#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Kontroverzie v manažmente neseminomatóznych germinatívnych nádorov testis v I. klinickom štádiu


Authors: D. Ondrus 1;  K. Kajo 2;  V. Stastna 3;  M. Ondrusova 4,5
Authors‘ workplace: 1st Department of Oncology, Comenius University Faculty of Medicine, St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovak Republic 1;  Department of Pathology, Slovak Medical University, St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovak Republic 2;  Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences and Social Work, Trnava University in Trnava, Slovak Republic 3;  St. Elizabeth University of Health and Social Sciences, Bratislava, Slovak Republic 4;  Cancer Research Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovak Republic 5
Published in: Klin Onkol 2015; 28(2): 112-115
Category: Original Articles
doi: https://doi.org/10.14735/amko2015112

Overview

Prísny dohľad po orchiektómii samotnej sa stal populárnym v manažmente neseminomatóznych germinatívnych nádorov testis v I. klinickom štádiu (clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell testicular tumors –  CSI NSGCTT). Úsilie identifikovať pa­cientov s vysokým rizikom progresie ochorenia viedlo k vyhľadávaniu rizikových faktorov u CSI NSGCTT. Cieľom súčasnej štúdie bolo analyzovať dlhoročné skúsenosti s liečebnými postupmi založenými na prítomnosti rizikových faktorov (prísny dohľad a adjuvantná chemoterapia). V období 1/ 1992– 2/ 2015 bolo celkovo 454 pa­cientov s CSI NSGCTT zaradených do štúdie. Stratifikovali sa do dvoch skupín podľa použitých liečebných postupov v závislosti na prítomnosti rizikových faktorov. Skupina A (CSI NSGCTT s nízkym rizikom) pozostávala z 287 pa­cientov ktorí podstúpili prísny dohľad, progresia ochorenia sa zistila u 48 (16,7 %) pa­cientov po mediáne sledovania 7,0 mesiacov. Šesť pa­cientov (2,1 %) v tejto skupine zomrelo po mediáne sledovania 34,3 mesiacov. Skupina B (CSI NSGCTT s vysokým rizikom) pozostávala z 167 pa­cientov, ktorí boli dostávali adjuvantnú chemoterapiu, progresia ochorenia sa zistila u dvoch pa­cientov (1,2 %) s mediánom sledovania 56,2 mesiacov. Jeden pa­cient (0,6 %) zomrel 139,4 mesiacov po orchiektómii. Štatisticky významný rozdiel medzi oboma skupinami sa zistil v prežívaní bez progresie ochorenia, avšak nevýznamný bol rozdiel v celkovom prežívaní.

Klúčové slová:
testikulárne nádory – prísny dohľad – adjuvantná chemoterapia – progresia ochorenia

Práca bola podporená grantom Agentúry pre podporu výskumu a vývoja APVV – 0016-11.

Autoři deklarují, že v souvislosti s předmětem studie nemají žádné komerční zájmy.

Redakční rada potvrzuje, že rukopis práce splnil ICMJE kritéria pro publikace zasílané do biomedicínských časopisů.

Obdrženo:
4. 3. 2015

Přijato:
8. 3. 2015


Sources

1. Einhorn LH, Donohue J. Cis‑ diamminedichloroplatinum, vinblastine, and bleomycin combination chemotherapy in disseminated testicular cancer. Ann Intern Med 1977; 87(3): 293– 298.

2. Peckham MJ, Barrett A, Husband JE et al. Orchidectomy alone in testicular stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. Lancet 1982; 2(8300): 678– 680.

3. Johnson DE, Lo RK, von Eschenbach AC et al. Surveil­lance alone for patients with clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors of the testis: preliminary report. J Urol 1984; 131(3): 491– 493.

4. Sogani P, Whitmore WF, Herr HW et al. Orchiectomy alone in the treatment of clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumor of the testis. J Clin Oncol 1984; 2(4): 267– 270.

5. Thompson PI, Nixon J, Harvey VJ. Disease relapse in patients with stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumor of the testis on active surveillance. J Clin Oncol 1988; 6(10): 1597– 1603.

6. Ondrus D, Hornak M. Orchiectomy alone for clinical stage nonseminomatous germ cell tumors of the testis (NSGCTT): a minimum follow‑up period of 5 years. Tumori 1994; 80(5): 362– 364.

7. Sturgeon JF, Jewett MA, Alison RE et al. Surveillance after orchiectomy for patients with clinical stage I nonseminomatous testis tumors. J Clin Oncol 1992; 10(4): 564– 568.

8. Klepp O, Olsson AM, Henrikson H et al. Prognostic factors in clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors of the testis: multivariate analysis of a prospective multicenter study. J Clin Oncol 1990; 8(3): 509– 518.

9. Wishnow KI, Johnson DE, Swanson, DA et al. Identifying patients with low risk clinical stage nonseminomatous testicular tumors who should be treated by surveil­lance. Urology 1989; 34(6): 339– 343.

10. Ondrus D, Hornak M, Vrabec J. Low sperm counts as a prognostic factor of progression in stage I non‑seminomatous germ cell testicular tumours. Br J Urol 1988; 62(2): 82– 84.

11. Ondrus D, Gonçalves F, Kausitz J et al. The value of prog­nostic factors in the management of stage I nonseminomatous germ cell testicular tumors (NSGCTT). Neoplasma 1996; 43(3): 195– 197.

12. Ondrus D, Matoska J, Belan V et al. Prognostic factors in clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell testicular tumors: rationale for different risk‑adapted treatment. Eur Urol 1998; 33(6): 562– 566.

13. Ondrus D, Ondrusova M, Hornak M et al. Nonseminomatous germ cell testicular tumors –  clinical stage I: dif­ferentiated therapeutic approach in comparison with therapeutic approach using surveillance strategy only. Neoplasma 2007; 54(5): 437– 442.

14. Krege S, Beyer J, Souchon R et al. European consensus conference on dia­gnosis and treatment of germ cell cancer: a report of the second meeting of the European Germ Cell Cancer Consensus group (EGCCCG): part I. Eur Urol 2008; 53(3): 478– 496.

15. Albers P, Albrecht W, Algaba F et al. EAU guidelines on testicular cancer: 2011 update. Eur Urol 2011; 60(2): 304– 319. doi: 10.1016/ j.eururo.2011.05.038.

16. Coleman S, Stephenson A. Controversies in the management of stage I non‑seminomatous germ cell tumors. Curr Urol Rep 2013; 14(5): 506– 510. doi: 10.1007/ s11934‑ 013‑ 0362‑ 5.

17. Albers P, Siener, R, Kliesch S et al. Risk factors for relapse in clinical stage I nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumors: results of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group Trial. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21(8): 1505– 1512.

18. Brewster SF. Challenging the EAU 2009 guidelines on testis cancer: the risk‑adapted management of stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumours: surveil­lance yields equal results with less toxicity. Eur Urol 2010; 1 (Suppl): 459– 461.

19. Kollmansberger CH, Tandstad T, Bedard, PL et al. Pat­terns of relapse in patients with clinical stage I testicular cancer managed with active surveillance. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33(1): 51– 57. doi: 10.1200/ JCO.2014.56.2116.

20. Sturgeon JF, Moore MJ, Kakiashvili DM et al. Non‑ risk‑adapted surveillance in clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors: the Princess Margaret Hospital‘s experience. Eur Urol 2011; 59(4) 556– 562. doi: 10.1016/ j.eururo.2010.12.010.

21. Nichols CR, Roth B, Albers P et al. Active surveil­lance is the prefered approach to clinical stage I testicular cancer. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31(28): 3490– 3493. doi: 10.1200/ JCO.2012.47.6010.

22. Jewett MAS, Richie JP, Albers P. Treatment of nonseminoma: Stage I. In: Laguna MP, Albers P, Bokemeyer C, Richie JP (eds). Cancer of the testis. London: Springer Verlag 2010: 147– 166.

23. Tandstad T, Dahl O, Cohn‑ Cedermark G et al. Risk‑adapted treatment in clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell testicular cancer: The SWENOTECA management program. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27(13): 2122– 2128. doi: 10.1200/ JCO.2008.18.8953.

24. Tandstad T, Ståhl O, Håkansson U et al. One course of adjuvant BEP in clinical stage I nonseminoma mature and expanded results from the SWENOTECA group. Ann Oncol 2014; 25(11): 2167– 2172. doi: 10.1093/ annonc/ mdu375.

25. Albers P, Siener R, Krege S et al. Randomized phase IIItrial comparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection with one course of bleomycin and etoposide plus cisplatin chemotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of clinical stage I nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumors: AUO trial AH 01/ 94 by the German Testicular Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26(18): 2966– 2972. doi: 10.1200/ JCO.2007.12.0899.

26. Westermann DH, Studer UE. High‑risk clinical stage Inonseminomatous germ cell tumors: the case for chemotherapy. World J Urol 2009; 27(4): 455– 461. doi: 10.1007/ s00345‑ 009‑ 0456‑ 3.

27. Abrahamova J. Therapeutic approaches for early stage nonseminomatous germ cell testicular tumors. Klin Onkol 2008; 21(3): 81– 85.

28. Lakomy R, Poprach A, Nemecek R et al. Adjuvant treatment for stage I of testicular germ cell tumours. Klin Onkol 2009; 22(1): 22– 26.

29. Oldenburg J, Aparicio J, Beyer J et al. Personalizing, not patronizing: the case for patient autonomy by unbiased presentation of management options in stage I testicular cancer. Ann Oncol (2014). doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu514. First published online: November 6, 2014.

Labels
Paediatric clinical oncology Surgery Clinical oncology
Topics Journals
Login
Forgotten password

Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.

Login

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#