#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Median nerve entrapments in the forearm – a case report of rare anterior interosseous nerve syndrome


Authors: P. Vondra;  M. Vlach
Authors‘ workplace: Hand and Plastic Surgery Institute, Vysoké nad Jizerou, Czech Republic
Published in: ACTA CHIRURGIAE PLASTICAE, 65, 2, 2023, pp. 70-73
doi: https://doi.org/10.48095/ccachp202370

Introduction

The most common median nerve entrapment syndrome is the carpal tunnel syndrome [1], while proximal forearm median entrapment syndromes have been considered rare [2]. In recent years, it has been shown that proximal forearm median entrapment syndromes are more frequent than it was previously thought and they are rather underdiagnosed. Moreover, their diagnosis is problematic [2].

Two or three separate units may be hidden under what is historically known as "pronator syndrome". These are:

1. lacertus syndrome; 2. superficialis syndrome; 3. anterior interosseous nerve syndrome (AIN syndrome), which could be considered a subgroup of the superficialis syndrome (and therefore might also be called superficialis–AIN syndrome) [3].

Lacertus syndrome is caused by the compression of the median nerve by the aponeurosis of the biceps brachii muscle (called lacertus fibrosus), as the median nerve runs directly under this structure [4,5]. Lacertus syndrome mainly affects people working with their forearm in pronation, for example typing on a computer or a similar kind of job [6,7]. There is no predominance with regard to dexterity [4]. In correspondence with the topography of the median nerve, the pressure of the lacertus primary affects the motor fibers of the nerve rather than the sensitive ones [7]. Flexor carpis radialis muscle (FCR), flexor digitorum profundus muscle for second digit (FDP II) and flexor pollicis longus muscle (FPL) are predominantly affected, which is clinically manifested by weakening of these muscles. Sensitive neuropathy occurs in later stages with more severe damage. The diagnosis is established mainly clinically. In their medical history, the patient complains about a weakened pinch grip, clumsiness of the hand or dropping objects. The patient will not complain about nocturnal pain, which is the difference from CTS [8]. The clinical examination consists of examining the muscle strength of the FCR, FDP II and FPL. On top of that, pressing at the lacertus site is painful. Another exam is the scratch collapse test. In this test the patient is asked to perform external rotation of the shoulders with elbows flexed to 90°, while the skin over the area of suspected nerve compression is scratched. This should cause temporary loss of muscle resistance. The healthy side is compared to the contralateral side where the entrapment syndrome is present [4]. Non-surgical treatment consists of physiotherapy, load restriction and application of corticosteroids. However, non-surgical treatment tends to have only a temporary effect during the period of skipping exercise or work [6]. Surgical treatment is represented by the release of the lacertus under general or regional anesthesia. The patient should feel an almost immediate improvement in muscle strength by breaking the conduction block after the release [4].

Superficialis–AIN syndrome occurs when the arcade of the flexor digitorum superficialis muscle (FDS) causes compression. The clinical difference between this unit and lacertus syndrome lies in the presence of sensitive symptoms, especially pain in the volar forearm. A weakening of pinch grip may be present, caused by the affection of the FPL and FDP II–III muscles, although weakening of the FDP may not be well expressed. Isolated AIN syndrome is the rarest of the described conditions. Since it is a motor nerve, there are no sensitive symptoms, and it manifests as a weakening or loss of FPL function, i.e. flexion of the thumb interphalangeal (IP) joint. Non-surgical treatment consists of physiotherapy, load restriction and corticosteroid injection. Surgical treatment consists of cutting the fibrous part of the FDS arcade, which is located between the pronator teres and FDS muscles. If only isolated AIN syndrome is present, additional fibrous or vascular strangulations may be present directly above the nerve. The procedure is performed under general or regional anaesthesia, using a tourniquet. Similarly to lacertus syndrome, the patient should feel an immediate muscle strength improvement. AIN syndrome can be confused with the so-called Parsonage-Turner syndrome [9,10], which is a brachial neuritis with a potential to spontaneously heal within 6 months.

In recent years, the wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet technique (WALANT) has gained importance in the surgery of nerve entrapment syndromes. In WALANT, a mixture of 1% lidocaine with adrenaline and bicarbonate is applied approx. 30 minutes before the surgery. This approach is considered most comfortable for the patient and en­ables testing of muscle strength during the surgery. The method has been promoted by Dr. Elizabeth Hagert from Sweden (currently working in Qatar), albeit originally introduced by Dr. Donald H. Lalonde from Canada.

Below we shall be presenting a recent case from our Institute.

Description of the case

The presented case involves a 37-year--old woman, who came to our tertiary care unit complaining of an inability to flex the thumb of her right hand in the IP joint. The condition has been present for 6 months without any progress. Medical history revealed a short episode of forearm pain without the history of any injury, followed by the inability to flex the right thumb in the IP joint. She was referred by a neurologist under the diagnose Kiloh-Nevin syndrome, which is a synonym for AIN syndrome. This diagnosis was supported by MRI scan. The later conducted electromyography confirmed AIN syndrome. The clinical examination revealed a lack of power in the FPL muscle with no active flexion in the IP joint of the right thumb. However, the tenodesis effect was normal, which indicated that FPL tendon should be intact. Other fingers had a normal active range of motion. An ultrasound was performed, which showed the FPL tendon in continuity and without adhesions during passive range of motion. However, FPL muscle belly had no voluntary contractility. The diagnosis was very clear and thus surgery was scheduled as soon as possible.

The surgery was performed under infraclavicular brachial plexus block. During the surgery, tenotomy of the musculotendinous junction of the humeral head of the pronator teres muscle was executed, but we left muscle fibers in continuity in the fashion of fractional lengthening. A discission of the arcade of the flexor digitorum superficialis muscle followed (Fig. 1), revealing the site of the compression of the anterior interosseus nerve (Fig. 2). At the end of the procedure, we placed a Redon drain and finished with intradermal suture, resulting in a scar that was only 6 cm long (Fig. 3).

Fig. 1. Flexor digitorum superficialis arcade in dissector forceps.
Fig. 1. Flexor digitorum superficialis arcade in dissector forceps.

Fig. 2. Median nerve and anterior interosseous nerve. Hourglass site of compression is showed by the tweezer. After the cutting of the flexor digitorum superficialis arcade, the branching of the median nerve with the anterior interosseous nerve is clearly visible.
Fig. 2. Median nerve and anterior interosseous nerve. Hourglass site of
compression is showed by the tweezer. After the cutting of the flexor
digitorum superficialis arcade, the branching of the median nerve with the
anterior interosseous nerve is clearly visible.

Fig. 3. Scar.
Fig. 3. Scar.

Two days after the surgery, the patient was able move the thumb in full range of motion, including the IP joint. Only a small degree of weakness was apparent in comparison to the opposite side (Fig. 4, 5). At the follow up of 4 weeks after the surgery, the patient showed only minimal signs of FPL weakness, full thumb IP joint range of motion and was completely happy with the result.

Fig. 4. Post-operative thumb extension.
Fig. 4. Post-operative thumb extension.

Fig. 5. Post-operative thumb flexion.
Fig. 5. Post-operative thumb flexion.

Conclusion

Proximal median nerve entrapments are less frequent compared to CTS, but their incidence is probably higher than it has been traditionally stated in last decades [2]. Yet it remains rare constituting less than 1% of median nerve neuropathies. Physicians should actively seek and investigate patients with forearm affections who complain of grip weakness. Also, muscle strength tests should be an integral part of the clinical examination, when nerve entrapment syndrome is suspected. The use of ultrasound in nerve entrapment syndromes of the forearm brings a great benefit and should be added to clinical practice, as it shows the muscle contractility and tendon continuity, and may therefore prevent misdiagnosis and even tendon revisions, which apparently happen in some cases.

Statement: There are no conflicts of interest in relation with the theme, creating and publication of this manuscript. There was no financial support during the preparation of the article.

Funding: The authors have no financial disclosures to declare.

Roles of authors: Petr Vondra examined the patient, performed the surgery and built up the core of the paper; Martin Vlach assisted in the surgery, edited the text and prepared it for submission.

Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Petr Vondra, MD, FEBHS

Dr. Karla Farského 267

512 11 Vysoké nad Jizerou

Czech Republic

e-mail: petr.vondra.jr@seznam.cz

Submitted: 17. 8. 2022

Accepted: 18. 7. 2023


Sources

1. Bickel KD. Carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 2010, 35(1): 147–152.

2. Nigst H., Dick W. Syndromes of compression of the median nerve in the proximal forearm (pronator teres syndrome; anterior interosseous nerve syndrome). Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1979, 93(4): 307–312.

3. Chang J., Hagert E., Lalonde D. Nerve entrap­ment syndromes. In: Neligan PC. (ed.). Plastic surgery – hand and upper extremity. London: Elsevier. 2018: 525–548.

4. Hagert E. Clinical diagnosis and wide-awake surgical treatment of proximal median nerve entrapment at the elbow: a prospective study. Hand (N Y). 2013, 8(1): 41–46.

5. Laha RK., Lunsford D., Dujovny M. Lacertus fibrousus compression of the median nerve. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1978, 48(5): 838–841.

6. Stal M., Hagert CG., Moritz U. Upper extremity nerve involvement in Swedish female machine milkers. Am J Ind Med. 1998, 33(6): 551–559.

7. Sunderland S. The intraneural topography of the radial, median and ulnar nerves. Brain. 1945, 68(4): 243–299.

8. Hagert CG., Hagert E. Manual muscle testing – a clinical examination technique for diagnosing focal neuropathies in the upper extremity. In: Slutsky DJ. Upper extremity nerve repair – tips and techniques: a master skills publication. The American Society for Surgery of the Hand Rosemont. 2008: 451–466.

9. Parsonage MJ., Turner JW. Neuralgic amyotrophy; the shoulder-girdle syndrome. Lancet. 1948, 26(1): 973–978.

10. Pan YW., Wang S., Tian G., et al. Typical brachial neuritis (Parsonage-Turner syndrome) with hourglass-like constrictions in the affected nerves. J Hand Surg Am. 2011, 36(7): 1197–1203.

Labels
Plastic surgery Orthopaedics Burns medicine Traumatology
Topics Journals
Login
Forgotten password

Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.

Login

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#