#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Development of Quality of Life of Women afterUrogynecological Operations


Authors: P. Drahorádová;  J. Mašata;  A. Martan;  K. Švabík
Authors‘ workplace: Gynekologicko-porodnická klinika VFN a 1. LF UK, Praha, přednosta prof. MUDr. J. Živný, DrSc.
Published in: Ceska Gynekol 2004; (6): 506-510
Category:

Overview

Objective:
The aim of the study is to show the changes in quality of life before and after surgery forgenuine stress urinary incontinence by means of the subjective assessment.Design: Prospective study.Setting: The Department of Obstetric and Gynaecology, the 1st Medical Faculty of Charles Universityand General Hospital, Prague.Methods: 73 women were initially involved in the study. After one year of control we could onlyevaluate 51 of them (69.9%). Their average age was 56, BMI over 25 had 70% of them and 47% of themunderwent a gynaecologic surgery in history. With these 51 women we managed to get completequestionnaire before the surgery on GSI and during the following checking after 3 months and 1year. The most frequent type of surgery was colposuspension (76%).The quality of life in connection with the incontinence is measured by the help of a specifi c standardizedquestionnaire IQoL from Donald L. Patrick. In the same document we also evaluate theglobal effect of provided surgical procedures.Results: The average value of the IQoL questionnaire before operation was 50.2. It reached 80.2done year after the surgery. The difference of 30 makes a notable improvement in the quality of life.The average value 78.8 three month after the surgery was similar. The check up three month andone year after the surgery showed 6% aggravation in the quality of life in comparison with the lifebefore the surgery. The quality of life one year after the surgery improved in 82% women.Conclusion: One year after surgery the quality of life remains highly improved as evaluated by thepatient.

Key words:
urinary incontinence, quality of life, urgency

Full text is not available online.
If interested in a scan of this journal, contact NTO ČLS JEP.

Labels
Paediatric gynaecology Gynaecology and obstetrics Reproduction medicine

Article was published in

Czech Gynaecology


2004 Issue 6

Most read in this issue
Topics Journals
Login
Forgotten password

Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.

Login

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#