Intraoperative diagnosis of the head and neck lesions, thyroid and parathyroid gland, bone and soft tissue, and genitourinary tract

Česká verze

Authors: Jan Laco ^1*; Ondřej Daum ^2,3* ; Iva Zambo ^4*; Ondrej Ondič ^2,3* ; Marián Švajdler ^2,3
Authors place of work: Fingerlandův ústav patologie, Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Lékařská fakulta a Fakultní nemocnice Hradec Králové ¹; Šiklův ústav patologie, Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Lékařská fakulta v Plzni a Fakultní nemocnice Plzeň, Česká republika ²; Bioptická laboratoř, s. r. o., Plzeň ³; I. patologicko-anatomický ústav FN u sv. Anny a LF MU ⁴
Published in the journal: Čes.-slov. Patol., 54, 2018, No. 2, p. 72-80
Category: Přehledový článek

Summary

In this article, indications and pitfalls in frozen section diagnosis in selected organs and systems are discussed. The main indications for frozen section examination of head and neck and genitourinary system lesions are to evaluate the resection margin and the metastatic involvement of lymph nodes. Recently, intraoperative consultation has been introduced for identification of patients who might benefit from testis-sparing surgery. Preoperative fine-needle aspiration has greatly diminished the need for frozen section evaluation of thyroid lesions. The only reasonable indication for intraoperative examination of the thyroid is a lesion suspected of malignancy for which preoperative cytology is not aviable for various reasons. In contrast, frozen section is still routinely requested at many institutions to confirm the presence of parathyroid lesions, although precise differentiation between parathyroid hyperplasia, adenoma, and carcinoma is not possible in most cases by histological assesment alone. Tumors of bone and soft tissue are relatively rare, and most pathologists are unfamiliar with intraoperative consultation of these lesions. However, in many cases, limb-sparing management of bone and soft tissue sarcomas is dependent on intraoperative histological diagnosis. Accurate diagnosis is possible in most instances by correlating the histology with clinical and radiological data. In selected cases, histochemistry and/or intraoperative immunohistochemistry may be helpful in diagnosis of bone lesions.

Keywords:

frozen section – head and neck – thyroid gland – parathyroid gland – soft tissue – urogenital tract

Zdroje

1. Sharma SM, Prasad BR, Pushparaj S, Poojary D. Accuracy of intraoperative frozensection in assessing margins in oral cancer resection. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2009; 8(4): 357-361.

2. Chiosea SI. Intraoperative margin assessment in early oral squamous cell carcinoma. Surg Pathol Clin 2017; 10(1): 1-14.

3. Wenig BM. Atlas of Head and Neck Pathology (2nd edn). Saunders Elsevier; 2008: 390-403, 533-534.

4. Michal M, Kacerovská D, Kazakov DV, Skálová A. Pseudotumory a imitátory malignity v patologii hlavy a krku. Cesk Patol 2012; 48(4): 190-197.

5. Hamburger JI, Hamburger SW. Declining role of frozen section in surgical planning for thyroid nodules. Surgery 1985; 98(2): 307-312.

6. LiVolsi VA, Baloch ZW. Use and abuse of frozen section in the diagnosis of follicular thyroid lesions. Endocr Pathol 2005; 16(4): 285-293.

7. Miller MC, Rubin CJ, Cunnane M, et al. Intraoperative pathologic examination: cost effectiveness and clinical value in patients with cytologic diagnosis of cellular follicular thyroid lesion. Thyroid 2007; 17(6): 557-565.

8. Antic T, Taxy JB. Thyroid frozen section: supplementary or unnecessary? Am J Surg Pathol 2013; 37(2): 282-286.

9. Neale ML, Delbridge L, Reeve TS, Poole AG. The value of frozen section examination in planning surgery for follicular thyroid neoplasms. Aust N Z J Surg 1993; 63(8): 610-613.

10. Ganly I, Wang L, Tuttle RM, et al. Invasion rather than nuclear features correlates with outcome in encapsulated follicular tumors: further evidence for the reclassification of the encapsulated papillary thyroid carcinoma follicular variant. Hum Pathol 2015; 46(5): 657-664.

11. Anton RC, Wheeler TM. Frozen section of thyroid and parathyroid specimens. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2005; 129(12): 1575-1584.

12. Osamura RY, Hunt JL. Current practices in performing frozen sections for thyroid and parathyroid pathology. Virchows Arch 2008; 453(5): 433-440.

13. Iacobone M, Scarpa M, Lumachi F, Favia G. Are frozen sections useful and cost-effective in the era of intraoperative qPTH assays? Surgery 2005; 138(6): 1159-1164.

14. Seethala RR, Ogilvie JB, Carty SE, Barnes EL, Yim JH. Parathyroid lipoadenomas and lipohyperplasias: clinicopathologic correlations. Am J Surg Pathol 2008; 32(12): 1854-1867.

15. Rosen IB, Young JE, Archibald SD, Walfish PG, Vale J. Parathyroid cancer: clinical variations and relationship to autotransplantation. Can J Surg 1994; 37(6): 465-469.

16. Bhaker P, Mohan H, Handa U and Kumar S. Role of intraoperative pathology consultation in skeletal tumors and tumor-like lesions. Sarcoma 2014; 2014: 902104.

17. Bui MM, Smith P, Agresta SV, Cheong D and Letson GD. Practical issues of intraoperative frozen section diagnosis of bone and soft tissue lesions. Cancer Control 2008; 15(1): 7-12.

18. Ashford RU, McCarthy SW, Scolyer RA, Bonar SF, Karim RZ, Stalley PD. Surgical biopsy with intra-operative frozen section. An accurate and cost-effective method for diagnosis of musculoskeletal sarcomas. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88(9): 1207-1211.

19. Yossepowitch O, Thompson RH, Leibovich BC, at al. Positive surgical margins at partial nephrectomy: predictors and oncological outcomes. J Urol 2008; 179(6): 2158-2163.

20. Lam JS1, Bergman J, Breda A, Schulam PG. Importance of surgical margins in the management of renal cell carcinoma. Nat Clin Pract Urol 2008; 5(6): 308-317.

21. 3. Sidana A, Donovan JF, Gaitonde K. Surgeons‘ preferences and practice patterns regarding intraoperative frozen section during partial nephrectomy. Urol Oncol 2014; 32(6): 864-868.

22. Gordetsky J, Gorin MA, Canner J, et al. Frozen section during partial nephrectomy: Does it predict positive margins? BJU Int 2015; 116(6): 868-872.

23. Liapis H, Gaut JP, Klein C, et al. Banff Working Group. Banff histopathological consensus criteria for preimplantation kidney biopsies. Am J Transplant 2017; 17(1): 140-150.

24. Loeser A, Katzenberger T, Vergho DC, Kocot A, Burger M, Riedmiller H. Frozen section analysis of ureteral margins in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: differential impact of carcinoma in situ in the bladder on reliability and impact on tumour recurrence in the upper urinary tract. Urol Int 2014; 92(1): 50-54.

25. Satkunasivam R, Hu B, Metcalfe C, et al. Utility and significance of ureteric frozen section analysis during radical cystectomy. BJU Int 2016; 117(3): 463-468.

26. Baltaci S, Adsan O, Ugurlu O, et al. Reliability of frozen section examination of obturator lymph nodes and impact on lymph node dissection borders during radical cystectomy: results of a prospective multicentre study by the Turkish Society of Urooncology. BJU Int 2011; 107(4): 547-553.

27. Nunez AL, Giannico GA, Mukhtar F, Dailey V, El-Galley R, Hameed O. Frozen section evaluation of margins in radical prostatectomy specimens: a contemporary study and literature review. Ann Diagn Pathol 2016; 24: 11-18.

28. Song J, Li M, Zagaja GP, Taxy JB, Shalhav AL, Al-Ahmadie HA. Intraoperative frozen section assessment of pelvic lymph nodesduring radical prostatectomy is of limited value. BJU Int 2010; 106(10): 1463-1467.

29. Conti A, Santoni M, Burattini L, et al. Update on histopathological evaluation of lymphadenectomy specimens from prostate cancer patients. World J Urol 2017; 35(4): 517-526.

30. Mikuz G, Montironi R, Lopez-Beltran A, Bussolati G. The dilemma of multiorgan donors with high serum PSA--a pathologist‘s proposal. Virchows Arch 2006; 449(2): 273-276.

31. Shen SS, Truong LD, Ro JY. Penis. In: Truong LD, Shen SS, Ro JY, eds. Frozen Setion Library: Genitourinary Tract. New York: Springer Science-Business Media, LLC; 2009: 95-135.

32. Chipollini J, Tang DH, Manimala N, et at. Evaluating the accuracy of intraoperative frozen section during inguinal lymph node dissection in penile cancer. Urol Oncol 2018; 36(1): 14e1-14e5.

33. Heyns CF, Fleshner N, Sangar V, Schlenker B, Yuvaraja TB, van Poppel H. Management of the lymph nodes in penile cancer. Urology 2010; 76(2 Suppl 1): S43-57.

34. Matei DV, Vartolomei MD, Renne G, et al. Reliability of frozen section examination in a large cohort of testicular masses: what did we learn? Clin Genitourin Cancer 2017; 15(4): e689-e696.

35. Djaladat H. Organ-sparing surgery for testicular tumours. Curr Opin Urol 2015; 25(2): 116-120.

36. Dodat H, Chavrier Y, Dyon JF, et al. Primary testicular tumors in children. Apropos of 23 cases. Chir Pediatr 1986; 27(1): 1-13.

37. Lin JN, Wang KL, Chuang JH. Primary testicular tumors in children. Int Surg 1988; 73(3): 190-192.

38. Sheynkin YR, Sukkarieh T, Lipke M, Cohen HL, Schulsinger DA. Management of nonpalpable testicular tumors. Urology 2004; 63(6): 1163-1167.

39. Moch H, Humphrey PA, Ulbright TM, Reuter VE, eds. WHO classification of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs (4th ed). Lyon: IARC; 2016.