Specifics of evidence-based practice guidelines for public health domain and proposal of an algorithm for their development and evaluation
Authors:
M. Špačková 1,2; K. Ivanová 1; R. Líčeník 3
Authors‘ workplace:
Ústav veřejného zdravotnictví Lékařské Fakulty Univerzity Palackého, Olomouc, Vedoucí: prof. MUDr. Dagmar Horáková, Ph. D.
1; Státní zdravotní ústav Praha, Centrum epidemiologie a mikrobiologie, Oddělení epidemiologie infekčních nemocí, Vedoucí: MUDr. Jan Kynčl, Ph. D.
2
Published in:
Prakt. Lék. 2021; 101(6): 291-300
Category:
Reviews
Overview
Evidence-based public health integrates the best available evidence with the knowledge and judgment of experts and other stakeholders to improve health and protect the population from infectious and environmental risks. Good public health best practices should always identify and take into account the quality of the evidence-making process (such as the design and quality of the study performed), the transparency of the methods and processes used to obtain evidence, and whether the strength of supporting evidence has been assessed. The basic tools for obtaining evidence for public health include systematic review (SR), risk assessment, economic analysis (cost-effectiveness studies), surveillance and expert panels or consensus conferences. SRs represent the most important and most valuable types of studies. They summarize all the research published so far, assess its quality and determine the strength of the recommendations, thus providing decision-making powers to public health professionals and policy makers. This article aims to describe the basic focus of practice guidelines in public health and presents a brief proposal of an algorithm for the development, adaptation, implementation and evaluation of evidence-based guidelines in the field of public health.
Keywords:
public health – health policy – practice guidelines – evidence-based public health
Sources
1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Evidence-based methodologies for public health – How to assess the best available evidence when time is limited and there is lack of sound evidence. Stockholm: ECDC 2011; Monografie.
2. Líčeník R. Klinické doporučené postupy II. 1. vydání. Olomouc. Univerzita Palackého 2013.
3. Kebza V. Psychosociální determinanty zdraví. 1. vydání. Praha: Academia 2005.
4. Telleen S, Simpson H. Identifying evidence-based resources in public health [online]. MPH Skills Building Session March 5, 2006 Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs Annual Conference. Identifying Evidence-Based Practices in Public Health.; Dostupné z: https://www.slideserve.com/poppy/ identifying-evidence-based-resources-in-public-health-powerpoint- ppt-presentation [cit. 2019-05-19].
5. Brownson RC, Gurney JG, Land GH. Evidence-based decision making in public health. J Public Health Manag Pract 1999; 5(5): 86–97.
6. Rychetnik L, Hawe P, Waters E, et al. A glossary for evidence based public health. J Epidemiol Community Health 2004; 58(7): 538–545.
7. Thomas P. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services: Report of the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 1996; 276(11): 923–924.
8. Nekola M, Ochrana F, Tollarová B, Veselý A. Metodika systematického přehledu poznatků pro tvorbu a evaluaci veřejných strategií. Centrum pro sociální a ekonomické strategie. Praha: FSV UK 2017.
9. Pappaioanou M, Evans Jr C. Development of the guide to community preventive services: a US Public Health Service initiative. J Public Health Manag Pract 1998; 4(2): 48–54.
10. Suchý M, Bednařík J, Škoda O, a kol. Vývoj Národní sady klinických standardů a ukazatelů zdravotní péče a první výsledky v oboru neurologie. Cesk Slov Neurol N 2010; 73/106(5): 569–577.
11. Klugar M, Pokorná A, Klugarová J, a kol. Metodické postupy pro vytvoření a posuzování nově vytvořených KDP [online]. Verze 2.1, leden 2020. Dostupný na: https://kdp.uzis.cz/res/file/metodika/ metodicke-postupy-pro-vytvoreni-a-posuzovani-nove-vytvorenych- kdp_v2.1.pdf [cit. 2021-03-19].
12. Brownson RC, Fielding JE, Green LW. Building capacity for evidence-based public health: reconciling the pulls of practice and the push of research. Annu Rev Public Health 2018; 39: 27–53.
13. World Health Organization. WHO guidelines on ethical issues in public health surveillance [online]. Dostupné z: https://apps. who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/255721/9789241512657-e ng.pdf [cit. 2021-10-19].
14. Brownson RC, Fielding JE, Maylahn CM. Evidence-based public health: a fundamental concept for public health practice. Annual Rev Public Health 2009; 30: 175–201.
15. Brownson R, Baker E, Leet T, Gillespie K. Evidence-based public health. New York: Oxford University Press 2003; 3–23.
16. Jacobs JA, Jones E, Gabella BA, et al. Tools for implementing an evidence-based approach in public health practice. Prev Chronic Dis 2012; 9: E116.
17. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity. About CHANGE [online]. Dostupné z: https://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpao/state-local- programs/change-tool/about.html [cit. 2021-10-19].
18 Rutter M. Identifying the environmental causes of disease: how should we decide what to believe and when to take action? London: Academy of Medical Sciences 2007.
19. Büthe T, Harris N. Codex alimentarius commission. In: Hale T, Held D. (eds.) The Handbook of Transnational Governance: New Institutions and Innovations. Cambridge: Polity Press 2011.
20. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Risk communication applied to food safety: handbook [online]. Dostupné z: https://www.fao.org/3/i5863e/I5863E.pdf [cit. 2021- 10-19].
21. de Gaudry DK, Grede N, Motschall E, Lins S. Analysis of German nutrition brochures for pregnant women with evidence-based patient information criteria. Patient Educ Couns 2015; 98(2): 207–212.
22. Gray JAM. Evidence-based healthcare and public health: how to make decisions about health services and public health. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2009.
23. Brownson CA, Allen P, Yang SC, et al. Scaling up evidence-based public health training. Prev Chronic Dis 2018; 15: 180315.
24. Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research. SORMAS. The real- time software for outbreak and epidemic surveillance [online]. 2020. Dostupné z: https://sormas.org/ [cit. 2021-10-19].
25. Sallam RL, Tapadinhas J, Parenteau J, et al. Magic quadrant for business intelligence and analytics platforms. Gartner RAS core research notes G00173700. Stamford, CT: Gartner 2014.
26. Ministerstvo zdravotnictví České Republiky. Strategický rámec Zdraví 2030 [online]. Dostupný na: https://zdravi2030.mzcr.cz/ [cit. 2021-10-19].
Labels
General practitioner for children and adolescents General practitioner for adultsArticle was published in
General Practitioner
2021 Issue 6
Most read in this issue
- Quality of life of patients after orthotopic liver transplantation performed for alcoholic cirrhosis
- Can GPs ease the plight of informal carers?
- Specifics of evidence-based practice guidelines for public health domain and proposal of an algorithm for their development and evaluation
- Mesenchymal stem cells business – importance of informed consent