Embolization of Uterine Arteries during Myoma Treatment from the Patient’s Point of View

Czech version

Authors: Z. Fučíková ¹; M. Mára ¹; J. Mašková ^2,3; D. Kužel ¹; P. Fencl ³; J. Svárovský ^1,4; P. Drbohlav ¹; J. Mašata ¹; J. Křivánek ³
Authors‘ workplace: Gynekologicko-porodnická klinika 1. LF UK a VFN, Praha, přednosta prof. MUDr. A. Martan, DrSc. ¹; Radiodiagnostická klinika 1. LF UK a VFN, Praha, přednosta doc. MUDr. J. Daneš, CSc. ²; Radiodiagnostické oddělení ÚVN, Praha, primář pplk. MUDr. F. Charvát ³; Gynekologické oddělení ÚVN, Praha, primářka MUDr. H. Kašpárková ⁴
Published in: Ceska Gynekol 2005; 70(5): 383-388
Category: Original Article

Overview

Objectives:
To acquire information about the patient’s follow-up evaluation of treating fibroids by uterine artery embolization (UAE).

Design:
A retrospective multicenter clinical trial.

Setting:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1^st Faculty of Medicine and the General Faculty Hospital, Charles University, Prague.

Methods:
45 women who underwent the UAE due to uterine fibroids from 1999 to 2003 were asked to complete a questionnaire. The questionnaire included 26 questions asking how the women had been informed and what they had expected. Further questions were focused on the course of embolization itself, early post-procedural difficulties (post-embolization syndrome) and patient’s overall evaluation of treatment in a longer term. Those women who had completed the questionnaire and had been ready to co-operate were thereafter examined and included in the follow-up monitoring and, if necessary, further treatment was recommended.

Results:
Thirty one out of 45 patients from 26 to 48 years of age, who had been addressed (68.9%) answered the questionnaire. UAE was indicated 12 times (38.7%) on account of symptoms, 10 times (32.3%) because of sterility, 5 times (16.1%) as a preventive measure within the framework of family planning and 4 times (12.9%) for an asymptomatic but growing leiomyoma. Twenty seven (87.1%) women were also offered an alternative treatment, which they refused. As far as problems are concerned, 18 (58%) women described the course of treatment as corresponding with what they had expected, 5 times it was less painful, and 8 times it was worse than expected. The long-term results were considered as positive by 87.1% of responders, only 12.9% considered the treatment as failure. 5 in 11 women planning pregnancy became pregnant, 3 of them gave birth in term and 2 miscarried in the 1st trimester.

Conclusion:
From the point of view of the patients, the evaluated method proves highly successful, it is well tolerated and it involves a low risk of complications. It is not possible, at this point, however, to give an unequivocal answer to the question whether the method should also be routinely offered to women who are planning pregnancy.

Key words:
evaluation of the procedure by patients, leiomyoma, post-embolisation syndrome, uterine artery embolization