Management Renal Tumors
Authors:
M. A. Ordonez; J. M. Mckiernan
Authors‘ workplace:
Columbia University Medical Center New York
Published in:
Urol List 2010; 8(2): 20-23
Overview
With the rising incidence of incidentally discovered small renal tumors, active surveillance with delayed intervention is a viable option for management of these tumors. We review the rational for active surveillance including evaluation of the epidemiology of these tumors and a review of the literature regarding small renal masses. We review criteria for eligibility for active surveillance of small renal masses.
Key words:
renal masses, active surveillance, renal cell carcinoma
Sources
1. Chow WH, Warren JL, Fraumeni JF Jr. Rising incidence of renal cell cancer in the United States. JAMA 1999; 281(17): 1628–1631.
2. Jayson M, Sanders H. Increased incidence of serendipitously discovered renal cell carcinoma. Urology 1998; 51(2): 203–205.
3. Zini L, Capitanio U, Jeldres C et al. Radical versus partial nephrectomy: effect on overall and noncancer mortality. Cancer 2009; 115(7): 1465–1471.
4. Zini L, Capitanio U, Crepel M et al. Cancer-specific and non-cancer-related mortality rates in European patients with T1a and T1b renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int 2009; 103(7): 894–898.
5. Berger A, Atalla MA, Herati AS et al. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: oncological outcomes at 10 years or more. J Urol 2009; 182(5): 2172–2176.
6. Berger A, Canes D, Haber GP et al. Minimally invasive nephron-sparing surgery. Curr Opin Urol 2008; 18(5): 462–466.
7. Aron M, Remer E, Berger A et al. Laparoscopic renal cryoablation: 8-year, single surgeon outcomes. J Urol 2010; 183(3): 889–895.
8. Wehle MJ, Thiel DD, Petrou SP et al. Conservative management of incidental contrast-enhancing renal masses as safe alternative to invasive therapy. Urology 2004; 64(1): 49–52.
9. Abou Yousiff T, Kassouf W, Steinberg J et al. Active surveillance for selected patients with renal masses: updated results with long-term follow-up. Cancer 2007; 110(5): 1010–1014.
10. Thomas AA, Aron M, Hernandez AV et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in octogenarians. Urology 2009; 74(5): 1042–1046.
11. Abouassaly R, Lane BR, Novick AC. Active surveillance of renal masses in elderly patients. J Urol 2008; 180(2): 505–508.
12. Chawla SN, Crispen PL, Hanlon AL et al. The natural history of observed enhancing renal masses: meta-analysis and review of the world literature. J Urol 2006; 175(2): 425–431.
13. Crispen PL, Viterbo R, Fox EB et al. Delayed intervention of sporadic renal masses undergoing ac-tive surveillance. Cancer 2008; 112(5): 1051–1057.
14. Frank I, Blute ML, Cheville JC et al. Solid renal tumors: an analysis of pathological features related to tumor size. J Urol 2003; 170: 2217–2220.
15. Laudano MA, Klafter FE, Katz M et al. Pathological tumour diameter predicts risk of conventional subtype in small renal cortical tumours. BJU Int 2008; 102(10): 1385–1388.
16. McKiernan J, Yossepowitch O, Kattan MW et al. Partial nephrectomy for renal cortical tumors: pathologic findings and impact on outcome. Urology 2002; 60(6): 1003–1009.
17. Rendon RA, Stanietzky N, Panzarella T et al. The natural history of small renal masses. J Urol 2000; 164(4): 1143–1147.
18. Kato M, Suzuki T, Suzuki Y et al. Natural history of small renal cell carcinoma: evaluation of growth rate, histological grade, cell proliferation and apoptosis. J Urol 2004; 172(3): 863–866.
19. Pierorazio PM, Murphy AM, Benson MC et al. Gender discrepancies in the diagnosis of renal cortical tumors. World J Urol 2007; 25(1): 81–85.
Labels
Paediatric urologist UrologyArticle was published in
Urological Journal
2010 Issue 2
Most read in this issue
- SCROTAL ULTRASOUND: PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE
- Management Renal Tumors
- Tumor markes in renal cancer: help for diagnosis, prognosis, treatment and follow up
- A STANDARDIZED ANATOMICAL CLASSIFICATION OF SMALL RENAL TUMORS