#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

What's new in the 2020 update of the CEAP classification system of chronic venous disease?


Authors: Dalibor Musil
Authors‘ workplace: Angiologické centrum, I. interní klinika – kardiologická FN a LF Olomouc
Published in: Vnitř Lék 2021; 67(3): 143-148
Category: Review Articles

Overview

The aim of the 2020 update of the CEAP (Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology) classification is provide the reproducibility of clinical findings between physicians, enable comparison of old and new versions of the CEAP classification, incorporate new evidence- based knowledge into the classification, and provide a balance between simple practical use and highly specific and detailed description of patient with chronic venous disease (CVD) in clinical and other studies. Clinical (C) classification remained unchanged and clinical definitions of all seven classes C0–C6 have been preserved. Class C4 is newly divided into three subclasses: C4a – pigmentation or eczema, C4b – lipodermatosclerosis or atrophie blanche and corona phlebectatica as the C4c clinical subclass has been added. Classes C2 (varicose veins) and C6 (active venous ulcer) are divided into subclasses C2R – recurrent varicose veins and C6R – recurrent active venous ulcer. Etiological (E) classification has not changed, more information on the subgroups has been recommended, resulting in a clearer description of each E subclass. ES is subcategorized to recognize intravenous secondary causes of venous disease (ESI), which is defined as any intravenous condition causing venous wall and/or valve damage; and extravenous secondary causes (ESE), in which case there is no venous wall or valve damage, yet symptoms are present owing to a condition affecting venous hemodynamics either locally or systemically. No cause identified category (EN) is defined of exclusion. The EN descriptor should be present when no other venous etiology (EC, EP, ESI or ESE) is found, yet there are clinical signs and symptoms that can be consistent with those typically associated with venous disease. In the Anatomical (A) classification anatomic abbreviations are now used instead of numbers of the venous segments. Pathophysiological (P) classification has not changed and the basic designation still includes four pathophysiological categories – reflux (PR), obstruction (PO), reflux and obstruction (PR/O), no venous pathophysiology (PN) with the addition of any (one or more) of named specific A anatomic venous segments according to the newly introduced abbreviations.

Keywords:

chronic venous disease – signs – symptoms – clinical presentation – Etiology – Anatomy – pathophysiology


Sources

1. Consensus statement. Classification and Grading of Chronic Venous Disease in the Lower Limbs: A Consensus Statement. Phlebology 1995; 10: 42–45.

2. Reporting standards in venous disease. Prepared by the Subcommittee on Reporting Standards in Venous Disease, ad hoc committee on reporting standards, Society for Vascular Surgery/North American Chapter, International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, J Vasc Surg 1988; 8: 172–181.

3. Lurie F, Passman M, Meisner M et al. The 2020 update of teh CEAP classification system and reporting standards. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2020; 8: 342–352.

4. Vasquez MA, Rabe E, McLafferty RB et al. Revision of the venous clinical severity score: Venous outcomes consensus statement: Special communication of the American Venous Forum ad hoc outcomes working group. J Vasc Surg 2010; 52: 1387–1396.

5. Perrin M, Eklöf B, Van Rij A et al. Venous symptoms: the SYM Vein Consensus statement developed under the auspices of the European Venous Forum. Int Angiology 2016; 35: 374–398.

6. Eklof B, Rutherford RB, Bergan JJ, Carpentier PH, Gloviczki P, Kistner RL, Meissner MH, Moneta GL, Myers K, Padberg FT, Perrin M, Ruckley CV, Smith PC, Wakefield TW. Revision of the CEAP classification of chronic venous disorders. Consensus statement. J Vasc Surg 2004; 40: 1248–1252.

7. Caggiati A, Bergan JJ, Gloviczki P et al. Nomenclature of the veins of the lower limbs: an international interdisciplinary consensus statement. J Vasc Surg 2002; 36: 416–422.

8. Federative International Committee on Anatomical Terminology. Terminologia Anatomica. Stuttgart: Thieme; 1998.

9. Holý M. Syndrom pánevní kongesce. Kardiol Rev Int Med 2014; 16: 321–329.

Labels
Diabetology Endocrinology Internal medicine
Topics Journals
Login
Forgotten password

Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.

Login

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#