Prenatal Screening of Congenital Defects in the CRin 1998
Authors:
V. Gregor 1; A. Šípek 2; M. Chudobová 3
Authors‘ workplace:
Institut postgraduálního vzdělávání ve zdravotnictví, Subkatedra lékařské genetiky, Praha, vedoucí prof.
1
Published in:
Ceska Gynekol 2000; (6): 387-392
Category:
Overview
Objective:
Presentation of prenatal diagnostics results in the year 1998 and their comparison withthe period 1990 - 1997.Design: A retrospective study.Setting: Subchair of Medical Genetics, Postgraduate Medical Institute, Vídeňská 800, Praha 4,Czech Republic.Methods: Processing of prenatal diagnostics data obtained from departments of Medical Geneticsfrom all the Czech Republic. The comparison with livebirths with congenital malformation wasmade possible using the data from Statistics Reports „Congenital malformation in a foetus/new-born“ which are filed in the Institute of Health Information and Statistics. For a comparison onthe international level the data published by the International Clearinghouse for Birth DefectsMonitoring Systems were used.Results: 553 foetuses with congenital malformation were diagnosed in 1998. In the same year, 406pregnancies were terminated from this reason. Totally, 445 particular malformations were foundin the above mentioned foetuses. Most often, inborn chromosomal aberrations (and Down Syndro-me especially) were detected. Down Syndrome itself was diagnosed in 101 cases, out of which in98 cases the pregnancy was terminated. Taking into account 61 cases of Down Syndrome inlivebirths in 1998, the sensitivity of prenatal diagnostics of this defect is 61.64%. Finally, a compa-rison of our results with data from different congenital malformation registers all over the worldwas made.Conclusion: An increase of the prenatal diagnostics of congenital malformation as well as itsimprovement has taken place in the Czech Republic in last years. This improvement is accompa-nied by an increase of the number of prenatally diagnosed cases and also by an increase of thenumber of terminated pregnancies as its consequence. An incidence of severe congenital malfor-mations therefore decreases in livebirths. An efficiency of prenatal diagnostics is fully comparab-le to the results published by major congenital malformation registers worldwide.
Key words:
prenatal diagnostics, secondary prevention, congenital malformation, Down syndro-me, sensitivity
Labels
Paediatric gynaecology Gynaecology and obstetrics Reproduction medicineArticle was published in
Czech Gynaecology
2000 Issue 6
Most read in this issue
- Ambulatory Hysteroscopy - a New Trend in Diagnosticsand Treatment of Intrauterine Pathologies
- Radical Trachelectomy in the Treatment of EarlyCervical Carcinoma
- Ablation of the Endometrium: Prospective 5-years“Follow up“ Study
- Coloured and Duplex Dopplerometry in the PrenatalDiagnosis of Congenital Developmental Defects