#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Rare cases imitating acute appendicitis: Three case reports and a review of literature


Vzácné případy napodobující akutní apendicitidu: tři kazuistiky a přehled literatury

Akutní apendicitida, se svým typickým klinickým průběhem, je jedna z nejčastějších diagnóz vyžadující akutní operaci. V těchto třech kazuistikách prezentujeme pacienty, jež měli typický klinický průběh svědčící pro akutní apendicitidu, která se však během operace nepotvrdila. CT nebo MR nebyly předoperačně provedeny vzhledem k typických příznakům akutní apendicitidy. V první kazuistice je popsán pacient s pravostrannou divertikulitidou, v druhé kazuistice gravidní pacientka ve 33. týdnu těhotenství s torzí pravého ovária a v poslední popisujeme spontánní perforaci apendikální mucinózní neoplazie.

Klíčová slova:
pravostranná divertikulitida – dermoidní cysta – mucinózní neoplazie – pseudomyxom peritonea – apendicitida


Authors: L. Kunovsky 1;  Z. Kala 1;  L. Mitas 1;  V. Can 1;  Jiří Dolina 2 ;  E. Nemcová 3;  L. Klvacova 4;  T. Gajdosova 5;  I. Penka 1
Authors place of work: Department of Surgery, University Hospital Brno Bohunice, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno Head of Department: prof. Z. Kala, M. D., Ph. D. 1;  Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Brno Bohunice, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno Head of Department: prof. A. Hep, M. D., Ph. D. 2;  Department of Radiology, University Hospital Brno Bohunice, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno Head of Department: prof. V. Valek, M. D., Ph. D. 3;  Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno Bohunice, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno Head of Department: prof. J. Mayer, M. D., Ph. D. 4;  Department of Pathology, University Hospital Brno Bohunice, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno Head of Department: assoc. prof. L. Kren, M. D., Ph. D. 5
Published in the journal: Rozhl. Chir., 2017, roč. 96, č. 2, s. 82-87.
Category: Kazuistika

Summary

Acute appendicitis with its characteristic clinical course is one of the most common diagnoses that require urgent surgery. The following three case reports present patients with symptoms typical of acute appendicitis which was, however, not confirmed intraoperatively. Preoperative CT or MRI were not requested because symptoms clearly indicated acute appendicitis. The first case describes a male patient with right-sided diverticulitis, the second case report involves a pregnant woman in 33rd week of gestation with right adnexal torsion due to a dermoid cyst, and in the last report, a case of spontaneous perforation of appendiceal mucinous neoplasm is presented.

Key words:
right-sided diverticulitis – dermoid cyst – adnexal torsion – mucinous neoplasm – pseudomyxoma peritonei – appendicitis

Introduction

Acute appendicitis (AA) is one of the most common causes for urgent surgery.

The lifetime incidence of AA is approximately 7% [1,2]. In recent studies, a decreasing rate in most countries worldwide has been reported [3–6]. The annual incidence varies from 75/100,000 in Ontario (Canada) [4], 94/100,000 in USA [7], 98/100,000 in Finland [5] to 107/100,000 in Taiwan [6].

The first-line treatment for AA is prompt surgical intervention. Therefore, surgery is sometimes performed for presumed appendicitis and a non-appendiceal and less common diagnosis is finally revealed.

Differential diagnosis of right iliac fossa pain includes a wide variety of conditions. Apart from AA, problems of gynaecological or urological origin, mesenteric lymphadenitis, infectious gastroenteritis, inflammatory bowel disease, cecal tumours etc. can be considered.

In differential diagnosis of right lower quadrant pain, we have recently encountered the following infrequent cases at our department: right-sided diverticulitis, adnexal torsion in late pregnancy and spontaneous perforation of an appendiceal mucinous neoplasm.

Right-sided diverticular disease is rare in the Western world with incidence being approximately 1–2% of all cases of colonic diverticulosis. However, the disease is more common in Asia where the incidence varies between 50–70% [8–11]. Preoperative diagnostics of acute right-sided diverticulitis (RSD) is challenging and the success rate is usually as low as 0−23% [12] due to symptoms similar to AA. Most diagnoses of RSD (70−90%) are made during surgery [12,13].

Right adnexal pathology can often mimic symptoms of AA. A clear distinction based on clinical examination or ultrasound is difficult. Moreover, pregnancy, particularly in its later stages, can make differential diagnosis of right iliac fossa pain even more demanding.

Dermoid cysts represent 20−40% of ovarian neoplasms discovered during pregnancies and can cause serious complications such as rupture, torsion, bleeding, infection, malignancy or obstructed labour [14–16]. The highest number of torsions occurs in the first, occasionally in the second and very rarely in the third trimester [16].

Appendiceal tumours are rare and can be found in less than 1% of the performed appendectomies [17,18]. Of these, low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMN) represent only a minor subgroup [18]. Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is described as mucinous ascites or intraperitoneal mucin deposits containing variable numbers of neoplastic epithelial cells [19]. PMP mostly arise from appendiceal mucinous neoplasms [19,20].

Case report 1

Right-sided diverticulitis

A 39-year-old man was referred to our outpatient department with a two-day history of right iliac fossa pain without nausea or vomiting. The patient was known to have diabetes mellitus and had undergone left inguinal hernia repair. Clinical examination revealed signs of peritonitis in right lower quadrant and blood tests showed elevated inflammatory markers (CRP: 69 mg/l, WBC count: 12×109/l). An ultrasound scan proved a thickened appendix wall as well as mild inflammatory changes in the caecum and ascending colon. The patient was admitted for a high suspicion of AA and laparoscopy was performed, however, with surprising findings. The appendix showed no inflammatory changes. On the contrary, initial stage of cecal diverticulitis was diagnosed (Fig. 1a, 1b). No severe complications were observed and therefore laparoscopic appendectomy was performed. During hospital stay, antibiotic therapy was administered and CT scans were done (Fig. 2a). The patient was discharged on the 6th postoperative day with appropriate instructions and scheduled follow-up. Three months later, the patient was readmitted for abdominal pain with a WBC count of 17x109/l and CRP of 250 mg/l. A repeat CT scan showed extensive diverticulitis of the caecum and the ascending colon with a forming abscess (fluid collection) (Fig. 2b). Laparoscopic revision was carried out and pericecal abscess, distant abscess in small pelvis and inflammatory adhesions between terminal ileum and caecum were found. All pus was aspirated, thorough lavage was performed and two drains were placed into the abdominal cavity (pericaecally and into the small pelvis). Parenteral nutrition and intravenous antibiotic therapy was given. The patient was discharged on day 9 after surgery and scheduled for elective right hemicolectomy in 2 months’ time.

Fig. 1a, 1b: Laparoscopic view – no inflammatory changes of the appendix (green arrow), diverticula with infiltrate (red arrow), other mildly inflamed diverticula in the caecum and ascending colon (blue arrows)
Fig. 1a, 1b: Laparoscopic view – no inflammatory changes of the appendix (green arrow), diverticula with infiltrate (red arrow), other mildly inflamed diverticula in the caecum and ascending colon (blue arrows)

Fig. 2a: CT scan – image of the initial stage of cecal diverticulitis (red arrow – diverticula)
Fig. 2a: CT scan – image of the initial stage of cecal diverticulitis (red arrow – diverticula)

Fig. 2b: CT scan – image of extensive diverticulitis affecting caecum and ascending colon with a forming abscess (fluid collection) (red arrow – diverticula, blue arrows – forming abscess)
Fig. 2b: CT scan – image of extensive diverticulitis affecting caecum and ascending colon with a forming abscess (fluid collection) (red arrow – diverticula, blue arrows – forming abscess)

Case report 2

Adnexal torsion due to a dermoid cyst in the 3rd trimester of pregnancy

A 35-year-old woman in the 33rd week of her second pregnancy suffered from diffuse abdominal pain that lasted for 24 hours and later progressed into the right lower abdomen. The pain was accompanied by nausea and occasional vomiting. The patient was known to have Crohn’s disease affecting terminal ileum, in remission at that point, and a solitary gallbladder stone. Gynaecological examination was unremarkable – normal gestation. Blood tests showed elevated inflammatory markers (CRP: 59 mg/l, WBC count: 11×109/l) and signs of peritoneal irritation were present in the right lower quadrant during physical examination. Abdominal ultrasound study was limited due to patient’s late pregnancy and the appendix was not visualized although indirect signs of AA were reported. There were no signs of acute cholecystitis or active inflammatory changes in the terminal ileum. The patient was admitted for typical signs of AA and, because of her advanced pregnancy, Mc Burney’s laparotomy was performed. Surprisingly, a normal appendix was found together with dermoid cyst 5×3 cm in size causing ovarian torsion on the right side (rotated three times around the axis) (Fig. 3). Detorsion of the ovary and resection of the dermoid cyst was performed. Appendectomy was not indicated due to the absence of inflammatory changes. The patient was discharged 5 days after surgery. She vaginally delivered in the 39th week of gestation. The weight of the newborn was 2100 g. The diagnosis of dermoid cyst was confirmed by histology (Fig. 4).

Fig. 3: Intraoperative findings showing hairs and sebum characteristic for dermoid cyst (green arrow – ovary, blue arrow – part of the dermoid cyst)
Fig. 3: Intraoperative findings showing hairs and sebum characteristic for dermoid cyst (green arrow – ovary, blue arrow – part of the dermoid cyst)

Fig. 4: Histological section of the dermoid cyst – epidermis with sebaceous glands and hair follicles (red arrows), lumen of the dermoid cyst (star), residual ovarian stroma (green arrows)
Fig. 4: Histological section of the dermoid cyst – epidermis with sebaceous glands and hair follicles (red arrows), lumen of the dermoid cyst (star), residual ovarian stroma (green arrows)

Case report 3

Spontaneous perforation of an appendiceal mucinous neoplasm

A 66-year-old woman presented with intermittent pain in the hypogastrium. A CT was done showing only a dilated base of the appendix (Fig. 5a, 5b). The scan was reported as postinflammatory changes. The patient refused any further investigations at that point.

Fig. 5a, 5b: CT scan – dilated appendix in its base, filled with mucus (red arrow), unextended part of the appendix in medial-dorsal position (blue arrow), the caecum (green arrow)
Fig. 5a, 5b: CT scan – dilated appendix in its base, filled with mucus (red arrow), unextended part of the appendix in medial-dorsal position (blue arrow), the caecum (green arrow)

One year later, she was admitted for 2-day history of right hypogastrium pain without vomiting, nausea or dysuria. The patient’s surgical history was significant for hysterectomy performed for uterus prolapse with no other comorbidities reported. Blood test showed altered inflammatory markers. Given the suspicion of AA reported by ultrasound scan together with tenderness in the right lower quadrant, diagnostic laparoscopy was indicated. The procedure was converted to open due to unclear findings in the area of appendix. The appendix was found in the medial-dorsal position, with no inflammatory changes, however, dilated at the base and full of mucinous tissue with signs of spontaneous perforation. Standard appendectomy was performed. The patient’s recovery was uneventful and she was discharged on the 7th postoperative day. The specimen was reported as a low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (Fig. 6a, 6b). In accordance with oncologists, no further surgical intervention was indicated and patient will proceed with clinical follow-up including a surveillance CT scan in 6 months’ time and a colonoscopy.

Fig. 6a: Histological section – low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (red arrows – undulating epithelium with low-grade dysplasia which rests on fibrous stroma; there is no lamina propria, blue arrow – mucin, green arrows – normal non-dysplastic epithelium)
Fig. 6a: Histological section – low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (red arrows – undulating epithelium with low-grade dysplasia which rests on fibrous stroma; there is no lamina propria, blue arrow – mucin, green arrows – normal non-dysplastic epithelium)

Fig. 6b: Histological section through dilated base of the appendix, lumen filled with mucin (star), (red arrows – undulating epithelium with low-grade dysplasia)
Fig. 6b: Histological section through dilated base of the appendix, lumen filled with mucin (star), (red arrows – undulating epithelium with low-grade dysplasia)

Discussion

Differential diagnosis of right lower quadrant pain remains a challenge surgeons frequently face in their clinical practice. The spectrum of organs and potential conditions to be considered is wide and therefore, it is often difficult to reach the right conclusion. Particular case history and physical examination may not raise suspicion of a certain disease. Moreover, ultrasound study or blood test do not always correlate with the clinical findings and do not necessarily reveal the cause of the pain. Three cases were presented in which the only common lead for the surgeon was right iliac fossa pain. Neither ultrasound nor laboratory tests contributed to the right diagnosis.

The treatment of RSD remains controversial and varies from antibiotic therapy only, through prophylactic appendectomy, diverticulectomy, up to radical resection. Despite the controversies, most authors recommend performing a prophylactic appendectomy followed by antibiotic therapy in non-complicated diverticulitis when diagnosed intraoperatively [10,13,21]. The management of RSD depends on the disease stage and should be treated similarly as left-sided diverticulitis [22]. In complicated diverticulitis (stage Ib or higher according to modified Hinchey classification [23]), surgical intervention should be considered [13,21].

For recurrent disease, elective surgical resection should be preferred [13,21]. The early stage of complicated diverticulitis (stage Ib) can be treated conservatively or with CT-guided percutaneous drainage. In Hinchey stage II, CT-guided drainage should be preferred to urgent radical surgery [24]. Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage and drainage (LLD) are also suitable options at this stage. In case of peritonitis (stage III or IV), laparoscopic Hartman’s procedure (LHP) or LLD is indicated according to Liang et al. [25]. In their study, both methods were reported as safe and effective in management of severe diverticulitis. Liang claims that LLD does not treat completely the source of infection, but avoids stoma and has better short- and long-term outcomes than LHP. Gentile et al. [26] published similar results suggesting that LLD is safe and effective, but only for Hinchey stage III. Open Hartmann’s procedure remains the golden standard in the management of stage IV diverticulitis, however, the surgery is associated with a high morbidity and mortality. LLD should be indicated based on individual, complex patient assessment as well as on the department’s experience [27].

In our case, the first attack of diverticulitis was treated with appendectomy followed by antibiotic therapy. The second attack with pericecal abscess was managed by surgery – abscess evacuation and drainage. Given two subsequent episodes of diverticulitis and the fact the second one was classified as complicated, the decision was made to proceed with elective right hemicolectomy.

The incidence of adnexal torsion is approximately 5 per 10 000 spontaneous pregnancies [28,29] and is more frequent in the first and second trimester [15,16]. The onset peaks between 8th and 16th week of gestation when uterus grows faster [15], in contrast to the third trimester when the uterus fills out most of the abdominal cavity and the incidence of torsions is rather sporadic.

Dermoid cysts measuring 5 cm and less with benign ultrasound appearance can be treated conservatively during pregnancy [14,30]. Resection should be performed in the cysts larger than 10 cm because of an increased risk of malignancy, rupture or torsion [14,29,30]. The management of cysts 5−10 cm in size remains controversial. Caspi et al. [31] advocate conservative management of adnexal masses with <6 cm in diameter. Masses of 6−10 cm in size require careful evaluation by ultrasound or MRI imaging. If multilocular, thick-walled, semi-solid cysts or cysts with papillary excrescences are detected, resection is recommended [16,29,30]. Some authors claim that if a dermoid cyst larger than 6 cm in diameter is detected by ultrasound or MRI scan in gravidity, elective resection should be performed to prevent surgical emergency [14,16,30].

If elective surgery is indicated during pregnancy, it should be scheduled between the 16th and 20th week when the fetus is securely implanted. Moreover, some types of cysts (e.g. functional cysts) can resolve spontaneously by the 16th week of gestation [14,29]. Patients who underwent surgery due to adnexal torsion or any laparotomy after 23rd week of gestation are in a significantly higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes compared to patients who had the operation in earlier stages of pregnancy [16,30]. This has been also documented in our case report (newborn hypotrophy – 2100 g).

In the first two trimesters, laparoscopy should be preferred, in contrast to the third trimester where open approach is usually indicated due to uterus size. This decision has also been taken in our patient in the 33rd week of pregnancy. Most current studies have proven that the laparoscopic approach, when compared to open, has similar risks for the fetus. Laparoscopy in pregnancy is considered to be a safe and feasible procedure and the risks of complications are mostly associated with the underlying disease combined with other maternal factors rather than with the type of surgical approach [14,32].

In our case of LAMN, the appendectomy was radical enough because no infiltration of the surrounding colon or mesocolon was present. Nevertheless, careful follow-up is needed including control CT scan after half a year to rule out intraabdominal relapse as well as colonoscopy because the appendiceal neoplasia can be associated with colorectal cancer [17,33]. Patients with mucin limited to the appendix (without any free mucin on the appendix serosa) are at a very low risk of developing PMP and appendectomy is a sufficiently radical procedure. If mucin occurs in the appendix serosa, the risk of PMP has to be considered. Even though, in our case the risk of relapse and PMP had to be considered due to spontaneous perforation, more extended procedure was not indicated from our point of view. The extra-appendiceal mucin was reported by a pathologist as acellular (no neoplastic epithelial cells present). If cellular mucin (with neoplastic epithelial cells) occurred on the appendiceal serosa, the patient would be at a higher risk of developing PMP [18,19,34].

Some authors claim cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) should be considered in patients with a high risk of PMP [18]. More studies focused on the efficacy of CRS and HIPEC should be conducted before these approaches become the method of choice in high-risk patients as they are very difficult to organize and carried out in a limited number of departments; better data about their benefits, effectiveness and significance in the prevention of disease recurrence should therefore be available.

In consensus with oncologists, it has been taken into account that neoplastic epithelial cells had not been detected in the extra-appendiceal mucin and therefore conservative treatment with clinical follow-up was indicated as mentioned previously.

Conclusion

AA usually has a typical clinical course requiring prompt surgery. In this article, three cases are presented where the diagnosis of AA has not been confirmed intraoperatively, nevertheless, in all cases the surgical intervention was indicated. Less common conditions need to be considered in differential diagnosis of right iliac fossa pain. Despite the availability of modern imaging, the indication for surgery should be based on clinical examination and, if any doubts (for example unclear CT or MRI findings), at least a diagnostic laparoscopy should be performed.

Abbreviations:

AA – acute appendicitis

RSD – right-side diverticulitis

LAMN – low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm

PMP – pseudomyxoma peritonei

LLD – laparoscopic peritoneal lavage and drainage

LHP – laparoscopic Hartman’s procedure

CRS – cytoreductive surgery

HIPEC – hyperthermic intraperitonal chemotherapy

CRP – c-reactive protein

WBC – white blood cells

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have not conflict of interest in connection with the emergence of and that the article was not published in any other journal.

Lumir Kunovsky, M.D.

Department of Surgery, University Hospital Brno Bohunice,

Faculty of Medicine MU

Jihlavska 20

625 00 Brno

e-mail: lumir.kunovsky@gmail.com


Zdroje

1. Galli R, Fenner H, Metzger J, et al. Laparoscopic approach in perforated appendicitis: increased incidence of surgical site infection? Surg Endosc 2013;27:2928–33.

2. Omari AH, Khammash MR, Qasaimeh GR, et al. Acute appendicitis in the elderly: risk factors for perforation. World J Emerg Surg 2014;9:6.

3. Andreu-Ballester JC, González-Sánchez A, Ballester F, et al. Epidemiology of appendectomy and appendicitis in the Valencian community (Spain), 1998-2007. Dig Surg 2009;26:406–12.

4. Al-Omran M, Mamdani M, McLeod R. Epidemiologic features of acute appendicitis in Ontario, Canada. Can J Surg 2003;46:263−8.

5. Ilves I, Paajanen HEK, Herzig KH, et al. Changing incidence of acute appendicitis and nonspecific abdominal pain between 1987 and 2007 in Finland. World J Surg 2011;35:731.

6. Lin KB, Lai KR, Yang NP, et al. Epidemiology and socioeconomic features of appendicitis in Taiwan: a 12-year population-based study. World J Emerg Surg. 2015;10:1–13.

7. Buckius MT, McGrath B, Monk J, et al. Changing epidemiology of acute appendicitis in the United States: Study period 1993–2008. J Surg Res 2012;175:185–90.

8. Park SM, Kwon TS, Kim DJ, et al. Prediction and management of recurrent right colon diverticulitis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2014;29:1355–60.

9. Radhi JM, Ramsay JA, Boutross-Tadross O. Diverticular disease of the right colon. BMC Res Notes 2011;4:383.

10. Chiu PW, Lam CY, Chow TL, et al. Conservative approach is feasible in the management of acute diverticulitis of the right colon. ANZ J Surg 2001;71:634–6.

11. Griffiths E, Bergin F, Mudawi A, et al. Acute inflammation of a congenital cecal diverticulum mimicking appendicitis. Med Sci Monit 2003;9:CS107−CS109.

12. Papaziogas B, Makris J, Koutelidakis I, et al. Surgical management of cecal diverticulitis: is diverticulectomy enough? Int J Colorectal Dis 2005;20:24–7.

13. Fang JF, Chen RJ, Lin BC, et al. Aggressive resection is indicated for cecal diverticulitis. Am J Surg 2003;185:135–40.

14. Yakasai IA, Bappa LA. Diagnosis and management of adnexal masses in pregnancy. J Surg Tech Case Rep 2012; 4:79–85.

15. Balci O, Gezginc K, Karatayli R, et al. Management and outcomes of adnexal masses during pregnancy: A 6-year experience. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2008;34:524–8.

16. Walid MS, Boddy MG. Bilateral dermoid cysts of the ovary in a pregnant woman: case report and review of the literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2009;279:105–8.

17. Connor SJ, Hanna GB, Frizelle FA. Appendiceal tumors: Retrospective clinicopathologic analysis of appendiceal tumors from 7,970 appendectomies. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:75–80.

18. Chua TC, Gill P, Gill AJ, et al. Ileocecal intussusception caused by an appendiceal neoplasm. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20:867.

19. Panarelli N, Yantiss R. Mucinous neoplasms of the appendix and peritoneum. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2011;135:1261–8.

20. Carr N, Finch J, Ilesley I, et al. Pathology and prognosis in pseudomyxoma peritonei: A review of 274 cases. J Clin Pathol 2012;65:919–23.

21. Yang H-R, Huang H-H, Wang Y-C, et al. Management of right colon diverticulitis: a 10-year experience. World J Surg 2006;30:1929−34.

22. Gilmore T, Jordan C, Edelstein E. Right-sided diverticulitis mimics appendicitis. J Emerg Med. 2013; 44: e29–32.

23. Biondo S, Golda T, Kreisler E, et al. Outpatient versus hospitalization management for uncomplicated diverticulitis: a prospective, multicenter randomized clinical trial (DIVER Trial). Ann Surg. 2014;259:38−44.

24. Durmishi Y, Gervaz P, Brandt D, et al. Results from percutaneous drainage of Hinchey stage II diverticulitis guided by computed tomography scan. Surg Endosc 2006;20:1129−33.

25. Liang S, Russek K, Franklin ME. Damage control strategy for the management of perforated diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis: Laparoscopic lavage and drainage vs. laparoscopic Hartmann’s procedure. Surg Endosc 2012;26:2835−42.

26. Gentile V, Ferrarese A, Marola S, et al. Perioperative and postoperative outcomes of perforated diverticulitis Hinchey II and III: Open Hartmann’s procedure vs. laparoscopic lavage and drainage in the elderly. Int J Surg 2014;12:S86−9.

27. Zonča P, Ihnát P, Peteja M, et al. Laparoscopic lavage and drainage in the management of acute diverticulitis: is it time to move on? Rozhl Chir 2013;92:634−9.

28. Hasson J, Tsafrir Z, Azem F, et al. Comparison of adnexal torsion between pregnant and nonpregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 202: 536.e1−536.e6.

29. Kolluru V, Gurumurthy R, Vellanki V, et al. Torsion of ovarian cyst during pregnancy: A case report. Cases J 2009;2:9405.

30. Raman A, Sinha G, Sinha A, et al. Subtile presentation of bilateral ovarian dermoid cysts with unilateral torsion: A case report. J Clin Gynecol Obstet 2015;4:232–4.

31. Caspi B, Levi R, Appelman Z, et al. Conservative management of ovarian cystic teratoma during pregnancy and labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:503–5.

32. Sadot E, Telem D, Arora M, et al. Laparoscopy: A safe approach to appendicitis during pregnancy. Surg Endosc 2010;24:383–9.

33. Khan MN, Moran BJ. Four percent of patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery may have synchronous appendiceal neoplasia. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:1856–9.

34. Arnason T, Kamionek M, Yang M, et al. Significance of proximal margin Involvement in low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2015;139:518–21.

Štítky
Chirurgie všeobecná Ortopedie Urgentní medicína

Článek vyšel v časopise

Rozhledy v chirurgii

Číslo 2

2017 Číslo 2
Nejčtenější tento týden
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvyšte si kvalifikaci online z pohodlí domova

Svět praktické medicíny 3/2024 (znalostní test z časopisu)
nový kurz

Kardiologické projevy hypereozinofilií
Autoři: prof. MUDr. Petr Němec, Ph.D.

Střevní příprava před kolonoskopií
Autoři: MUDr. Klára Kmochová, Ph.D.

Aktuální možnosti diagnostiky a léčby litiáz
Autoři: MUDr. Tomáš Ürge, PhD.

Závislosti moderní doby – digitální závislosti a hypnotika
Autoři: MUDr. Vladimír Kmoch

Všechny kurzy
Kurzy Podcasty Doporučená témata Časopisy
Přihlášení
Zapomenuté heslo

Zadejte e-mailovou adresu, se kterou jste vytvářel(a) účet, budou Vám na ni zaslány informace k nastavení nového hesla.

Přihlášení

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte se

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#