Historic Survey of Posterior Lamellar Keratoplasty Techniques – an Overview
Authors:
P. Studený; D. Křížová; P. Kuchynka
Authors‘ workplace:
CSc., FCMA
; Oční klinika FNKV a 3. LF UK, Praha
přednosta prof. MUDr. Pavel Kuchynka
Published in:
Čes. a slov. Oftal., 72, 2016, No. 4, p. 112-118
Category:
Comprehensive Report
Overview
Some of the modifications of posterior lamellar keratoplasty is at the present considered by most of the corneal surgeons as method of choice in case of patient’s corneal endothelium damage. However, this surgical technique undergoes in the last 20 years relatively rapid development. Even in the current time, there exist side by side and are used different types and modifications of this sort of transplantation. Because of this reason, differences among individual methods are sometimes not accurately understood and the terminology may be used not exactly as well. The authors specify all until now described surgical methods, describe differences among single surgical procedures, and point out their advantages and disadvantages. The methods are described in the same order as they were historically introduced into the literature.
Key words:
posterior lamellar keratoplasty, surgical methods
Sources
1. Agarwal, A., Dua, H.S., Narang, P. et. al.: Pre-Descemet‘s endothelial keratoplasty (PDEK). Br J Ophthalmol, 98; 2014: 1181–5.
2. Ahmed, K.A., McLaren, J.W., Baratz, K.H. et al.: Host and graft thickness after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy.Am J Ophthalmol, 150; 2010: 490–497.
3. Akova, Y.A., Onat, M., Koc, F. et al.: Microbial keratitis following penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers, 30; 1999: 449–55.
4. Aldave, A.J., Hollander, D.A., Branco, B. et al.: Primary graft failure associated with epithelial downgrowth: a case report. BMC Ophthalmol, 25; 2005: 5–11.
5. Alió Del Barrio, J.L., Ziaei, M., Bhogal, M. et al.: Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Deep Lamellar Endothelial Keratoplasty: A New Approach to a Forgotten Technique. Cornea, 34; 2015: 1369–74.
6. Allouch, C., Borderie, V., Touzeau, O. et al.: Incidence et facteurs de risque de l‘hypertonie oculaire au cours des keratoplasties transfixiantes. J Fr Ophtalmol, 26; 2003: 553–61.
7. Anshu, A. Price, M.O., Price, F.W. Jr.: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty and hybrid techniques for managing failed penetrating grafts. Cornea, 32; 2013: 1–4.
8. Anwar, M., Teichmann, K.D.: Big-bubble technique to bare Descemet‘s membrane in anterior lamellar keratoplasty.J Cataract Refract Surg, 28; 2002: 398–403.
9. Barraquer, J.I.: Lamellar keratoplasty. (Special techniques). Ann Ophthalmol, 4; 1972: 437–69.
10. Busin, M., Albé, E.: Does thickness matter: ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 25; 2014: 312–8.
11. Busin, M., Patel, A.K., Scorcia, V. et al.: Stromal support for Descemet‘s membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology, 117; 2010: 2273–7.
12. Cunningham, W.J., Brookes, N.H., Twohill, H.C. et al.: Trends in the distribution of donor corneal tissue and indications for corneal transplantation the New Zealand National Eye Bank Study 2000-2009. Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 40; 2012: 141–7.
13. Dua, H.S., Mastropasqua, L., Faraj, L. et al.: Big bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty: the collagen layer in the wall of the big bubble is unique. Acta Ophthalmol, 93; 2015: 427–30.
14. Dua, H.S., Faraj, L.A., Branch, M.J. et al: The collagen matrix of the human trabecular meshwork is an extension of the novel pre-Descemet‘s layer (Dua‘s layer). Br J Ophthalmol, 98; 2014: 691–7.
15. Dua, H.S., Faraj, L.A., Said, D.G. et al.: Human corneal anatomy redefined: a novel pre-Descemet‘s layer (Dua‘s layer). Ophthalmology, 120; 2013: 1778–85.
16. Farjo, A.A., Rhee, D.J., Soong, H.K. et al.: Iris-sutured posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation during penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea, 23; 2004: 18–28.
17. Galvis, V., Tello, A., Gomez, A.J. et al.: Corneal Transplantation at an Ophthalmological Referral Center in Colombia: Indications and Techniques (2004-2011). Open Ophthalmol J, 17; 2013: 30–33.
18. Gamaleldin, S.A., Salama, M.M., Elshazly, M.I.: Seven-day storage of pneumatically dissected Descemet‘s endothelial grafts with and without Dua‘s layer. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015; Aug 27. doi: 10.1111/aos.12823 (v tisku)
19. Gorovoy, M.S.: Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea, 25; 2006: 886–9.
20. Groh, M.J., Seitz, B., Händel, A. et al.: Expulsive Blutung bei der perforierenden Keratoplastik--Inzidenz und Risikofaktoren. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd, 215; 1999: 152–7.
21. Guerra, F.P., Anshu, A., Price, M.O. et al.: Descemet‘s membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective study of 1-year visual outcomes, graft survival, and endothelial cell loss. Ophthalmology, 118; 2011: 2368–73.
22. Ham, L., van der Wees, J., Melles, G.R.: Causes of primary donor failure in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol, 145; 2008: 639–644.
23. Ham, L., Dapena, I., van Luijk, C. et al.: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy: review of the first 50 consecutive cases. Eye (Lond), 23; 2009: 1990–8.
24. Heinzelmann, S., Maier, P., Böhringer, D. et al.: Visual outcome and histological findings following femtosecond laser-assisted versus microkeratome-assisted DSAEK. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 251; 2013: 1979–85.
25. Hlinomazová, Z., Horáčková, M., Pirnerová, L.: DMEK (Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty) – časné a pozdní pooperační komplikace. Čes slov Oftalmol, 67; 2011: 75–9.
26. Huang, S.C., Wu, S.C., Wu, W.C.et al.: Microbial keratitis-a late complication of penetrating keratoplasty. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg, 94; 2000: 315–7.
27. Hsu, M., Hereth, W.L., Moshirfar, M.: Double-pass microkeratome technique for ultra-thin graft preparation in Descemet‘s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Clin Ophthalmol, 6; 2012: 425–32.
28. Ide, T., Yoo, S.H., Kymionis, G.D.et al.: Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty tissue preparation with femtosecond laser and contact lens. Cornea, 29; 2010: 93–8.
29. Jirásková, N., Rozsíval, P., Urminský, J.: Klinické výsledky 100 transplantací rohovky. Čes slov Oftalmol, 55; 1999: 355–358.
30. Kaiserman, I., Bahar, I., McAllum P. et al.: Suture-assisted vs forceps-assisted insertion of the donor lenticula during Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol, 145; 2008: 986–990.
31. Lie, J.T., Birbal, R., Ham, L.et al.: Donor tissue preparation for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg, 34; 2008: 1578–83.
32. McCauley, M.B., Price, F.W. Jr, Price, M.O.: Descemet membrane automated endothelial keratoplasty: hybrid technique combining DSAEK stability with DMEK visual results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 35; 2009: 1659-64.
33. McKee, H.D., Irion, L.C., Carley, F.M. et al: Donor preparation using pneumatic dissection in endothelial keratoplasty: DMEK or DSEK? Cornea, 31; 2012: 798–800.
34. Melles, G,R., Ong, T,S., Ververs, B. et al.: Preliminary clinical results of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol, 145; 2008: 222–227.
35. Melles, G.R., Ong, T.S., Ververs, B.et al.: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Cornea. 25; 2006: 987-90.
36. Melles, G.R., Wijdh, R.H., Nieuwendaal, C.P.: A technique to excise the descemet membrane from a recipient cornea (descemetorhexis). Cornea, 23; 2004: 286-8.
37. Melles, G.R., Lander, F., Nieuwendaal, C.: Sutureless, posterior lamellar keratoplasty: a case report of a modified technique. Cornea, 21; 2002: 325–327.
38. Melles, G.R., Eggink, F.A., Lander, F.et al: A surgical technique for posterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea, 17; 1998: 618–26.
39. Módis, L.,Jr., Szalai, E., Facskó, A. et al.: Corneal transplantation in Hungary (1946–2009). Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 39; 2011: 520–5.
40. Muraine, M., Gueudry, J., He, Z. et al.: Novel technique for the preparation of corneal grafts for descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol, 156; 2013: 851–9.
41. Patel, S.V.: Graft survival and endothelial outcomes in the new era of endothelial keratoplasty. Exp Eye Res, 95; 2012: 40–7.
42. Pereira, C.R., Guerra, F.P., Price, F.W. Jr. et al.: Descemet‘s membrane automated endothelial keratoplasty (DMAEK): visual outcomes and visual quality. Br J Ophthalmol, 95; 2011: 951–4.
43. Phillips, P.M., Phillips, L.J., Saad, H.A. et al.: „Ultrathin“ DSAEK tissue prepared with a low-pulse energy, high-frequency femtosecond laser. Cornea, 32; 2013: 81–6.
44. Price, M.O., Giebel, A.W., Fairchild, K.M. et al.: Descemet‘s membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective multicenter study of visual and refractive outcomes and endothelial survival. Ophthalmology, 116; 2009: 2361–8.
45. Price, F.W.Jr., Price, M.O.: Descemet‘s stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 50 eyes: a refractive neutral corneal transplant. J Refract Sur, 21; 2005: 339–45.
46. Ruzza, A., Parekh, M., Salvalaio, G. et al.: Bubble technique for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty tissue preparation in an eye bank: air or liquid? Acta Ophthalmol, 93; 2015: 129–34.
47. Schlötzer-Schrehardt U., Bachmann B.O., Tourtas T. et al.: Ultrastructure of the posterior corneal stroma. Ophthalmology, 122; 2015: 693–9.
48. Shinton, A.J., Tsatsos, M., Konstantopoulos, A. et al.: Impact of graft thickness on visual acuity after Descemet‘s stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol, 96; 2012: 246–9.
49. Sikder, S., Nordgren, R.N., Neravetla, S.R. et al.: Ultra-thin donor tissue preparation for endothelial keratoplasty with a double-pass microkeratome. Am J of Ophthalmol, 152; 2011: 202–208.
50. Sinha, R., Vajpayee, R.B., Sharma, N. et al.: Trypan blue assisted descemetorhexis for inadvertently retained Descemet‘s membranes after penetrating keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol, 87; 2003: 654–5.
51. Studený, P., Hamouz, J., Kuchynka, P.: Transplantace rohovek v České republice v roce 2012. Čes a slov Oftal, 70; 2014: 224–227.
52. Studeny, P., Farkas, A., Vokrojova, M. et al.: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty with a stromal rim (DMEK-S). Br J Ophthalmol, 94; 2010: 909–14.
53. Studeny, P., Sivekova, D., Liehneova, K. et al.: Hybrid Technique of Lamellar Keratoplasty (DMEK-S). J Ophthalmol, 2013; 2013: 254383.
54. Taban, M., Behrens, A., Newcomb, R.L.: Incidence of acute endophthalmitis following penetrating keratoplasty: a systematic review. Arch Ophthalmol, 123; 2005: 605–9.
55. Terry, M.A., Hoar, K.L., Wall, J. et al.: Histology of dislocations in endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK and DLEK): a laboratory-based, surgical solution to dislocation in 100 consecutive DSEK cases. Cornea, 25; 2006: 926–32.
56. Terry, M.A., Ousley, P.J.: Endothelial replacement without surface corneal incisions or sutures: topography of the deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty procedure. Cornea, 20; 2001: 14–18.
57. Thomas, P.B., Mukherjee, A.N., O‘Donovan, D. et al.: Preconditioned donor corneal thickness for microthin endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea, 32; 2013: 173–8.
58. Tillett, C.W.: Posterior lamellar keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol, 41; 1956: 530–3.
59. Ting, D.S., Sau, C.Y., Srinivasan, S. et al.: Changing trends in keratoplasty in the West of Scotland: a 10-year review. Br J Ophthalmol, 96; 2012: 405–8.
60. Tseng, S.H., Lin, S.C., Chen, F.K.: Traumatic wound dehiscence after penetrating keratoplasty: clinical features and outcome in 21 cases. Cornea, 18; 1999: 553–8.
61. Vetter, J.M., Butsch, C., Faust, M. et al.: Irregularity of the posterior corneal surface after curved interface femtosecond laser-assisted versus microkeratome-assisted descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea, 32; 2013: 118–24.
62. Wagoner, M.D., Ba-Abbad, R., Al-Mohaimeed, M. et al.: Postoperative complications after primary adult optical penetrating keratoplasty: prevalence and impact on graft survival. Cornea, 28; 2009: 385–94.
63. Wang, J., Hasenfus, A., Schirra, F. et al.: Changing indications for penetrating keratoplasty in Homburg/Saar from 2001 to 2010-histopathology of 1.200 corneal buttons. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 251; 2013: 797–802.
64. Williams, K.A., Lowe, M.T., Keane, M.C. et al.: The Australian Corneal Graft Registry: 2012 Report. Adelaide, Australia: Snap Printing. 2012; vol. 182: 85–6.
65. Zirm E.: Eine erfolgreiche totale Keratoplastik.: Arch Ophthalmol, 64; 1906: 580–593.
66. Zirm, E.K.: Eine erfolgreiche totale Keratoplastik (A successful total keratoplasty). 1906. Refract Corneal Surg, 5; 1989: 258–61.
Labels
OphthalmologyArticle was published in
Czech and Slovak Ophthalmology
2016 Issue 4
Most read in this issue
- Gene Therapy for Inherited RETINAL AND OPTIC NERVE Disorders: Current Knowledge
- Haemangiomas are Common Benign Tumors of the Child
- New Diagnostic Imaging Technique – Shear Wave Elastography
- Ocular Motility Disorders with Diplopia Like the first Symptoms of Paranasal Tumours with Orbital Invasion – a Case Report