Trends in Indications of Perforating Keratoplasty at the Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic, E.U., During the Period 2008–2012
Authors:
N. Rybárová; E. Vlková; L. Pirnerová; V. Trnková; H. Machačová
Authors‘ workplace:
Oční klinika LF MU a FN Brno, Brno
přednosta prof. MUDr. Eva Vlková, CSc.
Published in:
Čes. a slov. Oftal., 71, 2015, No. 1, p. 16-22
Category:
Original Article
Overview
Introduction:
The aim of the study is retrospective analysis of perforating keratoplasty (PKP) indications at the Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty Hospital, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic, E.U., during the period of 5 years, from January 1st, 2008 to December 31st, 2012.
Material and Methods:
We performed the PKP indications’ retrospective analysis at the Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty Hospital, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic, E.U., during the period of 5 years, from January 1st, 2008 to December 31st, 2012, with complex evaluation of demographic and clinical data. The clinical diagnoses indicating the perforating keratoplasty were divided into 6 groups (keratoconus, bulous keratopathy, keratitis, corneal dystrophies, injuries, corneal transplant failure, and others) according to Cunningham et al. 2011 (2) and Boimer et al. 2012(1) methods.
Results:
Our results correspond to data in the literature published abroad, where the majority of recently published papers refer significant increase of corneal transplant failure in the last years of follow-up.
Key words:
perforating keratoplasty, indications
Sources
1. Boimer, C., Lee, K., Sharpen, L., Mashour, RS. et al.: Evolving surgical techniques of and indications for corneal transplantation in Ontario from 2000 to 2009. Can J Ophthalmol, 46, 2011, 4: 360–366.
2. Cunningham, WJ., Brookes, NH., Twohill, HC. et al.: Trends in the distribution of donor corneal tissue and indications for corneal transplantation: the New Zealand National Eye Bank Study 2000–2009. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol, 40, 2012, 2: 141–147.
3. Dandona, L., Ragu, K., Janarthanan, M. et al.: Indications for penetrating keratoplasty in India. Indian J Ophthalmol, 45, 1997, 3: 163–168.
4. Dobbins, KR., Price, FW Jr., Whitson, WE.: Trends in the indications for penetrating keratoplasty in the midwestern United States. Cornea, 19, 2000, 6: 813–816.
5. Galvis, V., Tello, A., Gomez, AJ. et al.: Corneal Transplantation at an Ophthalmological Referral Center in Colombia: Indications and Techniques (2004–2011). Open Ophthalmol J, 2013, 7: 30–33.
6. Ghosheh, FR., Cremona, FA., Rapuano, ChJ. et al.: Trends in penetrating keratoplasty in the United States 1980–2005. Int J Ophtalmol, 2008, 28: 147–153.
7. Jirásková, N., Rozsíval, P., Urminský, J.: Klinické výsledky 100 transplantácií rohovky. Čes a slov Oftal, 55, 1999, 6: 355–358.
8. Lois, N., Kowal, VO., Cohen, EJ., Rapuano, CJ. et al.: Indications for penetrating keratoplasty and associated procedures 1989–1995. Cornea, 16, 1997, 6: 623–629.
9. Módis, L Jr., Szalai, E., Facskó, A. et al: Corneal transplantation in Hungary (1946–2009). Clin Experiment Ophthalmol, 39, 2011, 6: 520–525.
10. Rahman, I., Carley, F., Hillarby, C. et al.: Penetrating keratoplasty: indications, outcomes, and complications. Eye (Lond)., 23, 2009, 6: 1288–1294.
11. Siganos, CS., Tsiklis, NS., Miltsakakis, DG. et al.: Changing indications for penetrating keratoplasty in Greece, 1982–2006: a multicenter study. Cornea, 29, 2010, 4: 372–374.
12. Sundmacher, R., Reinhard, T.: Ciclosporin A in perforating keratoplasty. Čes a slov Oftal, 51, 1995, 5:271–276.
13. Tilahun, Y., Shimelash, D.: The outcome of corneal transplantation versus indications in a tertiary eye care center in Ethiopia. Ethiop Med J, 48, 2010 Jan, 1: 35–39.
14. Ting, DS., Sau, CY., Srinivasan, S., Ramaesh, K. et al: Changing trends in keratoplasty in the West of Scotland: a 10-year review. Br J Ophthalmol, 96, 2012, 3: 405–408.
15. Vlková, E., Hlinomazová, Z.: Riziková keratoplastika. Brno, Masarykova Univerzita, 1999, 76 s.
16. Wang , J., Hasenfus, A., Schirra, F. et al.: Changing indications for penetrating keratoplasty in Homburg/Saar from 2001 to 2010 – histopathology of 1,200 corneal buttons. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 251, 2013, 3: 797–802.
17. Wang, JY., Xie, LX., Song, XS., Zhao, J.: Trends in the indications for penetrating keratoplasty in Shandong, 2005–2010. Int J Ophthalmol, 4, 2011, 5: 492–497.
18. Xie, L., Song, Z., Zhao, J. et al: Indications for penetrating keratoplasty in north China. Cornea, 26, 2007, 9: 1070–1073.
19. Zare, M., Javadi, M.A., Einollahi, B. et al.: Changing indications and sirgical techniques for corneal transplantation between 2004 and 2009 at a tertiary refferal center. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol, 2012, 19: 323–329.
Labels
OphthalmologyArticle was published in
Czech and Slovak Ophthalmology
2015 Issue 1
Most read in this issue
- Comparison of Visual Acuity and Higher-order Aberrations after Standard and Wavefront-guided Myopic Femtosecond LASIK
- Dynamic Vitreomacular Traction
-
Jednodenní oboustranná operace katarakty.
Vlastní výsledky - Anophthalmic Conjunctival Sac Plastic Surgery Using the Modified Cul-de-Sac Method