#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#
CS
proLékaře.cz / Journals / Clinical speech therapy (Listy klinické logopedie) / 2022 - 2

SPATIAL NEGLECT IN STROKE PATIENTS

Czech version

Authors: Hoidekrová Kristýna 1,2;  Vilimovský Tomáš 2
Authors‘ workplace: Rehabilitační ústav Kladruby 1;  1. lékařská fakulta Univerzity Karlovy 2
Published in: Listy klinické logopedie 2022; 6(2): 34-41
Category: Main topic
doi: https://doi.org/10.36833/lkl.2022.025

Overview

Spatial neglect (SN) is a heterogeneous syndrome that occurs in individuals after acquired brain injury. It is a disorder of spatial attention, with a negative impact on the individual's functional status and independence psychosocial abilities, with adverse effects on rehabilitation outcomes. SN can be observed during reading and writing tasks in the Speech and Language Therapist's office. Because of the great variability of SN symptoms, it has been suggested that complex diagnostic methods for SN assessment should be utilised. The choice of the appropriate diagnostic tools can be key in revealing the type of neglect and subsequently in setting up an optimal therapeutic approach for SN treatment. However, the most widely used diagnostic tools have been paper-pencil tests, despite their inadequate sensitivity and inability to detect subvariants of SN, especially regarding the functional status of the individual. In addition, a wide number of SN treatment approaches have been described, yet there has been no clear consensus among professionals regarding the optimal SN treatment method selection. An example of the most frequently employed approaches is optokinetic stimulation. Another example that has gained substantial popularity in recent years is the prism adaptation treatment, that utilises the effect of lateral shifting of the visual field using prism lenses.

Keywords:

acquired brain injury – spatial neglect – neglect dyslexia – prism adaptation treatment – Catherine Bergego Scale

Sources
  1. ANDRADE, K. et al., 2010. Visual neglect in posterior cortical atrophy. BMC Neurology. 10(1), s. 1-7.
  2. ARDUINO, L. et al., 2002. Lexical effects in left neglect dyslexia: A study in Italian patients. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 19(5), s. 421-444.
  3. AZOUVI, P. et al., 2003. Behavioral assessment of unilateral neglect: study of the psychometric properties of the Catherine Bergego Scale. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 84(1), s. 51-57.
  4. BARRETT, A. M., BOUKRINA, O., SALEH, S., 2019. Ventral attention and motor network connectivity is relevant to functional impairment in spatial neglect after right brain stroke. Brain and Cognition. 129, 16-24.
  5. BARTOLOMEO, P., D’ERME, P., GAINOTTI, G., 1994. The relationship between visuospatial and representational neglect. Neurology. 44(9), s. 1710.
  6. BEHRMANN, M. et al., 2002. Oculographic analysis of word reading in hemispatial neglect. Physiology & behavior. 77(4-5), s. 613-619. BESCHIN, N. et al., 2014. Prose reading in neglect. Brain and Cognition. 84(1), s. 69-75.
  7. BILLINGSLEY, R. L. et al., 2007. Visual-spatial neglect in a child following sub-cortical tumor resection. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 44(3), s. 191-200.
  8. BISIACH, E., LUZZATTI, C., PERANI, D., 1979. Unilateral neglect, representational schema and consciousness. Brain: A Journal of Neurology. 102(3), s. 609-618.
  9. BOSMA, M. S. et al., 2020. Impact of visuospatial neglect post-stroke on daily activities, participation and informal caregiver burden: A systematic review. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 63(4), s. 344-358.
  10. BOUKRINA, O., CHEN, P., 2021. Neural mechanisms of prism adaptation in healthy adults and individuals with spatial neglect after unilateral stroke: a review of fMRI studies. Brain sciences. 11(11), s. 1468.
  11. BOWEN, A., MCKENNA, K., TALLIS, R. C., 1999. Reasons for variability in the reported rate of occurrence of unilateral spatial neglect after stroke. Stroke. 30(6), s. 1196-1202.
  12. BUXBAUM, L. J. et al., 2004. Hemispatial neglect: Subtypes, neuroanatomy, and disability. Neurology. 62(5), s. 749-756.
  13. CARTER, A. R. et al., 2017. Differential white matter involvement associated with distinct visuospatial deficits after right hemisphere stroke. Cortex. 88, s. 81-97.
  14. CORBETTA, M., SHULMAN, G. L., 2011. Spatial neglect and attention networks. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 34, s. 569-599.
  15. DE RENZI, E., GENTILINI, M., BARBIERI, C., 1989. Auditory neglect. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 52(5), s. 613-617.
  16. DIJKERMAN, CH. H. et al., 2003. Ocular scanning and perceptual size distortion in hemispatial neglect: effects of prism adaptation and sequential stimulus presentation. Experimental Brain Research. 153(2), s. 220-230.
  17. DIJKERMAN, H. C. et al., 2004. A long-lasting improvement of somatosensory function after prism adaptation, a case study. Neuropsychologia. 42(12), s. 1697-1702.
  18. EDWARDS, D. F. et al., 2006. Screening patients with stroke for rehabilitation needs: validation of the post-stroke rehabilitation guidelines. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 20(1), s. 42-48.
  19. FARNÈ, A. et al., 2002. Ameliorating neglect with prism adaptation: visuo-manual and visuo-verbal measures. Neuropsychologia. 40(7), s. 718-729. FINK, J. N., 2005. Underdiagnosis of right-brain stroke. The Lancet. 366(9483), s. 349-351.
  20. FORTIS, P. et al., 2010. Rehabilitating patients with left spatial neglect by prism exposure during a visuomotor activity. Neuropsychology. 24(6), s. 681.
  21. FRASSINETTI, F. et al., 2002. Long-lasting amelioration of visuospatial neglect by prism adaptation. Brain. 125(3), s. 608-623.
  22. GILLEN, R., TENNEN, H., McKEE, T., 2005. Unilateral spatial neglect: Relation to rehabilitation outcomes in patients with right hemisphere stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 86(4), s. 763-767.
  23. GIRARDI, M. et al., 2004. Sensorimotor effects on central space representation: prism adaptation influences haptic and visual representations in normal subjects. Neuropsychologia. 42(11), s. 1477-1487.
  24. GOEDERT, K. M. et al., 2014. Presence of motor-intentional aiming deficit predicts functional improvement of spatial neglect with prism adaptation. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 28(5), s. 483-493.
  25. HEILMAN, K. M., VALENSTEIN, E., WATSON, R. T., 2000. Neglect and related disorders. In Seminars in Neurology. 20(4), s. 463-470)
  26. CHEN, P. et al., 2012. Functional assessment of spatial neglect: a review of the Catherine Bergego scale and an introduction of the Kessler foundation neglect assessment process. Topics in stroke rehabilitation. 19(5), s. 423-435.
  27. CHEN, P. et al., 2013. Interdisciplinary communication in inpatient rehabilitation facility: Evidence of under-documentation of spatial neglect after stroke. In Disability and Rehabilitation. 35(12), s. 1033-1038.
  28. CHEN, P. et al., 2014. Spatial Neglect Commonly Occurs after Traumatic Brain Injury (P7.289). Neurology. 82(10 Supplement).
  29. CHEN, P. et al., 2015a. Kessler Foundation Neglect Assessment Process uniquely measures spatial neglect during activities of daily living. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 96(5), s. 869-876.e1.
  30. CHEN, P. et al., 2015b. Impact of spatial neglect on stroke rehabilitation: evidence from the setting of an inpatient rehabilitation facility. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 96(8), s. 1458-1466.
  31. CHEN, P.; FYFFE, D. C.; HREHA, K., 2017. Informal caregivers’ burden and stress in caring for stroke survivors with spatial neglect: an exploratory mixed-method study. Topics in stroke rehabilitation. 24(1), s. 24-33.
  32. CHEN, P. et al., 2018. Ask the experts how to treat individuals with spatial neglect: a survey study. Disability and rehabilitation. 40(22), s. 2677-2691.
  33. CHEN, P.; TOGLIA, J., 2019. Online and offline awareness deficits: Anosognosia for spatial neglect. Rehabilitation Psychology. 64(1), s. 50.
  34. JACQUIN-COURTOIS, S. et al., 2010. Effect of prism adaptation on left dichotic listening deficit in neglect patients: glasses to hear better? Brain. 133(3), s. 895-908.
  35. JEHKONEN, M., LAIHOSALO, M., KETTUNEN, J. E., 2006. Impact of neglect on functional outcome after stroke – a review of methodological issues and recent research findings. Restorative Neurology & Neuroscience. 24, s. 209-215.
  36. KARNATH, H.-O., RORDEN, CH., 2012. The anatomy of spatial neglect. Neuropsychologia. 50(6), s. 1010-1017. KAUFMANN, B. C. et al., 2022. Auditory spatial cueing reduces neglect after right-hemispheric stroke: A proof of concept study. Cortex. 148, s. 152-167.
  37. KERKHOFF, G., 2001. Spatial hemineglekt in humans. Progress in Neurobiology. 63(1), s. 1-27.
  38. KERKHOFF, G. et al., 2006. Repetitive optokinetic stimulation induces lasting recovery from visual neglect. Restorative neurology and neuroscience. 24(4-4), s. 357-369.
  39. LEE, B. H. et al., 2009. Neglect dyslexia: Frequency, association with other hemispatial neglects, and lesion localization. Neuropsychologia. 47(3), s. 704-710.
  40. LECHEVALIER, Bernard, et al., 2007. Auditory disorders related to strokes. The behavioral and cognitive neurology of stroke. 348-368.
  41. LISA, L. P., JUGHTERS, A., KERCKHOFS, E., 2013. The effectiveness of different treatment modalities for the rehabilitation of unilateral neglect in stroke patients: A systematic review. NeuroRehabilitation. 33(4), s. 611-620.
  42. MENON, A., KORNER-BITENSKY, N., 2004. Evaluating unilateral spatial neglect post stroke: working your way through the maze of assessment choices. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 11(3), s. 41-66.
  43. MOORE, M. et al., 2022. Rapid screening for neglect following stroke: A systematic search and European Academy of Neurology recommendations. European Journal of Neurology. 29(9), s. 2596-2606.
  44. NIJBOER, T. C. W; KOLLEN, B. J.; KWAKKEL, G., 2013. Time course of visuospatial neglect early after stroke: a longitudinal cohort study. Cortex. 49(8), s. 2021-2027.
  45. NIJBOER, T. C. W et al., 2014a. Neglecting posture: Differences in balance impairments between peripersonal and extrapersonal neglect. Neuroreport. 25(17), s. 1381-1385.
  46. NIJBOER, T. C. W. et al., 2014b. Functional assessment of region-specific neglect: are there differential behavioural consequences of peripersonal versus extrapersonal neglect? Behavioural neurology. 2014, s. 526407
  47. NIJBOER, T. C. W. et al., 2014c Prism adaptation improves postural imbalance in neglect patients. Neuroreport. 25(5), s. 307-311. NISHIDA, D. et al., 2021. Behavioral assessment of unilateral spatial neglect with the Catherine Bergego Scale (CBS) using the Kessler Foundation Neglect Assessment Process (KF-NAP) in patients with subacute stroke during rehabilitation in Japan. Behavioural neurology. 2021, s. 8825192.
  48. PIA, L. et al., 2009. Mental number line disruption in a right-neglect patient after a left-hemisphere stroke. Brain and Cognition. 69(1), s. 81-88.
  49. PISELLA, L. et al., 2002. Dissociated long lasting improvements of straight-ahead pointing and line bisection tasks in two hemineglect patients. Neuropsychologia. 40(3), s. 327-334.
  50. PITTERI, M. et al., 2018. Conventional and functional assessment of spatial neglect: Clinical practice suggestions. Neuropsychology. 32(7), s. 835.
  51. POLANOWSKA, K. E., SENIÓW, J. B., 2005. Searching for methods of rehabilitation in neglect syndrome patients–a review. Medical Rehabilitation. 9, s. 10-18.
  52. REINHART, S.; KELLER, I.; KERKHOFF, G., 2010. Effects of head rotation on space-and word-based reading errors in spatial neglect. Neuropsychologia. 48(13), s. 3706-3714.
  53. RUNDEK, T. et al., 2000. Predictors of resource use after acute hospitalization: the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study. Neurology. 55(8), s. 1180-1187.
  54. SHIRAISHI, H. et al., 2010. Prism intervention helped sustainability of effects and ADL performances in chronic hemispatial neglect: a follow-up study. NeuroRehabilitation. 27(2), s. 165-172.
  55. STARKSTEIN, S. E., JORGE, R. E., ROBINSON, R. G., 2010. The frequency, clinical correlates, and mechanism of anosognosia after stroke. Can. J. Psychiatry. 55, s. 355–361.
  56. SUBBIAH, I., CARAMAZZA, A. , 2000. Stimulus-centered neglect in reading and object recognition. Neurocase. 6(1), s. 13-31.
  57. TAVASZI, I. et al., 2021. Neglect syndrome in post-stroke conditions: Assessment and treatment (scoping review). International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. 44(1), s. 3-14.
  58. THAM, K., KIELHOFNER, G., 2003. Impact of the social environment on occupational experience and performance among persons with unilateral neglect. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 57(4), s. 403-412.
  59. TROMP, E., DINKLA, A., MULDER, T., 1995. Walking through doorways: An analysis of navigation skills in patients with neglect. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 5(4), s. 319-331.
  60. TURTON, A. J. et al., 2009. Walking and wheelchair navigation in patients with left visual neglect. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 19(2), s. 274-290.
  61. VALERO-CABRÉ, A. et al., 2020. Perturbation-driven paradoxical facilitation of visuo-spatial function: revisiting the ‘Sprague effect.’ Cortex. 122, s. 10-39.
  62. VALLAR, G.; BURANI, C.; ARDUINO, L. S., 2010. Neglect dyslexia: a review of the neuropsychological literature. Experimental Brain Research. 206(2), s. 219-235.
  63. VERHOEVEN, C. L. M. et al., 2011. Is cognitive functioning 1 year poststroke related to quality of life domain?. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases. 20(5), s. 450-458.
  64. VILIMOVSKY, T. et al., 2021. Prism adaptation treatment to address spatial neglect in an intensive rehabilitation program: A randomized pilot and feasibility trial. PLoS One. 16(1), s. e0245425.
  65. WEBSTER, J. S. et al., 1984. Visual scanning training with stroke patients. Behavior Therapy. 15(2), s. 129-143.
  66. WIESEN, D., KARNATH, H.-O., SPERBER, CH., 2020. Disconnection somewhere down the line: Multivariate lesion-symptom mapping of the line bisection error. Cortex. 133, s. 120-132.
  67. YANG, N. Y. H. et al., 2013. Rehabilitation interventions for unilateral neglect after stroke: a systematic review from 1997 through 2012. Frontiers in human neuroscience. 7, s. 187.
Labels
Clinical speech therapy General practitioner for children and adolescents
EDITORIAL
SPEECH/LANGUAGE COMPREHENSION IN THE CONTEXT OF LANGUAGE DIFFICULTIES IN PERSONS WITH NEUROCOGNITIVE DISORDERS
THERAPY OF PRIMARY PROGRESSIVE APHASIA IN CURRENT RESEARCH
SENTENCE COMPREHENSION IN A PATIENT WITH MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT OF THE AMNESTIC TYPE: A CASE REPORT
OVERVIEW OF RISK FACTORS FOR DEMENTIA
PATIENT WITH ACQUIRED SPEECH DISORDER IN CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY PRACTICE, A CASE STUDY
ODKAZY NA ZAJÍMAVÉ ZÁVĚREČNÉ PRÁCE S TEMATIKOU KOGNITIVNĚ-KOMUNIKAČNÍCH PORUCH
BRIEF CHILDREN’S DICTIONARY QUESTIONNAIRE SDDS 16-42: INTRODUCING A SCREENING DIAGNOSTIC TOOL FOR EARLY DETECTION OF CHILDREN WITH DELAY IN THEIR LANGUAGE SKILLS’ DEVELOPMENT
SOCIAL (PRAGMATIC) COMMUNICATION DISORDER
Self-stigma in stuttering – a preliminary study using the Polish adaptation of the Stuttering Perception Scale
RECENZE DIAGNOSTICKÉHO MATERIÁLU TEPO – TEST POROZUMĚNÍ VĚTÁM
RECENZE KNIHY DEMENCE: HODNOTICÍ TECHNIKY A NÁSTROJE
STIMULUJÚCE A PODPORUJÚCE PROSTREDIE JE AZDA NAJDÔLEŽITEJŠIE PRE ZAČÍNAJÚCEHO ODBORNÍKA ROZHOVOR S PROF. ZSOLTEM CSÉFALVAYEM
Article was published in

Clinical speech therapy (Listy klinické logopedie)

Issue 2
2022 Issue 2
Most read in this issue
Topics Journals
Login
Forgotten password

Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.

Login

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#