(2):281–288. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182251aa3.
  9. 2015 European Society of Coloproctology Collaborating Group. The relationship between method of anastomosis and anastomotic failure after right hemicolectomy and ileo-caecal resection: an international snapshot audit. Colorectal Dis. 2017. doi:10.1111/codi.13646. [Epub ahead of print]
  10. Fabozzi M, Cirillo P, Corcione F. Surgical approach to right colon cancer: from open technique to robot. State of art. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;8(8):564–573. doi:10.4240/wjgs.v8.i8.564.
  11. Athanasiou CD, Markides GA, Kotb A, et al. Open compared with laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision with central lymphadenectomy for colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2016;18(7):O224–235. doi: 10.1111/codi.13385.
  12. Bosker RJI, Vant Riet E, de Noo M, et al. Minimally invasive versus open approach for right-sided colectomy: a study in 12,006 patients from the Dutch surgical colorectal audit. Dig Surg. 2019;36(1):27–32. doi:10.1159/000486400.
  13. Kileen S, Mannion M, Devaney A, et al. Complete mesocolic resection and extended lymphadenectomy for colon cancer: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis. 2014; 16(8): 577–594. doi:10.1111/codi.12616.
  14. Pelz JOW, Wagner J, Lichthardt S, et al. Laparoscopic right-sided colon resection for colon cancer-has the control group so far been chosen correctly? World J Surg Oncol. 2018;16(1):117. doi:10.1186/s12957-018-1417-3.
  15. Adamina M, Manwaring ML, Park KJ, et al. Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision for right colon cancer. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(10):2976–2980. doi:10.1007/s00464-012-2294-4.
  16. Bae SU, Saklani AP, Lim DR, et al. Laparoscopic assisted versus open complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation for right-sided colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(7):2288–2294. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3614-9.
  17. Mori S, Baba K, Yanagi M, et al. Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision with radical lymph node dissection along the surgical trunk for right colon cancer. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(1):34–40. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3650-3.
  18. Han DP, Lu AG, Feng H, et al. Long-term results of laparoscopy-assisted radical right hemicolectomy with D3 lymphadenectomy: clinical analysis with 177 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013;28:623–629.
  19. Petrucciani N, Memeo R, Genova P, et al. Impact of conversion from laparoscopy to open surgery in patients with right colon cancer. Am Surg. 2019;85:177–182.
  20. Tanis E, van Geloven AA, Bemelman WA, et al. A comparison of short-term outcome after laparoscopic, transverse, and midline right-sided colectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012;27(6):797–802. doi: 10.1007/s00384-011-1404-4.
  21. Jurowich C, Lichthardt S, Matthes N, et al. Comparison of conventional access routes for right hemicolectomy in colon cancer—data from the DGAV StuDoQ registry. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019;34910:161–167. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3188-2.
  22. Santoro A, Boselli C, Renzi C, et al. Transverse skin crease versus vertical midline incision versus laparoscopy for right hemicolectomy: a systematic review--current status of right hemicolectomy. Biomed Res Int. 2014: 643685. doi: 10.1155/2014/643685.
  23. Martinek L. What are the benefits of laparoscopic-assisted right colectomy with extracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis as compared to open thru minilaparotomy? Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg. 2019;4:68. doi: 10.21037/ales.2019.07.05.
  24. Fürstenberg S, Goldman S, Machado M, et al. Minilaparotomy approach to tumors of the right colon. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41(8):997–999. doi:10.1007/bf02237389.
  25. Fleshman JW, Fry RD, Birnbaum EH, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted and minilaparotomy approaches to colorectal diseases are similar in early outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39(1):15–22. doi:10.1007/bf02048262.
  26. Liu Z, Zhou T, Yang G, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes between laparoscopic-assisted and minilaparotomy approaches for colon cancer. J Gastrointest Cancer 2018;49(2):158–166. doi:10.1007/s12029-017-9923-z.
  27. Chen CF, Lin YC, Tsai HL, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted surgery, mini-laparotomy and conventional laparotomy in patients with stage I-III colorectal cancer. J Minim Access Surg. 2018;14(40):321–334. doi:10.4103/jmas.JMAS_155_17.
  28. Feroci F, Lenzi E, Garzi A, et al. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013;28:1177–86. doi:10.1007/s00384-013-1651-7.
  29. Hellan M, Anderson C, Pigazzi A. Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. JSLS 2009;13(3):312–317.
  30. van Oostendorp S, Elfrink A, Borstlap W et al. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in right hemicolectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(1):64–77. doi:10.1007/s00464-016-4982-y.
  31. Milone M, Elmore U, Vignali A, et al. Recovery after intracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2018;403(1):1–10. doi: 10.1007/s00423-017-1645-y.
  32. Ricci C, Casadei R, Alagna V, et al. A criti­cal and comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017;402(3):417–427. doi:10.1007/s00423-016-1509-x.
  33. Wu Q, Jin C, Hu T, et al. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017;27:348–357. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0485.
  34. Carnuccio P, Jimeno J, Parés D. Laparoscopic right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies comparing two types of anastomosis. Tech Coloproctol. 2014;18(1):5–12. doi:10.1007/s10151-013-1029-4.
  35. Cleary RK, Kassir A, Johnson CS, et al. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis for minimally invasive right colectomy: A multi-center propensity score-matched comparison of outcomes. PLoS One 2018;13(10):e0206277. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0206277.
  36. Lee KH, Ho J, Akmal Y, et al. Short- and longterm outcomes of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(6):1986–1990. doi:10.1007/s00464-012-2698-1.
  37. Martinek L, You K, Giuratrabocchetta S, et al. Does laparoscopic intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis decreases surgical site infection rate? A propensity score-matched cohort study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018;33(3):291–298. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2957-7.
  38. Solaini L, Cavaliere D, Pecchini F, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis: a multicenter comparative analysis on short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(60):1898–1902. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6469-5.
  39. Xu H, Li J, Sun Y, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2014;12:27. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-274.
  40. Ma Sa, Chen Y, Chen Y, et al. Short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted right colectomy compared with laparoscopic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. ASJSUR 2019;42(5):589–598. doi:10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.11.002.
  41. Park JS, Kang H, Park SY, et al. Long-term oncologic after robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc. 2018;33(9):2975-81. doi:10.1007/s00464-018-6563–6568.
  42. Kang J, Park YA, Baik SH, et al. A comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery in the treatment of right-sided colon cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016;26(6):497–502. doi:10.1097/SLE.0000000000000331.
  43. Remzi FH, Kirat HT, Kaouk JH, et al. Single-port laparoscopy in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2008;10(8):823–826. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01660.x.
  44. Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P. Single port access laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23(10):1013–1016. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01660.x.
  45. Vettoretto N, Cirocchi R, Randolph J, et al. Single incision laparoscopic right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2014;16(4):O123–132. doi:10.1111/codi.12526.
  46. Dong B, Luo Z, Lu J, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic right colectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2018; 55:31–38. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.05.013.
  47. Juo YY, Luka S, Obias V. Single-incision robotic colectomy (SIRC): Current status and future directions. J Surg Oncol. 2015;112(3):321–325. doi:10.1002/jso.23935.
  48. Sheng QS, Pan Z, Chai J, et al. Complete mesocolic excision in right hemicolectomy: comparison between hand-assisted laparoscopic and open approaches. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2017;92(2):90–96. doi:10.4174/astr.2017.92.2.90.
  49. Wang G, Zhou J, Sheng W, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus laparoscopic right colectomy: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2017;15(1):215. doi:10.1186/s12957-017-1277-2.
  50. Li F, Zhou X, Wang B, et al. Comparison between different approaches applied in laparoscopic right hemi-colectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2017;48:74–82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.
  51. Li H, He Y, Lin Z, et al. Laparoscopic caudal-to-cranial approach for radical lymph node dissection in right hemicolectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016;401(5):741–746. doi:10.1007/s00423-016-1465-5.
  52. Zarzavadjian Le Bian A, Cesaretti M, Smadja C, et al. Total laparoscopic right colectomy: the duodenal window first approach. Surg Oncol. 2016;25(2):117–178. doi:10.1016/j.suronc.2016.04.001.
  53. Benz S, Tam Y, Tannapfel A, et al. The uncinate process first approach: a novel technique for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(5):1930–1937. doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4417-1.
  54. Milone M, Elmore U, Allaix ME, et al. Fashi­oning enterotomy closure after totally laparoscopic ileocolic anastomosis for right colon cancer: a multicenter experience. Surg Endosc. 2019. doi:10.1007/s00464-019-06796-w. [Epub ahead of print]
  55. Ibáñez N, Abrisqueta J, Luján J, et al. Isoperistaltic versus antiperistaltic ileocolic anastomosis. Does it really matter? Results from a randomized clinical trial (ISOVANTI). Surg Endosc. 2019;33(9):2850-7. doi:10.1007/s00464-018-6580-7.
  56. Sugiyama M, Sakaguchi Y, Oki E, et al. Clinical significance of closure of mesenteric defects in laparoscopic colectomy: a single-institutional cohort study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016;26(1):82–5. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000234.
  57. Cabot JC, Lee SA, Yoo J, et al. Long-term consequences of not closing the mesenteric defect after laparoscopic right colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2010;53(3):289–292. doi:10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181c75f4.
  58. Tsai KL, Lai WH, Lee KC, et al. Long-term consequences of nonclosure of mesenteric defects after traditional right colectomy. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:9123912. doi:10.1155/2018/9123912.
  59. Dostalik J, Gunkova P, Martinek L, et al. 1000 laparoscopic colorectal operations. Rozhl Chir. 2011;90(8):457–462.
Labels
Surgery Orthopaedics Trauma surgery
Laparoscopic liver resections – state of art
„Quo vadis“ laparoskopická chirurgie… chirurgie 3.0?
Our experience with transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) procedures in middle and distal rectal tumors
Acute abdomen in pregnancy: a retrospective study of pregnant patients hospitalised for abdominal pain
Perioperative acute internal carotid thrombosis after general surgery
Lumbar hernia – case report
Diskuze k editorialu „Můžeme vyřešit současné problémy regionálních chirurgických pracovišť?“ prof. MUDr. M. Rysky v Rozhledech chirurgie 2/2020.
Profesor Eduard Albert: není Impakt jako „impact“.
Per-oral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (g-poem) for the treatment of gastroparesis – a pilot single-centre study with mid-term follow-up
Article was published in

Perspectives in Surgery

Issue 3
2020 Issue 3
Most read in this issue
Topics Journals
Login
Forgotten password

Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.

Login

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#