Predictive Factors for Non-Sentinel Lymph Nodes Affection in Breast Carcinoma – Outcomes of a Czech Multicenter Study of Sentinel Lymph Nodes
Authors:
K. Šťastný 1; V. Červinka 1; J. Šiller 1; K. Havlíček 1; J. Gatěk 2; M. Vachtová 3; I. Zedníková 3; A. Ňaršanská 3; B. Sůvová 3; V. Třeška 3; O. Kubala 4; J. Prokop 4; P. Ostruszka 4; J. Dostalík 4; H. Hornychová 5; E. Hovorková 5; A. Ryška 5; M. Hácová 6; P. Rothröckel 6; P. Vážan 7; J. Velecký 7; O. Hes 8; M. Michal 8; J. Horáček 9; P. Buzrla 9; M. Čegan 9; R. Tomanová 9; J. Dvořáčková 9; J. Záhora 10
Authors‘ workplace:
Chirurgická klinika, Pardubická krajská nemocnice a. s.
1; Chirurgické oddělení nemocnice Atlas Zlín, Univerzita Tomáše Bati ve Zlíně
2; Chirurgická klinika FN v Plzni
3; Chirurgická klinika FN Ostrava
4; Fingerlandův ústav patologie LF UK a FN Hradec Králové
5; Oddělení patologie, Pardubická krajská nemocnice a. s.
6; Bioptická a cytologická laboratoř Zlín
7; Šiklův patologicko-anatomický ústav FN Plzeň
8; Ústav patologie FN Ostrava
9; Katedra biofyziky, Lékařská fakulta Univerzity Karlovy v Hradci Králové
10
Published in:
Rozhl. Chir., 2011, roč. 90, č. 6, s. 348-351.
Category:
Monothematic special - Original
Overview
Background:
The aim of the study was to assess positivity nonsentinel lymph nodes in patients with macro, micro and submicrometastases in sentinel lymph nodes and find predictive factors of positivity nonsentinel lymph nodes. Study was conducted at the Department of Surgery in Pardubice, Pilsen, Ostrava and Zlín.
Material and methods:
Sentinel lymph nodes were assessed based on standards of Czech Pathological Society. Detection of sentinel lymph nodes was performed based on radionavigation or combination of radionavigation and blue dye method.
Results:
In group N1 (macrometastases) there was found positivity of nonsentinel lymph nodes in 50% (45 from 90 patients). In group N1 Mi (micrometastases) there was found positivity of nonsentinel lymph nodes in 26.7% (16 from 60 patients). In group N0 I+ (submicrometastases) there was found positivity of nonsentinel lymph nodes in 6.7% (1 from 15 patients).Predictive factors were size of metastasis, number of positive sentinel lymph nodes and grading. Size of tumor was not found to be a predictive factor of positivity nonsentinel lymph nodes.
Discussion:
High positivity of nonsentinel lymph nodes in pacients with macro and micrometastases in sentinel lymph nodes advocates to perform axillary lymph nodes dissection. Due to small number of patients with submicrometastases it is not possible to assess if axillary dissection is necessary or not. Predictive factors of positivity of nonsentinel lymph nodes are size of metastasis in sentinel lymph nodes, number of positive sentinel lymph nodes and grading. Size of tumor was not found to be a predictive factor due to small tumors in the study. In spite of this it is necessary to consider it like a predictive factor of positivity nonsentinel lymph nodes.
Conclusion:
In patients with macro and micrometastases it is necessary to perform axillary dissection. In patients with submicrometastases in sentinel lymph nodes it is necessary to consider predictive factors.
Key words:
macrometastases – micrometastases – submicrometastases – sentinel lymph node – nonsentinel lymph node – predictive factor
Sources
1. Turner, R., Chu, K., Qi, K. Pathologic features associated with nonsentinel lymph node metastase in patiens with metastatic breast carcinoma in a sentinel lymph node. Cancer, 2000; 89: 574–581.
2. Marin, C., Mathelin, C., Neuville, A. Sentinel lymph node biopsy with micrometastases in breast cancer. Histological data and surgical implications. Bull du Cancer, 2003; 90: 459–465.
3. Dabbs, J., Fung, M., Landsitel, D. Sentinel lymph node micrometastases as a predictor of axillary tumor burden. Br. Journal, 2004; 10: 101–105.
4. Changsri, C., Prakash, S., Sandweiss, L. Prediction of additional axillary metastasis of breast cancer following sentinel lymph node surgery. Br. Journal, 2004; 10: 392–397.
5. Freéneaux, P., Nos, C., Vincent-Salomon, A. Histological detection of minimal metastatic involvement in axillary sentinel nodes: A rational basis for a sensitive methodology usable in daily practice. Mod. Pathol., 2002; 15: 641–646.
6. Houvehaeghel, G., Nos, C., Mignotte, H. Micrometastases in sentinel lymph node in multicentric study: Predictive factors of nonsentinel lymph node involvement. Journal of Clin. Oncol., 2006; 24: 1814–1822.
7. Cserni, G., Burzykowski, T., Vinh-Hing, V. Axillary sentinel node and tumor related factors associated with nonsentinel node involvement in breast cancer. Jap. Journal of Clin. Oncol., 2004; 34(9): 519–524.
8. Rahusen, F. D., Torrenga, H., van Diest, P. J. Predictive factors for metastatic involvement of nonsentinel nodes in patiens with breast cancer. Arch. Surg., 2001; 136: 1059–1063.
9. Abdessalam, S. F., Zervos, E. F., Prasad, M. Predictors of positive axillary lymf nodes after sentinel lymf node biopsy in breast cancer. Am. J. Surg., 2001; 182: 312–320.
10. Viale, G., Maiorano, E., Mazzarol, G. Histologic detection and clinical implications of micrometastases in axillary sentinel lymph nodes for patiens with breast carcinoma. Cancer, 2001; 92: 1378–1384.
11. Saidi, F. R., Dudrick, P. S., Remine, S. G. Nonsentinel lymph node status after positive sentinel lymph node biopsy in early breast cancer. Am. Surg., 2004; 70: 101–105.
12. Joseph, K. A., El Tamer, M., Komenaka, I. Predictors of sentinel node metastasis in patients with breast cancer after sentinel node metastasis. Arch. Surg., 2004; 139: 645–651.
13. Viale, G., Maiorano, E., Pruneri Predicting th erisc for additional axillary metastases in patiens with breast carcinoma and positive sentinel lymph node biopsy. Ann. Surg., 2005; 241: 319–325.
14. Nos, C., Harding- Mackean, C., Fréneaux, P. Predicting positivity of non-sentinel axillary nodes in breast cancer patients with sentinel node metastases. Br. J. Surg., 2003; 90: 1354–1360.
15. Hwang, R. F., Krishhnamurthy, S., Hunt, K. K. Clinicopathological factors predicting involvement of nonsentinel axillary nodes in women with breast cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol., 2003; 10: 248–254.
Labels
Surgery Orthopaedics Trauma surgeryArticle was published in
Perspectives in Surgery
2011 Issue 6
Most read in this issue
- Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS) and Biopsy of the Sentinel Lymph Node
- Treatment Outcomes in Patients with Toxic Megacolon
- Benefits of Sentinel Lymph Node Examination in Early Breast Carcinoma
- Ankle Fractures in Children