NAŠE PRVNÍ ZKUŠENOSTI S NOVOU METODOU PREPARACE DIEAP LALOKU

Autoři: P. Hýža ¹; J. Veselý ¹; L. Streit ¹; D. Schwarz ³; T. Kubek ¹; F. Catalano ²; Lombardo G. A. G. ²
Působiště autorů: Department of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, St. Anne University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic ¹; Breast Unit, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy ²; Institute of Biostatistics and Analyse, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic ³
Vyšlo v časopise: ACTA CHIRURGIAE PLASTICAE, 58, 2, 2016, pp. 64-69

Zdroje

1. BreastCancer.org. U.S.Breast Cancer Statistics. September 17, 2012. Available at: http://www.breastcancer.org/symptoms/understand_bc/statistics.jsp

2. Sisco M, Du H, Warner JP, Howard MA, Winchester DP, Yao K. Have we expanded the equitable delivery of postmastectomy breast reconstruction in the new millennium? Evidence from the national cancer database. J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Nov;215(5):658–66; discussion 666.

3. Matros E, Albornoz CR, Razdan SN, Mehrara BJ, Macadam SA, Ro T, McCarthy CM, Disa JJ, Cordeiro PG, Pusic AL. Cost-effectiveness analysis of implants versus autologous perforator flaps using the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Apr;135(4):937–46.

4. Zhong T, Novak CB, Bagher S, Maass SW, Zhang J, Arad U, O’Neill AC, Metcalfe KA, Hofer SO. Using propensity score analysis to compare major complications between DIEP and free muscle-sparing TRAM flap breast reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Apr;133(4):774–82.

5. Ireton JE, Lakhiani C, Saint-Cyr M. Vascular anatomy of the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Nov;134(5):810e–821e.

6. Ireton JE, Lakhiani C, Saint-Cyr M. Vascular anatomy of the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Nov;134(5):810e–821e.

7. Bajaj AK, Chevray PM, Chang DW.Comparison of donor-site complications and functional outcomes in free muscle-sparing TRAM flap and free DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Mar;117(3):737–46; discussion 747–50.

8. Eltahir Y, Werners LL, Dreise MM, Zeijlmans van Emmichoven IA, Werker PM, de Bock GH. Which breast is the best? Successful autologous or alloplastic breast reconstruction: patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jan;135(1):43–50.

9. Grover R, Padula WV, Van Vliet M, Ridgway EB. Comparing five alternative methods of breast reconstruction surgery: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Nov;132(5):709e–723e.

10. Chun YS, Sinha I, Turko A, Yueh JH, Lipsitz S, Pribaz JJ, Lee BT. Comparison of morbidity, functional outcome, and satisfaction following bilateral TRAM versus bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Oct;126(4):1133-41. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ea42d3.

11. Nahabedian MY, Tsangaris T, Momen B. Breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap or the muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM flap: is there a difference? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Feb;115(2):436–44; discussion 445–6.

12. Garvey PB, Salavati S, Feng L, Butler CE. Perfusion-related complications are similar for DIEP and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps harvested on medial or lateral deep inferior epigastric Artery branch perforators for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Dec;128(6):581e–9e.

13. Selber JC, Nelson J, Fosnot J, Goldstein J, Bergey M, Sonnad SS, Serletti JM. A prospective study comparing the functional impact of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps on the abdominal wall: part I. unilateral reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Oct;126(4):1142–53.

14. Selber JC, Fosnot J, Nelson J, Goldstein J, Bergey M, Sonnad S, Serletti JM. A prospective study comparing the functional impact of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps on the abdominal wall: Part II. Bilateral reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Nov;126(5):1438–53.

15. Man LX, Selber JC, Serletti JM. Abdominal wall following free TRAM or DIEP flap reconstruction: a meta-analysis and critical review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Sep;124(3):752–64.

16. Egeberg A, Rasmussen MK, Sørensen JA. Comparing the donor-site morbidity using DIEP, SIEA or MS-TRAM flaps for breast reconstructive surgery: a meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012 Nov;65(11):1474–80.

17. Hyza P, Streit L, Schwarz D, Kubek T, Vesely J. Vasospasm of the flap pedicle: the effect of 11 of the most often used vasodilating drugs. Comparative study in a rat model. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Oct;134(4):574e–84e. discussion 585e–7e.

18. Blondeel PN. One hundred free DIEP flap breast reconstructions: a personal experience. Br J Plast Surg. 1999 Mar;52(2):104–11.

19. Paget JT, Young KC, Wilson SM. Accurately costing unilateral delayed DIEP flap breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013 Jul;66(7):926–30.

20. Saint-Cyr M, Wong C, Schaverien M, Mojallal A, Rohrich RJ. The perforasome theory: vascular anatomy and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Nov;124(5):1529–44.

21. Wong C, Saint-Cyr M, Arbique G, Becker S, Brown S, Myers S, Rohrich RJ. Three- and four-dimensional computed tomography angiographic studies of commonly used abdominal flaps in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Jul;124(1):18–27.

22. Wong C, Saint-Cyr M, Mojallal A, Schaub T, Bailey SH, Myers S, Brown S, Rohrich RJ. Perforasomes of the DIEP flap: vascular anatomy of the lateral versus medial row perforators and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Mar;125(3):772–82.

23. Lindsey JT. Integrating the DIEP and muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM techniques optimizes surgical outcomes: presentation of an algorithm for microsurgical breast reconstruction based on perforator anatomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Jan;119(1):18–27.