Comparison of Curing Efficacy of Halogen and LED Polymerization Lamps Using Composite Materials of Different Polymerization Mechanism

Czech version

Authors: P. Bradna ¹; J. Froněk ²; L. Comba ¹; D. Houšová ¹
Authors‘ workplace: Výzkumný ústav stomatologický 1. LF UK a VFN, Praha ¹; Student 1. LF UK Praha, obor zdravotnická technika a informatika ²
Published in: Česká stomatologie / Praktické zubní lékařství, ročník 109, 2009, 5, s. 85-91

Overview

The objective was to compare efficacy of several types of halogen and LED polymerization lamps in curing restorative composite materials. Halogen lamps Heliolux DLX1 (Ivoclar Vivadent) and Megalux Fast Cure (MegaPhysik) and LED lamps DioPower (CMS Dental), Translux Power Blue (Heraeus Kulzer), BluePhase C8 (Ivoclar Vivadent) of a narrow spectral emission (group LED 1) and G-Light (GC, USA) and BluePhase G2 (Ivoclar Vivadent) of a broad spectral emission (group LED 2) were used. Curing efficacy was evaluated by measuring the composite hardness on the top irradiated and bottom not-irradiated surfaces of 2 mm thick specimens prepared from radically initiated dimethacrylate-based composite material Charisma (Heraeus Kulzer) and epoxy-based cationically polymerized composite material Filtek Silorane (3M ESPE). In curing of both composite materials a significant effect of the polymerization lamp on composite hardness and hence, polymerization degree was observed. The highest hardness of the composite material Charisma was found after polymerization with the halogen lamps and also BluePhase G2 of a broad spectral emission. With the epoxy-based Filtek Silorane the highest surface hardness was reached with both LED 2 and halogen lamps. In spite of limited number of polymerization lamps tested it seems obvious that the highest polymerization degree can be reached with polymerization lamps of broad spectral emission, such as high-power halogen lamps or LED lamps equipped with diodes emitting light in a short wavelength range.

Key words:
composite materials – cationic polymerization – epoxide – polymerization lamps – hardness

Sources

1. 10650-1, ČSN EN ISO: Stomatologie-Aktivní aktivátory polymerace - část 1: Křemenné a halogenové světelné zdroje.

2. 10650-2, ČSN EN ISO: Stomatologie-Aktivní aktivátory polymerace - část 1: Diodové (LED) světelné zdroje.

3. Crivello, J. Sangermano, M.: Visible and Long-Wavelength Photoinitiated Cationic polymerization. Journal of Polymer Science: Part A: Polymer Chemistry, roč. 39, 2001, s. 343-356.

4. Dunn, W. J. Bush, A. C.: A comparison of polymerization by light-emitting diode and halogen-based light-curing units. J. Am. Dent. Assoc., roč. 133, 2002, č. 3, s. 335-341.

5. Eick, J. D., Kotha, S. P., Chappelow, C. C. et al.: Properties of silorane-based dental resins and composites containing a stress-reducing monomer. Dent. Mater., roč. 23, 2007, č. 8, s. 1011-1017.

6. Ferracane, J. L., Mitchem, J. C., Condon, J. R. et al.: Wear and marginal breakdown of composites with various degrees of cure. J. Dent. Res., roč. 76, 1997, č. 8, s. 1508-1516.

7. Gritsch, K., Souvannasot, S., Schembri, C. et al.: Influence of light energy and power density on the microhardness of two nanohybrid composites. Eur. J. Oral. Sci., roč. 116, 2008, č. 1, s. 77-82.

8. Ikemura, K., K., I., Yoshida, M. et al.: UV-VIS spectra and photoinitiation behaviors of acylphosphine oxide and bisacylphosphine oxide derivatives in unfilled, light-cured dental resins Dent. Mater. J., roč. 27, 2008, č. 6, s. 765-774.

9. Jandt, K. D., Mills, R. W., Blackwell, G. B. et al.: Depth of cure and compressive strength of dental composites cured with blue light emitting diodes (LEDs). Dent. Mater., roč. 16, 2000, č. 1, s. 41-47.

10. Michelsen, V. B., Lygre, H., Skalevik, R. et al.: Identification of organic eluates from four polymer-based dental filling materials. Eur. J. Oral Sci., roč. 111, 2003, č. 3, s. 263-271.

11. Moszner, N. Salz, U.: New developments of polymeric dental composites. Progress in Polymer Science, roč. 26, 2001, č. s. 535-576.

12. Musanje, L. Darvell, B. W.: Polymerization of resin composite restorative materials: exposure reciprocity. Dent. Mater., roč. 19, 2003, č. 6, s. 531-541.

13. Neumann, M. G., Miranda, W. G., Jr., Schmitt, C. C. et al.: Molar extinction coefficients and the photon absorption efficiency of dental photoinitiators and light curing units. J. Dent., roč. 33, 2005, č. 6, s. 525-532.

14. Owens, B. M. Rodriguez, K. H.: Radiometric and spectrophotometric analysis of third generation light-emitting diode (LED) light-curing units. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract., roč. 8, 2007, č. 2, s. 43-51.

15. Price, R. B., Felix, C. A. Andreou, P.: Effects of resin composite composition and irradiation distance on the performance of curing lights. Biomaterials, roč. 25, 2004, č. 18, s. 4465-4477.

16. Price, R. B., Felix, C. A. Andreou, P.: Knoop hardness of ten resin composites irradiated with high-power LED and quartz-tungsten-halogen lights. Biomaterials, roč. 26, 2005, č. 15, s. 2631-2641.

17. Price, R. B., Felix, C. A. Andreou, P.: Third-generation vs a second-generation LED curing light: effect on Knoop microhardness. Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent., roč. 27, 2006, č. 9, s. 490-496.

18. Rueggeberg, F. A., Craig, R. G.: Correlation of parameters used to estimate monomer conversion in a light-cured composite. J. Dent. Res., roč. 67, 1988, č. 6, s. 932-937.

19. Sideridou, I. D., Achilias, D. S.: Elution study of unreacted Bis-GMA, TEGDMA, UDMA, and Bis-EMA from light-cured dental resins and resin composites using HPLC. J Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater., roč. 74, 2005, č. 1, s. 617-626.

20. Stahl, F., Ashworth, S. H., Jandt, K. D. et al.: Light-emitting diode (LED) polymerisation of dental composites: flexural properties and polymerisation potential. Biomaterials, roč. 21, 2000, č. 13, s. 1379-1385.

21. Stansbury, J. W.: Curing dental resins and composites by photopolymerization. J. Esthet. Dent., roč. 12, 2000, č. 6, s. 300-308.

22. Sun, G. J., Chae, K. H.: Properties of 2,3-butanedione and 1-phenyl-1,2-propanedione as new photosensitizers for visible light cured dental resin composites. Polymer, roč. 41, 2000, č. 16, s. 6205-6212.

23. Technická dokumentace BluePhase G2. Ivoclar Vivadent.

24. Technická dokumentace BluePhase Meter. Ivoclar Vivadent.

25. Technická dokumentace, Charisma. Heraeus-Kulzer.

26. Technická dokumetace Filtek™ LS Low Shrink Posterior Restorative System Product Profile. 3M-ESPE.

27. Teshima, W., Nomura, Y., Tanaka, N. et al.: ESR study of camphorquinone/amine photoinitiator systems using blue light-emitting diodes. Biomaterials, roč. 24, 2003, č. 12, s. 2097-103.

28. Torno, V., Soares, P., Martin, J. M. et al.: Effects of irradiance, wavelength, and thermal emission of different light curing units on the Knoop and Vickers hardness of a composite resin. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl Biomater. roč. 85, 2008, č. 1, s. 166-171.

29. Uhl, A., Mills, R. W., Vowles, R. W. et al.: Knoop hardness depth profiles and compressive strength of selected dental composites polymerized with halogen and LED light curing technologies. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., roč. 63, 2002, č. 6, s. 729-738.

30. Watts, D. C., McNaughton, V. Grant, A. A.: The development of surface hardness in visible light-cured posterior composites. J. Dent., roč. 14, 1986, č. 4, s. 169-174.

31. Weinmann, W., Thalacker, C. Guggenberger, R.: Siloranes in dental composites. Dent. Mater., roč. 21, 2005, č. 1, s. 68-74.

Labels

Maxillofacial surgery Orthodontics Dental medicine

Individual Titan-ceramic Extension

Cephalometric Analysis

History and Etiology of Jawbones Osteonecrosis

Article was published in

Czech Dental Journal

2009 Issue 5