Determination of Cerebellar Dominance from Muscle Tone of the Limbs

Czech version

Authors: J. Tichý ¹; J. Běláček ²; M. Nykl ¹; N. Kaspříková ²
Authors‘ workplace: 1. LF UK a VFN v Praze Neurologická klinika ¹; 1. LF UK a VFN v Praze Ústav biofyziky a informatiky ²
Published in: Cesk Slov Neurol N 2012; 75/108(3): 334-343
Category: Original Paper

Overview

Objective:
Is the more pronounced physiological passivity of the left upper and lower extremities (UE, LE) in right-handed individuals equally present in the right limbs of left-handed subjects? May we define cerebellar dominance from this information?

Methods:
Muscle tone of the limbs was investigated in healthy 18–57 years old individuals (n = 69) considered right-handed (n = 26) or left-handed (n = 35) as assessed by the Edinburgh Inventory. Impaired ambidextrous (n = 8) were excluded. Muscle tone was ascertained: a) by conventional clinical examination of passivity in the shoulder, elbow, wrist, knee and instep; b) by 10 times repeated and registered number of UE swings fallowing a fall from forward arm raise, the number of shank swings following a fall from extension in sitting individuals, forearms falling from extension in prone position and after patellar and tricipital reflexes. The data were analysed using the chi-squared test of independence in 2 × 2 contingency tables; graphical presentations are based on statistical significance of percent predictive values. Number of swings was evaluated using the 2-way ANOVA model.

Results:
Right-handed females (n = 13) and right-handed males (n = 13) had a reduced muscle tone in 90% of left UEs and 65% of left LEs. Unlike right-handed, only 50% of left-handed females (n = 21) and left-handed males (n = 14) had an increased muscle tone on both extremities. The lateral difference in muscle tone, more manifested on UE, was not as evident in left-handers as in right-handers. The different pendular responses were significant in falling of forearms (p = 0.026) and in patellar reflex (p = 0.030).

Conclusions:
Right-handers represent a more homogeneous group. The asymmetry of muscle tone in left-handed does not correspond to the simple traditional concept of cerebellar dominance contralateral to the dominant hemisphere of the brain.

Key words:
muscle tone – cerebellar dominance – dextrals – left-handed – ambidextrous

Sources

1. Krkljes M. Regulation of muscle Tonus. Med Pregl 1990; 43(3–4): 172–174.

2. Henner K. Příznaky vznikající z nadměrné činnosti mozečku. Praha: Grégr a syn 1928.

3. Hrbek J. Nový výklad převládající pravorukosti, dominance levé mozkové hemisféry a pravé mozečkové hemisféry. Cesk Slov Neurol N 1978; 41/74(3): 145–165.

4. Tichý J. Vír vlasů – geneticky vázaný jev při vyšetřování fenotypu praváctví a hemisferální dominance. Čas Lék čes 2006; 145: 995–998.

5. Tichý J. Běláček J. Pravo/levorukost a preference druhostranné dolní končetiny. Testování laterality a mozečkové dominance. Cesk Slov Neurol N 2008; 71/104(5): 552–558.

6. Tichý J. Běláček J. Laterality in children: cerebellar dominance, handedness, footedness and hair whorl. Activitas Nervosa Superior Rediviva 2009; 51(1–2): 9–20.

7. Růžička E, Amber Z. Mozeček. In: Amber Z, Bednařík J, Růžička E (eds). Klinická neurologie. I. část obecná. Praha: Triton 2004.

8. Marien P, Engelborghs S, Fabbro F, De Devn PP. The lateralized linguistic cerebellum: a review and a new hypothesis. Brain Lang 2001; 79(3): 580–600.

9. Gebhart AL, Petersen SE, Thach WT. Role of the Posterolateral Cerebellum in Language. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2002; 978: 318–333.

10. Urban PP, Marx J, Hunsche S, Gawehn J, Vucurevic G, Wicht S et al. Cerebellar Speech Representation. Arch Neurol 2003; 60(7): 965–972.

11. Hubrich-Ungureanu P, Kaemmerer N, Henn FA, Braus DF. Lateralized organization of the cerebellum in a silent verbal fluency task: a functional magnetic rezonance imaging study in healthy volunteers. Neurosci Lett 2002; 319(2): 91–94.

12. Jansen A, Flöel A, Van Randenborgh J, Konrad C, Rotte M, Förster AF et al. Crossed cerebro-cerebellar language dominance. Hum Brain Mapp 2005; 24(3): 165–172.

12. Ito M. Cerebellar circuitry as a neuronal machine. Prog Neurobiol2006; 78(3–5): 272–303.

14. De Smet HJ, Baillieux H, De Deyn PP, Mariën P, Paquier P. The cerebellum and language: the story so far. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2007; 59(4): 165–170.

15. Kajimoto K, Oku N, Kymura Y, Kato H, Tahaka MR, Kanai Y et al. Crossed cerebellar diaschisis: a positron emission tomography study. Ann Nucl Med 2007; 21(2): 109–113.

16. Krienen FM, Buckner RL. Segregated fronto-cerebellar circuits revealed by intrinsic functional connectivity. Cereb Cortex 2009; 19(10): 2485–2497.

17. Murdoch BE. The cerebellum and language: historical perspective and review. Cortex 2010; 49(7): 858–868.

18. Neff D. Differences in the function of the two cerebral hemispheres. In: Geschwind N, Galaburda AM (eds). Cerebral dominance: The biological foundations. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press 1984.

19. Bakar M, Kirschner HS, Hertz RT. Crossed aphasia. Functional braion imaging with PET or SPECT. Arch Neurol 1996; 53(10): 1026–1032.

20. Annett M, Alexander MP. Atypical cerebral dominance: Prediction and tests of the right shift theory. Neuropsychologia 1996; 34(12): 1215–1227.

21. Chee MW, Buckner RL, Savoy RL. Right hemisphere language in a neurologically normal dextral: a fMRI study. Neuroreport 1998; 9(15): 3499–3502.

22. McManus IC. Handedness, cerebral lateralisation, and the evolution of language. In: Corballis MC, Lee SEG (eds). The descent of mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1999.

23. Tzourio N, Crivello F, Mellet E, Nkanga-Ngila B, Mazoyer B. Functional anatomy of dominance for speech comprehension in left handers vs right handers. Neuroimage 1998; 8(1): 1–16.

24. Annett M. Handedness and cerebral dominance: the right shift theory. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 1998; 10(4): 459–469.

25. Pujol J, Deus J, Posilka JM, Capdevila A. Cerebral lateralization of language in normal left-handed people studied by functional MRI. Neurology 1999; 52(5): 1038–1048.

26. Knecht S, Dräger B, Deppe M, Bobe L, Lohmann A, Flöel E et al. Handedness and hemispheric language dominance in healthy humans. Brain 2000; 123(12): 2512–2518.

27. Knecht S, Deppe M, Dräger B, Bobe L, Lohmann H, Ringelstein B et al. Handedness and hemispheric language dominance in healthy humans. Brain 2000; 123(12): 2512–2518.

28. Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Josse G, Crivello F, Mazoyer B. Interindividual variability in the hemispheric organization for speech. Neuroimage 2000; 21(1): 422–435.

29. Isaacs KL, Khedr EM, Hamed E, Said A, Basahi J. Handedness and language cerebral lateralization. Eur J Appl Physiol 2002; 87(4–5): 469–473.

30. Chee MW, Caplan D. Face encoding and psychometric testing in healthy dextrals with right hemisphere language. Neurology 2002; 59(12): 1928–1934.

31. Borbély K, Gjedde A, Nyáry I, Czirják S, Donauer N, Buck A. Speech activation of language dominant hemisphere: a single-photon emission computed tomography study. Neuroimage 2003; 20(2): 987–994.

32. Wood AG, Harvey AS, Wellard RM, Abbot DF, Anderson V, Kean M et al. Language cortex activation in normal children. Neurology 2004; 63(6): 1035–1044.

33. Klateb A, Martyry MD, Annoni JM, Lazeyras F, de Tribolet N, Pegma AJ et al. Transient crossed aphasia evidence by functional brain imagery. Neuroreport 2004; 15(5): 785–790.

34. Lindelll AK. In your right mind: right hemisphere contributions to language processing and production. Neuropsychol Rev 2006; 16(3): 131–148.

35. Barr WB, Nelson PK, Devinski O. Degree of handedness and cerebral dominance. Neurology 2006; 66(12): 1855–1858.

36. Crosson B, McGregor K, Kaudinya SG, Conway TW, Benjamin M, Yu-Ling Chan et al. Functional MRI of language in aphasia: a review of the literature and the methodological challenges. Neuropsychol Rev 2007; 17(2): 157–177.

37. Hatta T. Handedness and the brain: a review of brain-imaging techniques. Magn Reson Med Sci 2007; 6(2) 99–112.

38. Keele SW, Ivry R. Does the cerebellum provide a common computation for diverse tasks? A timing hypothesis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1990; 608: 179–211.

39. Marien P, Engelborghs S, Fabbro F, De Devn PP. The lateralized linguistic cerebellum: a review and a new hypothesis. Brain Lang 2001; 79(3): 580–600.

40. Gebhart AL, Petersen SE, Tlach WT. Role of the posterolateral cerebellum in language. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2002; 978: 318–333.

41. Hubrich-Ungueranu P, Kaemmerer N, Henn FA, Braus DF. Lateralized organization of the cerebellum in a silent verbal fluency task: a functional magnetic rezonance imaging study in healthy volunteers. Neurosci Lett 2002; 319(2): 91–94.

42. Urban PP, Marx J, Hunsche S, Gawehn J, Vucurevic G, Wicht S et al. Cerebellar speech representation: lesion topography in dysarthria as derived from cerebellar ischemia and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Neurol 2003; 60(7): 965–972.

43. Habas C, Axelrad H, Cabanis EA. The cerebellar second homunkulus remains silent during passive bimanual movements. Neuroreport 2004; 15(10): 1571–1574.

44. Kajimoto K, Oku N, Kymura Y, Kato H, Tahaka MR, Kanai Y et al. Crossed cerebellar diaschisis: a positron emission tomography study. Ann Nucl Med 2007; 21(2): 109–113.

45. Chusid JG. Correlative Neuroanatomy and Functional Neurology. 18th ed. Los Altos, California: Lange Medical Publication 1982.

46. Kandel ER, Schwarz JH, Jessell TM. Principles of neural science. 4th ed. New York: McGraw Hill 2000.

47. Ivry RB, Keele SW. Timing functions of the cerebellum. J Cogn Neurosci 1989; 1: 136–152.

48. Oldfield RC. The Assessment and Analysis of Handedness: The Edingurgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971; 9(1): 97–113.

49. Běláček J, Tichý J, Novák M, Nykl M, Pecha O, Voleman M. Měření laterality mozečku – metodika. Poster. In: Mornstein V, Vlk D (eds). Sborník abstrakt XXXIII. dnů lékařské biofyziky Mikulov 2010.

50. Běláček J, Tichý J, Novák M, Nykl M, Pecha O, Kaspříková N. Měření laterality – statistická analýza klinických vyšetření dominance mozečku. Cesk Slov Neurol N 2010; 73/103 (Suppl 2): S113–S114.

51. SPSS Statistisc 17.0 Command Syntax Reference. Chicago, IL 60606-6412: 1717–1720.

52. Ito M. Historical review of the significance of the cerebellum and the cells in motor learning. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2002; 978: 273–288.

53. Ito M. Cerebellar circuitry as a neuronal machine. Prog Neurobiol 2006; 78(3–5): 272–303.

54. Wartenberg R. Pendulousness of the legs as a diagnostic test. Neurology 1951; 1(1): 18–24.

55. Vítek J. Obecná neurologická diagnostika. Praha: Zdravotnické nakladatelství 1950.

56. Černáček J et al. Neurologická propedeutika. Bratislava: Vydavatelstvo Slovenskej Akademie Vied 1963.

57. Brown RA, Lawson DA, Leslie GC, Part NJ. Observation on the applicability of the Wartenberg pendulum test to healthy, elderly subjects. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1988; 51(9): 1171–1177.

58. Lin CC, Ju MS, Lin CW. The pendulum test evaluating spasticity of the elbow joint. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84(1): 69–74.

59. Huang HW, Ju MS, Wang WC, Li CC. Muscle tone of upper limbs evaluated by quantitative pendulum test in patients with acute cerebral stroke. Acta Neurol Taiwan 2009; 18(4): 250–254.

60. Bohannon RW, Harrison S, Kinsella-Shaw J. Reliability and validity of pendulum test measures of spasticity obtained with the Polhemus tracking system from patients with chronic stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2009; 6: 30.

61. Růžička E, Ambler Z. Mozeček. In: Ambler Z, Bednařík J, Růžička E (eds). Klinická neurologie. 1. část obecná. Praha: Triton 2004.

62. Bares M, Lungu OV, Liu T, Waechter T, Gomez CM, Ashe J. The neural substrate of predictive motor timing in spinocerebellar ataxia. Cerebellum 2011; 10(2): 233–244.

63. Stoodley CJ. The cerebellum and Cognition: Evidence from Functional Imaging Studies. Cerebellum. In press 2011.

64. Swadlow HA, Waxman SG. Axonal conduction delays [online]. Dostupné z URL: http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Axonal_conduction_delays.