Kontaktní dermatitidy – část II:
epikutánní testy v současné praxi

1. AERTS, O., CATTAERT, N., LAMBERT, J., GOOSSENS, A. Airborne and systemic dermatitis, mimicking atopic dermatitis, caused by methylisothiazolinone in a young child. Contact Dermatitis, 2013, 68, p. 250–251.

2. AERTS, O., MEERT, H., GOOSSENS, A. et al. Methylisothiasolinone in selected consumer products in Belgium: Adding fuel to the fire? Contact Dermatitis, 2015, 73, p. 142–149.

3. BASKETTER, D. A., ANGELINI, G., INGBER, A. et al. Nickel, chromium and cobalt in consumer products: revisiting safe levels in the new millenium. Contact Dermatitis, 2003, 49, p. 1–7.

4. BERK, D. R., BAYLISS, S. J. Cellular Phone and Cellular Phone Accessory Dermatitis Due to Nickel Allergy: Report of Five Cases. Pediatric Dermatology, 2011, 28, p. 327–331.

5. BOYAPATI, A., TAM, M., TATE, B. et al. Allergic contact dermatitis to methylisothiazolinone: Exposure from baby wipes causing hand dermatitis. Australasian Journal of Dermatology, 2013, 54, p. 264–267.

6. BRASCH, J., BECKER, D., ABERER, W. et al. Guideline contact dermatitis: S1-Guidelines of the German Contact Allergy Group (DKG) of the German Dermatology Society (DDG), the Information Network of Dermatological Clinics (IVDK), the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI), the Working Group for Occupational and Environmental Dermatology (ABD) of the DDG, the Medical Association of German Allergologists (AeDA), the Professional Association of German Dermatologists (BVDD) and the DDG. Allergo J. Int., 2014, 23, 4, p. 126–138.

7. BREGNBAK, D., JOHANSEN, J. D., JELLESEN, M. S. et al. Chromium allergy and dermatitis: prevalence and main findings. Contact Dermatitis, 2015, 73, p. 261–280.

8. BRUZE, M., ENGFELDT, M., GONCALO, M. et al. Recommendation to include methylisothiazolinone in the European baseline patch test series – on behalf of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis and the European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Contact Dermatitis, 2013, 69, 5, p. 263–270.

9. DASTYCHOVÁ, E., DOBEŠOVÁ, J., HORAŽĎOVSKÝ, J. et al. Vývoj kontaktní přecitlivělosti na alergeny evropské základní sady v České republice v průběhu let. Čes.-slov. Derm., 2014, 89, 3, p. 93–148.

10. DE GROOT, A. C., HERXHEIMER, A. Isothiasolinone preservative: cause of a continuing epidemic of cosmetic dermatitis. Lancet, 1989, 1, p. 314–316.

11. DE GROOT, A. C., VAN DER KLEY, A. M., BRUYNZEEL, D. P. et al. Frequency of false-negative reactions to the fragrance mix. Contact Dermatitis, 1993, 28, 3, p. 139–140.

12. DE GROOT, A. C., FROSCH, P. J. Adverse reactions to fragrances. A clinical review. Contact Dermatitis, 1997, 36, p. 57–86.

13. DE GROOT, A. C., COENRAADS, P. J. Twenty-five years quaternium-15 in the European baseline series: does it deserve its place there? Contact Dermatitis, 2010, 62, p. 210–220.

14. DE GROOT, A. C., VEENSTRA, M. Formaldehyde-releasers in cosmetics in the USA and in Europe. Contact Dermatitis, 2010, 62, p. 221–224.

15. DE GROOT, A. C., MAIBACH, H. I. Frequency of sensitization to common allergens: comparison between Europe and the USA. Contact Dermatitis, 2010, 62, p. 325–329.

16. DE GROOT, A. C. Side-effects of henna and semi-permanent ‘black henna’ tattoos: a full review. Contact Dermatitis, 2013, 69, p. 1–25.

17. DE WAARD-VAN DER SPEK, F. B., ORANJE, A. P. Patch Test in Children with Suspected Allergic Contact Dermatitis: A Prospective Study and Review of the Literature. Dermatology, 2009, 218, p. 119–125.

18. DINKLOH, A., WORM, M., GEIER, J. et al. Contact sensitization in patients with suspected cosmetic intolerance: results of the IVDK 2006–2011. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol., 2015, 29, p. 1071–1081.

19. ESPASANDÍN-ARIAS, M., GOOSSENS, A. Natural rubber gloves might not protect against skin penetration of methylisothiazolinone. Contact Dermatitis, 2014, 70, p. 249–251.

20. FRÉLING, E., POREAUX, C., VALOIS, A. et al. Occupational contact dermatitis caused by nickel in scratchcards. Contact Dermatitis, 2015, 73, p. 371–372.

21. FROSCH, P. J., PIRKER, C., RASTOGI, S. C. et al. Patch testing with a new fragrance mix detects additional patients sensitive to perfumes and missed by the current fragrance mix. Contact Dermatitis, 2005, 52, 4, p. 207–215.

22. FROSCH, P. J., JOHANSEN, J. D., SCHUTTELAAR, M.-L. et al. Patch test results with fragrance markers of the baseline series – analysis of the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA) network 2009–2012. Contact Dermatitis, 2015, 73, p. 163–171.

23. GAMEIRO, A., COUTINHO, I., RAMOS, L. et al. Methylisothiazolinone: second ‚epidemic‘ of isothiazolinone sensitization. Contact Dermatitis, 2014, 70, 4, p. 242–243.

24. GARCÍA-GAVIN, J., VANSINA, S., KERRE, S. et al. Methylisothiasolinone, an emerging allergen in cosmetics? Contact Dermatitis, 2010, 63, p. 96–101.

25. GIMENEZ-ARNAU, A., MAURER, M., DE LA CUADRA, J. et al. Immediate Contact Skin Reactions, an Update of Contact Urticaria, Contact Urticaria Syndrome and Protein Contact Dermatitis – „A Never Ending Story“. Eur. J. Dermatol., 2010, 20, 5, p. 552–562.

26. GONÇALO, M., FERGUSON, J., BONEVALLE, A. et al. Photopatch testing: recommendations for a European photopatch test baseline series. Contact Dermatitis, 2013, 68, p. 239–243.

27. GONÇALO, M., GOSSENNS, A. Whilst Rome burns: the epidemic of contact allergy to methylisothiasolinone. Contact Dermatitis, 2013, 68, p. 257–258.

28. GOOSSENS, A., MORREN, M. Contact Allergy in Children. In Frosch, P. J., Menne, T., Lepoittevin, J.-P., (Eds). Contact Dermatitis. 4th ed., Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2006, p. 811–830.

29. GOOSSENS, A. Art and science of patch testing. Indian J. Dermatol. Venereol. Leprol., 2007, 73, p. 289–291.

30. GOOSSENS, A. Alternatives to patch tests. Ann. Dermatol. Venereol., 2009, 136, p. 623–625.

31. HAMANN, D., YAZAR, K., HAMANN, C. R. et al. p-Phenylenediamine and other allergens in hair dye products in the United States: a consumer exposure study. Contact Dermatitis, 2014, 70, p. 213–218.

32. HANNUKSELA, M. Protein Contact Dermatitis. In Frosch, P. J., Menné, T., Lepoittevin, J.-P. (Eds). Contact Dermatitis. 4th ed., Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2006, p. 345–348.

33. HAUKSSON, I., PONTÉN, A., ISAKSSON, M. et al. Formaldehyde in cosmetics in patch tested dermatitis patients with and without contact allergy to formaldehyde. Contact Dermatitis, 2015, 74, p. 145–151.

34. HEISTERBERG, M. V., MENNÉ, T., JOHANSEN, J. D. Contact allergy to the 26 specific fragrance ingredients to be declared on cosmetic products in accordance with the EU cosmetics directive. Contact Dermatitis, 2011, 65, p. 266–275.

35. HOSTEING, S., MEYER, N., WATON, J. et al. Outbreak of contact sensitization to methylisothiazolinone: an analysis of French data from the REVIDAL-GERDA network. Contact Dermatitis, 2014, 70, p. 262–269.

36. HSU, J. W., MATIZ, C., JACOB, S. E. Nickel Allergy: Localized, Id, and Systemic Manifestations in Children. Pediatr. Dermatol., 2011, 28, 3, p. 276–280.

37. ISAKSSON, M., RYBERG, K., GOOSSENS, A. et al. Recommendation to include a textile dye mix in the European baseline series. Contact Dermatitis, 2015, 73, p. 15–20.

38. JACOB, S. E., ADMANI, S. Allergic Contact Dermatitis to a Laptop Computer in a Child. Pediatric Dermatology, 2014, 31, p. 345–346.

39. JENSEN, J. M., HARDE, V., BRASCH, J. Airborne contact dermatitis to methylchloroisothiasolinone/methylisothiasolinone in a boy. Contact Dermatitis, 2006, 55, p. 311.

40. JENSEN, P., JELLESEN, M. S., MØLLER, P. et al. Nickel may be released from laptop computers. Contact Dermatitis, 2012, 67, p. 384–385.

41. JENSEN, P., JOHANSEN, U. B., JOHANSEN, J. D. et al. Nickel may be released from iPhone® 5. Contact Dermatitis, 2013, 68, p. 255–256.

42. JOHANSEN, J. D., AALTO-KORTE, K., AGNER, T. et al. European Society of Contact Dermatitis guideline for diagnostic patch testing – recommendations on best practice. Contact Dermatitis, 2015, 73, p. 195–221.

43. JOHNSTON, G. A. et al. The rise in prevalence of contact allergy to methylisothiazolinone in the British Isles. Contact Dermatitis, 2014, 70, s. 238–240.

44. KETTELARIJ, J. A. B., LIDÉN, C., AXÉN, E. et al. Cobalt, nickel and chromium release from dental tools and alloys. Contact Dermatitis, 2004, 70, p. 3–10.

45. LACHAPELLE, J. M., MAIBACH, H. I. Patch Testing and Prick Testing. A Practical Guide. 2nd ed. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 2009, 195 s. ISBN 978-3-540-92805-8.

46. LACHAPELLE, J. M. Giant Steps in Patch Testing. Phoenix, USA, SmartPractice Phoenix, 2010, 169 s. ISBN 978-0-9773571-2-3.

47. LIDÉN, C. Nickel allergy following EU regulation – more action is needed. Br. J. Dermatol., 2013,169, p. 733.

48. LISI, P., STINGENI, L., CRISTAUDO, A. et al. Clinical and epidemiological features of textile contact dermatitis: an Italian multicentre study. Contact Dermatitis, 2014, 70, p. 344–350.

49. LUNDOV, M. D., KRONGAARD, T., MENNÉ, T. L. et al. Methylisothiazolinone contact allergy: a review. Br. J. Dermatology, 2011,165, p. 1178–1182.

50. LUNDOV, M. D., OPSTRUP, M. S., JOHANSEN, J. D. Methylisothiazolinone contact allergy – a growing epidemic. Contact Dermatitis, 2013, 69, p. 271–275.

51. MADSEN, J. T., ANDERSEN, K. E. Further evidence of the methylisothiazolinone epidemic. Contact Dermatitis, 2014, 70, 4, p. 246–247.

52. MACHOVCOVÁ, A., DASTYCHOVÁ, E., KOŠŤÁLOVÁ, D. et al. Common contact sensitizers in the Czech Republic. Patch test results in 12,058 patients with suspected contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis, 2005, 53, 3, p. 162–166.

53. MACHOVCOVÁ, A. Contact Dermatitis in Children. In Young Suck, R. O., (Ed). Contact Dermatitis. Rijeka: InTech, 2011, p. 141–156.

54. MACHOVCOVÁ, A. Profesionální kožní nemoci z povolání. In Pelclová, D. a kol. Nemoci z povolání a intoxikace. Praha: Karolinum, 2014, p. 41–48.

55. MALINAUSKIENE, L., BRUZE, M., RYBERG, K. et al. Contact allergy from disperse dyes in textiles-a review. Contact Dermatitis, 2013, 68, p. 65–75.

56. MARIDET, C., ATGE, B., AMICI, J.-M. et al. The electronic cigarette: the new source of nickel contact allergy of the 21st century? Contact Dermatitis, 2015, 73, p. 49–50.

57. MIDANDER, K., JULANDER, A., SKARE, L. et al. The cobalt spot test – further insights into its performance and use. Contact Dermatitis, 2013, 69, p. 280–287.

58. MIDANDER, K., KETTELARIJ, J., JULANDER, A. et al. Nickel release from white gold. Contact Dermatitis, 2014, 71, p. 109–111.

59. MIDANDER, K., HURTIG, A., BORG TORNBERG, A. et al. Allergy risks with laptop computers – nickel and cobalt release. Contact Dermatitis, 2016, 74, p. 353–359.

60. MOUSTAFA, M., HOLDEN, C. R., ATHAVALE, P. et al. Patch testing is a useful investigation in children with eczema. Contact Dermatitis, 2011, 65, p. 208–212.

61. MOWAD, C. M., MARKS, J. G. Jr. Allergic Contact Dermatitis. In Bolognia, J. L., Jorizzo, J. L., Schaffer, J. V. Dermatology. 3rd ed., Vol. I, USA: Elsevier Saunders: 2012, p. 233–248.

62. MOWAD, CM., ANDERSON, B., SCHEINMAN, P. et al. Allergic contact dermatitis: Patient diagnosis and evaluation. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 2016, 74, 6, p. 1029–1040.

63. NARDELLI, A., CARBONEZ, A., DRIEGHE, J. et al. Results of patch testing with fragrance mix 1, fragrance mix 2, and their ingredients, and Myroxylon pereirae and colophonium, over a 21-year period. Contact Dermatitis, 2013, 68, p. 307–313.

64. PATEL, A. N., WOOTTON, C. I., ENGLISH, J. S. Methylisothiazolinone allergy in the paediatric population: the epidemic begins? Br. J. Dermatol., 2014, 170, 5, p. 1200–1201.

65. PONTÉN, A., GOOSSENS, A., BRUZE, M. Recommendation to include formaldehyde 2.0% aqua in the European baseline patch test series. Contact Dermatitis, 2013, 69, p. 372–374.

66. RIETSCHEL, R. L., FOWLER, J. F. Jr. Fisher’s Contact Dermatitis. 6th ed., Hamilton: BC Decker Inc, 2008, 862 s. ISBN 978-1-55009-378-0.

67. RUI, F., BOVENZI, M., PRODI, A. et al. Nickel, chromium and cobalt sensitization in a patch test population in north-eastern Italy (1996–2010). Contact Dermatitis, 2013, 68, p. 23–31.

68. RYBERG, K., AGNER, T., ANDERSEN, K. E. et al. Patch testing with a textile dye mix – a multicentre study. Contact Dermatitis, 2014, 71, p. 215–223.

69. SALAM, T. N., FOWLER, J. F. Jr. Balsam-related systemic contact dermatitis. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 2001, 45, p. 377–381.

70. SCHNUCH, A., UTER, W., REICH, K. Allergic contact dermatitis and atopic eczema. In Ring, J., Przybilla, B., Ruzicka, T., (Eds.). Handbook of Atopic Eczema. 2nd ed., Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2006, p. 178–201.

71. SCHNUCH, A., UTER, W., GEIER, J. et al. Sensitization to 26 fragrances to be labelled according to current European regulation. Contact Dermatitis, 2007, 57, p. 1–10.

72. SCHNUCH, A., LESSMANN, H., FROSCH, P. J. et al. Para-phenylenediamine: the profile of an important allergen. Results of the IVDK. Br. J. Dermatol., 2008, 159, p. 379–386.

73. SCHNUCH, A., WOLTER, J., GEIER, J. et al. Nickel allergy is still frequent in young German females – probably due to insufficient protection from nickel-releasing objects. Contact Dermatitis, 2011, 64, p. 142–150.

74. SCHNUCH, A., LESSMANN, H., GEIER, J. et al. Contact allergy to preservatives. Analysis of IVDK data 1996–2009. Contact Dermatitis, 2011, 64, p. 1316–1325.

75. SCHNUCH, A., SCHWITULLA, J. Decrease in nickel allergy in women after the second EU nickel directive. Contact Dermatitis, 2013, 69, p. 253–256.

76. SCHRAM, S. E., WARSHAW, E. M., LAUMANN, A. Nickel hypersensitivity: a clinical review and call to action. Int. J. Dermatol., 2010, 49, p. 115–125.

77. THYSSEN, J. P., JOHANSEN, J. D. Mobile phones are now covered by the European Union Nickel Directive. Contact Dermatitis, 2009, 61, p. 56–57.

78. THYSSEN, J. P., ENGKILDE, K., LUNDOV, M. D. et al. Temporal trends of preservative allergy in Denmark (1985–2008). Contact Dermatitis, 2010, 62, p. 102–108.

79. THYSSEN, J. P., SKARE, L., LUNDGREN, L. et al. Sensitivity and specificity of the nickel spot (dimethylglyoxime) test. Contact Dermatitis, 2010, 62, 279–288.

80. THYSSEN, J. P., MENNÉ, T., JOHANSEN, J. D. The increase in p-phenylenediamine allergy in Denmark is not explained by an increase in contact allergy to para group chemicals. Contact Dermatitis, 2011, 64, p. 158–184.

81. THYSSEN, J. P., UTER, W., MCFADDEN, J. et al. The EU Nickel Directive revisited-future steps towards better protection against nickel allergy. Contact Dermatitis, 2011, 64, p. 121–125.

82. THYSSEN, J. P., MENNÉ, T., LIDÉN, C. et al. Cobalt release from implantants and consumer items and characteristics of cobalt sensitized patients with dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis, 2012, 66, 3, p. 113–122.

83. THYSSEN, J. P., STRANDESEN, M., POULSEN, P. B. et al. Chromium in leather footwear-risk assessment of chromium allergy and dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis, 2012, 66, p. 279–285.

84. THYSSEN, J. P., JOHANSEN, J. D. Hexavalent chromium in leader is now regulated in European Union member states to limit chromium allergy and dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis, 2013, 70, p. 1–2.

85. THYSSEN, J. P., JOHANSEN, J. D., JELLESEN, M. S. et al. Consumer leather exposure: an unrecognized cause of cobalt sensitization. Contact Dermatitis, 2013, 69, p. 276–279.

86. THYSSEN, J. P., JELLESEN, M. S., MØLLER, P. et al. Allergic chromium dermatitis from wearing ‘chromium-free’ footwear. Contact Dermatitis, 2014, 70, p. 185–187.

87. TOMAR, J., JAIN, V. K., AGGARWAL, K. et al. Contact allergies to cosmetics: testing with 52 cosmetic ingredients and personal products. J. Dermatol., 2005, 32, p. 951–955.

88. TRAVASSOS, A. R., BRUZE, M., DAHLIN, J. et al. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by nickel in a green eye pencil. Contact Dermatitis, 2011, 65, p. 307–308.

89. URBANČEK, S., DASTYCHOVÁ, E., BUCHVALD, D. et al. Kontaktné alergeny v pracovnom a životnom prostředí. 2. upravené vydání, Banská Bystrica: Press Group, 2013, 304 s. ISBN 80-969307-5-3.

90. UTER, W., RAMSCH, C., ABERER, W. et al. The European baseline series in 10 European Countries 2005/2006 – results of the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA). Contact Dermatitis, 2009, 61, p. 31–38.

91. UTER, W., GEFELLER, O., GEIER, J. et al. Methylchloroisothiazolinone/ methylisothiazolinone contact sensitization: diverging trends in subgroups of IVDK patients in a period of 19 years. Contact Dermatitis, 2012, 67, p. 125–129.

92. UTER, W., YAZAR, K., KRATZ, E.-M. et al. Coupled exposure to ingredients of cosmetic products: II. Preservatives. Contact Dermatitis, 2013, 70, p. 219–226.

93. UTER, W., GEFELLER, O., GEIER, J. et al. Contact sensitization to cobalt – multifactorial analysis of risk factors based on long-term data of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology. Contact Dermatitis, 2014, 71, p. 326–337.

94. VANDEVENNE, A., VANDEN BROECKE, K., GOOSSENS, A. Sofa dermatitis caused by methylisothiazolinone in a leather-care product. Contact Dermatitis, 2014, 71, p. 111–113.

95. VALLADARES-NARGANES, L. M., SANCHEZ-SAMBUCETY, P., RUIZ-GONZALEZ, I. et al. Lymphomatoid dermatitis caused by contact with textile dyes. Contact Dermatitis, 2013, 68, p. 62–64.

96. VAN OOSTEN, E. J., SCHUTTELAAR, M.-L.A., COENRAADS, P. J. Clinical relevance of positive patch test reactions to the 26 EU-labelled fragrances. Contact Dermatitis, 2009, 61, p. 217–223.

97. VAN STEENKISTE, E., GOOSSENS, A., MEERT, H. et al. Airborne-induced lymphomatoid contact dermatitis caused by methylisothiazolinone. Contact Dermatitis, 2015, 72, p. 237–240.

98. VERHULST, L., PERSSON, L., ZIMERSON, E. et al. Palpebral eczematous dermatitis caused by nickel in an eye pencil. Contact Dermatitis, 2014, 70, p. 247–249.

99. WAHLBERG, J. E., LINDGERG, M. Patch testing. In Frosch, P. J., Menné, T., Lepoittevin, J.-P., (Eds.). Contact Dermatitis, 4th ed., Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2006, p. 366–390.

100. WARBURTON, K. L., WILKINSON, M. Contact allergy to methylisothiazolinone: Has there been any change? Experience of a UK centre. Contact Dermatitis, 2015, 72, p. 398–400.

101. WÖHRL, S., JANDL, T., STINGL, G. et al. Mobile telephone as new source for nickel dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis, 2008, 56, p. 113.

102. WONG, C. C., NIXON, R. L. Systemic allergic dermatitis caused by cobalt and cobalt toxicity from a metal on a metal hip replacement. Contact Dermatitis, 2014, 71, p. 113–114.

103. YAZAR, K., JOHNSSON, S., LIND, M. L. et al. Preservatives and fragrances in selected consumer-available cosmetics and detergents. Contact Dermatitis, 2011, 64, p. 265–272.