The use of robotic technology in female pelvic floor reconstruction
Authors:
S. L. Ogawa; E. Forsyth; J. Anger
Published in:
Urol List 2016; 14(1): 29-31
Overview
Key words:
robotic approach, female pelvic floor reconstruction, robotic sacrocolpopexy
Sources
1. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO et al. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89(4): 501–506.
2. Marchionni M, Bracco GL, Checcucci V et al. True incidence of vaginal vault prolapse. Thirteen years of experience. J Reprod Med 1999; 44(8): 679–684.
3. Leach GE, Zimmern PE, Ganabathi K. Formal cystocele repair with bladder neck suspension. In: Resnick MI, Leach GE (eds). Atlas of the Urological clinics of North America, vaginal surgery for the urologist. Philadelphia: WB Saunders 1994: 37–46.
4. Eilber KS, Alperin M, Khan A et al. Outcomes of vaginal prolapse surgery among female Medicare beneficiaries: the role of apical support. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122(5): 981–987. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a8a5e4.
5. Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K et al. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 4: CD004014.
6. de Tayrac R, Cornille A, Eglin G et al. Comparison between trans-obturator trans-vaginal mesh and traditional anterior colporrhaphy in the treatment of anterior vaginal wall prolapse: results of a French RCT. Int Urogynecol J 2013; 24(10): 1651–1661. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2075-1.
7. FDA Public Health Notification: serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh in repair of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. [online]. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/PublicHealthNotifications/ucm061976.htm.
8. FDA Safety Communications: UPDATE on serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. [online]. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/ucm262435.htm.
9. Anger JT, Mueller ER, Tarnay C et al. Robotic compared with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123(1): 5–12. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000006.
10. Hudson CO, Northington GM, Lyles RH et al. Outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2014; 20(5): 252–260. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000070.
11. Guiahi M, Kenton K, Brubaker L. Sacrocolpopexy without concomitant posterior repair improves posterior compartment defects. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2008; 19(9): 1267–1270. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0628-5.
12. Jelovsek JE, Chagin K, Brubaker L et al. A model for predicting the risk of de novo stress urinary incontinence in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123 (2 Pt 1): 279–287. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000094.
Labels
Paediatric urologist UrologyArticle was published in
Urological Journal
2016 Issue 1
Most read in this issue
- Female urethral diverticulum – a difficult diagnosis and a big challenge for the surgeon
- Penile doppler ultrasound in clinical practice – a primer for urologists
- Penile cancer and penile sparing surgery – current concepts
- The use of robotic technology in female pelvic floor reconstruction