Pure uterine lipoma – a paradoxical rarity
Authors:
F. Medić 1; D. Habek 2,3; M. Pavlović 1; A. I. Miletić 1; G. Stanić 4
Authors‘ workplace:
University Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Hospital Sveti Duh, Zagreb, Croatia
1; School of Medicine Catholic, University of Croatia, Zagreb, Croatia
2; University Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Hospital Merkur, Zagreb, Croatia
3; Department of Pathology, University Hospital Sveti Duh, Zagreb, Croatia
4
Published in:
Ceska Gynekol 2023; 88(4): 291-293
Category:
Case Report
doi:
https://doi.org/10.48095/cccg2023291
Overview
Pure uterine lipomas are extremely rare benign uterine tumors. This paper presents the case of a 68-year-old patient with symptomatic leiomyoma-like fundus formation on ultrasound. A hysterectomy was performed with anterior vaginal plastic surgery as a treatment option for concomitant cystocele grade II. Histological diagnosis of pure uterine lipoma with S-100 positive immunohistochemical staining was confirmed. This case shows us that uterine lipoma clinically and diagnostically mimics myoma very well. We believe that surgery as a therapeutical approach is justified in symptomatic patients.
Keywords:
postmenopause – pure uterine lipoma – gynecological surgery
Introduction
Although lipomas are considered the most common soft tissue tumors, the presence of adipose tissue in the uterus is an exception [1]. Pure uterine lipomas are extremely rare, with only a few cases described in the literature. These tumors often mimic uterine leiomyomas in clinical presentation, ranging from asymptomatic patients to those presented with vaginal bleeding, urinary urgency, abdominal pain, and abdominal distension [1–3]. In most cases, postmenopausal women are affected and are distributed intramurally [1–3]. In this paper, we present the case of a postmenopausal patient with a postoperative confirmed diagnosis of pure uterine lipoma.
Own observation
A 68-year-old patient in postmenopause for 18 years was incidentally diag- nosed with a fundal tumor suspected of a leiomyoma on ultrasound examination at her annual check-up a few years ago. The tumor was regularly monitored and stationary upon examination. However, the patient developed pelvic pressure symptoms and stage II cystocele in the last 18 months, and surgical treatment was indicated. The obstetric-gynecological history was unremarkable, with two normal vaginal births and short-term use of hormone replacement therapy during perimenopause. Furthermore, the patient had been treated for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and hypertension for a long time. Preoperatively, ultrasound verified severe hyperechoic, peripherally calcified intramural formation measuring 5 × 4 × 4 cm without pathological Doppler flow findings. Laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and anterior vaginal plastic surgery were indicated. The surgery went smoothly, and the patient was discharged on day six postoperatively in good general condition. A uterus measuring 90 × 40 × 30 mm with adnexa was submitted for pathohistological analysis. The ovaries and fallopian tubes were morphologically neat and age-appropriate. The histological finding of the exocervix was orderly, while the epithelium of the endocervix showed signs of focal squamous metaplasia with a thin endometrium and somewhat dilated tubular glands. The cross-section showed a yellowish intramural, well-bound node measuring 40 × 40 mm, which macroscopically corresponded to lipoma (Fig. 1).
A tumor made of mature adipocytes with S-100-positive immunohistochemistry was shown microscopically (Fig. 2).
Discussion
Uterine adipose tissue tumors consist in part or whole of adipocytes [4]. The literature indicates an incidence of 0.03% to 0.2% [3]. Mixed forms include lipoleiomyoma, lipofibroma, and fibrolipomyoma, depending on the proportion and redistribution of adipose, muscle, and connective tissue. Pure uterine lipomas are extremely rare tumors and are much rarer than other variants of mixed tumors [1,5]. Although there are no clearly defined criteria for differences between individual tumors within a group, pure lipomas are de facto encapsulated adipose tissue. It is distributed peripherally if smooth muscle tissue is present [2,6], while a thin fibrovascular barrier within the tumor is possible and acceptable [6,7]. Although several proposed cellular mechanisms exist for developing this group of tumors, histogenesis is still considered an enigma, given the unexpected occurrence of adipocytes in the uterine wall. Potential mechanisms include misplaced embryonic cells, metaplasia of muscle cells or fibroblasts in the adipocytes, and perivascular migration of adipocytes in the myometrium [8]. Immunohistochemical analysis of the sample can approximate the type of tumor and exclude the malignant form. It also serves valuable information, potentially indicating the tumor’s embryological origin. Desmin and smooth muscle actin (SMA) are markers of smooth muscle tissue, HMB-45 and Melan-A are positive in angiomyolipomas, S-100 is a marker of adipocytes, and MDM2 is positive in liposarcomas [6]. On ultrasound, lipomas are well-demarcated hyperechoic avascular tumors. If peripheral smooth muscle tissue is present, it is seen as a hypoechoic margin [2]. Wijesuriya et al reported a uterine lipoma measuring 2.5 cm, diagnostically imaged by ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The obtained results favored MRI as an imaging method that can distinguish lipoma from leiomyoma reliably. This paper believes that in this way, lipoma could be diagnosed preoperatively, and according to the authors, unnecessary surgery would be avoided [2]. However, the literature agrees more about the need for surgical treatment and subsequent pathohistological diagnosis to exclude other pathologies, especially malignant ones [6,7]. Chan et al presented a pure intramural corporeal posterior wall lipoma case in a postmenopausal patient who initially presented with an abdominal mass. Hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy were performed, and a 150 × 140 × 125 mm lipoma was removed. On immunohistochemical analysis, tumor tissue was positive for desmin and SMA perivascularly, while MDM2, HMP 45, and Melan-A were negative with a very low Ki-67 proliferation index [6]. Patwardhan et al [3] documented a similar case of pure uterine lipoma measuring 2.5 × 2 × 1.4 cm incidentally found in a postmenopausal patient who underwent hysterectomy due to a cystocele and rectocele. Immunohistochemical S-100 staining was positive, while SMA and desmin were negative in contrast to the case described by Chan et al [6]. Unlike the previously described intramural lipomas, Aggarwal et al described two polypoid lipomas measuring 4 × 1 cm and 2.7 × 2 cm removed hysteroscopically. In the latter 70-year-old patient, hysteroscopy was indicated for endometrial thickening of 20 mm [1].
Conclusion
This case shows us that uterine lipoma clinically and diagnostically mimics myoma very well. Therefore, imaging diagnosis of a tumor is not reliable. However, most tumors, especially if symptomatic, are treated surgically. Since it is most common in postmenopausal women, we believe that hysterectomy as a therapeutical approach is justified in symptomatic cases.
ORCID authors
F. Medić 0000-0002-5658-6771
D. Habek 0000-0003-1304-9279
Submitted/Doručeno: 5. 3. 2023
Accepted/Přijato: 11. 5. 2023
Filip Medić, MD
University Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Clinical Hospital Sveti Duh
Sveti Duh 64
10 000 Zagreb
Croatia
Sources
1. Aggarwal D, Gupta P, Rajwanshi A et al. Pure uterine lipoma: a case report and review of the literature. J Gynaecol Surg 2019; 35 (2): 121–126. doi: 10.1089/gyn.2018.0049.
2. Wijesuriya SM, Gandhi S. A pure uterine lipoma: a rare, benign entity. BMJ Case Rep 2011; 2011: bcr0720114425. doi: 10.1136/bcr.07.2011. 4425.
3. Patwardhan PP, Waghmare TP, Taware AC. Pure uterine lipoma: a common tumour at an uncommon site. J Clin Diagn Res 2017; 11 (5): ED34–ED35. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/27479. 9931.
4. Pounder DJ. Fatty tumours of the uterus. J Clin Pathol 1982; 35 (12): 1380–1383. doi: 1136/jcp.35.12.1380.
5. Willen R, Gad A, Willen H. Lipomatous lesions of the uterus. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histol 1978; 377 (4): 351–361. doi: 10.1007/BF 00507135.
6. Chan N, Vythianathan M. Uterine lipoma: a case report. Case Rep Womens Health 2020; 28: e00247. doi: 10.1016/j.crwh.2020.e00247.
7. Garg A, Sudhamani S, Kiri VM et al. Pure lipoma of uterus: a case report with review of literature. J Sci Soc 2013; 40 (2): 114–115. doi: 10.4103/0974-5009.115488.
8. Vamseedhar A, Shivalingappa D, Suresh D et al. Primary pure uterine lipoma: a rare case report with review of literature. Indian J Cancer 2011; 48 (3): 385–388. doi: 10.4103/0019-509X.84936.
Labels
Paediatric gynaecology Gynaecology and obstetrics Reproduction medicineArticle was published in
Czech Gynaecology
2023 Issue 4
Most read in this issue
- The efficacy of human papillomavirus vaccination in the prevention of recurrence of severe cervical lesions
- Therapeutical strategies for recurrent endometrial cancer
- Direct abdominal muscle diastasis and stress urinary incontinence in postpartum women
- Effect of umbilical cord drainage after spontaneous delivery in the third stage of labor