#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Results of endovascular treatment and management of carotid stenosis at the Vítkovice Hospital


Authors: O. Pavlík 1;  D. Kučera 2,3
Authors‘ workplace: Vzdělávací a výzkumný institut Agel, Neurologické oddělení, Vítkovická nemocnice a.  s., Ostrava 1;  Vaskulární centrum, Vítkovická nemocnice a.  s., Ostrava 2;  II. interní klinika kardiologie a angiologie 1. LF UK a VFN v Praze 3
Published in: Kardiol Rev Int Med 2016, 18(3): 157-162

Overview

Internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis is one of the most common causes of ischaemic stroke. The gold standard in the treatment of ICA stenosis is carotid endarterectomy (CEA), while carotid artery stenting (CAS) is considered as an alternative. Indications for CAS are restenosis after prior CEA, stenosis after radiotherapy, high position of carotid bifurcation, tandem stenosis, contralateral head nerves palsies, ICA dissection or previous neck surgery. CAS safety has been well studied in many trials. In our hospital we have long-term experience with CAS. Particular cases are discussed and the best method for ICA stenosis treatment is chosen by a board composed of a neurologist, vascular surgeon and interventional radiologist. We observe the patients at the neurology department and immediately after CAS, patients are observed at the neuro-intensive care unit for one day. We have our own registry of complications and restenosis cases after CAS, which helps us improve our efforts. Between 2010 and 2014, we implanted 242 stents into ICA. The 30-day overall mortality and morbidity (death, stroke, acute myocardial infarction) was 4.96%, in the asymptomatic ICA stenosis group it was 2.88%, in symptomatic 7.77%. We did not find any in-stent restenosis. We consider well-indicated CAS as a safe alternative to CEA.

Keywords:
carotid stenosis – stents – registries – postoperative complications


Sources

1. Bednařík J, Ambler Z, Růžička E et al. Klinická neurologie. 1. vyd. Praha: Triton 2010.

2. Kalina M. Cévní mozková příhoda v medicínské praxi. 1. vyd. Praha: Triton 2008.

3. de Weerd M, Greving JP, Hedblad B et al. Prevalence of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis in the general population: an individual participant data meta-analysis. Stroke 2010; 41: 1294–1297. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.581058.

4. Lojík M, Krajíčková D, Krajina A. Stenózy karotických tepen – endovaskulární léčba. Postgrad Med 2008; 2: 143–147.

5. Liistro F, Di Mario C. Carotid artery stenting. Heart 2003; 89: 944–948. doi: 10.1136/heart.89.8.944.

6. Stankovic G, Liistro F, Moshiri S et al. Carotid artery stenting in the first 100 consecutive patients: results and follow-up. Heart 2002; 88: 381–386. doi: 10.1136/heart.88.4.381.

7. Bradáč O, Mohapl M, Kramář F et al. Carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting: changing paradigm during 10 years in a high-volume centre. Acta Neurochirurgica 2014; 156: 1705–1712. doi: 10.1007/s00701-014-2166-x.

8. Kuliha, M, Roubec, M, Procházka V et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing neurological outcomes after carotid endarterectomy or stenting. Br J Surg 2015; 102: 194–201. doi: 10.1002/bjs. 9677.

9. Krajíčková D, Krajina A, Lojík M et al. Periprocedurální komplikace a dlouhodobý efekt karotických angioplastik – výsledky z praxe. Cesk Slov Neurol N 2016; 79/112: 317–322.

10. Lacman J, Charvát F, Mašková J et al. Léčba aterosklerotických stenóz bifurkace karotických tepen: sedmileté zkušenosti z jednoho pracoviště. Ces Radiol 2009; 63: 113–121.

11. Brott TG, Halperin JL, Abbara S et al. 2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/ /SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American Stroke Association, American Association of Neuroscience Nurses, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, American College of Radiology, American Society of Neuroradiology, Congress of Neurological Surgeons, Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery, Society for Vascular Medicine, and Society for Vascular Surgery. Circulation 2011; 124: 54–130. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31820d8c98.

12. Altinbas A, Algra A, Bonati LH et al. Periprocedural hemodynamic depression is associated with a higher number of new ischemic brain lesions after stenting in the International Carotid Stenting Study – MRI substudy. Stroke 2013; 45: 146–151. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003397.

13. Bijuklic K, Wandler A, Tübler T et al. Impact of asymptomatic cerebral lesions in diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging after carotid artery stenting. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013; 6: 394–398. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.10.019.

Labels
Paediatric cardiology Internal medicine Cardiac surgery Cardiology

Article was published in

Cardiology Review

Issue 3

2016 Issue 3

Most read in this issue
Topics Journals
Login
Forgotten password

Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.

Login

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#