Antiarythmic treatment from the point of view of recent recommendations for the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillations

1. European Heart Rhythm Association; European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Camm AJ, Kirchhof P, Lip GY et al. Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: The Task Force for the Management of trial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2010; 31: 2369–2429.

2. Kowey PR, Dorian P, Mitchell LB et al. Atrial Arrhythmia Conversion Trial Investigators. Vernakalant hydrochloride for the rapid conversion of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2009; 2: 652–659.

3. Roy D, Pratt CM, Torp-Pedersen C et al. Atrial Arrhythmia Conversion Trial Investigators. Vernakalant hydrochloride for rapid conversion of atrial fibrillation: a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Circulation 2008; 117: 1518–1525.

4. Camm AJ, Capucci A, Hohnloser S et al. AVRO Investigators. A randomized active-controlled study comparing the efficacy and safety of vernakalant to amiodarone in recent onset atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57: 313–321.

5. Friberg L, Hammar N, Rosenqvist M. Stroke in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: report from the Stockholm Cohort of Atrial Fibrillation. Eur Heart J 2010; 31: 967–975.

6. Alboni P, Botto GL, Baldi N et al. Outpatient treatment of ESC Guidelines 2425 recent-onset atrial fibrillation with the ‘pill-in-the-pocket’ approach. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 2384–2391.

7. Thrall G, Lane D, Carroll D et al. Quality of life in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. Am J Med 2006; 119: 448.e1–e19.

8. Wyse DG, Waldo AL, DiMarco JP et al. Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) Investigators. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 1825–1833.

9. Van Gelder IC, Hagens VE, Bosker HA et al. Rate Control versus Electrical Cardioversion for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Study Group. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with recurrent persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 1834–1840.

10. Roy D, Talajic M, Nattel S et al. Atrial Fibrillation and Congestive Heart Failure Investigators. Rhythm control versus rate control for atrial fibrillation and heart failure. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 2667–2677.

11. Van Gelder IC, Groenveld HF, Crijns HJ et al. RACE II Investigators. Lenient versus strict rate control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1363–1373.

12. Singh BN, Singh SN, Reda DJ et al. Sotalol Amioda­rone Atrial Fibrillation Efficacy Trial (SAFE-T) Investigators. Amiodarone versus sotalol for atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 1861–1872.

13. Kirchhof P, Franz MR, Bardai A et al. Giant T-U waves precede torsades de pointes in long QT syndrome. A systematic electrocardiographic analysis in patients with acquired and congenital QT prolongation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 54: 143–149.

14. Haverkamp W, Breithardt G, Camm AJ et al. The potential for QT prolongation and proarrhythmia by non-antiarrhythmic drugs: clinical and regulatory implica­tions. Report on a policy conference of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2000; 21: 1216–1231.

15. Connolly SJ. Evidence-based analysis of amiodarone efficacy and safety. Circulation 1999; 100: 2025–2034.

16. Le Heuzey J, De Ferrari GM, Radzik D et al. A short-term, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dronedarone versus amiodarone in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: the DIONYSOS study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2010; 21: 597–605.