#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Visualization of Numerical Centrosomal Abnormalities by Immunofluorescent Staining


Authors: F. Kryukov 1;  E. Dementyeva 1;  P. Kuglík 1,2;  R. Hájek 1,3,4
Authors‘ workplace: Babak Myeloma Group, Department of Pathological Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic 1;  Laboratory of Molecular Cytogenetics, Department of Genetics and Molecular Biology, Institute of Experimental Biology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic 2;  Laboratory of Experimental Hematology and Cell Immunotherapy, Department of Clinical Hematology, University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic 3;  Department of Internal Medicine – Hematooncology, University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic 4
Published in: Klin Onkol 2011; 24(Supplementum 1): 49-52

Overview

The presence of multiple centrosomes in tumor cells is associated with the formation of multi­polar mitotic spindles and results in aneuploidy of both daughter cells. Centrosome amplification is a feature of all cancer cells. We have previously described centrosome amplification in abnormal B cells. Further studies of centrosome amplification in different stages of B lineage development could provide important information about multiple myeloma pathogenesis.

Key words:
multiple myeloma – B cells – centrosome amplification – plasma cells

This work was supported by research grants of The Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports: LC06027, MSM0021622434; research projects of IGA of The Ministry of Health: NS10406, NS10207, NT11154 and grant of GACR GAP304/10/1395.

The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study.

The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE “uniform requirements” for biomedical papers.

Introduction

Centrosomes are small organelles composed of two cylindrically shaped centrioles surrounded by pericentriolar material in a normal mitotic cell. The centrosome function is to direct mitotic bipolar spindles in a process that is essential for accurate chromosome segregation during mitosis [1,2]. Centrosomes duplicate once per cell cycle, and each daughter cell receives one centrosome upon cytokinesis [3]. The presence of multiple centrosomes in tumor cells is associated with formation of multipolar mitotic spindles and faulty chromosome segregation which usually results in aneuploidy of both daughter cells [3]. In addition, centrosomes have recently come into focus as part of the network that integrates cell cycle arrest and repairs signals in response to genotoxic stress – the DNA damage response [4]. It has been well established that centrosome amplification (CA) is a distinct feature of most cancer cells [5]. Recent studies have shown the presence of CA in all stages of monoclonal gammopathies. Centrosome amplification is present in about a third of multiple myeloma (MM) cases, and it is likely that CA contributes to the accumulation of genomic abnormalities in tumor cells during disease progression [8]. Using immunofluorescent staining, we have confirmed the presence of CA in early stages of plasma cells development (abnormal B-cells) for the first time [6].

In this paper, we will describe in details immunofluorescent staining of CA in different stages of MM cell development, method possibilities, its advantages and disadvantages.

Methodology

Centrin, an integral centrosomal protein, was selected as the target for determination of centrosome copy number in B-cells and plasma cells (PCs). Immunofluorescent staining of centrin in B-cells and PCs is performed with required modification for commercially available antibodies. Bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMC) are isolated using gradient density centrifugation on Histopaque 1077 (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA). Cytospin slides for immunolabeling detection of CA in PCs are prepared as follows: approximately 100,000 BMMC are placed on a slide and air dried for 24 h at room temperature. In case of PCs infiltration less than 5% in BMMC, CD138+ cells are sorted directly on microscopic slides by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) using anti-CD138 fluorescence-labeled antibody (Beckman Coulter, Inc., CA, USA). Then, PCs are fixed in ice-cold methanol for 5 min at room temperature. B-cells are isolated from BMMC after CD138+ cells depletion using magnetic cell separation (MACS) utilizing magnetic labeled anti-CD138 antibodies (Miltenyi Biotec, Germany). Early stages of B-cells (CD19+) are sorted directly on microscope slides from CD138 cell fraction by FACS using anti-CD19 fluorescent-labeled antibody (Beckman Coulter). Cytoplasmic membrane permeabilization is done by Triton X-100 0.2% (Affymetrix/USB, UK) for 1 minute at 37°C. After that, slides are placed in PBS for 10 min using gentle agitation. To prevent non-specific binding, blocking buffer (PBS with 10% normal goat serum – Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., CA, USA) is added to each slide and incubated for 20 min in the wet chamber at 37°C. After incubation, the blocking buffer is poured off by gentle agitation during 10 min. After that, 20 μl of diluted (3 : 1,000) primary antibody (Centrin 1/2 rabbit polyclonal antibody Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) is applied to each slide. The slides are incubated for 1 hr in the wet chamber at 37°C. To wash out unspecific antibody binding, slides are washed 3 times with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) for 5 min each using gentle agitation. The secondary goat anti-rabbit IgG antibody (1.5 : 1000) is applied (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) and incubated under the same conditions for 45 min. Another step of washing is done again 3 times (PBS for 5 min, light-protected). Further immunolabeling on cytospin slides is done, using immunoglobulin light chain staining, according to the procedure described previously [7]. A cover slip is applied on all slides using mounting medium antifade without propidium iodide (PI) for plasma cells and DAPI (4‘,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) for B cells.

One hundred cells are scored per each slide. Up to four centrin signals (representing four centrioles of two centrosomes) can be present in a normal cell depending on the phase of cell cycle. Thus, the presence of more than four centrin signals was chosen as a criterion for CA [8]. According to the centrin copy number, we are able to identify three cell subpopulations:

  1. no centrin signal (non-CS),
  2. 1–4 centrin signals (1–4 CS) or
  3. more than 4 signals of centrin.

Samples with more than 11% of B cells with > 4 signals of centrin are considered CA-positive (Fig. 1). The threshold for CA positivity was calculated as the M+3SD of CA-positive cells detected in healthy donors.

Fig. 1. B-cells (CD 19+) were identifi ed by DAPI (blue), and centrin was stained with anticentrin 1/2 conjugated with FITC/ TR (arrow; green/red). (A, D) 2 signals – cells with 1 to 4 signals were considered to have normal centrosome. (B) Centrosome amplifi cation (> 4 fl uorescence signals of centrin) – abnormal B cell. (A, B, D) centrosomes are in projection of the cell nucleus. The cells were visualized with either Olympus BX61 fl uorescence microscope equipped with a Vosskuhler 1300D digital camera and LUCIA-KARYO/FISH/CGH imaging system (Laboratory Imaging, s.r.o, Czech Republic) or microscope AXIOPLAN 2 Imaging (Carl Zeiss Imaging Solutions GmbH, München, Germany) equipped with computer analysis system ISIS (MetaSystems GmbH, Altlussheim, Germany).
Fig. 1. B-cells (CD 19+) were identifi ed by DAPI (blue), and centrin was stained with anticentrin 1/2 conjugated with FITC/ TR (arrow; green/red). (A, D) 2 signals – cells with 1 to 4 signals were considered to have normal centrosome. (B) Centrosome amplifi cation (> 4 fl uorescence signals of centrin) – abnormal B cell. (A, B, D) centrosomes are in projection of the cell nucleus. The cells were visualized with either Olympus BX61 fl uorescence microscope equipped with a Vosskuhler 1300D digital camera and LUCIA-KARYO/FISH/CGH imaging system (Laboratory Imaging, s.r.o, Czech Republic) or microscope AXIOPLAN 2 Imaging (Carl Zeiss Imaging Solutions GmbH, München, Germany) equipped with computer analysis system ISIS (MetaSystems GmbH, Altlussheim, Germany).

Methodological Pitfalls in Multiple Myeloma Research

There are two main problems in the methodological part of MM research. Bone marrow aspirate is a mixture of abnormal cells and other cell types. Each population of interest has to be separated. The second problem is the lack of cells of interest in research material for complex patient investigation. It was optimized in our laboratory and shown that immunofluorescent staining can be carried out on cells separated and sorted by FACS directly on microscope slides. Thereby, only one thousand cells are enough. In case of PCs, there is an­other possibility to use cytospin slides of 100,000 BMMC with further immuno­globulin light chain staining. Thus, described method gives us a possibility to analyze numerical centrosome abnormalities by detection of supernumerary centrioles on small amount of cells using commercially available antibody.

State of the Art

CA is common in MM, occurs in early stages of malignant cell development and may represent a mechanism leading to genomic instability in MM [9]. Previously, studies described immunofluorescent staining of 3 main structural centrosome proteins, including pericentrin, γ-tubulin and centrin. Studies, based on different target proteins, conclude accu­mulation of centrosome with disease development: the mean number of centro­somes per cell and the percentage of tumor cells with centrosome abnormalities increased progressively from MGUS to MM [10,11].

Other structural abnormalities such as increased centrosome volume, accumulation of excess pericentriolar material and inappropriate phosphorylation of centrosomal proteins are not detectable by previously described method. Supernumerary centrosomes can result from replication errors or failure of cytokinesis, whereas overexpression of centrosomal proteins, such as pericentrin, TACC and aurora kinase, can induce structural centrosomal abnormalities [12,13]. Centrosome volumes can be determined by three-dimensio­nal rendering of confocal z-stacks labeled with γ-tubulin. It was published that mean total centrosome volume highly correlates with numerical centrosome abnormalities and is significantly higher in MM compared to MGUS [10]. Study of gene expression-based index (centrosome index) comprising the expression of genes encoding the main centrosomal proteins, centrin, pericentrin, and γ-globulin, has found that it was associated with poor prognostic genetic subtypes and portends a short survival. [11]. Evaluation of expression profile of genes, involved in numerical and structural centrosome abnormalities, showed their significant increase in CA positive patients versus CA negative (CA positive/negative patients were defined by IF staining of centrin).

Despite comprehensive data about CA in PCs, preceding B cell populations in the light of carcinogenesis are still not examined enough. Further studies of B cells with CA in different stages of their development could provide important information about MM pathogenesis.

Prof. MUDr. Roman Hájek, CSc.
Babak Myeloma Group
Department of Pathological Physiology
Faculty of Medicine
Masaryk University
Kamenice 5
625 00 Brno
Czech Republic
e-mail: r.hajek@fnbrno.cz


Sources

1. Hinchcliffe EH, Sluder G. “It takes two to tango”: understanding how centrosome duplication is regulated throughout the cell cycle. Genes Dev 2001; 15(10): 1167–1181.

2. Krämer A, Neben K, Ho AD. Centrosome replication, genomic instability and cancer. Leukemia 2002; 16(5): 767–775.

3. Rebacz B, Larsen TO, Clausen MH et al. Identification of griseofulvin as an inhibitor of centrosomal clustering in a phenotype-based screen. Cancer Res 2007; 67(13): 6342–6350.

4. Löffler H, Lukas J, Bartek J et al. Structure meets function – centrosomes, genome maintenance and the DNA damage response. Exp Cell Res 2006; 312(14): 2633–2640.

5. Harrison MK, Adon AM, Saavedra HI. The G1 phase Cdks regulate the centrosome cycle and mediate oncogene-dependent centrosome amplification. Cell Div 2011; 6: 2.

6. Dementyeva E, Nemec P, Kryukov F et al. Centrosome amplification as a possible marker of mitotic disruptions and cellular carcinogenesis in multiple myeloma. Leuk Res 2010; 34(8): 1007–1011.

7. Ahmann GJ, Jalal SM, Juneau AL et al. A novel three-color, clone-specific fluorescence in situ hybridization procedure for monoclonal gammopathies. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1998; 101(1): 7–11.

8. Salisbury JL. Centrin, centrosomes, and mitotic spindle poles. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1995; 7(1): 39–45.

9. Chng WJ, Fonseca R. Centrosomes and myeloma; aneuploidy and proliferation. Mol Mutagen 2009; 50(8): 697–707.

10. Maxwell CA, Keats JJ, Belch AR et al. Receptor for hyaluronan-mediated motility correlates with centrosome abnormalities in multiple myeloma and maintains mitotic integrity. Cancer Res 2005; 65(3): 850–860.

11. Chng WJ, Ahmann GJ, Henderson K et al. Clinical implication of centrosome amplification in plasma cell neoplasm. Blood 2006; 107(9): 3669–3675.

12. Zhou H, Kuang J, Zhong L et al. Tumour amplified kinase STK15/BTAK induces centrosome amplification, aneuploidy and transformation. Nat Genet 1998; 20(2): 189–193.

13. Nigg EA. Centrosome aberrations: cause or consequence of cancer progression? Nat Rev Cancer 2002; 2(11): 815–825.

Labels
Paediatric clinical oncology Surgery Clinical oncology
Topics Journals
Login
Forgotten password

Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.

Login

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#